Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Homeowners kick up stink over work to staunch smell

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
WORK to curb the infamous "Seafield stench" from a sewage treatment plant which has blighted thousands of people in the Scottish capital is launched today.
However, residents last night dismissed the £20 million project as "completely inadequate" because it would not reduce the smell during regular maintenance work.

The odour improvement plan is designed to remove 70 per cent of smells from the Seafi
eld site in eastern Edinburgh when it is completed in two years' time.

It involves covering areas of eastern Scotland's largest waste treatment plant and installing "odour control equipment" to prevent smells escaping.

The project was approved by the city council last year.

This summer, the stench was so bad, people complained they could not sit in their gardens.

Kenny MacAskill, the SNP MSP for Edinburgh East and Musselburgh, who chairs the Seafield stakeholders committee, described the smell then as "frankly appalling".

Residents said it was too early to tell whether short-term measures, finished two months ago, have had any effect.

They said they had agreed only reluctantly to the current project going ahead, and would have preferred a £40 million option that would also contain smells during maintenance work.

Linda Tarbuck, the joint chair of the Leith Links Residents Association, said: "The option they are going for will cover some open areas of sewage and waste water, which should reduce odours considerably.

"However, this is completely inadequate because a lot of the problems are caused during maintenance work, and the scheme will not address that.

"Maintenance happens very frequently and is weather dependent – it should take place only when the wind is blowing offshore."

Mrs Tarbuck said it was also yet to be decided how the effectiveness of the project would be assessed, and how it would be decided whether further work was required.

The project is being led by Scottish Water and plant operators Veolia Water, which treats sewage from 550,000 people.

The city council and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency will monitor odours during and after the work.

Alex McTear, the senior project manager, said: "Seafield copes very well. However, on occasion, there have been odour issues that have had a detrimental effect on the surrounding communities. The works are designed to directly tackle these issues at source."

Mr MacAskill said: "This is very welcome news for the residents. The community has been blighted for a long time. The fact that action is now commencing is reassuring. It won't be easy and it won't be quick but a start has been made."

A spokesman for Scottish Water said the treatment works was already covered by an odour management plan to ensure "odour is minimised in all operating circumstances, including periods of maintenance".




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2009 9:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Davy,

Millions have been wasted 09/11/2009 00:48:59
We missed our opportunity 9 years ago. This is yet another greeny liberal induced nightmare with no visible end in sight. Millions have been wasted, Scotland is on the brink of an economic collapse, and nothing has been accomplished, "in Seafield", apart from the constant hum. Is it time to bring our men and women home, so they can wash their hands.
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 00:54:11

Better, Just do not purchase property in an area near any sewage treatment plant, it could be, what you can't smell, is more detrimental to your health.





3

Alice Cooper,

09/11/2009 02:39:36
east coast stench?,oh the sewage works ,thought it was about labour greed and hypocrisy,all those backhanders would cause some reek,like claiming for tea bags and coffee?
cupa anyone?,govs paying for it
4

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 09/11/2009 03:32:58
Most of it emanates from the bottom of the royal mile, if you will pardon the pun.
5

Baggy Troosers,

09/11/2009 04:19:36
#4

Yep i agree especially from the Labour Benches
6

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 09/11/2009 05:26:14
There's an awfie stink of the Ferry plant of Dingwall. It isn't adequate at a' for the greater surburban development of northern Tescoland.
7

Trams shams,

09/11/2009 07:06:24
Should have gone for the incinerator option. Heat and power from poo now how green is that but oh no, the Greenies and the liberals get in and talk poo about the potential environmental 'issues' associated with such a plant. Lets all go back to the dark ages and start lighting candles again.

Well here's a balanced start to a discussion on plasma gasification...
http://www.slate.com/id/2181083/
8

Navvy,

09/11/2009 08:16:27
#3 & & you have it

Modern plants are not smelly. Ignorant greenies still oppose incineration. They are ostriches
9

Ben Thehoose,

09/11/2009 08:29:45
I am a Greenie. I regret the Seafield plant. I don't know any Greenie that does approve of it. There is a far greener system that would serve Edinburgh well, but it wasn't chosen for venal reasons. Visit the Findhorn Community to see a scaled down model of a working system.
10

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 09:32:45
It sounds ike they are only going through the motions.
11

Pentland,

Upwind 09/11/2009 11:19:57
#10. Very sharp!
12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 13:04:29

#10.

I always wondered the song title,...
.....'C'mon baby do the Loco-motion'.

13

Age of Reason,

Aberdeen 09/11/2009 16:56:49
All very funny above, but not clever. (not amused)
Let's be clear - if his stink came from an oil&gas plant there would be immediate outcry for the Big Bad Oil Co's to get clean, and compensation demands would flood in if an Oilman farted in a pub.
The technology is there, and the money has to be spent. So get on with it. Or you'll be shut down... and then what will we do?
14

North Perth Hibby,

09/11/2009 23:52:13
Is staunch the correct word to use?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.