Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scots pupils are falling behind English, says think-tank report

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
SCOTTISH schoolchildren are continuing to trail behind students south of the Border despite massive financial investment aimed at helping them achieve better grades.
The conclusions from Reform Scotland, an independent think-tank, claims the school-leavers' exam results have flat-lined over the past decade compared with England, where results have steadily improved.

This is despite spending per pupil in Scot
land increasing by more than 50 per cent in real terms since 1999, implying a "major fall in productivity in the schools sector".

The report says: "It is clear that the additional money has not been spent to good effect in Scotland."

According to the report, the proportion of pupils getting five "good" grades by age 16 this year grew by 1.4 per cent in Scotland, against 2.1 per cent in England.

The report calls for a reform of school education and demands that the Scottish Government publishes school league tables based on the number of pupils gaining five good Standard grade passes in subjects including maths and English.

However, teachers dismissed the report as a poorly disguised assault on the Scottish comprehensive system.

Ronnie Smith, general secretary of Scotland's biggest teaching union, the EIS, said: "In England, schools are still judged on the flawed and overly-simplistic league-table approach which has been removed in Scotland.

"South of the Border, this has led to pressure to teach to the test on a narrowed curriculum, and rising rates of exam passes have prompted media claims of grade inflation and 'dumbing down' in order to ensure higher pass rates which look good on league tables."

And Ann Ballinger, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, said that the report neglected to include equivalent figures for spending on English schools.

She said: "Perhaps this was because the comparisons don't bear scrutiny over the full ten-year period.

"The presentation of the figures suggests that all of this money was spent on teaching and learning, a naïve and somewhat ridiculous presumption. It fails to explain the reasons for the increased spending – the fact that after decades of neglect Scotland's schools were in a shocking state, many simply not fit for purpose and others in such poor repair demolition was the only possible solution."

She also claimed the think tank had strong Conservative links, adding: "Having the courage to make an honest statement of their political persuasion would, in our view, give more honour to the members of this group and their pronouncements."

The report comes just weeks after leading political economist John McLaren warned that exam achievement had not improved since devolution.

The honorary research fellow at Glasgow University also cast doubt on the SNP's key policy to reduce class sizes as a "red herring". He said: "There is little evidence the policy has any impact and, even if it did, it would be expensive and could probably be produced some other way."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2009 11:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Tracker,

09/11/2009 00:14:20
An increase in spending of 50 per cent in real terms since 1999 is a lot of money. What do teachers and their representatives want - more spending and less accountability?
2

Independent Mind,

Buckie, Glasgow, Oxford 09/11/2009 00:59:35
The best "league-table" is the free market.

Lets stop this madness of public spending which we can't afford and simply gets spent on more bureaucracy. We need to adopt a modern education system that benefits the students and not the teachers unions. The Swedish school model has proved to be a huge success, both dramatically increasing the standard of education and saving a siginifcant amount of tax payers money.
3

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 09/11/2009 07:28:38
Can you buy thoughts? Think Tanks and Horticulturists seem to think so. I suppose when you're to busy or stupid to think, you're easily fooled and buy into this stuff. But what's it gotta do with education ?
4

EdwinB,

Glasgow 09/11/2009 07:31:07
Well I'v read that Irish schools - north and south - produce children able to read and write at a higher level than both English and Scottish schools. Anyone got any figures?

5

Navvy,

09/11/2009 08:24:30
the daft lefty focus on buildings will never improve skills which should be learned at school.

We should first be looking to families and how they live and then at political interference and continual fiddling with, and in, education.

Teachers'authority has been undermined and we now have a combination of demoralised teachers and poor teachers which the good making a climate in schools which the good teachers struggle
6

Ben Thehoose,

09/11/2009 08:32:24
The SNP presiding over increasing failure? Dearie me. Has anyone told our Fat Controller?
7

mr broon,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 09:10:00
Reform Scotland is a recently cobbled together collection of Scots Tories who claim they are members of an independent think tank?

One of the directors of Reform Scotland is also chairman of the UK arm of the Noble Group, one of the largest financiers of PRIVATE investment in education, health and transport.

The Noble Group HQ is literally around the corner from the Reform Scotland HQ in Edinburgh city centre.

Another Reform Scotland director was for 8 years the chief political adviser to the previous leader of the Scots Tories.

The politically muted Scots Tories are simply using Reform Scotland as a mouthpiece to promote their own privatisation policies.

However, the Scots Tory Party has a slight problem if it ever hopes to enact these privatisation policies?

Since its 1997 wipeout, the Scots Tory Party has still never recovered, and is now a minority political party which the mass of the Scots Electorate still stubbornly refuse to consider as an alternative
Scottish Government.

This was clearly demonstrated in the 2007 Scottish Parliament Elections when tens of thousands of nominally Unionist voters preferred the Nationalists than ever consider voting for the geriatric Scots Tories!
8

Marian,

09/11/2009 09:10:41
Labour told us that spending vast sums on new schools using PFI/PPP would improve our kids education but look at what has happened according to this report.

