Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Colombian drug trade targets Scotland

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2008
COLOMBIAN drug barons are increasingly targeting Scotland because they believe American law enforcers are getting too tough, police warned yesterday, as new figures revealed a huge jump in the value of drugs seized here.
Bob Lauder, who heads the Scottish enforcement arm of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, told a major conference on drugs there was growing evidence that more cocaine was being supplied to the lucrative UK and European markets.

He said that ther
e was a growing perception among drug barons that the United States had become "too hostile" an environment in which to operate.

He continued: "Cocaine use in the US has reached a plateau and there is evidence that more of it was arriving in Europe, which has the highest prices."

The European market is increasingly attractive for trafficking groups based in Latin America. He said that cocaine was typically arriving in high-purity kilo blocks worth around £32,000 each.

But drug traffickers are multiplying their profits several times by using agents to dilute the drug, which has a lower purity level in Scotland than in the rest of the UK.

Gordon Meldrum, the head of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA), told the annual police drugs conference at Turnberry, that there had been a major increase in the recovery of Class A drugs in the past few months.

Between April 2007 and 31 January this year, police have seized drugs worth £15.5 million – compared with drugs valued at more than £7.5 million for the whole of 2006-7. About £10 million worth of heroin was recovered in a single operation at Glasgow's Fruit Market, but Mr Meldrum revealed that the seizure had made "no impact" on the availability of heroin in the local area, pointing to the ready availability of drugs in Scotland.

Mr Meldrum also revealed that over the past ten months the SCDEA had made 126 arrests, 42 of which were "higher level" criminals.

He said that in North America, the drug enforcement agency and other organisations have had very significant successes against cocaine supplies, which have historically come from South America.

"That has displaced it eastwards into the west coast of Africa. We are finding that more and more cocaine is heading that way into Europe," he said.

A major exercise is now under way to determine the value of the illegal drugs market in Scotland.

The man leading the investigation is Gordon Hay, senior research fellow at the Centre for Drugs Misuse Research in Glasgow.

He said: "We are talking about millions of pounds, if not billions."

LIFETIME OF ASSETS TARGETED
DRUG barons face being stripped of money accumulated over their entire criminal careers, Fergus Ewing, the community safety minister, said yesterday.

A serious-crime taskforce set up by the Scottish Government has looked at strengthening the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act under which £17 million has already been recovered.

Currently under the act, only money made in the previous six years can be seized. "We are exploring the possibility of extending the investigation periods in both criminal confiscation and civil recovery investigations to ensure a lifetime of crime is open to a lifetime of asset recovery," said Mr Ewing.

"We want to capture those lower-level offenders affiliated to bigger criminal networks."

Mr Ewing said the act was "one of the most powerful tools in the fight against crime." He added: "This is the only way of reducing demand for drugs."

SPOTLIGHT ON UNDERWORLD
THE biggest-ever investigation into the scale of organised crime in Scotland has been launched by senior police officers.

The Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency is leading a 12-month inquiry to establish the number and extent of serious crime networks in the country.

The operation will also involve Scottish government officials, financial experts and academics.

Gordon Meldrum, head of the SCDEA, revealed that he also wanted to identify lawyers, accountants and other professionals who he said were acting as "organised crime consultants".

Mr Meldrum claimed the investigation would uncover the full range and extent of criminal activity among organised gangs in Scotland. "I want this to be delivered within 12 months but I don't want this to become a one-off project that provides us with a picture that very quickly becomes out of date."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 March 2008 11:15 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Boswall,

07/03/2008 00:27:59
Yes Scotsman....I'd imagine Scotlands 5M population is second on the EVIL DRUG BARONS hit list after 300M USA.

Silly melodramatic nonsense.
2

britsout,

camelon 07/03/2008 01:40:29
wot no 'erbs mon ? bwoy me na wan' na powder mon
3

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 02:17:39
This is clearly Bush's fault.
4

Stuart 2,

U.S.A. 07/03/2008 03:23:19
#3 Read your comment and all I got read was a stupid comment. The auther must not have much intelligence.
5

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 03:34:43
#4 - Stuart

Stuart, you must be new here.

