Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Druids fear shadow will be cast over view of 'birth of the Moon'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2008
IT IS a rare lunar spectacle whose significance dates back to ancient times, drawing visitors to the Isle of Lewis from across the world.
But now the druids, pagans and witches who gather at the Callanish Stones fear the next time they visit their treasured view of the Moon could be ruined by a 53-turbine wind farm.

According to local belief, the Callanish Stones were erected so they would have a special relationship with a range of hills opposite, known as the Old Woman of the Moors.

Also called Sleeping Beauty, it is thought to resemble a pregnant woman on her back, and every 18.6 years the Moon appears to rise through her legs, as if she is giving birth.

It then sets between the Callanish Stones, as visitors beat drums and celebrate the lunar cycle.

Hundreds of new age celebrants gathered at the stones for the spectacle in 2006, but in 2024 when it is next due, they are worried it could be ruined by a wind farm.

Beinn Mhor Power plans to build turbines on the Eisgein Estate in Lewis, some of them on the Old Woman of the Moors. One would be built on a lump that looks like her knee, and others would be on the skyline.

Archeologist Ian McHardy said the lunar phenomenon is mentioned in the Historic Scotland guidebook for the area.

"I think it's an integral part of Callanish and should have been afforded higher protection. The wind turbines would be a significant part of the view."

Alice Starmore, a tour guide who has lived on Lewis all her life, said: "Every 18.6 years when the Moon in its cycle around the Earth is at its lowest, it appears between her knees, as though she gives birth. It's a lovely, life-affirming event.

"It's one of our most mysterious and intriguing national treasures. It's something that we should take care of. It couldn't be any more inappropriate than building turbines on her. We might as well say that we should build turbines on Stonehenge."

If the proposed wind farm gets the go-ahead it would be the first in Scotland to be built on a National Scenic Area and Ms Starmore is worried it would have an impact on tourism.

Thirty of the turbines would be in the South Lewis, Harris and North Uist National Scenic Area.

The application comes in the wake of the failed bid by Lewis Wind Power to build Scotland's largest wind farm on Lewis.

Ms Starmore said: "We have just finished celebrating the fact that the entire northern peatlands won't be covered in them, and now we have this one right in the heart of the most spectacular landscape that we have. It has been very stressful for us."

It has also attracted opposition from the John Muir Trust, which is worried it could set a precedent for other wind farm applications on scenic areas, and Scottish Natural Heritage.

Helen McDade, head of policy at the John Muir Trust, said: "It is ludicrous that the government would even entertain the idea of marching turbines across such a world-class landscape.

"Scotland can easily meet its 50 per cent renewable target by 2020 without encroaching on designated areas of national importance such as this one.

"Callanish is Scotland's equivalent of Stonehenge and must be left unscathed by industrial development so that it can be fully appreciated by future generations."

A public inquiry finished last week into the plans for the Eisgein Estate and a decision is expected to be made by a Scottish Government reporter later this year.

BACKGROUND

BEINN Mhor Power has scaled down its original proposal for 133 turbines to 53. There have been 3,900 objections and 85 letters in support.

The decision on the Beinn Mhor Power plan will come in the wake of the Scottish Government's rejection of a 181-turbine project on Lewis.

The plans by Lewis Wind Power were turned down last month after nearly four years of debate. Supporters believed it was a chance to advance the country's renewables industry and the economy of the Western Isles.

But environmental groups said it could threaten birdlife and damage the island's peatlands, which store carbon.

The £500 million project had been controversial since it was put forward in October 2004. Of 11,022 representations, 10,924 were against the plan, with only 98 in favour.

Lewis Wind Power has said it is considering its next move.

The full article contains 759 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

JSP,

O'Connor 28/05/2008 00:33:26
It obviously needs to be put somewhere else ASAP! Is solar power an option?
2

Guga II,

Rockall 28/05/2008 01:13:19
#1. Yes, it does need to be put elsewhere.

Scotland already produces more power than it needs, and all the extra power they hope to gain from the monstrosities of turbines is for export to England; along with the profits.

If the English need the power, let them build these turbines on the South Downs, or string them out across London. Why should Scotland continue to be used as a dumping ground for things such as this?

3

Maisie from Morningside,

MORNINGSIDE 28/05/2008 01:41:20
Rather than acknowledge superstitious drivel from pagans and suchlike, it should be obvious that the environment of Scotland's ancient monuments shouldn't be defaced by inappropriate developments.
4

Kim McLaggan,

McAdam NB Canada 28/05/2008 01:48:07
Now is the time for the SNP to say no to destroying such a historic sight,there has to be other areas that could be of use for such a project.I thought renewable resources for energy also took into consideration not only the environment but the area in question and its importance,if not why not put a couple of turbines at Edinburgh Castle and Arthurs Seat,boils down to greed and money from big business
5

Kipling,

28/05/2008 02:23:35
The last line reads: "Lewis Wind Power has said it is considering its next move."

