Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008 Change Date

RBS Ambassador, Luke Donald

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Plan to use hares as bait to keep eagles away from wind turbines



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 March 2008
THEY were once a common sight on the west Highland estate of Beinn an Tuirc, but as the landscape has changed over the past 40 years, there is now a greater chance of spotting a mountain hare at a tea party than on the moorland.
Now, a project by an energy company aims to establish a thriving community of the creatures by next Easter.

ScottishPower Renewables is offering £30 to rangers for every hare they hand over. The animals will be reintroduced to draw a pai
r of golden eagles, which feed on the hares, away from the wind turbines.

The company is offering cash after a call to estates for help failed to elicit a strong response.

A colony of hares will be established near the Beinn an Tuirc wind farm in Argyll and Bute. David Macarthur, an ecologist at ScottishPower Renewables, said that the decline of the hares had come as open moorland – the animals' natural habitat – was replaced by forests.

When the wind farm was proposed, conservation groups and local planners insisted on a habitat mitigation plan to keep the eagles away from the turbines.

"The idea was to reinstate the heather moorland to act as a foraging habitat for the eagles," Mr Macarthur said. "The opportunity offered itself to improve the local ecosystem by introducing a species that had become extinct. But the other plus is that by doing this, we're also introducing another prey-item for the eagle."

Other prey of the bird, red and black grouse, have been reintroduced to the area successfully. But Mr Macarthur said it was not about simply setting up a ready source of food for the eagles.

"What the conservation groups are keen on is having management in place that is sustainable in its own right," he explained. So if we can do that by having the mountain hares sustaining themselves as a natural component of that ecosystem, then that's an ideal outcome."

A spokesman for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said: "ScottishPower's approach in creating this habitat that takes into account local biodiversity is to be welcomed."

Traditional protection: camouflage and top speed of 40mph

UNLIKE its close cousin, the rabbit, the mountain hare does not rely on burrows for protection.

Adapted to both polar and mountainous regions, it lives on moorland in gorse and other ground cover, in depressions in the ground known as "forms".

Only in severe weather, particularly in deep snow, do they burrow.

While the fur is brown in summer, in preparation for winter the mountain hare moults into a white "pelage", offering vital camouflage.

Mountain hares graze on heather and grasses.

The female mountain hare gives birth to a litter of up to five leverets. The breeding season is between February and September, and the young are born with fur and their eyes open.

Though generally solitary creatures, during severe winters or at good food sites, they may congregate in groups of up to 70.

Generally, they have a life-span of up to ten years, and when fully grown weigh between 5lb and 9lb, with a length of up to 2ft.

Mountain hares can reach speeds of nearly 40mph when threatened.

Though eagles prey on them, the mountain hare's greatest threat comes from red foxes and stoats.





The full article contains 560 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 March 2008 10:42 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Navvy,

24/03/2008 01:59:00
red foxes?
Red squirrels I know about but red foxes? Is there another colour of fox in Scotland? Apart, that is, from the silver foxes around the knecks of Kelvinside ladies
2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 24/03/2008 06:51:43
Are eagles really so stupid that they can't avoid a lumbering wind turbine?
3

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 24/03/2008 07:20:43
Rules.

Yes. Since turbines are not natural to the landscape, it will not register with the birds. Especially since they look around 2 miles ahead most of the time.
4

Kate Barr,

GLASGOW 24/03/2008 07:36:29
Awa ye go Dave from Barra, yer haverin' - You'll be saying next that they suffer from colour blindness and can't see big white turbines 'cos they're not used to seeing huge white monstrosities like the conglomeration of big hotels that seem to be sprouting upwards towards the Glasgow and Edinburgh skies.
5

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 24/03/2008 07:49:16
Prove what you wrote Kate or F*CK OFF.
6

Nomada,

24/03/2008 07:49:49
#2 & #4: Consider first that eagles do not limit their flights to clear still weather conditions when the turbine is neither rotating nor invisible at close range. There is a difference between avoiding a large stationary object when visibility is good, and avoiding an array of rapidly moving blades when visibility is poor (or even when it is good).

But you are right, Kate. He is havering - so all is normal on Barra!
7

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 24/03/2008 07:53:24
Prove what you wrote Nomada or F*CK OFF
8

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 24/03/2008 08:01:45
#2 Rulesbutnotrulers

Are human pedestrians/car drivers really so stupid that they can't avoid a lumbering lorry?

Accidents happen.
9

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 24/03/2008 08:01:58
#3. Dave.

Are you saying that eagles can only see things natural to the landscape? If so, where's the research to prove this? How is it the eagles around Crystal Rigg and Soutra Hill turbines manage to avoid them? East coast eagles smarter than west coast ones?
10

Nomada,

24/03/2008 08:26:23
Dave (#5, 7)- The rest of us are put to shame by the articulacy of your arguments. How can we compete?

