Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Meet the machine that can move mountains

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 January 2008
FIRST, there was a rumble like thunder, then a roar similar to a train approaching, and finally, the sight and sound of a mountain being carved open, as the nose of a giant tunnelling machine breached the last few metres of rock.
Workers gather after 'Eliza Jane' completes her task
Workers gather after 'Eliza Jane' completes her task
At 11:16am yesterday, to the cheers and applause of hundreds of workers, Eliza Jane finally saw daylight for the first time in 16 months, her giant head spinning as she demolished the solid wall, churning it into rubble.

Through the cloud of dust, the sharp end of the 200 metre-long tunnel- boring machine (TBM), which was given its name by local schoolchildren, emerged on to a bleak plateau, where one of the biggest civil engineering projects in Scotland is taking shape.

It was a significant milestone in the £140 million project to build a major hydro power station at Glendoe, near Fort William, on the shores of Loch Ness, the first development of its kind for 50 years and perhaps the last on this scale in Scotland.

The construction work began in February 2006, 2,000ft above the loch in the Monadhliath mountains.

The scheme, being developed by Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE), involves a dam, 35 metres high and 905 metres long, being built at the head of Glen Tarff and a power station constructed in a cavern 250 metres below ground level, inside Borlum Hill.

It will be fed from a reservoir more than a mile long and capable of holding eight million cubic metres of rainwater, collected from 60 square miles of surrounding hillside.

A 5.3-mile tunnel will collect water and take it to the reservoir, while five miles of tunnels will channel the water from the reservoir to the power station. That is where Eliza Jane, which went to work in September 2006, came in. It has been chewing into the hillside, cutting through about 1.8 metres of rock every hour.

Just before Christmas, there were only 2.3 metres to go and yesterday, the breakthrough was made by the two 14-strong crews employed by the German contractor Hochtief.

Christian Zimmerman, the TBM manager, said: "The moment we pushed through was amazing. It's been 15 months of work in quite a dangerous job and not a nice environment. So to complete a little piece of Scottish history was a great feeling."

Angus Speirs, resident engineer at the tunnel site, said: "This is a major milestone and its exciting for us to see the machine completing its work, but it's by no means the finishing line."

Work will continue to complete the dam, create the reservoir and build the power station. It is hoped it will be operational from the end of next year and, at a capacity of 100 megawatts, there will be enough for a city the size of Glasgow at peak output.

However, for a scheme dubbed the "power of Scotland", the question is, when will we see your likes again?

The arrival of hydropower was a milestone in the development of the Highlands. The North of Scotland Hydro Electric Board was created in 1943 by Tom Johnston, then Secretary of State for Scotland, who saw hydro power as a trigger for economic regeneration. Work was created for 11,000 people, with 56 power stations built, the bulk of them between 1948 and 1963, and the last in Loch Awe.

Today, SSE controls 70 power stations generating 1,000 MW, enough for 2.5 million homes.

But the political and environmental landscape has changed. As one senior SSE official said of new hydro stations: "We have proved we can build them, but it needs the political will. The government has to find a balance between renewable generation and the environmental disbenefits."

Peter Donaldson, renewable generation manager at SSE, said his predecessors had carried out all the good schemes. He said: "What's left is more difficult to develop and therefore more expensive, so can you justify the investment?

"The hills in Scotland are not that high, and once you are away from the west coast, it's not that wet. You have to look for schemes where you can get enough water to make useful amounts of energy."

He said Glendoe could have been developed previously but would have taken longer and cost more. "They did not have a tunnel boring machine so would have had to drill and blast the whole thing, so it wouldn't have been viable," he said.

"At Glendoe we had to come up with a scheme that was relatively environmentally benign. Good schemes in which you can invest so much money and produce a useful amount of energy from are few and far between. There are not really the sites available and if there are, you could run into environmental and cost difficulties."

But Brian Wilson, a former energy minister, believes it can be done and he is calling for a review of Scotland's hydro resources to identify locations that could be developed.

"It's very encouraging that Glendoe has happened with so little opposition, and there are other locations, large and small, which would be used. It's a fantastic resource," he said.

He said environmental opposition has helped to stifle hydro development and added: "

If the same criteria had been applied 40 or 50 years ago, very few of the schemes which grace the Highlands today would exist."

DIGGING OUT THE NUMBERS

£140 million

Cost of Glendoe project

£7 million

Cost of the tunnel-boring machine.

600 metres

The height the machine has climbed into the hills.

23 metres

The average distance the machine travels in a day.

