Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fred Goodwin: The 'boy from Paisley' who found himself at centre of a global storm



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 October 2008
FOR Sir Fred Goodwin, it wasn't supposed to end this way. The man who turned Royal Bank of Scotland into an international icon possibly imagined a hero's send-off when he eventually stepped down as its chief executive.
After all, during his seven-year tenure as RBS boss, he earned both respect and fear in the City as a leading figure in the financial world. And under his guidance, RBS swelled in size, taking over NatWest.

But yesterday, as his departure was announced, he was on the receiving end of paparazzi flashbulbs and shouted questions about a waste of taxpayers' money after the bank was forced to rely on £20 billion of government funding

His demise came less than six months after he was forced to ask shareholders for £12 billion of extra funds to bolster the balance sheet.

Sir Fred even had the embarrassment of having to share a telephone conference podium with his successor, Stephen Hester.

They were perfectly polite to each other but it cannot have been easy for Goodwin to hear Hester effectively say his aim was to review strategy "from first principles" and that there would be "no sacred cows".

His departure today makes him the highest-profile UK banking casualty of the credit crunch so far – and also one of the best paid.

Yesterday's events are a stunning setback for Sir Fred, 49, in a career that has had three distinct phases: stellar rise; City suspicions creeping in; and ignominious downfall.

After studying law at Glasgow University, he joined accountants Touche Ross, and became chief operating officer of the worldwide liquidation of Bank of Credit and Commerce International in 1990.

At just 32, Goodwin was running a staff of 1,000 with teams from London to Abu Dhabi in one of the most complex, high-profile financial frauds the City had ever seen.

He was seen as having done a very good job and it got him noticed in both political and business circles.

Goodwin was then headhunted for the job of deputy chief executive of Clydesdale Bank in 1995, and appointed to the top job a year later at 38.

It was from his unsentimental axe-wielding of jobs at Clydesdale, owned by National Australia Bank, that he first earned the nickname "Fred the Shred".

He was poached by Royal Bank of Scotland in 1999 as deputy chief executive to Sir George Mathewson, succeeding Mathewson in early 2001 after the successful acquisition of NatWest the previous year.

Some say it was Goodwin's high point. His cost-cutting at NatWest – Fred the Shred II – was seen as responsible for driving up RBS earnings.

However, as he later went on a flamboyant acquisition flurry some City doubters wondered whether the wunderkind was going too far, too fast.

Between 2001 and 2004, he bought Mellon Financial Corp's retail banking arm in the US for £1.33 billion, the "nodding dog" insurer Churchill for £1 billion and Charter One Financial, again in the US, for £5.8 billion. The pace of activity was dizzying.

Terms like "serial acquirer", even "megalomaniac", began to be aired in the City. Goodwin's halo was tarnishing.

However, things became much worse for him over the past 18 months or so. In March 2007, he publicly ruled out any further big deals. There were none that were "desirable, do-able or affordable," he said.

Just a month later, RBS formed a consortium with Santander of Spain and Fortis to bid for Dutch bank ABN Amro.

This cost RBS £10 billion for a share of ABN, with Goodwin still prepared to pay top dollar for the assets despite the onset of the credit crunch.

The rest is history. This year has been an unmitigated disaster for the RBS boss.

After saying RBS did not need to raise new capital, the bank launched a £12 billion rights issue earlier this summer, angering many City critics.

When £5.9 billion of credit-related writedowns tumbled RBS to a £692 million interim trading loss in August, his name was mud in some quarters.

The implosion over the wider banking sector did the rest and led to yesterday's further fall from grace.

Obviously tired from a gruelling set of talks with the government, Goodwin was asked yesterday what he would do now. "A good long rest is the first order of priority," he said. He added that he was looking forward to "a period of rest and reflection before getting round to what to do next".

He will have more time for his main hobbies, including golf and restoring classic motor cars. Perhaps less likely given the manner of his departure is further worthy work for the government.

Will he be missed at RBS? Probably yes, and no. His occasional micro-management is known to have upset some within the bank.

However, another senior insider once told me: "Fred's driven, but it's leavened with a mischievous sense of humour. You can take the boy out of Paisley, but you can't take Paisley out of the boy."

Goodwin's departure is softened by a pension pot of £8.4 million, worth £579,000 a year.

He also has 1.1 million shares worth a total £722,000 at last night's closing RBS share price.

In addition he has 454,000 nil-cost share options under a medium-term bonus plan currently worth about £298,000.

However, Goodwin did waive a £1.2 million severance payoff to which he would have been contractually entitled.

Even so, many "burnt" RBS investors will not have the cushion. The share price when Goodwin took over the bank in January 2001 was 442p. The closing price last night was 65.70p.