Others may be interested in this article (pasted to this page from the P&J last year): http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2007/01/27/death-of-buzzard-in-turbine-blades-heighten-windfarms-concern/
11

Unimpressed one,

24/03/2008 08:53:20
It's well established that the windmills are decimating bird of prey numbers when they're placed in sensitive areas.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5108666.stm

Only idiots would make excuses for siting these piles of useless metal in pristine countryside (or those who have a financial stake in them).
12

Saoghal Beag,

24/03/2008 09:26:21
Eagles are spectacularly thick. they do look quite nice though. brunettes on a blonde crusade.
13

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 24/03/2008 10:27:29
I suspect that many more birds of prey are killed by gamekeepers than by wind turbines.

In any case the strident anti-wind lobby repeatedly tells us that the turbines are 'mostly stationary on account of there being too much or too little wind.'
14

bogmon,

24/03/2008 10:41:32
Let's give eagles IQ tests so we can determine eligibility for the privilege of living near turbines. We can then tax the successful ones on their hare consumption. The unsuccessful ones can claim avian incapacity benefit, and the one injured by a 150mph+ blade tip can get DLA.
15

yockel,

24/03/2008 11:00:45
Rare hares, gather them up from where they are thriving, put them in a place where they are not thriving and feed them to eagles.
Bonkers.
16

TonyBLiar,

At the Bank 24/03/2008 11:15:42
Darwinian theory would dictate that hares with a predeliction to congregate under the spinning blades will thrive.

The stupid eagles ( as attested above) will therefore be drawn into a ghastly fate. Exactly the opposite of what the doughnuts at ScottishPower Renewables set out to achieve !!!!
17

sam the god,

24/03/2008 11:20:17
what a waste of good hare giving them to eagles.
18

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 24/03/2008 12:30:54
There are far too many eaglists postings here. Eaglism must be eradicated. The eaglist liberation front knows where you live.
19

n/,

Perth 24/03/2008 13:05:22
#13
'I suspect many more birds of prey killed by gamekeepers than by wind turbines'?
Could you please support this claim with facts and figures please fred bloggs. unless that is, you wish to be seen yet again as someone merely blinkered by vested interest and only too happy to spout whatever ill informed tripe you can dream up to promote the cause.
20

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 24/03/2008 13:46:10
#19 n/,Perth

See Scotsman article about RSPB report:

http://news.scotsman.com/birdsofprey/Fury-as-three-protected-red.3545632.jp

"An RSPB report published in September found that 2006 was the worst year in 25 years, with 42 confirmed incidents - more than double the 19 confirmed in 2005.

A further 85 cases of persecution by other means were recorded in 2006.

In the past 12 years a total of 494 birds of prey, including eagles, kites and hen
harriers, have been poisoned, shot or had their nests destroyed in Scotland."

I don't know how many birds have been killed by wind turbines in Scotland in 2006. Do you?
21

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 24/03/2008 14:28:41
19. I merely expressed a suspicion not a claim.

Please provide us with evidence for your implied accusation that wind turbines in Scotland have killed significant numbers of birds.
22

dido-bendigo,

Sunny Argyll 24/03/2008 15:08:37
#20 Slioch

You will never find out how many birds (and bats) are killed by wind turbines in the UK for the simple reason that no organisation searches for the corpses. Radar monitoring has never been imposed as a condition for planning approval. Sufficient to say that on the coast of Norway nine sea eagles were killed in eleven months at just one newly opened windfarm. In the UK buzzards and red kites have been found dead at wind-turbine sites. In the USA very high numbers of both birds and bats have been found dead. Wind turbines are an evil in the countryside. Put turbines under the sea. How much is it costing the electricity consumer to pay for such farces as re-introducing hares? It won't save the life of one eagle. Mr Macarthur has had his chance at mitigating habitat loss, he should re-apply for his old job with SNH, now at Inverness.
23

JayDeeTee,

24/03/2008 15:53:59
Why don't we strap a few Labour politicians to these wind turbines. I know this is nothing to do with the story but it would be entertaining nevertheless.
24

Saoghal Beag,

24/03/2008 16:20:41
23 that would be a laugh, do we point wendy into the wind or posterior first, which will create the biggest drag?

22 as pointed out above there are more raptors killed by illeagal bait, what about badgers, hedgehos and foxes killed on the roads, vastly greater than any killed by turbines. What about passerines and other small birds killed through flying into windows? Ban windows, ban cars?