Well unless a little breeze comes along, there's nothing like diversifying: as Shakespeare predicted, there is a tide in the affairs of men which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune...
6

,

28/05/2008 04:19:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

The Pict.,

28/05/2008 04:50:31
Jenny Haworth. It's time to get over your inferiority.
The words under the photo should read: THE ENGLISH STONEHENGE STONES ARE THE EQUIVALENT OF THE CALLANISH STONES, pictured above, FOUND ON THE ISLE OF LEWIS.
8

St. Brendan,

I wish you were here 28/05/2008 06:56:10
As development continues, I am shure four blade propellers will be invented to replace the current three blade propellers. The four bladed propellers will fit along with the crosses of the churches. Then the church also can provide the energy it currently has to rely on the Old Woman of the Moors to provide.
9

MarkR,

USA 28/05/2008 07:11:32
I'll withhold my opinion until I hear from the Goblins and Orcs.
10

Cappo Del Monte,

28/05/2008 07:21:29
#2

yes we produce enough power with aging nuclear and coal / oil and gas fired stations, but they are all nearing the end of their lives.
Am sure all the stone huggers are bitter about the high energy costs they are paying, i certainly hope so, because of their wishy washy narrow minded plans, they will continue to pay super high prices and have no money to spend.
Live with it huggers of all kinds, if you dont want these thypes of things, its back to peat, candles the horse as mode of transport.
All this is is a few stones , nothing more, nothing less and some weird freaks who gather there once in a blue moon
11

TREV,

Poland 28/05/2008 07:53:34
You'd have thought they'd have learned the lesson of Stonehenge. They built a road et al alongside it and then years later realised it had been a mistake.

#Cappo, it isn't just a case of hippies and stone huggers. It is realising the value of the site both as a world heritage centre and a piece of national history. Why not just build the farms in the Lake District? Well, it would chase the tourists away...

Better still, why not build the wind farms in the parliament building... let's face it, there is enough wind generated there already.
12

Phillip,

28/05/2008 07:57:37
There should be no wind turbines on a protected site just as there should be no Trump golf course on a protected site.

Surely there are better places to put the turbines.

I know, they run on the power of blowing air, so why not put up a whole field of them in front of Westminster & Holyrood! The massive amount of useless hot air created in those two locations alone ought to be able to power the entire EU for at least a century.
13

Sile,

28/05/2008 08:07:27
Can I ask a Question please, you have the SNP in power in Scotland the Scottish mafias New Liebore in charge in London, Why does every prob that you have end up being the fault of England?

As an aside I agree the turbines should not be placed where they can spoil any world heritage site.
14

Unimpressed one,

28/05/2008 08:11:12
#12, "Better still, why not build the wind farms in the parliament building... let's face it, there is enough wind generated there already."

And such a move would be an improvement on the tip that passes for a national parliament.
15

AbandonAllHope,

28/05/2008 08:30:25
Do the hippies not love this ecomentalist nonsense anyway ?
16

Boy Wonder,

28/05/2008 08:45:58
Are the planners of these rows and rows of giant turbines devoid of any notion of Historical Importance, or Natural Beauty, or the importance of Scotland's tourist trade due to its areas like Callanish?? Is their devotion to the almighty £ such that it blinds them to all else?

Callanish should be if it is not already a World Heritage Site. And if not, why not? It cannot and and must not be marred by the need to supply another country with electricity.

As I've said before, let them build their unsightly and unecofriendly windfarms on the Pennines or atop Snowdon. Scotland does not need them ... we can use hydro-power if necessity demands it ... but let's end this unhealthy occupation with windfarms which ruin the landscape!

For once, I'm with the superstitious!
17

Pontificatus Maximus of Avignon,

28/05/2008 08:55:24
Not to worry!
According to the predictions of the Mayans there will be nobody around on the planet in 2024 to witness this "event".

Even if there are it will probably fall on a Sunday and the Free Kirk Sect will ban it!
18

Rambo_the_Jambo,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 09:06:05
Druids, pagans and witches; isn't this the 21st century FFS???


Help ma boab, send for L Ron Hubbard, surely the Thetans can sort this mess out.




