Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Delay new curriculum or we won't be able to bring it in, fear teachers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 October 2008
TEACHERS are demanding the Scottish Government delays introducing the new school curriculum amid concerns it will prove impossible to implement under the current timetable.
The Curriculum for Excellence was expected to be used by every school from next August, but teachers say it cannot be done in the time available.

At a meeting of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association Council on Saturday, a motion was passed calling for a delay until August 2010.

Ann Ballinger, SSTA president, said the final shape of the curriculum would only be available in June or July next year – just weeks before every school is expected to implement the Curriculum for Excellence in August 2009.

She said: "There has been a gradual slippage in the timetable since Curriculum for Excellence was introduced.

"First we were going to get outcomes within six months, then a year. I don't think it was anyone's fault, it just took a lot longer than they had expected and, of course, there was a change in government.

"But they are potentially giving us an impossible timescale. If we get the final proposals sometime this session, with SQA's model for how the exams look, and we have a full year for teachers to look at that and work out how to implement it, then it might be possible."

The call for a delay is the latest concern expressed by senior educational professionals and organisations about the curriculum in recent months.

In May The Scotsman revealed huge confusion had led some headteachers at independent schools to say they would not introduce the curriculum until they considered it ready, an option which headteachers at local authorities do not have.

Teachers' unions have been united in their concerns about the new curriculum, which is expected to radically change the way Scottish children are taught. The EIS has warned there is not enough resources or funding for implementation. And parents expressed concern that their children could be treated as guinea pigs unless they were consulted.

Writing in The Scotsman in May Fiona Hyslop, education secretary, said: "Between now and next year, we will be engaging with teachers and other professionals before the new guidance is finalised for the academic year 2009-10. We expect all schools to be using Curriculum for Excellence from August 2009."

So far, only draft guidance, known as outcomes, as they detail the expected outcome of a child's learning in each subject, has been published. That is currently out to consultation and the final versions are expected to begin to be published from January.

Plans to ditch the Standard Grade and Intermediate qualifications to be replaced with a new general exam have also caused confusion. Teachers say they need to know the format of the new exams before they can implement the new curriculum as it will have a knock-on effect on how the pre-exam years are taught.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The timetable for Curriculum for Excellence is currently being finalised. Advice will be put to ministers in the coming weeks and an announcement will be made in due course."

A whole new school of thought

A NEW approach to education is being promised by the new school curriculum known as the Curriculum for Excellence.

A key aim is to move away from a tick-box mentality which teaches to test rather than create inquisitive minds. Independent thought will be rewarded over feats of memory.

There will be a greater cross-curricular emphasis with pupils writing an essay for English, perhaps based on a topic they are studying in history, or a lesson in Ancient Egypt may see maths focusing on pyramids.

Greater effort will be made to make lessons relevant to pupils' lives today, hence the introduction of text-messaging and internet blogs in literacy lessons.

Along with the new curriculum will be changes to exams. The Standard and Intermediate Grade will be replaced by a new General exam from 2012 to provide a better stepping stone to Highers, which will remain the "gold standard" exam.

First to third year are expected to change, with Generals only beginning in fourth year.

In an attempt to remove the problem of second year being seen as a dead year, rather than study every subject for the first three years, pupils will have those subject rotated. First to third years will study fewer subjects, but will study a differing range of subjects each year.

Compulsory literacy and numeracy exams will also be introduced for all school leavers.

TIMELINE

2002 – Scottish Executive undertakes extensive consultation on state of education in Scotland.

NOVEMBER 2003 –Ministers establish the Curriculum Review Group.

2004 – Review group creates concept of a new curriculum called A Curriculum for Excellence.

MAY 2005 – Work begins on updating all areas of the current curriculum known as the 5-14-year-old Guidelines.

SEPTEMBER 2006 – Draft guidance expected to be released on the curriculum.

DECEMBER 2006 – Schools pilot elements from the guidance on the curriculum.

SEPTEMBER 2007-MAY 2008 – Draft guidance published.

SCHOOL YEAR 2008-9 – Planning is finalised and implementation begins.

SCHOOL YEAR 2009-10 – Schools work on delivery of the new curriculum.

AUGUST 2010 – The date until which teachers would like Curriculum to be delayed.

The full article contains 880 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 October 2008 10:07 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Teaching
 
1

fife runner,

06/10/2008 06:08:19
before some begin by their usual attacks on teachers this confusion will only serve to cause problems for the kids. Should politicians not listen to staff instead of academics sitting in universities theorising all be ok.
2

AntiPCman,

06/10/2008 07:34:21
The 5-14 curriculum does not work is the opinion of most teachers so why not be supportive and get the CoE going asap instead of whinging about time scales.
3

silent majority,

edinburgh 06/10/2008 07:37:06
#1. No doubt we will read the usual tripe about teachers, long holidays and "exams getting easier". The teaching profession will implement the new curriculum in a professional manner but only when the guidance is clear. Teachers are only too well aware of the impact that a not fully developed major change like this will have on young people if it is implemented too early.
4

izzie,

dundee 06/10/2008 08:12:25
I hope that this will prevent non academic students hanging on long after they should have moved on.
5

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 06/10/2008 09:09:02
Stop tinkering with education and go back to teaching proper subjects and turning out students with basic literacy and numeracy skills.
6

Red Dykes,

Highland 06/10/2008 09:10:15
The government must listen to the teachers - they are under enough pressure as it is, without being given a disastrously short lead-in to such a major change.
7

Dk,

Broxburn 06/10/2008 12:31:02
Well said #5
We have been tinkering for too long now but the teachers themselves should know what is important
Like the health service there are too many non professionals with their fingers in the pie
8

Calum Crubag,

06/10/2008 12:40:35
Some more scaremongering from Hootsmon. Most primary schools are already using ACfE to some degree.

