Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Jury attacks navy over diabetic officer left to die



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 March 2008
THE mother of a Scottish naval officer left to die in a diabetic coma because her shipmates thought she was drunk yesterday said that her daughter had been "badly let down" by her comrades.
Lieutenant Emma Douglas, 29, was found dead aboard frigate HMS Cornwall in Plymouth on 3 October, 2004 – hours after being seen lying semi-naked on her cabin floor.

Yesterday, at the conclusion of an inquest into her death, the jury condemned
the care Lt Douglas received in the days before she died and criticised the Royal Navy over her death.

Coroner Ian Arrow said at the hearing in Plymouth that he would be writing to the General Medical Council, the Royal Navy and Ministry of Defence about the jury's findings. The jury returned a "narrative" verdict – one in which cause of death is not categorised.

Last night, the dead officer's mother, Cynthia, of Huntly in Aberdeenshire, said

she was considering asking the High Court in London to review the coroner's decision to remove a verdict of unlawful killing from the options open to the jury at the inquest.

The inquest was told that Lt Douglas had been seen by a seaman "gurgling" on the floor of her cabin and naked from the waist down the day before she died. The sailor shut the door of the cabin and left her there. Shipmates assumed she was drunk.

But post-mortem tests later showed she had died from diabetic keto-acidosis, which is treatable.

Lt Douglas had gone to a navy doctor, Surgeon Commander Marcus Evershed, at the HMS Drake Medical Centre in Plymouth four days before her death, complaining of constant vomiting and massive weight loss, but had been diagnosed with oral thrush.

Speaking after the jury returned its verdict, Mrs Douglas said: "Sadly, we shall always believe she was badly let down by her naval colleagues. No-one has accepted any responsibility or been held in any way accountable for Emma's death."

The family, she said, would like to see "responsibility laid at the door of those who were to blame for her daughter's death".

"We need to have somebody – an individual or individuals – so that we can say, well, they were responsible for whatever reason," said Mrs Douglas.

"The jury have found that, when Emma attended a medical consultation at HMS Drake, she was not asked relevant questions, nor were appropriate investigations undertaken to determine the underlying cause of Emma's illness.

"The jury have also found that, after the discovery of Emma on her cabin floor was reported to the officer of the day, he failed to take any appropriate action."

Mrs Douglas added: "We hope that the evidence given at the inquest and the findings of the jury will enable the Royal Navy to review its procedures to ensure that no other member of the service loses their life in similar circumstances.

"I would like to think this would never happen to anyone's child again – but it probably will at some point."

In its verdict, the jury criticised the medical consultation before Lt Douglas's death, at which her diabetes was not diagnosed.

The actions of the shipmate who closed her cabin door also came in for criticism. If the correct procedures had been followed, they would have established whether Lt Douglas was asleep or whether alcohol or illness were factors.

Given the abnormality of the officer's state of undress, and the fact she was on the floor with noisy breathing, it should have "triggered a greater response", the jury said.

Coroner Mr Arrow told the hearing he hoped the case had highlighted how diabetes could affect a healthy young person and underlined the importance of seeking help.

A Royal Navy spokesman said lessons had been learned and procedures tightened as a result of the case and an internal inquiry. The inquiry identified the lack of a formal process at the time on HMS Cornwall for checking on those who chose to live on board during leave.





The full article contains 671 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 06/03/2008 06:58:11
I seriously doubt that she was left lying on the floor for any length of time.
The tragedy is that medicine is not an exact science.
The navy did not make her ill and it certainly was not unlawful killing.
2

OhIdoliketobe,

beside the seaside 06/03/2008 07:44:19
Is it necessary to say she was found "semi-naked"?