Generally, here in the comments section of 'The Scotsman', anything bad that happens in the world is 'blamed on Bush'.

In this article, US anti-drug efforts have had such a detrimental effect on the Colombian drug trade that the drug dealers are moving away from the 'problem areas' (ie, the US) and into the areas where the trafficking is much safer - Scotland, apparently, according to this report.

Instead of crediting Bush and America's anti-drug efforts (and obvious success), and vowing to implement one of their own, I anticipate the pro-drug, anti-American, anti-Bush crowd to 'spin' it so that, as I stated, 'it is clearly Bush's fault'.

Watch and see.

If you don't understand this, let me know.
6

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 07:34:49
They Colombians have obviously no heard how tight we are wae oor money.

Daithi

Although I agree Bush isnae responsible for the woes of the world he has more than contributed to his fair share. He is simply an unconvicted mass murderer theif and traitor to his own country.
But I would expect nothing else but to see his praises spouted from a fund raiser of international terrorism.
7

,

07/03/2008 07:59:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Mcsnagpile,

07/03/2008 10:07:38
Put money in-:
The bank—a lot of banks internationally have been blown away since the 1980’s.
Endowment policy.
Enron.
Dot Coms.
Stock market.
CDOs.
Property.
Oil??? Could easily fall back to twenty Dollars a barrel this year—don’t believe me??
How about blowing away a country, Afghanistan. The only thing worth anything there is Poppy resin???
Columbia—the only thing worth anything there is Cocaine???
The only thing worth investing in, in the entire world seems to be drugs.
The second biggest investment is preventing drugs.
The third biggest investment is rehab so they can it again.
The fourth is writing about it –the amount of money spent by the media means no advertising overheads.
Perhaps we are destined to go back to our old home in the trees. Hey! Not bananas again???
9

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 14:53:14
10

they also recognise the banana republic type government we have and are obviously looking forward to doing business with them on their terms.
10

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 15:22:26
#7 - FO

>"They Colombians have obviously no heard how tight we are wae oor money."

From the article:

"...Cocaine use in the US has reached a plateau and there is evidence that more of it was arriving in Europe, which has the highest prices."

Not only are you guys buying more of it, you're paying more for it than anywhere else.

So much for being 'tight' with money.
11

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 15:28:01
#7 - FO (cont...)

From the article:

"...Cocaine use in the US has reached a plateau and there is evidence that more of it was arriving in Europe, which has the highest prices."

Hahahaha! FO, you and your ilk are finally exposed!

- you don't hate Bush because of all your lame excuses,

- you hate him because his successful anti-drug policies (as stated in the article) has increased drug prices so much!

Just say 'NO', FO!
12

britsout,

camelon 07/03/2008 15:28:35
daffy knows as much about scottish drug habits as he does about almost any other subject he posts on . nada
13

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 16:16:06
#14 - Suck

>"daffy knows as much about scottish drug habits as he does about almost any other subject he posts on . nada"

I was quoting the article - but I'm sure that we'd all be interested in your expertise with drug habits, Suck.
14

britsout,

camelon 07/03/2008 16:49:46
daffy proves his daftness to the world by addressing britfree as "suck" who in the name of the wee man is suck ? as for drug habits britfree is T total but likes a puff of 'erbs from time to time , its not a crime is it?.....OH it is a crime then , still dont let it get in the way of daffys "POINT" lessness
15

britsout,

camelon 07/03/2008 16:56:55
P S i, unlike yourself, LIVE in scotland who is more likely to know anything about THIS country some one who lives and works here or some berkeley hunt from san jose . i think what you know about dope is a result of self examination
16

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 17:15:45
#16 - bf

>"by addressing britfree as "suck" who in the name of the wee man is suck ?"

It's you. You blew it again when your ego overtook you in your comment #33 at:

http://news.scotsman.com/world/Poland-set--to-return.3848567.jp#2565181

>"because of the specialist nature of my skills ...work 15 hours a week.. is run mainly by my P A shelly ... and my small but well renumerated staff... frequent foreign jaunts . thats what britfree worked 18 hour days for, starting out .

