Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Homeowners vow to fight Trump resort in the courts

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2009
FURIOUS property owners have vowed to take their fight to the courts to prevent their homes being seized to pave the way for Donald Trump's £1 billion golf resort in Aberdeenshire.
Four homeowners living on the fringe of the Menie Estate have been left facing the prospect of compulsory purchase orders being used to buy their houses after a decision by Aberdeenshire councillors to include their land in a revised masterplan of the huge Trump development near Balmedie. They now plan to unite to challenge the controversial decision in the Court of Session.

David Milne, one of the home owners, told members of the Formartine area committee at a meeting in Ellon that the Trump Organisation planned to bulldoze his house – a former Coastguard station – and replace it with open grassland. "I do not see the benefit to the community and the country as whole of that manoeuvre," he said.

The committee, however, voted by nine votes to two in favour of granting the Trump Organisation outline planning permission for four pieces of privately owned land on the edge of the Menie Estate and a small parcel of land owned by Aberdeenshire Council as part of the overall Trump scheme.

As he left the meeting, Mr Milne, who has lived at Hermit Cottage for 17 years, said: "My house is not for sale.

"My intention, at the end of the day, is to leave there horizontally in a box.

"We are going to challenge this decision in court – and it is likely to be on the basis of all four households."

He said the committee's decision to approve outline applications for the parcels of land was unlawful, as they had not been the subject of separate environmental impact assessments.

Mr Milne added: "We will take professional legal advice to see how soon we can raise a motion in the courts to have these decisions overturned, because they are not legally valid."

But the property tycoon's son, Donald Trump Jnr, defended the decision to include the five pieces of land in the developing masterplan and hailed the councillors' vote as a "very important decision going forward". He said the areas of land were "critical" to the detailed proposals being developed by Gareth Hoskins,one of Scotland's leading architects.

George Sorial, the executive in charge of the Menie development, insisted negotiations would continue to secure the properties without the need for compulsory purchase order powers. He said: "If we can resolve this amicably and fairly, that's what we intend on doing." He said compulsory purchase was a decision for the council and the Scottish Government.

Angry farmer shouts abuse at Trump son

DONALD Trump jnr and right-hand man George Sorial made an unexpected visit to Michael Forbes's home yesterday in an attempt to speak to the defiant farmer.

After an anxious wait at the door, the Americans were chased off by Forbes, who unleashed a torrent of abuse at them. As they left, Mr Sorial commented: "This is what we have to deal with."

Speaking from his home at Mill of Menie, Mr Forbes said he was not surprised by the outcome of yesterday's hearing. He said: "There was no point of going because I knew what was going to happen. It's a vengeance thing now. It's become personal to Trump I think – he wants everybody who went against him all out."

COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDERS 'THE LAST RESORT'

THE decision was taken on planning grounds, setting aside the question of land ownership.

The Trump Organisation wants to negotiate agreements with the four homeowners and insists an application for Aberdeenshire Council to use compulsory purchase order powers would be the last resort. Councillor Martin Ford has tabled a motion for the council meeting on 1 October, opposing the use of CPOs to "force Aberdeenshire residents from their own homes on or adjacent to the Menie estate".

A spokesman for Aberdeenshire Council said: "We would expect further discussions with the Trump Organisation to discuss progress made before any decision would be taken to put the issue (of CPOs] to full council."




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 September 2009 11:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

Buttress,

02/09/2009 00:29:22
According to an earlier article, Gareth Hoskins, the architect who has taken Trump's dollar and is designing this 'resort', spoke at the meeting saying this 'compulsory purchase' was vital to Trump's plans.

Parcel of rogues?





2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 00:38:57

Quite ridiculous!, and a dammed disgrace, to have lived in Scotland all you life, and then to get threatened to be evicted from your home by an overseas visitor.

3

,

02/09/2009 00:52:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

02/09/2009 01:16:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

02/09/2009 01:28:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 01:29:21


we shall fight on the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Scotland, whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills, in the golf courses
we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Scotland or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the Scottish Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New Scotland, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

7

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 02/09/2009 01:55:38
I was fully in supporet of the Trump development as was the overwhelming majority of my fellow Aberdeenshire electors. However, I am not in favour of compulsory purchase unless it is for some public work such as roads etc. I think Mr Trump should either pay what it takes for those currently owning the land to want to sell or else he bides his time when he will no doubt acquire it in due course. Much institutions of public benefit are not publicly owned and exist for private gain, such as the utilities and rail, yet they benefit from the exercise of compulsory purchase. It is not doubted here in Aberdeenshire that the Trump project is one of immense benefit to the tourist industry locally and perhaps a case can be made for compulsory purchase, but my view is that it should be as a last resort and only as an absolute necessity. I am not convinced that position has been reached.
8

William C Anderson III,

Levittown 02/09/2009 02:15:38
Please don't think the Americans are invading your country. Trump is very liked and hated here in the states. He has a great deal of money to sway your newspapers and tele.You have to do what you can to stop him on your own.The problem is if he opens a casino in Scotland it will make you alot of money.I wish he would stay home in the states,but he might create alot of employment in Scotland.He has no good will in his heart just profit.But many people make profit along with him.It's really up to the people of Scotland. God bless Scotland.
9

TimCam,

Lexington, KY US 02/09/2009 02:37:06
I would fight with every breath to stop eminent domain for Trump. It is un-American and I hope un-Scots.

The community will however benefit financially, there is little question. Not worth trampling property rights though.

Fight the Donald! He can however make me an offer on my house here in Lexington, please pay me in chips.
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 03:06:37

Do not get me wrong!, I do not think anything wrong or threatening about the Americans, in-fact all the ones that I have ever met are gracious and friendly!
But I do think that Trump is arrogant in attitude.
To ask is to be respectful, to demand, is another kettle of fish.



11

JohnnyR,

Callanish 02/09/2009 04:25:59
"for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive".

We should never surrender to a man who's hair looks like a neglected sporran.
12

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 02/09/2009 04:28:48
#2 "..... and be evicted by an overseas visitor" LOL!The lot of you porridge gobbling gentlemen were evicted by overseas visitors, THE SCOTS!! Who came from Ireland. The old word Scot meant, Bandit,Robber etc.
So all Donald Trump is doing, is repeating history.See the genes are still there!Bye the bye, who did the Scots evict in Canada,Australia,New Zealand,HongKong,New Caledonia etc, etc? Just a thought.
13

Salem,

02/09/2009 04:40:49
# 12

Though your language is mangled you make a valid point.

