Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Pink poo to leave dog foulers red faced

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 June 2009
IT IS the scourge of communities across Scotland and beyond, and no council has escaped censure for failing to clean up its act.
Now one local authority has unveiled a novel solution to the problem of dog dirt – spraying it bright pink in a bid to shame guilty owners.

Shetland Islands Council is recruiting an army of volunteer "poo spotters" to scour the islands for signs of fouling. To highlight where owners have failed to clear up after pets, they will be armed with canisters of bright pink dye, which they will spray on the unwelcome deposits the dogs leave behind.

On-the-spot fixed penalty notices of £50 have already been used by the council to penalise owners who flout the law. And last year the authority organised a prize draw to reward owners who clean up after their pets.

But council officials claim the new pink poo blitz will mark the scale of problem still being caused by a minority of irresponsible owners in a way that persistent lawbreakers will find impossible to ignore.

The scheme, aimed at shaming irresponsible owners into changing their ways, has been devised by Maggie Dunne, the council's environmental health manager.

She explained: "Shetland is very clean and our streets are generally kept clean. But the issue that we get most complaints about is dog fouling, because it is so unpleasant."

"Last year we ran a proactive reward scheme for people who clean up after their dogs. We handed out little stickers to people saying well done for cleaning up and gave them the chance to enter into a draw where compost bins, recycling bins and environmentally friendly bags were the prizes.

"But this year we thought we would try something different and make it interesting and relevant to people, because I think that telling the same story over and over again probably doesn't have the same effect."

"I think that highlighting the problem with pink dye will raise the profile of dog fouling with other dog walkers and perhaps help apply peer pressure to get those last few dog owners to fall in line.

"Hopefully they will feel embarrassed when they see what is being left behind. I picked pink because it would stand out, and it will make it a bit more fun. And she stressed:

"We are not going to leave the pink poo in place and will be working with our colleagues in cleansing to ensure it is cleaned up."

Shetland is not the first local authority to tackle dog fouling in this fashion. In Cheltenham, dog wardens have been armed with cans of dye. On initial discovery of dog mess, they spray a circle around it. If it is still there a week later, a yellow circle is added and, after another week, a white one.

Only after it has been left for two weeks is it cleaned away.

Cheltenham Borough Council claims the amount of dog mess left on the streets has declined.

In the mid-1990s Edinburgh Council spent £4,000 on hiring a "dog-mess mobile", which patrolled the streets scooping up any deposits it found.

Ryan O'Mara, editor-in-chief of dog owners' magazine K9 and chair of the Coalition for Improved Dog Ownership Standards, said: "While it is well-intentioned, this type of scheme will not deter the sort of irresponsible people who allow their dogs to foul this way.

"The only way to stop this problem is to say, 'If you are caught, it will cost you £2,500'."

Mr O'Mara added that a combination of stiff financial penalties and reminding dog owners of their legal responsibilities would be more effective than "gimmicks".

The full article contains 619 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 June 2009 12:40 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 00:26:49

No-doubt, you have to be trained for such a skilled job, of poo-painting, it also no-doubt, earns a very good council salary.


2

nostress,

grangemouth 19/06/2009 00:34:36
I often wonder what happened to the white dog poo which used to be a feature of urban life in the 70's. Like pogo sticks and spangles it just seemed to disappear from public life...
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 00:43:15

~2 nostress,

Good Question!, I have not seen a 'White-Poo' for many a year, they used to be quite popular! :)

4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 00:48:37

It looks like we are going to see 'Pink-Ones' though, what a novelty for our Children!
What do we tell Them?
And can you imagine the Questions our Children Will Ask?

"WHY IS THAT POO, PINK MUMMY?"

What will we say, if we say, "Someone painted them Honey", our Children will think us MAD!, or start to want to, paint their Poo Pink Too!

5

Don't run greetin to me when you break a leg!,

Falkirk 19/06/2009 01:33:53
Strathclyde Police really want to scrap the Pipe band so that they can afford Poo painters too!.
6

Jardine,

19/06/2009 06:06:01
Bring on the supa dupa pink poo painters.
7

bluehead,

edinburgh 19/06/2009 06:49:56
it is the dog owners who should be sprayed with bright pink paint,for allowing their mangy curs to foul the streets
only nut cases keep dogs, they should try goldfish or something,then the steets will not be putrefied by these bampots,
plus there should be compulsory dog licences that cost ar least five hundred pounds a year
8

Grumpy,

19/06/2009 07:54:50
(7) You are totally correct - spray the dog owners not the poo.