These are Suck's exact words in posts November 3-11th, 2007 when you again had to brag about yourself back then.

Check the comments, you'll see there.

>"P S i, unlike yourself, LIVE in scotland who is more likely to know anything.

That's doubtful, you probably just watch old 'Taggert' re-runs.

Does that mean that every Scot, no matter where they now live, knows nothing about Scotland except YOU, because YOU live there currently?

Once again, you've reverted to insulting Scots around the world just to feed your own ego.

Like I've said before, Ego and stupidity are a bad combination for you, Suck.
17

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 17:47:09
Daithi

You have just quoted an article stating that cocaine use in the US has reach a saturation point and then praised Bush on his anti drug policies.
I am finding very hard to type this for laughing.

18

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 17:49:12
Posts #14 on

Suck (bf), from Post 14 on you've diverted away from the point to claim that only you know about Scottish drug habits.

From the article:

"COLOMBIAN drug barons are increasingly targeting Scotland because they believe American law enforcers are getting too tough..."

You don't have to be currently living in Scotland to know that drugs are not a good thing for Scots.

As a proclaimed Scot, why don't you quit avoiding the American anti-drug success (as stated in the article) and join with us to get the same results for Scotland?

Why would you object to that?
19

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 17:59:48
#19 - FO

>"You have just quoted an article stating that cocaine use in the US has reach a saturation point ..."

Uh, no. Once again you're proven that you are even incapable of a simple 'cut and paste' - it actually says:

"Cocaine use in the US has reached a plateau..."

Which means that it is no longer increasing. Interesting that you can't even get a quote right, but need to 'spin' it to support your weak case - the usual cause for laughter around here.

For some reason, you intentionally forgot:

"...increasingly targeting Scotland because they believe American law enforcers are getting too tough..."

"a growing perception among drug barons that the United States had become "too hostile" an environment in which to operate."

None of which point to 'saturation' a word you tried to insert instead of the actual quote to bolster your admittedly weak case.

My position is NOT a 'slight' against Scotland - quite the reverse, I'm inviting Scotland (and the rest of the UK) to see the results of anti-drug enforcement (from the dealer's own words) and inviting you to JOIN us!

Why does this so rattle you and Suck?

BTW, the laughter you hear - they're not laughing with you, they're laughing at you.
20

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 19:41:22
21

Plateau, saturation, same point exactly dearie there is no new money to be made in the US for the cartels but thats not stopping them from raking in their usual profits.
Their drug business is so successful in the US they are now branching out. Since Bush has been in power they have never had it so good. Money that could have been used to fight the war on drugs has been diverted to fight the so called war on terror. The war on terror he helped to create.

"increasingly targeting Scotland because they believe American law enforcers are getting too tough..."

"a growing perception among drug barons that the United States had become "too hostile" an environment in which to operate."

Propaganda p*sh put out by your administration to hide their obvious failings. They cant even control the heroin trade in Afganistan even when they have blanketed the country with troops. Where do you think all of that herion is heading for??

Oh by the way did you know that the IRA dealt in drugs as well?? So not only have you funded terrorism but international drug dealing as well!
You should be really proud o yersell.
21

jerrymanders,

Sniffing, just sniffing. 07/03/2008 20:52:36
Who's line is it anyway?
22

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 21:08:34
#25 - Jerry

>"Who's line is it anyway?"

The statement comes from (and I can post exactly, unlike FO)

"Bob Lauder, who heads the Scottish enforcement arm of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, told a major conference on drugs...

So it's Bob lauder, I'm under the impression that he's a Scot, who lives in Scotland

- he MUST be right, because, as 'Britsout' (Suck McC) states in Post #17, living in Scotland makes you correct about drugs in Scotland.

#24 - FO

>"same point exactly..."

Really?

- Then why was it necessary for you to reword it?

Why was it necessary for you to avoid the following statements:

"...increasingly targeting Scotland because they believe American law enforcers are getting too tough..."

"a growing perception among drug barons that the United States had become "too hostile" an environment in which to operate."

Don't worry about answering, FO, we know that you'll have to avoid mentioning them bacause they prove you wrong.