19

,

28/05/2008 09:54:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

28/05/2008 11:30:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

ChristineGrahameforPope,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 11:32:06
Given the choice between the wishes of those deluded by an ancient superstition and those deluded by the modern superstition of global warming, I'd back the former every time - they don't cost me any money.
22

AlecJ,

Aberdeen 28/05/2008 11:34:25
Attempting to put up wind turbines in this beautiful scenery is pure vandalism. I notice the company that wants to do this has taken what appears to be a gaelic name for itself - but where do the owners and executives come from? By previous examples they are probably not even British, just "get rich quick" merchants who only worship the mighty dollar (or euro, or even rouble!) The sooner this is called in by Holyrood and then thrown out the better.
23

Gramma Kitty,

portage lakes, OH USA 28/05/2008 11:34:42
The Druds, Pagans, Witches, Enlightened, tourists, etc are witnessing a glorious site and it's an inspiring one at that. You know, like many Christians watching the sun come up on Easter Morn.

I hope you are smarter than most of the twits in the US who allow mining in national parks, remove entire mountain ranges to mine coal and tell us it's improving the land.

Don't let 'em destroy the view... after all, the profits won't come to you, they're for the corporation. Of course wind is a good idea, yet aren't there places on private property where a wind farm will nicely do? Replacing the fossil fuel dependence is great and CAN BE DONE in a non-invasive way on private lands, or lands with less use as beauty spots.

This is the view of one hippie.
24

,

28/05/2008 11:53:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

MatTheCat,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 12:29:22
@33.

yeah, 'natural energy lines'.

A bit like gravity, the earths energy field is something that is their and affects you all the time. And just like gravity, it takes a certain level of enlightement to be capable of acknowledging it.

Now get back to your 8th bowl of cornflakes you ignorant jobless loser.
26

The Lurgan Tiger,

Concrete the Countryside 28/05/2008 12:32:44
Many people have commented that it may ruin the tourist industry. Wake up and smell the kerosene. Unless people are planning to make their journeys to Scotland using sailing ships and horses, there wont be a tourist industry given current (and predicted) oil price rises.
27

ACM,

Bearsden 28/05/2008 13:02:42
Perhaps PCs, TVs, iPods etc could be designed to run on power provided by the Callanish Stones.
28

radge dug,

28/05/2008 13:15:27
Pict - don't you mean Calanais. I'm sure your English is very good but Calanais is it's originall Gall-Gaidheal form.

Aye, pagans in Lewis. As if the place needs more religious bampots! Taigh na croiche orra uile!

Barrachd cumhachd gaoithe, tapadh leibhse!
29

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/05/2008 13:20:32
Lewis Wind Power had better wake up and realise that they have very, very few supporters of the site of this windpower project at this sacred site

It is a public relations nightmare for them and for that I am glad. They are arrogant industrialists and care not one wit for the sensibilities of those who worship the moon and others who value the singularity of this sacred and historical site.

I agree with Boy Wonder that I am siding with the "superstitious" and the Druidic.

Shame on Lewis Wind Power to be so arrogant and oblivious of public opinion. A curse on their CEO, Board of Directors, and all those who support this VERY ill-advised project.

It is the wrong project inthe wrong place.

FIND SOMEWHERE ELSE, YOU BUMBLING NUMPITIES FROM LEWIS WIND POWER!
30

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 28/05/2008 13:29:23
Medieval press tactics, pagans, witches, etc. Pathetic.

How dare they attempt to mess with the observation of the metonic cycle at Calanais.

The lunatics are running the asylum.

31

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 28/05/2008 13:47:50
24 What are you on about !

The druids used to control the entire western seaboard of Europe, the Celts then learned and continued this tradition knowing its basis in the truth of observation, from astronomy to nature, which is still extant in all the oral traditions from Gaul to Gael, from Manx to Briton, from Pict to Scot. It is a common inheritance to Ireland France, Britain, Scotland.

Arguably the oldest buildings that embody druidic astronomical principles are in Ireland and THEN Britain or Alba as it was then called.

