Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008 Change Date

The Scotsman Digital Archive - Special Christmas Offer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Rise in Scots suffering alcohol-related brain damage



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 September 2008
INCREASING numbers of Scots are literally drinking themselves senseless, according to new figures released yesterday.
A total of 540 Scots were discharged from hospitals with alcohol-related brain damage in 2006-7 – a rise of 16 per cent on the last figure, taken in 2003-4, of 463.

More than a third of cases came from Greater Glasgow, with 202, up from 179 in 200
3-4. The west of Scotland now has the highest rate of people suffering from Korsakoff's syndrome in western Europe.

Alcohol-related brain damage is an umbrella term for a number of conditions, and Korsakoff's syndrome is the primary one. The condition is the result of vitamin B deficiency from years of alcohol abuse and not eating properly. It causes large-scale memory loss and is classed as a form of dementia. Although cutting out alcohol can stop further deterioration, existing damage can never be reversed.

Most sufferers, once diagnosed, require a high level of care for the rest of their lives.

In the Lothians, hospitals discharged 79 people with alcohol-related brain damage in 2006-7, up from 54 in 2003-4. In Tayside, the figure grew from 27 to 42 and in Lanarkshire, there was an increase of 35 to 46. NHS Fife reported more than a doubling of alcohol-related brain damage patients, from 16 in 2003-4 to 36 in 2006-7.

One health board showed a marked reduction. NHS Forth Valley had 21 patients in 2003-4, but just 11 in 2006-7.

Conservative MSP Mary Scanlon, whose parliamentary question revealed the figures, said: "The increase in people suffering from alcohol-related brain disease shows the hidden effect of Scotland's dangerous relationship with alcohol."

She added: "The Scottish Parliament needs to address the issue of the growing number who are causing themselves irreversible brain damage through alcohol abuse."





The full article contains 315 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 September 2008 9:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 00:54:22

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah!!!

Be Done with it and say what your mentors mean!

Use anything that will aid, those wanting to ban alcohol!

How many people live in Lothian,?? OOOH "79" out off how many,?

Yes Just keep it up, and use, <000001% to be an example to us all.

So! one becomes murderer! does this make us all the same,,..

'Potential Dangerous Murderes',?

NO! I think NOT!

Stop 'hyping-up' some Political Correctness 'Muppet Show'!
2

S'me,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 02:26:57
I was back in Scotland this summer... you don't notice it when you live there all the time but... so so many drunks everywhere, we need to get a grip and address the problem instead of pretending its funny or acceptable.Its neither.
3

Beth Boyle,

NY 08/09/2008 04:59:44
Time to put down the bottle and take up the Bible. Slip on down to the Kirk next Sunday and turn your life around! The Church of Scotland is a sane and humane church, there is no fire and brimstone only a little positive social activism now and again! The Church of Scotland is going Green!
4

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 08/09/2008 10:20:37
The Chinese know how to imbibe and enjoy themselves.Have now seen 3 'under the weather' souls in nearly 7 years here in Dalian.None of them violent or abusive.This from a population 1 million larger than the whole of Scotland.None of your usual anti-China tripe.The truth is Scotland has a HUGE alcohol abuse problem. Independence? Then what will you do with them? Denial is normal for those with a problem. Only 4 letters here speaks volumes!
5

Navvy,

08/09/2008 10:29:31
Like the treatment for all self inflicted injuries, drunks should pay the full cost of their treatment to the NHS
6

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 10:40:10
Beth,

There is already enough stupid propaganda in my life already, without subjecting myself to more by sessions of bible bashing!

Give me a few pints of decent real ale any day.

#1:

I agree with you. This is not an issue that affects any significant number of people.
7

Big Carbon Footprint,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 10:45:20
This report doesn't surprise me at all. People in this Country are obsessed with drink and cannot take responsibility for their actions.

Look at an average Friday and Saturday night, drink is always the route cause of Police and Ambulance call outs.
Quite frankly drunks should be left in the gutter or where they pass out, maybe this will teach them their actions have bigger consequences than they currently believe.
8

GlenB,

08/09/2008 11:18:07
#6 "This is not an issue that affects any significant number of people."

Incorrect I think. This is just a small and extreme bit of a much larger problem with the abuse of alcohol.