Again. Still. Continuously. Habitual.
23

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 21:10:22
#24 - FO

>"Oh by the way did you know that the IRA dealt in drugs as well?? So not only have you funded terrorism but international drug dealing as well!

1. Who says I funded the IRA?

2. Are you upset that your money went to them?
24

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 07/03/2008 21:35:37
I am all for flooding the market with pure H meth and ICE let the junkies die in painful OD, and us sensible, tax paying, law abiding folks can move on.

25

jerrymanders,

Sarcasm City 07/03/2008 21:53:29
#26
#27

Whoosh!!!! It's true.
26

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 22:15:54
26

so where on earth would Bob get his impressions on the US drug scene if not from the US administration?? do you think oor Bobby boy went aboot the street o NY or San Francisco tae huv a look see for himsell?
He is repeating the p*sh put oot by the US Administration on their reported success wie fighting drugs. Oor government does the same thing we are told constantly we are winning the war on drugs but every year the seizures get bigger and bigger now you might think that is a good thing until you remember they only intercept a small percentage of the overall product.
But please feel free to live in yer ain wee fantasy world if it makes you feel better aboot the world ye live in just dont try and peddle yer mince to us.
I prefer to deal with reality.

27

You did. Only you refer to them as Noraid.
27

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 22:48:00
Take a look at this site

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/statistics.html

Do you see any pattern there that indicates the war on drugs is being won by the DEA? I get the impression of a finger in a dam thats starting to crack myself.
28

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 22:50:01
#30 - FO

>"so where on earth would Bob get his impressions on the US drug scene if not from the US administration??

He got it from the drug dealers, as stated in the article:

"He said that there was a growing perception among drug barons that the United States had become "too hostile" ..."

Since it would be his job to deal with these people, he's probably getting it firsthand, from personal experience - unlike you, who get it from the 'Ihatebushreallybad' blog or 'The Workers Weekly'

It's pretty apparent that you:

1. Didn't read the article,
2. Comprehend what you read, and
3. Rephrased what little you DID read

Try again.

Later.

Much later.

Never would be OK too.
29

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 22:51:17
#31 - FO

>"I get the impression of a finger in a dam thats starting to crack myself."

Sounds like you're confusing your crack. That's a bad sign.
30

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 23:00:27
32

You are cracking me up Daithi he got it from the drug dealers.???
that might actually be worth repeating in the pub tommorrow.

I bet your government could sell you low calorie mouth wash and fat free shampoo.

Would you no feel more comfortable commenting in a paper wie more pictures and less words?
31

jerrymanders,

Somewhere on the map. You choose. 07/03/2008 23:11:24
#32
#33

Tremendous. Keep it up!
32

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:13:25
FO - after you straighten out your 'crack' problem, let's see what you said:

1. You don't believe the Americans because they lie.

2. You don't believe the head of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency because he lies.

2. You don't believe the dealers, because they lie.

3. You provide any statistics, because, of course, they lie.

4. When your pals (ok, pal) sees you in the pub tomorrow, contrary to what you think, they won't believe what you say either - guess why??
33

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 23:13:52
35

I couldnt agree more.
34

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:15:56
#36 - Me

One correction:

3. You DON'T provide any statistics...

Thank You.
35

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 23:17:35
36

1 Swap the word americans for the American administration.
2 He formed an opinion based on lies he heard from 1 above.
3 I provided stats from the US DEA.
4 Who cares it will still be good for a laugh.
36

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:18:45
#37 - FO

"35

I couldnt agree more."

Uh, FO? He was complementing me, in my posts #32 and #33.

Proving, once again, that you don't understand what you read.
37

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:20:04
#39 - FO

"Who cares it will still be good for a laugh."

Yep, I'm sure that's exactly what happens when you walk into a pub.
38

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 23:20:09
40

I thought you understood satire?? you havent become a left wing radical over night have you?
39

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:29:05
#39 - FO

>"3 I provided stats from the US DEA."

HUH??? The same US ADMINISTRATION that you claim gave information to Bob Lauder - and dismiss it??