10 hours

The length of time tunnellers spend each day working underground.

16km

Total amount of tunnel used in the Glendoe scheme.

250 metres

The distance below ground where the power station will be built.

608 metres

Drop from the reservoir to the hidden power station.

60sq miles

Area of hills from where water will be collected for the scheme using a network of underground pipes.

25 years

Time during which locals will benefit from a fund set up by SSE to support the area.

250

Number which can be accommodated in a workers' village created in the remote hills for resident staff.

905 metres

Length of dam built for the scheme.

50 tonnes

Amount of rock excavated every metre.

400,000 tonnes

Amount of rock to be taken out of the hillside during the operation.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

alex patersons analyst,

08/01/2008 00:55:53
1100 words

The number of words this article takes to say b u g g e r all.
2

weeshooie1,

Australia 08/01/2008 01:16:35
apa #1,

G'day Sunshine,A wee bit bored today?
3

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 08/01/2008 03:38:40
#1 Are you suffering from carping tunnel syndrome?
4

Jimmy the Pie,

08/01/2008 06:30:50
Could Wendy be hiding in a tunnel??
5

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 08/01/2008 08:15:21
One of the biggest civil engineering projects in Scotland and no mention of which firm has undertaken the work or who has designed the project.
Must do better Scotsman.
6

Road to the isles,

near Glendoe 08/01/2008 08:37:08
#5

German contractor Hochtieff - it's mentioned in the article but not made clear they are the main contractor.
7

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 08/01/2008 09:18:18
No. 7:- Thanks, must have read it too quick first time. Still no mention of the designers.
On another point, why do we have to sign in every time we want to post a comment these days? It used to be just sign in once and as long as you stayed logged on you could post all day.
8

stubaby,

Killamarsh 08/01/2008 11:28:04
Well done to all concerned.
Is it to be a pumped storage scheme (like Loch Awe/Ffestiniog) or solely for the generation (of free) electricity?
9

Upbeat,

08/01/2008 12:52:05
Once again the German engineers prove that tunnelling through any substrate is technically perfectly possible.

German engineers stepped in ...50 years ago now.. to complete the Beinn Cruachan project when the drilling and blasting s method employed by the first contractors proved too unsafe to complete. The firm Ziegler completed the near vertical feed tunnel.

Now almost 50 years on the German firm Hochtieff ( Tr: high/deep) comes through with the finished projet.

So we can be excused for thinkling that if only they had been consulted about the Forth crossing.
6 km of (is it 4 metre diameter tunnel? )through difficult geology for less than £ 140 million. Surely for far less than notional £4 Billion bridge, we could have had four km of 8 meter tunnel approaches (total 16 km) linked to 4 km of preformed tube sections under the Forth ?
10

Neil,

Glasgow 08/01/2008 16:12:48
By comparison
£4,200,000,000 - Alleged cost of new Forth bridge which eis less than

£4,673,000,000 - the cost given by the Scottish government for a Forth Tunnel which is officially why they chose a bridge.

less than 3 km - Length of Forth tunnel (though there would be 2 carriageways)

£3.5 million
Cost per KM of similar tunnels built in Norway

£9 million - cost per km of Glendoe scheme (but remember tunnels are only a small fraction of total cost)

£19.5 million - cost of previous Forth bridge

£314 million - cost in today's money of previous forth bridge.

13 times - degree to which proposed bridge cost exceeds cost of the last bridge

100 times - minimum degree to which Holyrood's "costing" of a tunnel exceeds what a tunnel could cost.

0 - Number of Parliamentariams willing to appear in public to explain this
11

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/01/2008 18:43:02
I agree with all those comparing the costs with the Forth crossing.

Technical point though, Hochtief refers to the German construction industry. Hochbau is buildings and Tiefbau is civils. So Hochtief do both and have had a presence in Scotland for a wee while now.
12

Orwell,

Suffolk 12/01/2008 23:16:11
As a member of the original Cruachan Underground Power Station Construction Team who helped to realize the project, I am unaware of any German firm that helped to construct the Ventilation / Cable shaft, the only vertical one in the venture.

A German related company excavated a section of one main fifty five degree inclined penstock shafts but its methods did not supersede or negate the normal drilling and blasting solution.

There were several teams from various European countries that employed novel staging and tunneling techniques but most included the standard drilling and blasting method right up to the day the project was completed.

Although I am strongly in favour of machines to provide engineering solutions, I cannot help wondering if the employment of Tunnel Tigers similar to the ones that built Cruachan could have been a more economical solution for the five mile tunnel.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.