Donald Trump is a businessman who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.

His mother was born in the Orkney's as I recall. So he has a claim to Scottish heritage.

His project is probably 5% sentimental and 95% business. Trump is a risk taker. Risk takers are what made America into a country with 5% of the world population producing 25% plus of the world GDP.

Can you explain how that can be Charles?
14

JohnnyR,

Callanish 02/09/2009 04:41:56
Dragonhead no wonder you live in China; you wouldn't last five minutes here.
15

Iron Soul,

looking on in disgust 02/09/2009 04:51:28
Let this be a lesson. Trump is a man who will niggle away at anything to get advantage. Any show of weakness will be pounced on. Every minor victory for his empire will be used to start another skirmish.

The point is that if he (Trump) can't bring people to his point of view by reasonable negotiation, he must be told that he must accomodate the people whom he is impacting. There is no 'Common Good' in this. It is the rights of the individual which must be upheld.
16

Catharine,

winnipeg 02/09/2009 04:57:05
Can you say "I told you so?" Anyone who thought this greedy 'Murican was going to bring anything but trouble to Aberdeenshire was foolish to say the least. His record is less than stellar -bankrupt financially in 1991, 1992, and guess what, again in 2009!!! If I were a builder or land owner in Aberdeenshire, I'd be sure to insist on CASH upfront!
17

JohnnyR,

Callanish 02/09/2009 05:29:10
Furthermore Dragonhead the Scots have never exploited any race either at home or abroad, but rather have assimilated with the peoples of the world; you are obviously confusing us with the English who have a long history of subjegating the nations of the world much as the Chinese are doing supplanting and decimating the culture and religion of the people of the sovereign nation of Tibet.
18

Warden Resurrected,

02/09/2009 05:42:48
17-Try James Matheson for size.

http://www.scotland.org.uk/guide/James_Matheson
19

JohnnyR,

Callanish 02/09/2009 06:02:59
#18 Are you assuming I don't know the history of my people? I was commenting on Dragonhead's assertion that we evicted various peoples around the world. Incidentally Dragonhead New Caledonia is actually a French protectorate.
I am only too aware of the way the Scottish elite treated their own people; just name any clan Grant, Campbell etc. etc.
Clan chiefs are the reason the Scottish people got the chance to assimilate with other nations around the world due to "the clearances" in co-operation with the English.
The Scots have a saying " There's nane sae bad tae ye as yer ain" and our diaspora are living proof of that.
20

Billy Boy,

Sherman Oaks 02/09/2009 06:11:30
I find it amazing that people can be evicted (compulsory Purchase) to build a golf course/ luxury homes in the UK. Can it really be so? Then you think about Trump also thing DeLorean!
21

R Davis,

Vienna 02/09/2009 06:17:50
God bless the Planners for allowing this to go ahead. It only reaffirms the phrase money does talks?
22

Scozzy,

02/09/2009 06:33:48
The bully boy tactics employed by the Trump team in collusion with Aberdeenshire Council are an affront to the democratic rights that belong to all Scots.
23

ken 17,

Scotland UK 02/09/2009 06:50:47
I may be 'saft', but it was my impression that CPO's could only be used by Government [local/national] or an agency working on their behalf.
What part of the Government is Trump or his organisation?
24

Kate,

Zurich 02/09/2009 07:17:36
12#Dragonhead, partially right, but the area under discussion is not Scot, but rather pictish historically and therefore your argument falls a bit flat.

By all means, let Trump build a resort but not at the expense of people who have lived and loved the land and the country for all their lives. These CPOs are ridiculous. As another poster pointed out, how can it be possible to be granted planning permission on property you don't even own yet? Presumptious to say the least!
25

Royster,

02/09/2009 07:23:58
But this is Alex Salmond's big vision for Scotland. Waving through a developer who will create lots of highly skilled jobs such as lackey and table waiter whilst trying to close down nuclear power stations where there are lots of well-paid jobs. Trump has soft-soaped Salmond.
26

Ben Thehoose,

02/09/2009 07:33:16
Has anyone checked the bank balances of the councillors (and their close relations) who supported this application? I hope someone will just to prove how lily white and pure they all are.

As a poster above reminds us: the Scots' worst enemies are-the Scots.
27

Ham Mei Si,

Hong Kong 02/09/2009 07:55:23
2
Charles Linskaill,

That's richt Charlie kick the visiting Scots out of Scotland and their relatives.....You win the goldcoconut!
28

McGinty,

Glasgow & Aberdeen 02/09/2009 07:55:40
As they left, Mr Sorial commented: "This is what we have to deal with." Oh really? He does not. The only reason he does is because he is blinkered or blind. I'm sure he would give much worse if his toes were being stepped on. There are no words. This is vile behaviour on a par with that of Patrick Sellar. People of the Northeast who supported this without thinking through the more serious implications should think again.
29

,

02/09/2009 07:59:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

paulr,

edinburgh 02/09/2009 08:03:30
Money talks, principles and justice walk.
I wonder how much Aberdeen council are getting for this.
A ridiculous situation, people beong evicted from their homes to satisfy the urges of a rich megalomaniac.
31

Mr Ransk,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 08:11:58
The residents should watch the australian film 'The Castle' for inspiration in fighting a compulsory purchase...
32

Beth Boyle,

NY 02/09/2009 08:15:31
The new wee Laird is no a good master it seems. Hate to say I told you so, but I did!
33

MacGhillieBhain,

Aberdeen 02/09/2009 08:16:11
Much talk about Quislings on Scotsman threads,usually baseless.On this occasion though,the cap really fits. I mean the conduct of the majority of Aberdeenshire councillors is servile and a more self serving bunch of yes-men is hard to imagine.Good luck to the owners who won't sell to Trump,you have the support of all decent people in the country.
34

Morry,

Scotland 02/09/2009 08:21:09
Every comment, valid points.
Not just overseas visitors stealing our land,
the rich do it everyday, all you have to do is take a look at Scottish Courts and particular the Scottish Land Court where people are fighting for the right to stay on their land and in their homes.