But at this level of business, it is often as much about ego as monetary rewards.

And Goodwin will be hurting at the style of his ousting after seven years as chief executive.

"This would not have been the manner or circumstances I would have chosen," he said, with some understatement.

Stephen Hester: A man who proves the doubters wrong

STEPHEN Hester, a former investment banker, has built a reputation on his ability to prove his doubters wrong.

But replacing the Royal Bank of Scotland's Sir Fred Goodwin promises to be the greatest challenge of his meteoric career.

The keen gardener, who is married to a banker, was described as confident, bright and "scarily" young when he took over as chief executive of British Land, one of the country's biggest property companies, in 2004. Without a day's experience of the sector, he stepped in to replace Sir John Ritblat, one of the most respected names in the property world.

His return to banking in an executive role will mark a full circle in Mr Hester's career. At Credit Suisse First Boston Mr Hester's work ethic took him almost to the top of the bank.

In 19 years there, he held various investment roles, before becoming chief financial officer in 1996, and then global head of the fixed income division. He was the bank's youngest-ever managing director and later commuted to New York as finance director.

Later, at Abbey National, during a brief stint as chief operating officer, he restructured the ailing business.

He was recruited by British Land in 2004, but in recent months he has gravitated back to banking.

In February he joined the board of Northern Rock as deputy chairman, before moving to a non-executive position on the RBS board.

Despite his CV, his appointment is a surprise. Experts point out his style is very different from Sir Fred Goodwin's. Whether that is to his advantage remains to be seen.

Pay rises to directors 'defying gravity' amid crisis

THE scale of top directors' earnings in recent months "defied gravity", with increases still running into double figures, according to a new report.

Average pay for leading executives in the FTSE 100 companies hit a record £3.5 million in the last financial year, an rise of 11.5 per cent on the previous year.

Incomes Data Services (IDS) said top executives in the 250 firms below the FTSE averaged over £1.5 million, a 10.4 per cent increase and also a record.

The report said directors were prospering while the economy was entering tougher times and workers risked losing their jobs.

Chief executives in top finance firms received average earnings of almost £3.5 million last year, while their FTSE 250 colleagues received almost £2.3 million.

Virtually all incentive payments to top bosses were running at higher levels than the previous year.

Five directors earned more than £10 million, although there were signs that some companies were already preparing for a downturn in the economy by making changes to incentive plans.

Steve Tatton, of IDS, said: "Greedy City bankers rather than fat cat directors may be currently attracting all the adverse comment, but unless remuneration committees avoid making toxic pay decisions over the coming year UK boardrooms may soon find the spotlight returning to their pay packages.

"If there is ever a time for the pay-for-performance culture that has gripped UK boardrooms in the past decade to live up to its promise, it is when the economy enters stormy weather.

"The proof of the pudding will be when large numbers of directors do not receive any incentive payments as a result of deteriorating corporate performance."

Meanwhile, a separate report found that bonuses awarded during this year's main "bonus season" were £1.5 billion up on last year.

But the rise – from roughly £26.5 billion to £28 billion – did not come from the financial services sector.

RHIANNON EDWARD

The full article contains 1616 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

The Strategist,

14/10/2008 00:53:05
Hester seems to be a Goodwin clone.. Just another one of the financial services establishment mob. Why don't they put a real businessman in charge or even better, an engineer!
2

Destroy the Planet,

14/10/2008 07:49:16
"You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." --Andrew Jackson, 1828

Nothings changed really
3

noswod,

Honestas 14/10/2008 08:35:41
Another overambitious accountant/ consultant who got promoted to a role too many. Like the guy at M&S a few years ago and Hornby at HBOS. If he had started at 18 facing customers he may have realised that banking is about people not numbers and that to lend you have to have deposits. ANB Amro deal was crazy he had to beat Barclays at all costs. If he had left this posioned chalice to the Barclays boys it would have been him taking over them rather than Gordo taking over RBS. So a familar message Accountants get a life and humility before you think you can run a business.
4

JayJay,

Right here 14/10/2008 08:55:09
I am no real fan of Goodwin, but I think we all need to sidestep this entirely understandable desire to track down a bogeyman to blame for this calamity...especially when the real bogeymen are still very much at large.
The Sunday Times reported at the weekend on Philip Falcone of Harbinger Capital, the hedge fund manager. He is now shorting Santander, BBVA and Banco Popular in Spain, using 600m euros worth of other people's shares. Shorting is still legal in Spain. Last year, Falcone made $1.7bn.
Isn't it time this hideous practice was banned outright? I have no issue with speculation, but speculating with other people's assets, and creating an environment where it is absolutely in your interests to drive down a share, commodity or currency value, is surely unacceptable.
Falcone, like all hedge fund companies, contributes nothing except financial chaos, all driven by the desire to make him money. This sort of behaviour needs to be outlawed. Yet Brown sees no need to speak forth on the question of market speculators and their role in the shadows. As I say, Goodwin has taken his medicine, but I'd rather the far bigger fish were caught.
5

What a banker,

Baberton 14/10/2008 08:55:18
I hope you rot Sir Dred though I somehow think your friends in the city will have you well looked after. An an ex employee and shareholder my family supported RBS. We took part in your rights issue and yes we enjoyed some healthy dividends for a while.

