Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Inside the life-saving £60m supercomputer



View Video
Download Video

Video

Supercomputer: Take a tour round the UK's most powerful computer with scotsman.com
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 January 2008
SYSTEMS manager Luis Popovics edges down a narrow corridor in what looks like little more than a typical gym locker-room.
However, behind the nondescript, burgundy panels sits a £60 million technological innovation that could help answer some of the biggest questions in science.

Meet Hector, the most advanced supercomputer in the United Kingdom and a machine that can perform no fewer than 63 trillion calculations every second.

Based at Edinburgh University's Advanced Computing Facility, Hector, which stands for High-End Computing Terascale Resources, will be used by researchers at the cutting edge of their fields.

Its rather plain appearance belies an artificial intelligence that could be instrumental in tackling climate change, developing new drugs and producing the next generation of passenger aircraft.

Hector is located just outside the Scottish capital, but scientists based anywhere will have virtual access to the phenomenal resource if they are granted permission through an application process based on excellence.

And the machine can be in multiple use at any one time, so ground-breaking research in various fields can be carried out simultaneously.

For example, the National Centre for Atmospheric Science will use it to produce more detailed environmental models of the planet.

The hope is that by creating high- resolution models, environmental processes that currently remain unseen can be studied. This might then be used for climate-change forecasting.

Researchers at Oxford University will use the supercomputer to calculate the way electrical impulses travel around the heart. They could then use this information to work out how best to correct the electrical activity when it goes awry.

Dr Joe Pitt-Francis, one of the project leaders, said: "For the past two years, we have been developing new programming codes that model the heart's electrical and mechanical activity.

"We are now ready to test these on the supercomputer and, if we can build a reliable and robust model, we can hopefully experiment with new ways to control this activity – which might eventually lead to better technology to treat arrhythmias, for example."

The equations that make up the model heart on Hector could be altered to give it an electric shock and view the outcome. A virtual pacemaker could also be implanted. Meanwhile, Bristol University hopes to use Hector to speed up the process of designing drugs, while University College London even wants to employ it to find new uses for clay.

Hector's ingenuity also extends to providing information about how best to manage commercially important fisheries.

Dr Emma Young, of the British Antarctic Survey, wants to use the supercomputer to work out how the larvae and eggs of fish get swept around the oceans to set up new populations or replenish existing colonies.

She has developed a computer model to simulate how currents are influenced by the atmosphere and other factors.

For the simulation, the sea is divided into a grid of about 4.5 million cells and, within each of these, key factors are predicted at five-second intervals for several "virtual months". The level of detail means it can be done only with an extremely large computing capacity.

Dr Young said: "Currents are affected by tides, wind, heat exchange between the air and sea, melting water from glaciers, and so on. We are able to simulate different oceanographic conditions to see which ones might be important for transporting material away from spawning grounds and the likelihood of eggs and larvae being retained."

Hector's capacity is difficult to grasp. It is capable of performing 63 trillion calculations – the equivalent of every person on earth each carrying out 10,000 each – per second.

To match its capacity, 12,000 desktop computers would have to operate at full tilt.

Hector was officially unveiled yesterday by Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, who joked: "I suspect Northern Rock is beyond it."

However, he went on to say that Britain had an illustrious past in science and he was keen for this to be promoted and encouraged. He said: "The facility here means things that might have taken years to develop can be brought forward much more quickly."

Edinburgh University has secured Hector by virtue of its Parallel Computing Centre, which has a formidable worldwide reputation. It submitted the successful bid at European level to manage the project, while American computing firm Cray secured the contract to provide the hardware.

The scheme came in ahead of time and below budget – although operating costs over its lifespan are likely to be higher than predicted because of rising energy costs.

Professor Arthur Trew, director of the computing centre, said: "Hector is the latest UK national facility for high- performance computing and it's therefore the most powerful computer in the UK, which is going to be used for computational research by groups of academics.

"Hector has a performance of around 50 to 60 million million calculations per second. It's necessary to have that speed because many of the problems it will investigate are very complex – from trying to study the earth's climate, to better aircraft, to new drugs. The current UK national facility is called HPCX and is run by Edinburgh. Hector is four times faster."

The supercomputer is in the top 20 machines worldwide – or in the top ten if the weapons industry is discounted.

Back in the tennis court-sized room, the man in the overalls – system manager Luis Popovics – completes his walk between the "gym lockers".

It becomes clear that the top of his tea trolley is stocked with pieces of advanced technology that can "talk" to each other.