These people can fight and fight through the courts, and the only place they will get will be an early grave, through stress anxiety and futility.

It's been said previously, the land law of Scotland is an ass, the planning law following suit, and land reform? well what is that exactly? certainly not in favour of those who live on and work the land, no. It's for them that has oodles of money and the inclination to keep people like those in Aberdeen and you and me in court forever!!
35

Iwasdunbystandardlife,

Perth 02/09/2009 08:27:06
Surely, compulsory purchase CANNOT LEGALLY be used in this case, as far as I am aware, because one of the main and over-riding considerations for compulsory purchase is that it MUST ALWAYS for the good of the majority of the local community.
36

Beth Boyle,

NY 02/09/2009 08:28:09
It's more of the modern obsession with celebrity I think that let this fox into the hen house. Highland Clearances all over again.
37

Iwasdunbystandardlife,

Perth 02/09/2009 08:28:20
Re #35. MUST ALWAYS BE
38

A Crofter,

Trumplicking Arce of FatMan 02/09/2009 08:37:25
"This is not the first time Trump has attempted the compulsory purchase trick. In 1998 he tried to persuade the state of New Jersey to seize three properties - including the home of an elderly widow - that sttod in the way of the Trump Plaza Hotel and casino in Atlantic City. In that case, a judge found for the residents. But perhaps Aberdeenshire will prove an easier touch than notoriously corrupt New Jersey." - Private Eye, 7-20 August 2009

39

Buttress,

02/09/2009 08:37:39
The Trump Clearances. I nothing safe? Having your home forcibly removed in order that people can play golf!

All those involved in helping him should possibly be named?

40

Flying 15,

02/09/2009 08:47:16
I had a good laugh listening to those accents and who was telling whom to go back home! Cringe? I nearly ........(see me I am not a wealthy landowner stopping a development which would give my children jobs!)
41

LAM,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 08:51:28
I am against compulsory sale of ones property.. whether needed or not there is something about those words that immeidately get your back up! However in the light of day if people stop,look and listen and try and not be pig headed about it. This is not a child's game..is what they are offering more than fair? And really it has to be otherwise that would be adding insult to injury. Are they offering you say double of what you would have got if you decided to sell by choice... Hmmm well then that combined with the employment it will create and economic boost it will bring in at a very needed time is something to consider. It is about greed it is about pocketing ones pride and being sensible. If after looking at all that...none of those issues are important to you,to your loved ones or your community that badly needs a employment boost... well then you must do what you have to do. Unfortunately there are people that have a tendancy to get angry and try and get even ...even when the outcome will hurt themselves and others.FOOD FOR THOUGHT
42

Beth Boyle,

NY 02/09/2009 08:52:37
Slaves or serfs, Flying 15, is what the people working here will be. Trump does not pay his help well. I expect most will be Polish or Romanian.
43

SimonW,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 08:55:12
The residents should watch the australian film 'The Game'
It's much funnier.
44

Gravedigger,

Livingston 02/09/2009 09:02:12
Its up to anyone to sell their land or house or not to sell
Trump should ajust his plans to suit
Is it not that C P is for vital commerce eg Roads Schools ect
We fought the Second World War to stop dicators and it would appear that Mr Trump is a dicator
What would William Wallace or Robert Bruce have done if Mr Trump threaten them with evictions
I leave their answer to your own conclusion
45

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 02/09/2009 09:08:20
For those who oppose Trump and his plans, there is nothing particularly alarming or surprising in this latest news.

The decision to grant planning permission in this case was taken by the small Formartine area committee, who voted nine to two in favour. But when it comes to the decision on compulsory purchase the whole of Aberdeenshire Council, with 68 councillors, will be involved. It is (or should be) inconceivable that the Council would agree to this, see:

http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2525747.0.eviction_bid_threatens_trump_resort.php

The present vote is just a formality. It looks increasingly as if Trump wants a way out, and insisting that the Council heaps eternal opprobrium on itself by granting him compulsory purchase powers, is his exit strategy. No Council with a shred of decency would do such a thing, and if it did it would likely be overturned in the courts.

If this is correct, then Trump will be gone within a month and all else is smoke and mirrors.
46

Sedov,

02/09/2009 09:10:32
Whether its dealing with Libya or dealing with Trump, the language is the same - money, money money.

It's a rotten corrupt system, lets dump it for one based on need.
47

Scotfree,

Erskine 02/09/2009 09:12:09
The Trump organisation is a Mafia scam. The next demand will be for a gaming licence, without which it will never be viable. It is a shame on the Scottish govornment them have supported this homeland type development which will bring no benefit to local people. Like similar developments in South Africa and elsewhere this massive gaming development will drain money from the local people into the pockets of the global Mafia of which the Trump family has long been a part of, the gaming resort will be an island of wealth surrounded by a sea of poverty.
48

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 09:14:29
#17 JohnnyR... what have the English got to do with this thread? The Scots aren't all squeaky clean you know, and to believe so is naive. But back on topic, I don't think this development is a valid reason to use compulsory purchase.
49

It's me!,

02/09/2009 09:16:36
We see programmes on the television and read in the newspapers of ex-pats in Spain having their homes taken from them to allow profit seeking developers make bigger profits. We condemn the Spanish authorities for allowing this to happen. It seems we are no better.

The clearances continue.
50

bumpkin,

02/09/2009 09:26:23
its the clearances again,
last time it was for sheep.
this time for golf and trumps greed.
when will folks homes come before corporate interests?
51

Logie Almond,

02/09/2009 09:27:45
They were bought and sold for Yankee gold
What a parcel of rogues in a nation.
Or SNP administration.
52

JohnnyR,

Callanish 02/09/2009 09:36:23
#49 In this actual case probably nothing; however if you read ALL the posts you'll see the point.

53

Buttress,

02/09/2009 09:40:19
Isn't it an odd co-incidence that Trump Junior and Sorial just happened to arrive unannounced and univited on the doorstep of Michael Forbes yesterday, when they knew this would be in the news?

It couldn't be, of course, that they wanted to make some story for the press to try and show just how 'unreasonable' opponents are is it? It's mighty strange that the supposed 'abuse' was reported in the press. Did they happen to take a reporter along too?