You got too cocky though and lived outwith your means -an old Scots banking tradition that you and your cronies broke.

Our share portfolio has gone from £80K to under £10K due to your greed.Our dividend which we used to support the family for Xmas and annual holidays now gone.

Our retirment nest egg blitzed.

Shame on you Sir Fred. May you endure many many sleepless nights as undoubtedly thousands of small RBS shareholders will do.

You are a disgusting human being.
6

What a banker,

Baberton 14/10/2008 08:57:59
Jay Jay you do indeed have a very valid point. Life was quite comfortable for most and then suddenly wallop!

Hedge Funds are dangerous dangerous companies and I agree that action does indeed need to be taken.

Nothing hides the fact though that The Shred got greedy and his ego went into overdrive.
7

What a banker,

Baberton 14/10/2008 08:59:31
Post 6 sorry about the typos but maybe Sir Dread would be a better name?
8

Rob,

14/10/2008 09:06:54
What a Banker. You must be as stupid as Sir Fred was incompetent. You must have been the only bank employee in the world who didn't know shares go down as well as up.

I've lost some money too - but I was fully aware of the risks and I don't winge and blame anyone else.
9

What a banker,

14/10/2008 09:16:13
Rob, of course I knew they could go up as well as down - I'm not in the least bit stupid.

I'm pleased that you can forgive Sir Fred for being greedy and over extending the empire. Even in good times, ABN was a step too far for RBS - surely you agree?

By the way, I also supported the rights issue on the basis of this man telling us that all was OK!

Sorry to hear you've lost 'money' too - hope one day that things recover.
10

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 14/10/2008 09:54:16
"And Goodwin will be hurting at the style of his ousting after seven years as chief executive.

"This would not have been the manner or circumstances I would have chosen," he said, with some understatement."

However what he did was in fact the precursor to this very style of departure with pride and greed driving his business affairs. What about some sympathy for the investors and shareholders who have been badly hit? Although he has foregone benefits from this year he still walks away with a multi-million pound fortune.
11

Rob,

14/10/2008 10:06:54
#10 Actually, I don't. I think he was doing what most CEO's try to do - grow value for the shareholder. If you wind the clock back to a year or so ago when we were in the money, did we consider Fred and RBS with the Nat West acquisition plus the other bits and pieces to be a manifestation of a greedy and over extended empire? Of course not - he was making us richer and that is why we remained as shareholders. They were caught out by world sentiment on ABN Ambro - and Barclays, who had exactly the same agenda, got lucky because they were out bid. If they'd got ABN Ambro, then they would have been the basket case today.
But the die was cast by the rights issue - that was pretty obviously the time to pull back. It will recover. In 1987 I made a paper loss of £50k in a day on £100k invested. A year later my £100k was £120k. This one will take longer but if you have money now, buy bank shares. The equation is simple - bo banks, no Britain: it would be over. Mr Salmond is probably facing the same dilemma
12

Glasgow Expat,

Desert 14/10/2008 10:13:02
Every financial blow up in history has one thing in common - the total lack of humility and the lack of ability to admit mistakes before it is too late. Cognitive dissonance. Goodwin didn't even have the humility to resign!! He should pay his cash bonuses back - the shares he can keep.
13

Doh,

14/10/2008 10:35:34


From the article -

"At just 32, Goodwin was running a staff of 1,000 with teams from London to Abu Dhabi in one of the most complex, high-profile financial frauds the City had ever seen."

Yes it probably was fraud.
14

Big T,

14/10/2008 12:38:19
"A good long rest" eh Fred.

Yep - with a pension of over a half a million pounds a year you can afford to do that!

For thousands of others fighting to save their business and homes as a result of the financial chaos caused by fat cats like you, a good long rest is NOT an option!!!!
15

ultravires,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 13:50:15
Doh - best part of the story, they should just scrap the rest of it !
16

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 14:36:51
Mr Goodwin has been made a scapegoat for a global financial crisis. That's his 'union dividend'.
17

Buckpool Loon,

Cheshire 14/10/2008 14:38:06
You can't keep a good wart down!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.