Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


New licences to kill birds of prey could be handed to landowners

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2009
NEW guidelines on the licensed killing of birds of prey are being drawn up by the Scottish Government.
Gamekeepers' groups are hoping the new advice will make it easier for the owners of hunting estates to get licences to control certain types of birds of prey such as buzzards.

They say buzzards, which are now relatively common across Scotland, ta
ke large numbers of pheasants every year, incurring costs to estates which often rear the birds in captivity and depend on them to attract sporting parties.

However, conservation groups including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) Scotland is opposed to licences being granted for any birds of prey to be killed.

Under current legislation, it is theoretically possible for licences to be issued if landowners can show that raptors are causing serious economic damage, and if there is no alternative to lethal control.

However, an application for a licence has never yet been successful in Scotland.

Now the Scottish Government has held a meeting with key organisations – including the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Scottish Gamekeepers Association, RSPB Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage – to thrash out a new protocol.

Alex Hogg, chairman of the Scottish Gamekeepers' Association, who was part of the discussions, is hopeful it will soon become easier to get a licence. He has twice unsuccessfully applied for a licence to kill about 12 buzzards that were attacking pheasants on his estate.

"Anyone who rears livestock knows how traumatic it is to lose animals in their care particularly when they've done everything in their power to protect them," he said.

"Predation of pheasant poults by ever-growing numbers of buzzards has become a major problem for the shooting industry which sustains thousands of jobs and brings millions of pounds of revenue into the Scottish economy every year and the government is now well aware of our plight."

However, Duncan Orr-Ewing, head of species and land management at RSPB Scotland, said he did not think there was "any justification" for licences to be granted to control birds of prey. He said buzzards were a "naturally common" species.

A spokesman for RSPB Scotland added that evidence suggested the number of pheasants taken by buzzards was "negligible" in comparison to those killed on the roads.

Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, licences can be issued "for the purposes of preventing serious damage to livestock" only if "there is no other satisfactory solution".

A spokeswoman for the Scottish Government said: "Discussion with game industry, conservation and scientific organisations took place to determine what criteria would satisfy the conditions in the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981."

She emphasised that "lethal control will continue to be considered as a last resort, used only where all alternatives have failed".

The guidelines are expected next year.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2009 11:34 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Birds of prey
 
1

jerrymanders,

Beating the line. 04/11/2009 00:30:25
Be careful what you wish for Alex Hogg. If there was a licence for stocking pheasants, as there is for fish, I would have thought that gaining permission to control rogue birds would be possible. However, this may not be to the liking of Mr Hogg's Association because it then asks the question "Is it really good practice to stick 10000+ pheasants onto this estate in the first place"? Licensing will become a two way matter. I have no doubt.
2

,

04/11/2009 07:02:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 04/11/2009 07:52:26
#2 Am Fidhleir Lomartach

:)

I think gentle, caring Alex forgot to add the words, "the money invested in" in his heart-rending plea.

It should have read, "Anyone who rears livestock knows how traumatic it is to lose the money invested in animals in their care, particularly when they've done everything in their power to slaughter anything that might endanger their investment"
4

jane shore,

04/11/2009 08:07:06

Poor Alex indeed. A recent article in The Guardian stated that it costs approx. 29.50 pounds to blast just one pheasant out of the sky. From a farmed birth to a reluctant persuading high enough up into the sky to be shot (apparently pheasants don't like flying high).

Why don't these killers just send their wives down to Waitrose? 10.00 pound a brace of pheasants there.& take up clay pigeon shooting?
5

sam the god,

04/11/2009 08:18:32
at last someone is listening to all the sides of the senario and willing to stand up and do something about it. on the farm i shoot on the number of buzzards has increased dramatically over the last few years
6

,

04/11/2009 08:22:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

sam the god,

04/11/2009 10:28:39
#7
great idea lets go back in time that will make it legal to kill buzzards (man predator buzzard is prey) they would have been part of the food chain so legitimate quarry.
8

,

04/11/2009 10:37:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

warthog,

edinburgh 04/11/2009 12:24:35
Agree with 11...there are very very few societies anywhere in the world where carnivorous predators have been considered food...

But enough of the sideline nonsense...

Hasnt anyone in government learned anything about this situation yet...after dozens of prosecutions of gamekeepers in Scotland [and elsewhere in the UK]for the use of traps and poison to kill birds of prey - you are now going to reward the same people by giving them official licences to do what they are already doing illegally??!

The reason we still have this problem is that pheasant [and grouse] shooting was created in this country at a time [not so long ago!] when landowners made the Law and ignored ones they didnt like. That meant that all predators were killed with impunity. Now that those outside these estates obey the law...birds like buzzards have returned...and guess what?...some of them eat pheasants!...what a turn up for the books..

Society has for many decades put native natural populations of birds of prey higher in importance than the profits made from shooting...hence the present legal protection. If shooters want to continue then they must adapt their practices [less birds released would be a start] to the modern world....or be swept away..

Our government should beware of "quick fixes" to what is a very long term problem which will not go away.

Finally ...a reminder..in the 2001 Foot and Mouth outbreak the world saw what has been clearly shown in academic study...the revenue from shooting is a drop in the ocean compared to the millions in income from tourism in Scotland. Allowing licences for this would literally be "shooting the golden goose"..."Come Home to Scotland where we still shoot buzzards..." doesnt have a welcoming ring to it.
10

Endemoniada,

04/11/2009 13:16:07
OK then! In conjunction, how about introducing a licence to shoot grouse? This could be withdrawn if an estate employee was convicted of illegal bird of prey persecution.......
11

danbob,

04/11/2009 13:21:17
Killing birds for the love of money.

God made man
Man made money
Money made man mad.
12

Ciotach,

04/11/2009 22:42:18
It's almost unbelievable, we spend money to eradicate alien species, and yet we allow the chinless-wonder brigade and their lick-spittle servants like Alex Hogg to import that most alien of species - the pheasant, that can barely fly at the best of times, let alone when it's just been released into the wild after having been bred in captivity and hardly seen the light of day - by the thousand. And poor Alex 'knows how traumatic it is to lose animals in their care particularly when they've done everything in their power to protect them' Yea, right. Must say the Scottish Gamekeepers' Association must have a good PR adviser to let them be taken seriously when they put out this drivel time and time again.
13

John B (not the sloop),

05/11/2009 08:16:13
Haven't got the cojones to stamp out criminal activity (persecution of protected indigenous wildlife in this case) so simply decriminalise it - job jobbed. Why does the SGA have such a hold over the Scottish Government?

If this crassest of lunacy happens beautiful Scotland is going to be joining Malta on my "never visit, never contribute to tourism economy" blacklist".

Time for regime change perhaps......

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.