Sounds like a deliberate attempt to provoke Mr Forbes to me, in order to have something 'adverse' to report to the press. I'd be provoked and 'defiant' (who is he defying? Why is this bad?) if these clowns arrived on my doorstep unannounced and tried to steal my home too.

Own goal, Trump. Shot in foot.

54

ssj,

Aberdeen 02/09/2009 09:43:02
How can this be 'solved amicably and fairly' to quote Sorial, when the homeowners face the threat of having to sell their properties through bully-boy tactics?

Regardless of views on this development, most are against the use of CPO's on the residents' homes.

I would also think that using CPO's would surely fly in the face of the free market principle, simply because the threat to the residents would mean that they may have to sell up having taken less for their properties and land than without a CPO in place.

Most simply don't want to sell and should be respected for that.

This is a commercial development, not a national necessity such as a main road, hospital etc. Even in those cases, such as the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, every effort has been made in the plans to avoid consuming the homes/businesses that are on the route.

It will be a scandal if the use of CPO's goes ahead in this case.
55

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 02/09/2009 09:53:55
Although I am broadly in favour of Trump’s proposal – with conditions – I ask what sort of mega rich business man has to come to another country – that is currently being boycotted by a number of Americans – and come up with a plan that puts local people out of their own homes using all available resources to do so.
56

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 09:56:35
#48 & 54, Exactly my thoughts last night when I watched young master Trump and his minder, Sorial, doorstepping Mr Forbes to try and humiliate him for the cameras. Could have been a remake of the Godfather. This megalomaniac won't be content until he's built a replica of Atlantic City in Aberdeenshire - Sodom and Gomorrah for our time.
57

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 02/09/2009 09:56:48
#41 Rock on both shoulders "Aberdeen has got to be the most miserable place in the UK, Shire in hot pursuit, with the worst drivers and most unfriendly shop staff"
So you know the place well then?!!!
58

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 02/09/2009 09:59:16
The Americand are not really going to boycott Scotland as threatened over Lockerbie. They're going to send Trump to us instead!
59

tommytommy,

02/09/2009 10:12:21
"DONALD Trump jnr and right-hand man George Sorial made an unexpected visit to Michael Forbes's home yesterday in an attempt to speak to the defiant farmer.

After an anxious wait at the door, the Americans were chased off by Forbes, who unleashed a torrent of abuse at them. As they left, Mr Sorial commented: "This is what we have to deal with."

Well done Mr.Forbes.
Who do these people think they are calling unannounced to provoke an elderly man?
60

tommytommy,

02/09/2009 10:17:33
I cant fathom the population supporting an attempt to put their neighbours out their houses.

What kind of people are they that will support ambitious petty politicians decisions to feather their nests by "sooking" up to Trump?

If there is a fund set up to contest this draconian move I will donate to it.
61

Buttress,

02/09/2009 10:20:51
57 - you mean they took a camera crew along as well? Then it was a put up stunt. What a disgrace. Sounds like deliberate provocation to me. Trumpedup Junior and Sorial, what a pair of knaves.

If goons like those two turned up unannounced with an invited media audience on my doorstep I'd be hurling abuse, and good for Mr Forbes. Why can't they leave the man in peace? That goes also for the scum with cameras (and their editors) who went along with them, to report his discomfiture and try to make him seem 'unreasonable'.

This is becoming a very major scandal. What will they do next?

It's a golf course with some 'luxury' housing - or vice versa. It's for private greed, not public gain, despite those who will claim the McJobs are vital to the economy.
62

Buttress,

02/09/2009 10:31:43
My blood is boiling!

'This is what we have to deal with'

Yes - a man who wishes to live in peace in his own home and not bought out for the greed of Trump, who is NOT doing this for the good of anyone but himself and his bank account. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool manipulated by his PR machine, which has clearly got the press in thrall also.

Some people have principles and live by them. Money isn't all there is in life, but Trump and his henchmen clearly don't get it, do they?
63

,

02/09/2009 10:34:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
64

McGinty,

Glasgow & Aberdeen 02/09/2009 10:36:35
If I were Mr. Forbes, I would ask that Mr Trump buys up an equivalent area of neighbouring land, that he provides equivalent access roads and assurances that there would be not a squeak of disturbance, neither from the development in its building stages nor from its finished state, so that I could carry on living my life as before. I would then want to be shown how my property would be rebuilt brick for brick, board for board. All this to my satisfaction, before I even think about accepting. If not, then I would stay put, and ask for compensation for the time wasted. If, as this seems to be, is a case of one man's wishes over another, then this is surely reasonable enough. However I doubt if Mr Trump would accept. As far as rights are concerned, Mr Forbes was there first. First come, first served.
65

tommytommy,

02/09/2009 10:37:22
I note Martin Fords attempt to widen the debate.
Well done to him.

The people of Aberdeen will surely resist this attempt to slap them down.

It could be you or me in that firing line.
It is a worrying development.
66

ddmc,

02/09/2009 10:45:03
why doesnt Trump offer them a new house on his "greatest golf course in the wurld"
67

,

02/09/2009 10:45:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
68

Buttress,

02/09/2009 10:51:16
McJobs, in the end. Most of the money will line Trump's pockets. What a sad day when the economy depends on people like this, golf courses, 'luxury' homes for Americans and bullies like Junior and Sorial.
69

Buttress,

02/09/2009 10:53:32
Gareth Hoskins and Trump. What a sell-out.
70

blueinmo1,

missouri, usa 02/09/2009 10:53:50
Trump is a bottom-feeder. Men like him would trick his own mother out to johns to make a buck.

The only way he would get me out of my home would be in a pine box.

Time to throw rotten eggs at the Aberdeen Council.
71

Tom Cambeul,,

North 02/09/2009 10:54:10
The council in aberdeen has already been purchased by trump, so, soon trumpland will replace Scotland.
72

Not gay,

Huntly 02/09/2009 11:17:27
This is another example of the spineless councilors in power in the part of Scotland. It is obvious that they are also going to grant the orders for the compulsory purchase orders - how many new holiday homes will this produce for our councilors and officials?
73

MyricaGale,

Angus 02/09/2009 11:18:11
#72 (Tom). Thought we were Tescotland? Now you're saying we'll be Trumpland.
God forbid that Trump and that multi millionaire fellow at Tesco shoudl get together:

Trumpetescotland anyone?
74

tommytommy,

02/09/2009 11:23:09
#68

I was looking at this mottion.