As to needing more resources for it. Really? With more emphasis on dialogue and philosophy, i don't see how we need more resources.

Scotsman - how about printing something positive?
9

brusque,

06/10/2008 12:51:32
2002 – Scottish Executive undertakes extensive consultation on state of education in Scotland.

NOVEMBER 2003 –Ministers establish the Curriculum Review Group.

2004 – Review group creates concept of a new curriculum called A Curriculum for Excellence.

MAY 2005 – Work begins on updating all areas of the current curriculum known as the 5-14-year-old Guidelines.

SEPTEMBER 2006 – Draft guidance expected to be released on the curriculum.

DECEMBER 2006 – Schools pilot elements from the guidance on the curriculum.


If you want a thing done, never ask a Labour Government to do it!!!

Have Labour changed the 2 minute warning to 2 hours yet..............they were never in any rush to get things done, that's for sure.
10

Alan B,

06/10/2008 13:28:14
Cannot see how over a year is a too short a lead time.

11

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 14:01:56
No matter what this government tries to do there will be opposition from the "no can do" brigade which has infiltrated all of our public bodies over the past half century.
It is about time that the government took a few senior people and explained to them that they were appointed to do some work, if they cannot do it then they will be replaced by others who are at least willing to try.
12

Rufus T. Firefly,

06/10/2008 14:04:58
Alex Salmond's latest SNP broadcast is now available on YouTube.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=B-xG3D8OMQk
13

,

06/10/2008 14:33:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Jolly,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 16:45:09
#10 - because the teachers are spending most of their busy working time actually teaching the present classes, which sadly does not leave much time over, to create new brand courses!
15

Masterpiece,

06/10/2008 17:46:54
Can we have a seperate Gaelic curriculum for the Gaelic schools to represent our language, culture and history rather than a translation of the English one used in Scotland.
It seems odd just to use the Scottish English one rather than a curriculum suited to the Gaelic culture in all its facets.
16

Elginloon,

Moray 06/10/2008 19:57:38
"Most primary schools are already using ACfE to some degree." (Calum C)

That's because they teach all the subjects five days a week to the same class of kids for a whole school year! Quite how you expect secondary specialist subjects to be taught in the same way when we only see each year group for four lessons a week is beyond me! We are trying to get some 'rich tasks' together which would link say history, maths geog and English and this will make things more relevant and interesting with hopefully associated improvements in literacy over the WHOLE curriculum. But until we know what the heck the politicians want we are scunnered....they want us to drive this shiny new car without a test, manual or road map.....once we have all those teachers will be the first to embrace and implement these changes until the next time the politicians stick their uneducated noses in.
17

Brodric,

06/10/2008 23:05:52
13 - Brage : Agree entirely with you.

This is the crux of the matter. Teachers are forced to stick to rigid, and often complex, admin and testing systems, children learning a narrow bit of knowledge by rote and given endless chances to complete their tests to ensure that the school gets the passes it needs.

My partner is a foreign teacher who has worked both in Europe, and then here and says that the UK system is a farce compared to the Baccalaureate system, that children are not allowed to develop thinking skills, to discover knowledge for themselves with the guidance of a professional - the teacher. Teachers are paid almost the same as bus drivers and, in common with bus drivers, have to take a lot of flack and verbal abuse.

Teachers should be encouraged to develop and update their knowledge, and to spend time instilling a love of knowledge and learning in their pupils - not to arrive home after a day of stress (and often abuse when children exercise their rights - given to them by the state without any mention of responsibilities); then they spend the evening marking senseless tests that don't measure anything meaningful in the first place.

No wonder decent teachers are leaving in droves.
18

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

06/10/2008 23:56:47
I was initially very sceptical about the CfE - but I am a lot more positive after understanding and supportin gthe general thrust of the policy.

Unfortunately, the biggest obstacle to the CfE is not teacher scepticism but resourcing, genuine leadership in schools and conflicts with the examination system.
19

!Ya basta!,

07/10/2008 03:00:24
Giving teachers just a few months to implement what sounds like such a big change doesn't seem fair, and the kids would suffer as already pointed out. You can't introdcue a new curriculum mid year so a 1 year delay sounds like the best option.

I would be interested to know exactly what the fundamental changes to the curriculum are. My kids are doing the IB, which I think is good for them as its much more about processes of inquiry and understanding rather than accumulating lots of knowledge. But I know it doesn't suit everybody, especially the more fact driven return to the good old days brigade.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.