The beauty of the supercomputer is that it allows for lots of parts of the computer to converse continuously, while making numerous calculations simultaneously.

Security measures are in place to protect the system from thieves who may steal to order.

In keeping with Hector's prosaic appearance, there are no retina or fingerprint scanning devices in place. Instead, there is a labyrinth of clanking security doors which operate on timelock.

However, although Hector may be at the cutting edge of technology today, its time as the toast of the scientific community is limited. It will be upgraded in 2009, and again in 2011. In six years, however – having run up a bill of about £113 million – it will be obsolete.

• NOISE POLLUTION

THE aim is to reduce the sound of jet engines. The noise comes from the way the air flows from the engine's nozzles. Computers can be used to create a model that breaks the air into cells, which can be studied to work out how the sound is produced. Once this is achieved, researchers can work out how to reduce the level of noise. The greater the power of the computer, the smaller the cells can be made. Engineers have been experimenting with nozzle shapes for decades and have found a serrated shape works – but no-one knows why.

• EMISSIONS

TO cut harmful emissions from jet aircraft and gas turbines in power stations, scientists need to know how the flame is behaving in the combustion technology. This cannot be done by experiments and a computer model of the flame needs to be created. The more powerful the computer, the smaller pieces the model can be broken down into. The computer can then calculate what is happening at each stage of the – very, very fast – combustion process. Scientists will pass the results on to the industry, which can create cleaner systems.

• SCANNERS



THE goal is to make these vital diagnostic tools more efficient. Superconductors – materials through which electricity flows without resistance – could be used to create better scanners. Current superconductors are ceramics, which are brittle and not easy to process. They also have complex atomic structures, which are difficult to break down.

To understand why they are superconductors, all the electrons must be looked at simultaneously, which is an extremely complex mathematical problem.

• CLIMATE CHANGE

HECTOR could be used to produce improved forecasts of the possible consequences of global warming, and a more detailed representation of the Earth than has previously been possible.

At present, scientific models break the Earth into grid boxes of about 300sq km for the atmosphere and 100sq km for the ocean. By shrinking these to 100sq km and 30sq km respectively, more detail could be shown, such as the impact of the mountains on the atmosphere, or small tidal patterns. This could better indicate how climate processes work.

• FISHERIES

SCIENTISTS want to establish how larvae and the eggs of fish get swept around the sea, to better manage commercially-important fisheries. Sea currents are affected by factors such as tide, wind and heat. These can be simulated by a computer model, which can be altered to create different conditions in the oceans. To do this, the sea must be broken down into millions of cells. The number of calculations required to do this needs a hugely powerful supercomputer.

• HEART DISEASE

MEDICAL researchers are keen to improve our understanding of how the heart works and to develop new treatments for heart disease. The new supercomputer could create a model that simulates how electrical impulses travel around the heart. The contraction of the heart muscle is governed by these impulses which, in turn, are dictated by physiological factors. These factors can be described as a series of highly-complicated equations. Experiments could be done on the model – for instance, fitting a virtual pacemaker or inflicting an electrical shock.

The full article contains 1573 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 January 2008 5:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Video Archive
 
1

Arty Facila-Arty,

15/01/2008 00:59:26
PM still backing him, but will Hain face police inquiry into £103,000 donations?
2

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta... captured Mexican territory 1845 15/01/2008 02:05:13
Inside the life-saving £60m supercomputer
------------------------------------------

Fantastic.dudes and GOOD Luck.

But had U gone to Austin, TX, U could have save yourselves around £20m.

UT and Dell have built a super computer that is 10 times faster, using parallel CPU's with very low heat emissions.

Hey What Ever

GC

3

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 03:32:54
Carefull of your jokes darling, the Police may not find you so funny...
4

Statsman,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 05:24:43
Garbage in. Garbage out. Not even a supercomputer can change that.

If this super-computer predicts we are all doomed, you can assume the people that made up the scenarios weighted it to be so.

Would the utter folly of Mann et al be any less likely with a Super Computer?

No.

Mann et al IS Global Warming but Mann et al is now an utter joke.