"Councillor Martin Ford has tabled a motion for the council meeting on 1 October, opposing the use of CPOs to "force Aberdeenshire residents from their own homes on or adjacent to the Menie estate"
75

tommytommy,

02/09/2009 11:27:13
So where is the "fighting fund" for financing the case for staying in your own house?

If one isn't set up then get one up and running and you will get public backing.
76

McGinty,

Glasgow & Aberdeen 02/09/2009 11:27:37
Inward investment?!! What a joke. When the oil reserves were developed in the sixties and the seventies, it was done with the short term view. The Americans treated people from the Northeast as 'white n*****s' and 'slaves' and described workers as worse than Nigerians. Meanwhile, the profits went to the US or in tax whose uses have been questionable at best. (Norway on the other hand operated more cannily and have left large funds as a legacy for posterity. The upshot of it all was Piper Alpha.) While less is at stake here, issues are similar. All over the North of Scotland are follies to remind us of bad investment which profitted the profiteers but left little except desolation. In thirty years time, when all this has died down, we may be left with a fairly reasonable golf course, but the dunes will be gone for good, the buildings perhaps little better than the Aviemore Centre - the glory having departed replaced by graffiti, hoardings, vandalism, dilapidation and decay. Maybe a token hotel and pub left over. One is reminded of the Victorian development of Ravenscar, of which there is little left but whins and broom, whilst the developers will be vanished without trace.
77

PJ Walker,

East Lothian 02/09/2009 11:44:33
I thought Trump was close to bankruptcy? The day he got the green light for the project one of his biggest developments in Baja went t*ts up to the tune of several billion $$$$$'s!

I hope his backers have sufficient funds to finish off whatever they start
78

tassiestag,

rosebery 02/09/2009 11:49:57
bet trump disna ken the price o' a fish supper.
79

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 02/09/2009 12:08:29
#78 PJ Walker

"I thought Trump was close to bankruptcy?"

That is one reason to suspect that he is looking for a face-saving way out (see #46 above). Indeed, I would be surprised if he ever entered into any of his schemes without first making sure that such a way out was incorporated into the structure of the negotiations.

He is interested in appearing successful. If it becomes obvious that the scheme cannot continue, he needs to make sure that its failure will be blamed on someone else. In this case it will be the people who are refusing to accept his offer to buy them out and Aberdeenshire Council who will refuse to grant him compulsory purchase powers. See:

http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2525747.0.eviction_bid_threatens_trump_resort.php

This scheme is, I believe, already dead in the water.
80

Buttress,

02/09/2009 12:47:38
80 And when it is dead, there will be columns of comments here by people who will believe the PR nonsense which will be put about by Trumpery and his henchmen, that all he wanted to do was to build a nice golf course in memory of the country of his ancestors, but the short sighted people in that backward nation wouldn't bend over and be trampled on sorry I mean accept his inward investment and Gareth Hoskins Trumpery Towers. Or at least some of them won't. So he's taking his ball elsewhere.

Over the border, Hoskins has been given the job, by English Heritage and the National Trust for England and Wales, of building a new visitor centre at Hadrian's Wall, a World Heritage Site. Let's hope The Donald doesn't decide that's just the place for his next casino/golfcourse/luxury housing, because if a SSI isn't safe from him, nowhere is.
81

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 02/09/2009 12:56:16
#24 Kate,Zurich. Pictish, the lady says, so the name of the country of course is Pictland then?
#17 JohnnyR, Callanish, your knowledge of Tibet is as skewed as many others, who have not the faintest idea what they are talking about.Tibet is not a sovereign nation sunshine.Even the Dalai Lama accepts that Tibet is a part of China.The term 'Dalai'is a Chinese honorific bestowed on a previous Lama by the a Chinese emperor.It is strange that you consider Tibet to be a sovereign nation, yet not one other country on the planet recognises that.
As for your own country's history,methinks you are looking through rose coloured spectacles squire.Seem to remember Scots being in the van in Canada and the American war of Independence.Wasn't McQuarrie the first Governor of New South Wales including the prison colony at Botany Bay?
As for you knowing the history of 'my own people'? Depends who you read (If the Scotsman is any example, then the question answers itself).
Scots HAD an enviable reputation overseas, but they were no less culpable in the subjugation of India and China for profit. Ironic that it is Scotland now with a drugs problem. Hiding behind the butcher's apron, is a bit like Brown hiding behind MacCaskill!
HongKong was founded for the purposes of profit, not philanthropy!
82

William C Anderson III,

Levittown 02/09/2009 12:58:02
As an American I tell the people of Scotland to be wary of Mr.Trump.His life is all about greed and nothing else. Watch your government officials and see what ones are going on all paid for trips and golf outings.Mr.Trump will start sprinkling money on your government and will get his way.When he is done he will hire the cheapest foreign help he can find to work in his casinos.Make no mistake,this man pushes very hard to get his way,he will spread alot of money around. Keep your eyes open.
83

Rosscobhoy,

02/09/2009 13:04:09
Given the level of investment and revenue this project should generate, would it not be worthwhile for Aberdeen City Council to put something towards the purchase or offer the home owners free land elsewhere as a sweetener to make sure they are not losing out?
84

Lianachan,

Highlands 02/09/2009 13:09:21
I lost a lot of, if not all, respect for these people when they started comparing their plight to the clearances.
85

Esox Hunter,

Edinburgh 02/09/2009 13:15:23
~84 you just don't get it do you ?

The people involved have said thet they do not wish to move from their homes at any price and that should be the end of it.
86

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 02/09/2009 13:40:32
Trump doesn't get that either!
87

RSBuff,

The US of A 02/09/2009 14:11:41
I hope the home owners all the best! I can't stand Donald Trump. He's a blight on the US's psyche.
88

Jimmy Fae the West,

In the Land O' Green Ginger. (HULL) 02/09/2009 14:31:28
#2,

How odd that Trump born to a Scottish woman is called a visitor from oversees?