The fundamental mistake of english histographers, apart from the issue of their propaganda , is they are incapable of viewing the oral knowledge that was written down in the 1600's from the culture of context, thence followed such nonsenses as the Grand lodge of Druids in London and the new age numpties more recently. Many books were written by english fantasists in the 1800's and are not worth the paper they are printed on, many modern writers have used such references, compounding confusion. We know a great deal about the driud, and their observations, the most intact knowledge was defended in Ireland.
32

Scottish not British,

28/05/2008 14:11:02
This is the part of the history of Scotland and its a relic of the ancient people of this country. It is of significance to those of us who wish to remember the history of our ancestors, not just "hippies". This is just another symptom of a society where people dont know or wish to destroy any knowledge of their history and that is disgraceful. You woundn't have the Greeks shoving turbines in the Parthenon, Delphi or any other major site, nor would many other places.
Scotland is a large place and alot of are not populated or heavily populated why not put turbines there?
33

Bemused and above it all,

28/05/2008 15:17:08
#45
think you'll find the picts done allright against the most modern army the world had seen at that time, really the equivalent of an amazonian tribe taking on NATO, the russians and chinese in one go with the other three building a wall to protect themselves afterwards and deciding trade is mibbe a better option.
Admittedly the probably found the weather and midges a bit much once north of bearsden!
34

fritigern,

Inverness 28/05/2008 15:42:33
Has anyone ever calculated the power loss in tramsmitting electricity from Lewis to southern England, and the cost of that transmission? London has hills to its south and west. So build the turbines there, save millions on pylons and minimise transmission losses.

I recently spent a fortnight touring southern France. What a joy driving through hills and mountains without a turbine in sight day after day (and only two bridges with traffic lights!!!).
35

cuthbert,

Barabhas 28/05/2008 15:46:01
"Rather than acknowledge superstitious drivel from pagans and suchlike, it should be obvious that the environment of Scotland's ancient monuments shouldn't be defaced by inappropriate developments."

Well said that man.
36

Iain fae Elgin,

28/05/2008 16:15:32
They should chuck one up at the top of the Waverly Steps.
There's probably enough wind there to power the trams.
37

Cappo Del Monte,

28/05/2008 16:20:58
#44
They are a bunch of f'in stones, there is nothing pretty or architectural about them.
#48
There is no mention of shipping to southern engerland, if they want to do that the will from torness .
Yup lovely france, no doubt you want lovely new nuclear power stations in the highlands ( yup, cause you wont be around to deal with the crap in decades to come )
38

Cappo Del Monte,

28/05/2008 16:23:22
#44

"Scotland is a large place and alot of are not populated or heavily populated why not put turbines there? "

Cause all the huggers and bleeding hearts oppose them.
They want tourists instead of cheaper non polluting energy systems
39

jerrymanders,

Stoned Hengeless 28/05/2008 17:47:30
The Callanish Stones are actually the remnants of ancient wind turbines. They caused great controversy in their day and many tribes objected that they would be a blot on the landscape. However, the King at the time went ahead with the plan as he had the heads of the planners. The objectors thus kept silent but every now and then they would graffiti the turbines with inscriptions to vent their ire. Anyway the project was not successful as they ran out of spare parts for the generators because the English Tribes needed them for the bigger scheme at Stonehenge. And nuclear power became all the rage.
40

John Blackley,

Florida 28/05/2008 18:35:18
Couldn't they put one turbine each on the hills that represent the woman's breasts?
41

,

28/05/2008 19:15:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

Scottish not British,

28/05/2008 19:29:25
#51

They are significant from a number of perspectives and the intricacy of their placement and the significance they were held in the time the built by the people that erected them is a matter of importance to historians and archaeologists who attempt to obtain a greater understanding of these people and of how they were positioned so accurately and these particular stones are of particular intrest in the field of archaeoastronomy due to the alignment to the moon and stars. This is true beauty, its awe inspiring and shows that our ancestors had a level of insight lacking in many today.
Veiwing your posts here I suspect that you are one of those people I was refering to, who would rather forget or ignore history and frankly I pity you for it.
43

ThePeter,

Glasgae 28/05/2008 19:35:32
Huh?
Thought that druids and hippies would be into renewable power in a big way.....
Quite a variation of "Not in my back yard"
So they are for it, as long as it is somewhere else...
Does anyone else find this amusing???
44

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 28/05/2008 20:09:54
I still maintain that wind powered turbines should be underground (or at least, partially), with the wind channelled into the turbines.

I think the technology is already there. Complicated (mainly from a financial point of view) but not really difficult.