Presumably the people that went along with this nonsense had too much invested.
5

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 06:27:33
Just don't let Dr Chandra near it!
6

Drum Major,

15/01/2008 06:53:54
It is the Big Brother Machine. It exchanges information with the Big Brother machines in Canberra, Texas, Washington etc around the world. Another one is being installed in the WMD building in Iraq.
7

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 15/01/2008 07:05:05
Yeah, yeah. But will it do the vacuum cleaning?
8

Mapper,

Edinburghshire 15/01/2008 07:18:55
I wonder what the video showed?
Pity the link is broken.
(Sorry there was an error accessing the page you requested)
9

JulesF,

15/01/2008 07:56:50
Well the good news is that it will not be powered by windows so it might actually just work !
10

Unimpressed one,

15/01/2008 08:37:14
#9, Dave, when you hear that Washington is requesting an uplink then start to worry! But seriously, it's amazing how people are swept up in awe at sophisticated technology. I remember the late Marvin Minsky in the 1980s saying that computers would become so smart that they would keep us as pets. Someone else (an 'expert') stated that by now most of us would have that much leisure time we wouldn't know what to do with it, because machines would be doing all the grafting. Wait a minute, for some that is actually true! But you get the drift.
11

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 08:54:20
mmmmmmmmmmmm.....

NICE BOXES!

http://www.cray.com/products/xt4/
12

Filosofo,

Kirkcaldy 15/01/2008 09:26:09
#2, Sure, everything is bigger, and better, in Texas, Galactic Cannibal.
Maybe your Austin supercomputer could help you with that age-old conundrum: why does EVERYone detests Americans?
13

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 09:57:33
#11. I think Marvin Minsky's still about, aged 80.
14

Gothic Rose,

15/01/2008 10:22:38
Just so long as it can do the numbers.
15

Vigilant Watcher,

Bo'ness 15/01/2008 10:32:07
It's still 'garbage in, garbage out'! It will just spew it out a lot quicker, giving even more 'evidence' of whatever the researchers wish to prove.

If, particularly in the area of climate change, it is used to properly research the earth's climate and not to simply justify existing 'accepted' consensus then good and well but I have my doubts.

The application process may exclude real scientists whose research may contradict existing dogma and only 'granted permission through an application process based on excellence'.

What constitutes 'excellence'? Accepted theories, existing views, concensus or real cutting edge research attempting to understand the planet we live on and the universe in inhabits.

However, Hector itself, IS an example of 'excellence'!
16

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 10:42:24
Computers have their uses. However they are only as good as the programmers who program them and the data fed into them.
17

anchovy1,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 11:33:10
GalacticCannibal: A genuine question - if the UT machine is is 10 times faster than HECToR, why is it ranked 22nd in the world to HECToR's 17th? And as I pointed out in the last article you attached that comment to, the budget for this machine includes two further substantial technology upgrades.

I really can't see how UT is the bargain you say it is. Are you in fact Michael Dell?

Iain.
18

Mcsnagpile,

15/01/2008 11:34:21
I like Titanic style descriptions that still persist in our media. The computer is so large it could burn twenty bags of coal per minute; you could fry 100 hundred breakfasts on it. If it had wheels you could use it as a steam roller. But is still cannot beat a few pounds of jelly inside a cranium.
Why not tell us about its fuzzy logic capabilities, neural abilities etc instead of models that are limited to the maximum variables of the human brain. Alright it can work out models and do its tables. Can it reason why and prove that 1+1 can never equal two as 1=1 is an absolute absurdity in reality.
19

Mick W.,

Nuneaton 15/01/2008 11:41:12
It has been estimated that if ALL the variables in the climate were programmed into the most powerful computer it would take longer than the age of the universe to predict 100 years into the future.The only way is to wait and see.
20

Ron S,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 12:22:25
If it cost £60m and has the power of 12000 PCs, it would surely have been much cheaper to buy the 12000 PCs at, say, £500 each and keep the £54m change.
21

Morbo,

I will destroy you 15/01/2008 13:02:35
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
22

JulesF,

15/01/2008 13:47:04
#21

The problem there is that if you bought 12000 PCs, at any one time you would expect 30% to have blue-screened, 30% to be rebooting from a blue screen and 30% to be downloading and installing updates. Therefore you would only have a useable 10% of your computing power.

Thankfully enough I hadn't noticed Microsoft releasing Vista for Supercomputers (basic/premium/ultimate) or otherwise.

:)
23

clach,

Far Outer Hebrides 15/01/2008 15:14:02
#21

This is the obvious conclusion from reading this article, but that is only because it is a poorly written article.

The technical challenge (and expense!) in building such as massively scaling computer is providing a high-speed interconnect between all of the 11,300 CPUs (cores) of HECToR.