Methinks he may be much more Scottish that some posters pretending to be BritNats from North BritNation?

i am not allowed to state the garbage in this artice supported by you but are you aware that the land is actually Aberdeen councils scrub land?

Are you aware of the meaning of democracy?

Quote from the article reads; -The committee, however, voted by nine votes to two in favour of granting the Trump Organisation outline planning permission for four pieces of privately owned land on the edge of the Menie Estate and a small parcel of land owned by Aberdeenshire Council-.

SNP win again. Scotland wins again and democracy wins over fascists again.

Try telling the thousands being moved from their homes in London, that 2012 is bad for the people of Aberdeen who are paying for it, so Unionists are canceling it.

Add the Rugby World Cup redevelopments, then the bid for 2018 World football finals should also be abandoned as someone will have their council house torn down.

89

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 02/09/2009 15:44:38
Why isn't Trump forced to pay off the hundreds of millions he owes banks and former business associates before being allowed to also rip-off Scotland?
90

Buttress,

02/09/2009 15:58:33
89 - anyone who describes those he doesn't agree with as 'fascists' has lost the argument!

However, read that article in the Sunday Herald. This isn't the end of it.
91

pwd,

Borders 02/09/2009 16:35:18
The tactics of the Trump gang reek of bullying and blackmail. They will complement the totalitarian tendencies of Salmond & Co and disinherit those Scots who wish to keep their homes. How have we come to this?
92

AGNROB,

02/09/2009 17:04:59
Donald Trump's Mother was born and bred in Stornoway, He is half Scottish, I believe he has Cousins still up in Lewis and I believe his Sister visits Her Cousins every year I hope that these People don't have to move from their homes, that won't be fair, re-call history the Highland Clearances
93

cambeuluk,

UK 02/09/2009 17:26:25
#29

We shall just have to differ on our respective definition of what is "sensible and commendable", but as for some of the Trump millions? (tell that to his creditors) finding their way to the island of Lewis, I suggest you check with the people of Lewis - (i.e. those born and raised there, still live there and know the island, its people and its priorities better than any American visitor) what they think about the time that Trump was approached by the islanders to support the establishment of a hospice on Lewis. There is far more to being a Scot than where your mother (or father or granny) was born, far more than an accent or wearing the plaid. It is far more to do with where one's heart is. I may be mistaken, but from all indicators, Trump's (and all others who play the "I am of Scottish descent" when it suits them) heart lies not in Lewis nor indeed anywhere in Scotland.
94

,

02/09/2009 17:33:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
95

doug farquharson,

aberdeen 02/09/2009 17:40:49
this should be between trump and the four home owners not nimbys getting involved what did you think would happen when planning permission was granted.these people have been in their homes many years and are worth many times more what was payed for them. i,m sure if it was left to the people to get deals done it would be but to many people it has nothing to do with getting involved for their own agenda,s and the ne and the rest of scotland are going to end up lokking like backward thinking neeps.
96

,

02/09/2009 17:42:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
97

Beardy,

Menie 02/09/2009 17:49:57
#42 LAM there are two relevant points that you need to appreciate here. First, one that you question, is that the sums being offered by Trump and co are in the laughable and insulting bracket when compared to open market value, let alone a premium as some posters try to imply on this and other threads.

Second and more importantly, my home is simply not for sale. I am happy where I live and I intend staying there.

#61 tommytommy may I suggest you visit www.trippinguptrump.com where you should find a 'donate' button and an opportunity to sign an on line electronic petition which i would urge you to sign as well, please.

As for the cameras turning up on Mike Forbes doorstep, they were apparently waiting on him coming home and were there before Junior and Geo Sorial appeared, but it was the second time they knocked after being told to go away once that Mike Forbes swore at them.
98

glaswegian at heart,

florida 02/09/2009 17:50:53
I said it before I'll say it again Trump is an arrogant scum of the earth jerk,,,,,,,,,for him it has become a personal vendetta,,,,,notice he sends his lackey to do the dirty !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
99

Beardy,

Menie 02/09/2009 17:51:14
Spagan, please just grow up
100

Buttress,

02/09/2009 17:55:49
102 yes or go away! It's painful stuff to try to read, is spagan's ranting.

Thanks for the link:

"may I suggest you visit www.trippinguptrump.com where you should find a 'donate' button and an opportunity to sign an on line electronic petition which i would urge you to sign as well, please"

I have no doubt many will be rushing to sign up!
101

Blue Tooner,

02/09/2009 17:56:50
So DT Jnr and George Sorial take a media crew to Michael Forbes door to provoke an angry reaction from the poor guy to show the world how unreasonable he is! This whole thing has reached a level beyond a farce. Get out of this one Aberdeenshire Council, whatever the outcome of Trump's CPO request it will cause a storm. BTW, wasn't it made clear to local residents and at the Public Inquiry that no further land was required? Can you say whatever you like at these things? How could anyone in these enlightened times enjoy a game of golf on land that was forcibly cleared for the purpose?
102

McGinty,

Glasgow & Aberdeen 02/09/2009 18:00:27
Gets better

http://tinyurl.com/nps843
103

Goggsie #,

Fife 02/09/2009 18:09:58
I seem to remember that Alex Salmond supported the idea that this scheme was "called in" by the SE planning dept and subsequently was given the go ahead by their chief planner. Now it would appear that that scheme has altered. One can't help wondering if the amended scheme wasn't always top of the Trump agenda, but a bit to contentious (with compulsory evictions being required) to table as their original scheme.
104

Robert Burns,

Ocean Beach, San Diego, California, U.S.A. 02/09/2009 18:12:17
Yea homeonwers!!! Trump Trump!!!
105

Blue Tooner,

02/09/2009 18:16:37
106 - Aye Goggsie, I think you've just written what most folk think.
106

Buttress,

02/09/2009 18:17:01
Yes Blue Tooner, and we anti Trumpery Towers people were vilified in these pages for not thinking him the greatest thing to have hit Scotland since whisky.

The entire thing is a scandal for which certian politicians should shoulder the blame - nationally, locally.




107

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/09/2009 18:45:41
29 'to make omelettes some eggs may be broken'

A sentiment which the 1st Duke of Sutherland would have agreed with.
108

Buttress,

02/09/2009 18:50:19
"Susan Munro, who has lived at Leyton Cottage for the past 28 years, said Mr Trump gave her personal assurances that he did not need her land.