Looks like Labour couldn't see the wood for the trees for instead of focussing on the buildings they should have been focussing on the teaching.

Scotland's politicians in general should dispense with their usual arrogant "we know best" attitude for once and make a good start by re-introducing discipline and respect from students back into our schools then also go and learn from other European countries as to why their education systems produce better results.
9

David Ban,

04620 Vera 09/11/2009 09:19:24
I can remember Grammar,spelling books and slates of course. I can write and speak English in depth helped by my Scottish,"R's", vowel sounds and with the advantage of a Scots and Gaelic vocabulary I can lean on.

I know poetry too and quote English,Scots and the bible-more recently the latter as I am nearer the pearly gates! My family are "English" being brought up in Lonmdon and the grandchildren there do not know poetry,the Bible is a strange word and some think books are a waste of time!
I am oversimplifying but you have to teach "English" with discipline and make it interesting. Two of my grandchildren in Australia,aged four and six speak German well because Mum uses it in the house. I keep an eye on their English though-so far so good. Again they have good teachers in the broad sense of the word.
10

Skip McClendon,

09/11/2009 09:49:15
#7 is right...for a supposedly politically independent think-tank, they have produced a report that could have been lifted straight from any Conservative Party Manifesto of the last 20 years.

I've just read the Reform Scotland report - it would be difficult to contruct a more biased, less statistically sound report than this load of tosh. It is not comparing like with like, and conveniently ignores facts that don't suit its agenda - like the fact that education spending in EVERY European country has risen by about the same level of the same period.
11

Skip McClendon,

09/11/2009 09:52:37
OVER the same period...
12

Alan B,

09/11/2009 10:23:29
There are so many flaws in what is reported here.

First of all we know that England has had massive grade inflation. The media down south are always slagging this off.

As such it is very difficult to say if england has improved or not if you simply get allow pupils to get better grades via making exams easier.

The article in the scotsman fails to question this and how the report has dealt with that grade inflation.

"major fall in productivity in the schools sector"

Statements like the quote above tend to suggest it is an idiot writing the report.
13

jane shore,

london 09/11/2009 10:47:15

AlanB #12.

The latest International TIMSS. 425,000 children from 48 countries were tested in Maths & Science.

English children did very well, in all cases better than Scottish children
14

Skip McClendon,

09/11/2009 11:23:37
#13

In ALL cases?

EVERY SINGLE English child performed better than EVERY SINGLE Scottish child?

I think you may have misread something.
15

Unimpressed one,

09/11/2009 11:56:00
Where does this fall in standards exist? Having looked at my son's physics, chemistry and maths work, initial indications are that the material taught in these subjects is every bit as comprehensive as that taught by grammar schools in the 1970s. The exam questions also have the same level of difficulty. So it might well be the case that if pass rates are increasing then pupils are actually getting brighter.
16

Jo Public,

09/11/2009 12:31:17
The standards displayed by school children are only as good as those taught in the schools. I have seen reports and other correspondence from teachers that would make your toes curl. Some of the grammar and spelling I've come across leaves a lot to be desired. What chance have pupils got when those doing the teaching could do with being taught themselves.
17

Jo Public,

09/11/2009 12:35:24
#6 Ben

In response to your tripe I would point you to the second paragraph (repeated below for your perusal).

"The conclusions from Reform Scotland, an independent think-tank, claims the school-leavers' exam results have flat-lined over the past decade compared with England, where results have steadily improved"

The past decade indicates to anybody with a braincell that the problem started under the previous administration. We all know who they were.
18

Iain Mac,

09/11/2009 13:07:36
Tory think-tank alert.

Scotland's geography and social issues take it lots of the cost. Despite that we do well. My Gaelic kids could run rings around many navel-gazing Euro-phobic English ones.
19

Kobi.,

09/11/2009 13:58:11
#7

Mr Pavlov

"The Noble Group HQ is literally around the corner from the Reform Scotland HQ in Edinburgh city centre."

So what? You live around the corner from a BNP supporter.
20

Corky,

09/11/2009 16:08:53
Alan B,

The TIMMS report however is wholly objective and indicates the same kind of findings
21

Allan(handofgod137),

09/11/2009 17:31:39
Div parents produce div kids.
22

Tom Renwick,

www.mathsontrack.com 09/11/2009 20:34:09
The potential for improvement in numeracy skills is pretty substantial and it's probably the case for reading and writing as well, so, we perhaps shouldn't write this research off. The Scottish Government's own survey of achievement for mathematics in 2008, published in 2009, indicated that less than 50% of all P7's were either 'very good' or' well established' at 5-14 level D and only 30% were described as being that for level E in S2. Will the Curriculum for Excellence help to improve the situation?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.