Shall we begin the theory with a basis of fact. The pressure of the wind increases when it is channelled into a funnel? So, wind turbines could be installed in the cities where they would be required.
45

garef,

28/05/2008 21:42:22
I go for any thing that means that my life and my childrens life and my grandchildrens life is not pervaded by the poverty and and extreme hardship of previous generations.This fits the bill for me.
So I go for for alternatives to oil .
46

Saoghal Beag,

28/05/2008 21:54:59
58 true that channelling wind can increase pressure. Such turbines are already installed on top of the Lighthouse in Glasgow. These are small scale turbines. What you are talking about are large scale turbines and you would need a reliable and stable wind flow. Within cities that is rare. Turbines could be integrated into tall buildings but the channelling and burying i don't think would ever be deliverable.
47

jerrymanders,

28/05/2008 21:58:55
#60

What about the hot air though?
48

Keith Mac,

Edinburgh 29/05/2008 01:39:38
Nutters all. Next, they'll be having us believe that 2,000 years ago a guy walked on water, turned water into wine and fed the crowd at half-time with two loaves of bread and a few fish!
49

brian mcc,

the arctic 29/05/2008 02:11:10
John Muir was a high soul.
His eyes saw Canada and Alaska.
Leave these pristine places for the children of future generations.

2 people look at the same thing and see different images
50

indune1,

Canada 29/05/2008 03:56:18

41 - Tim - Well, well. We agree on something. There's hope for the world yet.
51

MichScot,

USA 29/05/2008 05:27:01
I oppose the wind turbines in that area. Lewis is too lovely to destroy and to desecrate an ancient heritage area is unthinkable!
And especially if it is for England...they should look to their own land.

Another anglicization... WHY is it now the Callanish Stones instead of the Standing Stones of Callanish? AND why am I seeing Skye Island in print rather than the Isle of Skye?
It sounds too English and succinct to me--all the romance is taken out of it... I have yet to hear of Kerry Ring.
52

MichScot,

USA 29/05/2008 05:28:34
#64 Keith Mac

Deride your own religion,please, even if it's secularism.
53

BiggusBirdus,

29/05/2008 09:50:11
#38 Couldn’t have out it better myself! I’m glad others are at least half-sensible!

#41 Catch-up! The Lewis Wind Power bunch have got nothing to do with this site this one is being done by Benn Mhor Power.

#44 – Get a grip – the western isles have a very low population and this isn’t desecrating the calanish stones, it is simply a distant view from the stones. I’ve been there and the weather is such that, of an evening you’ll be lucky to see the “sleeping beauty” at all let alone work out where her legs are! Yep – you’ll wait 18 and half years for… sweet FA.

Oh and by the way – when they built the stones there was no England, no Scotland no Wales, just a bloody big island off the coast of Europe… Get over it.

England don’t want you or your energy anyway – new nuclear is underway! They’ve had enough of the petty tartan politics! Trust me, I’m in the unfortunate position of being stuck between the both of you (and liking neither)!

#55 Love it!

#58 Stop talking peat sods!

#59 Well said!

#67 Get over yourself - If you love Scotland so much why are you stateside?
54

ChristineGrahameforPope,

29/05/2008 10:18:54
These windmills consume far more energy than they'll ever produce. Their meaning is symbolic - they tell the fundamentalist Greens that they're winning. That's why they're often sited in places where people like to look at the landscape, to tell them that the new religion of Global Warming has power over the landscape. Their practical value is nugatory.
55

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 29/05/2008 10:35:37
Fact: There is 300 years worth of coal sitting under the country so let's stop messing about, dig it up and build carbon filtered coal power stations. They say the technology isn't quite ready yet - well I'm pretty sure that if a few quid was diverted from these pesky windfarms into coal research they'd soon find a way.
56

MichScot,

#28` 29/05/2008 15:42:57
They aren't just mining in the Appalachians. They're blowing up whole mountaintops. Over a hundred, I have heard. And we used to be protected from strip mining. This is far worse and does untold damage. And the landowners are allowed no say and are not allowed on the land, in most cases.
57

MichScot,

USAI 29/05/2008 15:44:22
I love Scotland. I have been to Lewis. However, my husband won't move...
58

MichScot,

USA 29/05/2008 15:46:10
My cat is named Calanais
59

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/05/2008 12:00:12
The stuff relating to druids, witches, etc.. is a distraction. This should not go ahead purely because the area is one of vast archaeological significance.

Of course, your modern druids and pagans are in no way practising an ancient religion anyway - just a modern characiture. As somebody has already mentioned here, your actual historical Druids venerated groves, not stone circles.
60

W Smith,

Middle East 21/07/2008 03:58:36
The druids and the kiddy-on 'greens' living in the south coast of England are already gettting electricity supplied from nuclear power stations in North East France.

NEXT!
61

James1480,

21/07/2008 05:51:02
Not In My Backyard. Seems to be a world wide sentiment. Ted Kennedy doesn't want'em where he sails
his yacht, you don't want'em where the moon comes up every 18 odd years. Which would you rather have, a refrigerator that will keep the milk cold, and lights that come on when you flip the switch, or a really really killer view.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.