The 56 year old said: "The last thing Mr Trump said to me was Susan, I don't need your house, I don't need your land, I have plenty, we'll be good neighbours'. It's been my home for almost 30 years, but the council will just give in to Trump.

"This is only the start. Aberdeenshire has made a big mistake letting them in because nobody is going to benefit at the end of the day except Trump. It's our heritage, a protected bit of land." "

Clearly shome mishtake!

109

Buttress,

02/09/2009 18:51:49
"Despite not having included them in the original planning outline, Trump International Golf Links Scotland (TIGLS) now insists they are a "must-have" in order to create a "world-class destination".

Mr Milne, who owns Hermit Point, a converted cottage used as a coastguard lookout since the 1860s, says his historic home will be "bulldozed and replaced with grass".

"I'm disappointed but not surprised," he said.

"Disappointed by the scale of the vote, but not the outcome.

"We have taken legal advice and been advised that these current applications are technically invalid and therefore any granted permission would be technically unlawful.

"The intention is to challenge these in court. It is likely to be on the basis of all four households. My home is not for sale. My intention at the end of the day is to leave there horizontally in a box." "

110

Morry,

Scotland 02/09/2009 19:10:55
51 & 52, the last clearances were made to make way for a holidaymaker, so that he and his family could play polo in their garden which was ag land but now isn't.

112, Your resilience is to be admired, if not envied.
Bottom line is that regardless of your cause, your rights and your heritage, Trump wants and Trump will get because that is what all Trumps get, whether Scottish or not.

I wish you all the best in your fight, I hope you do win your case, but I have my reservations as to your chances,
unless you too have a bottomless purse, and even then nothing is guaranteed.
111

Donkey Hote,

02/09/2009 19:24:41

You judge a man by the company he keeps, Salmond and Trump are in this together, with Salmond as Trump's bagman.
112

Pilrig.,

Livingston 02/09/2009 19:28:19
Junior was taken aback. Nae doobt his heid was filled with romantic tales o' his granny's heilan hame back in Skatland.
Never mind jnr, there's plenty o' crawlers in the Aberdeen area who'll jump when you or yer auld man snap yer fingers.
113

Lianachan,

Highlands 02/09/2009 20:06:55
#95 & #110 Comparing this with the clearances is tactless in the extreme, and is something that could only be done by somebody whose knowledge of them is lacking somewhat.
114

Morry,

Highlands 02/09/2009 20:18:31
116, you do not see it as a clearance?
How do you see it then?
Been there? cleared I mean, I have, have you?
Trump is tactless in the extreme, as well as all those who follow him.
115

Buchan Wifie,

02/09/2009 20:22:47

Trump's Golf Resort is just a tiny part of the "Masterplan for the Future" (creepy...)
Our politicians have agreed to an industrial complex all the way from the Bridge of Don to Peterhead. If Trump's salemanship is successful there will be many more forced evictions and most of our precious farmland will be gobbled up.
(google - Energetica Aberdeenshire)

Salmond and Swinney don't care about Scotland's Independence.
Let's boot them out and make way for some real SNP leaders.

Big Cheer for Michael Forbes and his friends - our 21st Century Scottish Heros!
116

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 02/09/2009 20:38:39
It is time to change Scottish Planning Law and exclude the right of anyone to apply for planning permission on an occupied property that they do not own against the wishes of the owners. The 'Tangled Web Weavers' owe it to their countrymen and women. Why should any council be allowed to cause such stress and distress to decent people? It should be the law that such a council and its individual councillors can be sued for compensation.
117

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 02/09/2009 20:41:06
Were the unwanted visitors there to add to the stress and hasten the departure?
118

Labour Party Member,

02/09/2009 22:22:59
There is very little credible economic justification for this development. It will not contribute to prosperity. It may turn a tidy profit for the Trump Organisation. I cannot for the life of me imagine how in the 21st Century that you can be kicked out our own property so someone else richer can knock it down. Not to mention it is a site of Special Scientific Interest. The design is also appallingly bad taste. Have our leaders gone mad.
I am quite angry about this sad affair and offer empathy and help to those fighting this Development. Lets not let it happen!
119

Lianachan,

Highlands 02/09/2009 22:41:48
#117 I have no comment to make about Trump, and am not pro-Trump. I just hate to see the misuse of evocative historical terms. No, what these people are threatened with is absolutely not like the Highland clearances. Anybody who would claim otherwise, quite simply, doesn't know enough about the clearances for their opinion to carry much weight.
120

Scottyt,

Saint Paul, 02/09/2009 23:32:52
Keep the Donald at home; he's bought the votes to build and ruin a part of Scotland. Oh yes, if there are still the very rich around, it will bring money to Aberdeenshire but NOT at the expense of folk who live there or destroying a precious eco-system.
None of his properties in America are beautiful as is Aberdeenshire.
The very best of luck to the home-owners about to fight him in Court.
121

fritigern,

Inverness 02/09/2009 23:51:25
Welcome to Salmond's and the SNP's brave new third world Scotland. Stealing people's homes to build a leisure facilty for super rich financial criminals is a sure sign of the third world nation the SNP is going to create.
122

bumpkin,

02/09/2009 23:55:29
#122
the highlanders were removed from their homes against their will, by a combination of bribery, threats, and violence. Some compensation was paid ,on occasion, usually in the form of paid passage to america.

This situation is the modern equivalent, there is bribery and threats, and i am sure that it will end in violence if CP powers are used.

There was no economic justification for the highland clearances, just the daft notion of the lairds, and this is just a daft notion of trumps.

In the long run, the clearances were an economic failure for all concerned, as this resort will be.

The clearances had more to do with reducing the highland population, as the lairds feared a "french revolution" in scotland.
123

Lianachan,

Highlands 03/09/2009 00:24:20
#125 "the highlanders were removed from their homes against their will, by a combination of bribery, threats, and violence. Some compensation was paid ,on occasion, usually in the form of paid passage to america."