A well written program which takes, say a day running on this HECToR machine could not run in parallel on 12,000 desktop machines (connected together over, say, a fast internet connection), it would be lucky to run on more than 20-100 of them simulataneously, and even then it would run very slowly. So instead of taking one day on HECToR, it would take on the order of a year (if it could run at all) on the 12,000 desktop machines.

NB There are grid-computing projects, such as SETI and folding@home, which make use of thousands of desktop machines, but they make use of different algorithms.
24

clach,

Far Outer Hebrides 15/01/2008 15:29:36
#2

The machine at TACC ("Lonestar"), impressive as it is, is certainly not 10x faster than HECToR. Not by any metric I know of. You clearly don't know anything about supercomputers. Your misguided comments here give the impression to everyone that you are both dimwitted and insecure.

25

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 16:09:33
clach,

If I am not mistaken, the desktop machines would also have to pass the info down the OSI layers from application to physical in order to pass information between multiple operating systems whilst HECToR is not subject to the same limitations for cpu control or data movement internaly.
26

John1,

Stirling 15/01/2008 16:18:20
13 Filosofo:
Read "Why do people hate America?" by Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies(Icon 2002). I agree with it 90% of the time, which is good going. Incidentally, I don't (hate America that is).
27

circa53,

Bloomfield Hills, Mich. USA 15/01/2008 16:40:26
The knowledge here is mindblowing! I heard that if you locked a hundred monkeys in a room with a hundred computers they could write something intelligent.......
28

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 17:12:38
28 circa53

Just for ref:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem_in_popular_culture
29

Mcsnagpile,

15/01/2008 17:16:39
remember it is not always the size of your calculator that counts.
30

JulesF,

15/01/2008 17:21:39
Of course if you put 100 American monkeys in a room all they'd manage is to find a way of shooting each other in the back.
31

S MacLeod,

15/01/2008 17:42:51
31 JulesF,

Yep, crystal meth sure is evil stuff!
32

Mcsnagpile,

15/01/2008 18:12:06
One million monkeys in a room for one hundred years = infinite excrement + infinite banana skins.
33

scuirle,

Derry 15/01/2008 18:14:45
#30 Darn tootin'
34

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta... ..a captured Mexican territory 1845 15/01/2008 19:03:33
5
clach,
Far Outer Hebrides 15/01/2008 15:29:36
#2

The machine at TACC ("Lonestar"), impressive as it is, is certainly not 10x faster than HECToR. Not by any metric I know of. You clearly don't know anything about supercomputers.
---------------------------------------------------
Your misguided comments here give the impression to everyone that you are both dimwitted and insecure.
------------------------------------------------------

Dude you could be right ..then again U could be wrong.

Dude who is everyone ?

Does ur everyone put any bread on my table , wine on my table , shrooms on my table. etc NO they do not.

So why should I care a dam what ur everyone thinks of GC.

Every fast computer ever designed and built in my country the US, out-computes and cools faster, and cost far less, than any fast computer built anywhere else on this planet.

That is A FACT dude.
We lead the world when it comes to design, development, manufacture and application of electronic technology and the production of WMD's. Not forgetting the production of food for the have-nots like CHINA and Africa.

Adios Umbre

GC

35

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

15/01/2008 19:53:38
#25
Stating that GC is a dim-witted and insecure dude, reinforced by his hilariously blustering "response" in which every crackpot OPINION is a FACT (DUDE)is a given.

How anyone purporting to be so American should waste his time trawling so diligently through a Scottish newspaper website (Scotland is after all "a pipsqueak province of the UK") beggars belief. If we really are so unimportant and insignificant, why this unhealthy obsession? GET A LIFE!

Can you imagine any of us being so obsessed by the American press? I don't think so! But can anyone REALLY hate this most ridiculous example of American "culture"? I don't think so.

Please rant on, Dude, and keep the rest of us laughing!
36

,

15/01/2008 20:23:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

15/01/2008 20:37:42
#38
Hey Dude, GC, GalacticClown.

That was a corker! (as we Brits say)

Hi to the GF from us - and PLEASE keep entertaining us!!

PS Shouldn't it be "Adios HOMBRE" and not "Adios UMBRE" (though I appreciate your linguistic prowess, and of course your machismo, are far in advance of mine).
38

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

15/01/2008 20:54:07
Hey, Dude, don't make it bad
Take a sad song and make it better
Remember to let her into your heart
Then you can start to make it better.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.