Over indulgence by an individual affects their families, childen in particular, relatives and friends, performance in the work place and consequently fellow workers and employers.
Together they affect all tax payers in costs of treatment of related health problems, crime and disorder and the cost of policing.

Hardly amounts to a few.
9

Bigwull,

edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:19:26
F THIS ANYBODY FANCY A PINT?
10

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:42:10
#8:

OK Glen, if it worries you then stop drinking. You'll be perfectly safe then. In the meantime, I'm going to join Bigwull for a pint.
11

DeniseX,

08/09/2008 17:16:08
I notice that David from New Mills, with his drinking problems, has not made any comments on this story.
12

Active Sassenach,

08/09/2008 17:38:22
#8, GlenB, is right. #5, Navvy, questions the financial viability of NHS treatment for alcohol abuse. Journalism is not what it was, so I comment on the assumption that the facts in the article can be proved.

Life has become a consequence-free zone for people who drink too much, smoke or eat too much - or indeed who do more than one of these. At some point, people who repeatedly and systematically refuse to follow medical advice may have to be told that the NHS has done all it can for them. Otherwise genuine medical need will suffer.

The business pages comment on the reduced profitability of the licensed trade. However, J D Wetherspoon, last heard predicting doom for its shareholders, bases its whole offer on cheap drinks available pretty much 24/7 and still demands reductions in excise duty to save its business. This cannot continue.

Can we not get to the bottom of what makes people's lives so miserable they have to get slathered to blot it all out? At root, I suspect the greedy and selfish rat race victimises those who do not suceed at it and fails to satisfy those who do.

So why don't we concentrate on building society? Drink is cheap in Spain and Portugal and punitively expensive in Sweden. People in Spain and Portugal don't tear themselves apart because they have strong family life and people in Sweden have robust social democracy. Britain has lost the plot. We are all stoned out of our minds and the other countries have alcohol under control. Not rocket science is it?
13

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 18:09:16
"We are all stoned out of our minds and the other countries have alcohol under control."

No we are not. The vast majority are not in any case. Most people like a drink, even to the point of getting drunk sometimes. They do not endanger their health or those of others one little bit by doing so.

"...people who drink too much, smoke or eat too much..."

You of course meant to say:-

"people who drink too much, smoke too much or eat too much
14

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 08/09/2008 20:00:56
#13, Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head, thanks.

Most people are not aware of recommended alcohol consumption within "safe" limits and, when surveyed, usually under-estimate the units they drink. So more people may be stoned out of their minds than you think, although I agree it's not 100% of the population.

I meant to say what I wrote. There is no safe limit for smoking so you wreck your health if you smoke anything, never mind 20 or more a day. Food and alcohol can be consumed in reasonable quantities as part of balanced nutrition. It is over-consumption that causes harm.

Regrettably what the article shows is that people are not confining themselves to reasonable quantities in the case of alcohol.
15

DeniseX,

08/09/2008 21:02:09
#14. The oldest recorded person to live was about 122yo and was a smoker and drinker. The oldest man in Britain is about 110yo is a smoker and drinker. Smoking and drinking did not wreck their lives. Everything in moderation.
16

S'me,

Edinburgh 09/09/2008 00:21:41
Exactly, everything in moderation, the previous feeble attempts at humour or denial of a problem speak volumes.
17

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 09/09/2008 07:58:35
#15, DeniseX and #16, S'me. Thanks.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7439117.stm

Journalism is not noted for its reliability. For what is the word "joked" in this BBC news clip a journalistic code with regard to "cigarettes, whisky and wild women"? Could the quantum of consumption not be proved or did the journalist not believe that the remarks were related to reality?

"Smoking Kills" in 1998 identified £17 billion as a cost to the NHS of treating smoking related diseases. The number of people who survive to 112 if they smoke is greatly exceeded by the number of those who die much earlier from smoking related diseases. So it is clear where the risk is and, it seems, the denial.

Food and alcohol in moderation are fine as I affirm in post #13.

18

DeniseX,

09/09/2008 14:08:01
#17. The story is about alcohol related brain damage. It is accepted that alcohol is a more dangerous drug than tobacco. I think you'll find that quite a few non-smokers do not reach 112.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.