Is this a quality newspaper....or did I stumble onto the Daily Record's website by mistake. Unnecessary detail I think
3

Aye Right...,

06/03/2008 09:52:58
4# I think they are making the point that given the unusual circumstances that further investigation was warranted as to why she was lying like that..
4

Gothic Rose,

06/03/2008 09:57:45
A perfect example of "action of inaction" by unquestioning "Knowitalls"
5

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 06/03/2008 10:42:07
A tragedy undoubtedly, but why the need to find someone to blame?
6

WKKB,

06/03/2008 10:42:18
#3 If she had been found on the floor and immedicate action didn't take place then she was left on the for too long. Any length of time, especially after being discovered was too long. AND if she'd been seen just 4 days earlier complaining of not feeling well, vomiting and a dramatic weight loss someone should have been checking on her well being. You're correct that the Navy didn't make her ill but she WAS ill and reported it to the medics only to be misdiagnosed and not treated for the problem, therefore at least some responsibility should be taken by the Navy. If you went to a Dr here on land and complained of severe vomiting and weight loss and days later you were dead do you think your family would let it go? Especially after finding out it was something completely treatable? I hope mine wouldn't. Dr's MUST take responsibility for their diagnosis, afterall, they're the ones who went to school to find out how to be the all important Dr that we trust our lives to. If you're an IT tech and something goes wrong with the website or computer they don't call a chef to fix the problem, they come to YOU, the one trained to KNOW!
7

Daft Old Git,

06/03/2008 10:57:38
#4
It may explain why the bloke that found her didn't go into the room and leave himself open to all sorts of allegations. It is relevant to the story
8

Doreen,

The Cyber Shebeen 06/03/2008 11:26:16
9...That bloke, could quite easily have found a female colleague to enter the room with him and check on Emma....or notified a superior....his error is that he assumed she was drunk and left it at that...very sad...
9

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 06/03/2008 12:05:22
#3 in rural Scotland

Is it not a myth that farmers and agriculture workers have common sense and the "get-it-done" mentality that has made them renowned for simple solutions to common problems for centuries?

Your ignorant and uninformed comment is misplaced. She went to a shipboard doctor who misdiagnosed her condition which led to her eventual demise.

A little more compassion on your part would be welcome to this sad state of affairs.

You have insulted her family and friends by your callous remarks and should have kept them to yourself or just shared them with your cows or sheep or whatever.

10

SirJockland61™,

06/03/2008 15:01:04
3 nabodican

What absolute nonsense you speak. The RN owed her a duty of care and totally failed. The whole ethos of the Services is about camaraderie and there couldn't have been much on this ship. In other news stories it has been reported that the 'Officer of the Day' a Warrant Officer decided after having it reported to him that nothing needed to be done. In my day in the RN (sadly a long time ago) a Warrant Officer who is in fact a promoted Chief Petty Officer and not an Upper Deck Officer from the Ward Room, would never have been Officer of the Day. Standards are slipping - If I had not received good mate ship when I was in the Navy and on the odd occasion got absolutely 'Shiters' I would not be here today to post this comment.

11TimW1234 I couldn’t agree more with your very sensible post.
11

Shuggie,

Canada 06/03/2008 18:22:17
#12 Sir Jock
In my day, possibly an equally long timw ago, a warrant officer frequently served as officer-of-the-day on small ships without any noticeable "slipping of standards." I susect the MO's diagnosis of "Oral thrush" was correct as far as it went. He just did not look far enough for reasons as to why a healthy young woman should have such extensive oral thrush.
Much sympathy to the family.
12

SirJockland61™,

06/03/2008 19:08:10
13 Shuggie

I must be older than you Shuggie as in my day the RN did not have Fleet Chiefs or WO's as they are referred to now - it was Chief Petty Officer and that was it. However there are two parts to this tragic story. The first is the quality of medical care that she received. I know it is media stories but one paper has said that she had lost 4 stone in weight. If this is true maybe a second opinion might have been a good idea. The second part of the story refers to the care that she received from the Officers and crew of this ship. In my earlier post I mentioned camaraderie and standards and I stand by that.

Sadly none of this matters anymore and as you say much sympathy to her family.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.