So let me get this straight:

- when Bob Lauder gets info from the US ADMINISTRATION you claim it's no good:

- then YOU post info from the US ADMINISTRATION and you claim it's good and proves your case?

Forget reading other peoples posts, FO - TRY READING YOUR OWN.

I'm laughing way too hard today. I'm sure that you'll kill 'em at the pub tomorrow! ;)
40

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:31:15
#42 - FO

>"I thought you understood satire?? "

I do when I see it! ;)

REagrdless of our differences in opinion, have a good time at the pub tomorrow. I assume you'll be rooting for Celtic, Hibs or Calley Thistle?
41

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:34:06
Woops, I forgot that there is no SPL league games tommorrow. Oh well...
42

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 23:36:26
44

Well thank you very much I am a Celtic fan, ma older sisters are Hibees my younger sister is Rangers and my mum is Hearts so you can see where I my contrary nature comes from. My wife is from Zimbabwe originally and is a rugby fan.
43

Dáithí,

San Jose 07/03/2008 23:58:08
#46 - FO

>"Well thank you very much I am a Celtic fan,

Good for you! That's one thing in your favor. ;)

> ma older sisters are Hibees

Good for them too!

> my younger sister is Rangers

AAkkkk!!

> and my mum is Hearts

Hmmm....

> so you can see where I my contrary nature comes from.

Well, that explains a lot! I'm rooting for you and your older sisters.

I like 3 teams, that would be strange in anywhere but the SPL.

Seems like this to me (but I'll listen to your advice here)

1. You pretty much HAVE to root for one of the 'Old Firm', hard for anyone else to break in - I like Celtic.

2. Next is the battle for 3rd place, Hibs for me.

3. Last is the 'avoid relegation' derby, I'd like to see Calley Thistle start ending up in the top 6.

Kinda' confused, but it makes sense to me.
44

Foulkes Off the CyberNat,

Edinburgh 08/03/2008 00:10:07
47

Aye well I did have a thing for Meadowbank thistle for a while but only because they were local. Anyway as they say in Russia Mosgow. the thread is all yours knock yersell oot. Huv fun.
45

Dáithí,

San Jose 08/03/2008 00:12:39
Goodnight.
46

britsout,

camelon 08/03/2008 00:46:20
daffys talking crack #18 you cant even see his lips moving . you obviously think britfree is suck m'crunchie, its more like a king size mars bar. but as i said before it seems to be a f#tish of yours to ascribe other identities to britfree. please daffy fill your boots on that one . its boring , but when has that ever stopped you .
47

britsout,

camelon 08/03/2008 00:58:55
daffy claims posts showing britfree is suck. dates are provided . has any one else saved posts by suck ? is it just daffy who saves a library of back posts ? if he provides posts , verbatim . rather than assertions ,then maybe britfree IS suck ! itll come as a shock to missus britfree though
48

,

08/03/2008 18:51:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
49

,

09/03/2008 12:28:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

57Nomad,

california 09/03/2008 23:21:50
#30 F o

F o said:

"#28 reckless

reckless said:

"We're no better. Britain and Amerika are both officially police states.
USA PATRIOT ACT"

For a number of years now the "Patriot Act" has been cried over and over as a showcase of the abolition of civil liberties in American. But the cries like Reckless's, "USA PATRIOT ACT" (note the BOLD TYPE AS IF THAT HAD ANYTHING WITH ANYTHING) are the silliest.

Mr. Reckless, will you please live up to your name, take a walk on the wild side and cite the exact section of the Patriots Act that you find objectionable. Attempts to evade the issue with "how can you be so dumb, EVERYBODY knows the Patriot act is fascist," will do you know good. So since you saw fit to say that the Patriot Act makes the US a police state perhaps you would be so kind as to cite one single section of the Patriot Act to support your claim.
51

57Nomad,

09/03/2008 23:24:10
rats, inaccurate clicking resulted in posting #54 prior to review and edit.
52

britsout,

camelon 10/03/2008 00:25:01
nonuts cant click ? do what daffy does, buy in
53

daywalker,

west edinburgh 14/03/2008 17:25:50
never stop drugs we awe wish but://// 2 mutch profit 4 the hoodrats

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.