The kill rate of turbines is generally small and when considered against the accidental kill rates of protected species from other human activities, it actually is negligible. It is therefore not a rational objection to turbines other than for militant, lentil eating, ALF-supporting, vegetarians.
25

Nomada,

24/03/2008 17:13:06
Follow your logic Saoghal Beag #24, and you would agree with this sentiment:

'The kill rate of child-killers is generally small and when considered against the accidental kill rates of children from other human activities, it actually is negligible. It is therefore not a rational objection to child-killers other than for [add your own pet hate-groups].'
26

Am-Bodach,

24/03/2008 17:15:23
#21

Your comment begs the question - what would you accept as evidence that wind turbines represent a hazard to birds? Can we expect evidence demonstrating wind energy reduces power station CO2 emissions (in Scotland) produced to to the same exacting scientific standard - somehow I doubt it !

If you are looking for a peer-reviewed scientific study, the ink is scarcely dry on:

Journal for Nature Conservation Vol. 16 pp44-55 (March 2008):

Adverse impacts of wind power generation on collision behaviour of birds and anti-predator behaviour of squirrels


“The results in this paper suggest that wind farms kill millions of birds yearly around the world, and the high mortality of rare raptors is of particular concern"

27

Saoghal Beag,

24/03/2008 17:52:45
25 Nomada, a tasteless extrapolation. But in reality you are just underlining my point.

Whether children die or suffer at the hands of others or die of diseases, or through accidents we should afford as much protection as we can to prevent that. All deaths are equal and worthy and should be afforded the same effort.

Exactly the same point i was making to dido. it is dido you should aim this at.
28

Dumb Eye @,

24/03/2008 18:44:13
#22 "Put turbines under the sea" - There's not much wind there, is there?

(and yes, I do realise you didn't say wind turbines, but that's what the article is about)
29

John Blackley,

Florida 24/03/2008 19:26:59
"it was not about simply setting up a ready source of food for the eagles"

Go on then, I'm sitting comfortably and listening.
30

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 24/03/2008 20:59:31
"Are human pedestrians/car drivers really so stupid that they can't avoid a lumbering lorry?"

Yes.

...but provided they aren't exceeding the speed limit, everything will be ok and they will not get hurt.
31

yoric,

24/03/2008 21:19:17
Wind turbines will decimate the population of anything that flies.
They knew this before they built them.
32

Saoghal Beag,

24/03/2008 21:59:33
#31 does that include passenger jets?
33

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA........Hillary for Pres....Barack Hus 24/03/2008 22:23:03
31
yoric,
24/03/2008 21:19:17

Dead wrong Dude.

here in Calif. we have 000's of wind turbines some in the North , some in the South.

There is no evidence of decimation of ANY winged creatures, in the 25 years these machines have operated.

When your mind set is by default negative , then bad things will happen .

Think positive if U can. And stop Squawking.

GC
34

Angus,

Alexandria 24/03/2008 22:37:21
20 Slioch,

And the RSPB don't give a damn how many birds are killed by their shooting friends or they would oppose the industry for its very existence. But that might upset their connections.

35

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 24/03/2008 23:14:19
Clearly a number of the posters here have never heard of Altamont pass or Smola otherwise they would know how easily eagles are killed by wind turbines.
Firtsly they are not lumbering, simple arithmetic shows that blade tip speeds are nearly 200mph. Also the term eagle eyed is there for a reason - when an eagle is on the hunt its peripheral vision is very limited - a bit like looking through a telescope.
As one poster said, the wind industry knew this but do not give a damn as they get lots of money from them.
36

Robert,

Kirriemuir 25/03/2008 00:01:10
And where might the hares be found; beneath the turbines possibly?

Incidentally, I did on one occasion discover how large hares can grow and how fast they are able to run when one dark night one ran into my car then ran off leaving behind a very badly damaged vehicle! Trying to convince the insurance company that I had not hit a brick wall was not easy!
37

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 25/03/2008 08:55:03
26:

'Adverse impacts of wind power generation on collision behaviour of birds and anti-predator behaviour of squirrels'

Do the squirrels climb up the turbine tower then out along the rotors so they can launch themselves at passing predators?

38

Douglas,

Bathgate via Maddington, Oz. 26/03/2008 03:43:05
Splash a bit of hare restorer about and move on.
39

Kate Barr,

GLASGOW 26/03/2008 08:23:34
Douglas of Bathgate, I would totally agree with you in fun and otherwise, having just had a read at all the comments I would suggest that if this is a small exhibition of opinions around this area of the world it's a ruddy wonder anything gets done ! reminds me of Parliament (both) and Council meetings, don't let us "do" anything because "someone or something" will be affected - you are supposed to be making comments for, against and otherwise (if needs be).. Let's for goodness sake "move on".

See - Dave from Barra all these words and not a swear word in sight. Yeah I know that sounds supercillious but it is sooo tempting to press your buttons-you are very easy to rile. When you lose the "heid" you lose the argument (or discussion)...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.