I could not have asked for a better example of what I said in #116, the second part in particular, so thanks.
124

Finlang,

Switzerland 03/09/2009 02:01:42
#82 Dragonhead

Kate #24 is right, and she didn't say the country is called Pictland. You did. (Check out the history of the Picts.) The *area* Kate described described is well-known locally as Pictland for obviously authentic reasons. My own lineage is there in bucketloads surviving in placenames as well as the generations who came before me and still populate the place. The Irish intrusion into what was to become called Scotland did few natives any favours. Just like Donald Pump and his latter-day mafiosi.
125

overton,

balmedie 03/09/2009 14:01:47
If CPO's are granted for the land aquisitions as noted for this great development then it can only benefit the majority in a similar way that land aquisition for the AWPR is for the greater good. Well done to the local councillors for approving the latest plans.
126

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 03/09/2009 14:44:35
Why is this story not on the front page as a National Issue? One has to access it by looking up the North-East section of news items. This development is of National Planning Law concern. It is setting standards never before allowed and therefore is just as important as Salmond's referendum bid.
127

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 03/09/2009 14:55:26
Vexatious! Provocative! Harassment! Has anyone thought of asking for ASBO orders to be taken out?
128

Buttress,

03/09/2009 15:21:31
I did consider that may be something to think about for those people who are being harassed in this manner.

A disgrace, and they are beyond the pale. How anyone can condone this sort of behaviour I do not know.

And as for CPO and 'greater good', really this would set a precedent which may come back to haunt those who think it a good idea.

It could be your home next.
129

overton,

balmedie 03/09/2009 17:49:31
CPO's, if used for thr common good should be viewed as acceptable. In the case of the properties at Menie, if the owners do not want to negotiate, then as a last resort CPO's should be instigated. The development is too big an opportunity to have jeopardised by an extreme minority. Similarly no one wants to see the AWPR held up by unneccessary discussions regarding land ownership - that project also being for the common good.
130

Buttress,

04/09/2009 00:22:08
This isn't for the common good, it's for a private developer to make cash from, and ruin an area. To twist this as common good is bizarre.

It's not what a CPO should be used for.

I like the website www.trippinguptrump.com
131

overton,

balmedie 04/09/2009 06:53:48
Any project which generates substantial a volume of jobs and income for the area is arguably for the common good and as such should receive as much support as neccessary from the local authorities and if that eventually ends up with the instigation of CPO's because of the intransigence and mischief making of a tiny minority then so be it.
132

tommytommy,

04/09/2009 07:47:51
#134

If the project was a public funded one designed to enhance commerce and communication I might agree with you but this is a housing development come golf course fronted by Mr.Trump and sold to developers to build and sell for profit.

The intransigent minority that you refer to are people who will be evicted from their homes.

The legislation is clear in that this minority have rights .See the Human Rights Act for example.

What is so awful is that they are being harrassed and stressed and made to seem unreasonable(you call them mischief makers) as they battle to retain their homes.

Someting is very wrong with your outlook.
133

,

04/09/2009 09:34:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
134

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 09:52:31
I thought the tide was turning in favour of dumping Trump and his planning shenanigans, but I was wrong! Judging by all the comments above, the tide has TURNED!!! It is the threat of CPOs that has lost Trump nearly all of his support, and I suspect that he will be struggling from now on to 'persuade' people to believe in all his claims of benefit to the north-east of Scotland. We sussed long ago that the only 'good cause' you want to benefit is yourself.
135

,

04/09/2009 10:04:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
136

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 10:08:11
Oh, you were there were you? ..............
137

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 10:09:03
Hmmmmmmm - methinks we know each other, Cooncillor!!!
138

overton,

aberdeen 04/09/2009 10:21:21
#140
No we don't know each other but you are definately the nutty, fat guff.....also when you are leafleting Balmedie try not talking to yourself all the time it makes you look very disturbing and is upsetting the local population.
139

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 10:29:58
I think you'll find it was the group Tripping Up Trump who were leafletting Balmedie, asking them to sign their petition: http://38degrees.org.uk/page/s/aberdeenshire
Have you signed yet?
140

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 10:31:08
Enough, now back to filling in my benefits form!!!!!!!!
141

overton,

balmedie 04/09/2009 13:55:13
#143 Fat Guff

That's right you get on with your parasitic lifestyle and while your at it why don't you see if you can get day release to Carstairs where you may get some support (but no cure) for your quite obvious mental illness.
142

Sue E,

Inverurie 04/09/2009 14:26:58
Oh Allan, you say such lovely things .......
143

tommytommy,

05/09/2009 08:47:05
Overtons comments typify the cause he supports.

If you don't give me what i want i will abuse you and harrass you until you give up.

There is something very wrong if you think that is is acceptable to harrass and stress elderly people and threaten them with eviction to enable someone else to profit from their situation.

Surely that is a form of abuse.?It is abuse.
Elder abuse.
144

Buttress,

15/09/2009 17:20:23
Overton has made many of us laugh over a long period of time with his support for Trump. He's an offensive fool, best treated as such.
145

Prudence,

19/10/2009 09:22:52
#72
"How many new holiday homes will this produce"

www.northbalemedie.com
146

Prudence,

19/10/2009 09:39:14
Architecture and Design Scotland (A+DS) is Scotland's national champion for good architecture, design and planning in the built environment. Statement .
Balmedie
26 August 2009
Project Title: ABS 18: Balmedie
Details: Outline Planning Permission for Golf Course and Resort Development – Planning
Location: Land at Leyton Farm, Balmedie, Aberdeen; Land and property at Mill of Menie and Menie Fishing Station, Aberdeen; Council land at Menie Estate, Balmedie, Aberdeen.
Use type: Mixed Use / Housing / Leisure / Infrastructure
Client Developer: Trump International Golf Links Scotland
Lead Designer(s): Gareth Hoskins Architects Ltd.
Planning Authority: Aberdeenshire Council
Planning Status and Ref: F/APP/2009/1620; F/APP/2009/1631; F/APP/2009/1633
Issue Date: 14 July 2009
PDF Balmedie 28KB PDF


We note that the applicant’s supporting statements advise that, if incorporated in the masterplan, the additional land identified would “improve the design and operation of the golf resort” and “facilitate a better development.” It is not possible to comment at this time as to whether this would be the case, as a masterplan for the consented development site has not yet been supplied.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.