(5) Shetland is not covered by Strathclyde, so the Pipe Band funding comment is irrelevant
9

sam the god,

19/06/2009 08:21:02
#2 nostress
the white dog poo was as a result oflime being used in dog food it is now illegal that is why you do not see it anymore
10

Gdgy,

19/06/2009 08:23:13
Waste of time...WE know where the poo is!!!!
They should be embarassing the people whilst their dogs are doing their business -taking them to task at the time, photographs posted in post office windows...names in papers...on the poo fines...maybe if they sprayed the owners that would be more effective at shaming them
11

Boy Wonder,

19/06/2009 08:56:52
96 yr old Chuckles Linskail has been pooing different colours for years due to his medication.

Lets have pills for dogs!
12

nostress,

grangemouth 19/06/2009 09:34:07
#9 - Cheers Sam. With that kind of information at your fingertips your moniker is well chosen - omniscience at its best :-)
13

Gina Gibson,

Wales 19/06/2009 09:50:35
The only way to embarass these irresponsible dog owners is to pick up a fresh dog poo and splatter it on their face!
14

Lady of Shallot,

19/06/2009 09:51:50
#1 Charles - I think the key words in the text are "volunteer poo spotters", therefore one would assume that the positions are not paid!
15

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 10:02:22
Studies have shown that people are more likely to litter if there is litter already on the ground. This was the idea behind Rudi Gulianni's broken window policy in NYC: fix that broken window ASAP otherwise people get the idea to break more windows and the entire area goes down.

By highlighting the poo rather than cleaning it up as soon as it is noticed, it only encourages people to continue to allow their dogs to poo on the pavement. And painting it pink? Where do they get the idea that it's humiliating? The poo cannot be traced back to a single dog and its owner, so where does the shame come from?

This is the biggest waste of time and money I've heard of for a while.
16

Willie Mor,

19/06/2009 10:25:06
Poo painters - you couldn't make this up.

And pray tell us what the good council's instructions are when aforesaid painters discover a somewhat viscous specimen.

And what about vomit, that could be mistaken for you know what.

And then of course there is the health a safety aspect of training people to paint poo's and to distinguish them from other forms of unpleasant matter. I mean, presumably the good council are not just picking volunteers off the street.

And then there is the issue of accreditation and the need for credentials to show that aforesaid poo painters are fit for the job(by)

What a council thinking this lot up. It's a good thing they don't want to clean up the mess!

Taxpayer money well spent - methinks.

17

Willie Mor,

19/06/2009 10:27:54
Oh I forgot to ask. How long do you leave a painted poo before it is -

a) Either picked up
b) Stood on
c) Slipped on
d) Washed away or spread thinly over surrounding area.

Presumably the Council have this in hand.
18

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 10:30:12
The "scourge of communities" indeed. What a load of rubbish.

Surely people have better things to concern themselves with other than a bit of harmless dog poo?
19

BamberGaspipe,

The Moon 19/06/2009 10:33:57
What a lot of shi*e
20

Herb Aishus,

Border 19/06/2009 11:27:16
#18 its not really 'harmless' as it can carry all sorts of infections and nasty bugs as well as worms that can cause blindness and roundworms - all very unpleasant.

What next an SVQ in jobbyology? No doubt there will a committee set up by the council to decide what shade of pink to use and they will need to travel to far flung places in the name of research.
21

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 12:00:16
I dont get it.


I am glad to admit I dont get it.
22

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 19/06/2009 14:12:43
#20:

Simple way of avoiding that is not to eat it :-)
23

sergiesmax,

19/06/2009 16:58:04
First all dogs should be registerd to there owners with a number and a DNA sample taken of the said dog.Then when the said dog poops on the street,we only have to take a sample.This will result in the authorities knowing which dog pooped and who the owner is, simple.They get a fine pay all expencies and we soon have an end to the problem.
24

highland sheltie,

19/06/2009 20:16:00
Painting the poo pink is utter nonsense. Those of us who clean up after our dogs, and often after other people's as well when out doing walkies, are already doing the right thing. We would notice a poo pink or not. The louts who don't clean up after their animals aren't going to suddenly do so because someone else painted it pink after the fact. Catch them in the act, fine them on the spot and make them wear an oversize plastic poo around their necks for a week. A little public shaming would go a long way to end their selfish ways. A real poo would probably ensure a one time offense for most.

25

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 20/06/2009 00:42:34
Listen folks there are more important issues than dog sh£t -it has been around for millennia!

Lets look at important things like; are our politicians looking after the common good. Are they diverting us from issues that REALLY matter with sh£te ! Are they making us gang up against each other to serve their totalitarian ambitions over what is essentially craap? Never sell yourselves so cheap and understand that a politicians view and promise is nothing more than a power grab ... if you don't understand let us put it in simple terms; when is the last time a politician listened to YOU ?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.