Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Sea eagles 'not taking lambs to slaughter'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 November 2009
CLAIMS by crofters that sea eagles have been killing large numbers of their lambs have been called into question by new research.
Crofters in the Gairloch Peninsula in Wester Ross claimed the birds of prey were responsible for the deaths of 200 lambs last year alone.

To find out whether sea eagles were slaughtering flocks, Scottish Natural Heritage funded a study that involv
ed fitting 58 lambs with radio transmitters, which sent out a signal if the animal died.

Preliminary results show that none of the tracked lambs ended up dead in a sea eagle's nest.

RSPB Scotland has always maintained that the handful of white-tailed sea eagles in the area could not be responsible for such a large number of deaths, and a spokesman said yesterday he hoped the results of the study would "assuage" the concerns of the crofters.

The research, which cost almost £100,000, also involved an analysis of the nests of the four pairs of sea eagles in the area.

Some lamb carcases – not those being tracked – were discovered.

Forensic analysis of the blood patterns was used to determine whether these lambs were killed by the sea eagles or whether they were taken as carrion after they were already dead.

The number of lambs found in the eagles' nests is expected to be revealed when the full report of the study is published next month.

The analysis of the contents of the nests revealed the giant birds of prey were mainly eating seabirds.

Iain Ross, a spokesman for SNH, said: "The indications are that the level of lamb taking is nothing like what was suggested last year. "None of the lambs that were tagged ended up in a nest."

One person close to the study said: "If the sea eagles got through that many lambs, they couldn't fly for a start because they would be so full.

"There would need to be about 50 sea eagles. The skies would be black with them."

A spokesman for RSPB Scotland said: "There can be little doubt that the crofters do have some serious concerns about lamb losses.

"But attributing this to sea eagles in the way they did came as a great surprise to us because in our experience eagles do not take anything like that number."

However, Willie Fraser, chairman of the Gairloch and Poolewe branch of the Crofting Foundation, said he was convinced that the sea eagles were responsible.

He said: "I'm not surprised that the sea eagles did not take a single one of the radio-tagged lambs. The tags were so big and black it would have put the eagles off.

"They are still a major problem, though they have not been so bad this year. However, people started losing lambs again at the end of the study period after August."

He thinks a limit should be placed on the number of the birds in Scotland – and that plans to bring in even more from Norway over the next few years should be scrapped.

Sea eagles were persecuted to extinction in Scotland by the early 20th century.

However, they were reintroduced when birds were brought over from Norway in the 1970s. Numbers have reached record levels this year – with 46 breeding pairs and 36 chicks. Most live on Mull, Skye and the Western Isles. A more recent reintroduction programme has introduced chicks to Fife.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 November 2009 11:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Birds of prey
 
1

Am Balach,

Isle of Skye 03/11/2009 01:17:15
Crofters Knew this would be the outcome. The eagles don't carry the lambs to thier nests. They eat them on the hill. Asking SNH to carry out this research is like asking Harold Shipman to determine the cause of death of your auntie. This will cause justifiable outrage from crofters who have seen with their own eyes lamb after lamb being taken.
2

madrab,

Edinburgh 03/11/2009 01:40:19
Am Balach, will the crofters also give us evidence that the world is flat? Or that black is white? Or that the moon is made of cheese?
3

madrab,

Edinburgh 03/11/2009 01:42:07
If the crofters really think that they have seen lamb after lamb being taken, why is there no video evidence of any such event?

Less whisky, more work done, less storytelling please.
4

lobout,

Edinburgh 03/11/2009 04:50:39
There's a reason that they're also called fish eagles you know. I've never heard them calle lamb eagles...
5

Anna nexr door,

03/11/2009 05:33:05
Wont be long before the 1080 comes out.
6

Donkey Hote,

03/11/2009 05:42:13

Just give the crofters more cash in handouts and by some miracle the problem will disappear.
Salmond will no doubt back that solution.
7

McNasty,

Edinburgh 03/11/2009 07:14:49
I think the crofters are exaggerating.
8

catgut,

pomona 03/11/2009 07:40:14
headline
SNH to provide replacements for the empty seats on the drug advice council.

SNH science ewe know ewe can trust.
9

EdwinB,

03/11/2009 07:48:49
A high proportion of compensation-lured smallhollders, crofters, call them what you will, will of course inflate the cost of predator attacks. This will be true of Skye, Ontario or anywhere.

There is no doubt that eagles of all sorts will take pretty much anything but for sea eagles a plump fish-flavoured gannet will always be favoured over a lamb. There is certainly no evidence whatsoever for a slaughter on the scale claimed by crofters.
10

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 03/11/2009 08:08:18
As someone who was crofting for nine years on Skye I only had one lamb taken by an eagle and the eagle dropped it.
I had more lambs taken by otters than eagles. Then off course you have a great deal more taken by foxes.
I do not hear anyone mentioning golden eagles which are just as likely to take lambs.
11

catgut,

pomona 03/11/2009 08:28:03
Fact
SHN study proves seals dont eat fish(only sandeels).

RSPB sandeel fishermen destroying bird and seal stocks

SNH science you get what you pay for

RSPB SNH rural myth busters, toonies know best, you thick hick grant grabbers
12

eamon,

03/11/2009 09:09:01
Sheep farming is destroying the Highlands. Huge areas of land have been turned into deserts by these animals and the shepherds. Burning heather in spring kills hundreds of birds and small mammals, as well as small trees. Its time to let this industry fall into the past, and use the land for better things. Its not as if it brings money into an area, or gives employment to lots of people, better off with native forest.
13

Farmernot,

03/11/2009 09:23:59
Baaaahhd piece of Journalism !!!
14

GlenB,

03/11/2009 09:49:19
Rather liked this quote from the crofter foundation guy,

"However, people started losing lambs again at the end of the study period after August"

Some coincidence?
15

Ken Jack,

Dalgety Bay 03/11/2009 12:00:39
Thought some readers might like to have a look at my short video clip of a young sea eagle, shot (on camera!) at RSPB Loch of Strathbeg Reserve, at Crimond, Aberdeenshire.
16

Ken Jack,

Dalgety Bay 03/11/2009 12:04:14
Sorry - forgot to add the link to the sea eagle clip - here it is!
http://www.youtube.com/user/kijip#p/a/u/0/sS_NpmIjJUA
17

Iain Mac,

03/11/2009 12:35:08
However, Willie Fraser, chairman of the Gairloch and Poolewe branch of the Crofting Foundation, said he was convinced that the sea eagles were responsible.

He said: "I'm not surprised that the sea eagles did not take a single one of the radio-tagged lambs. The tags were so big and black it would have put the eagles off.

Well, there's the answer. Tag the lambs and none will be taken.
18

GlenB,

03/11/2009 14:45:45
If the Livestock Subsidy Scheme is available to crofters it would be quite helpful for a number of lambs to go "missing" and so be recorded as "dead", and very convenient for the Sea Eagles to carry them off so nobody can verify the figures.

Also there has been talk of a grant of up to £1500 for losses of lambs to Sea Eagles.

Hmm what is it they say about conspiracies - "follow the money"
19

EdwinB,

03/11/2009 15:24:34
As for otters, well all mustelids are efficient killers, but even Brazilian Giant Otters would have trouble catching lambs on our hills - and even if one managed to swim the Atlantic, they seem to be exclusive piscivores.

Eagle owls do take lambs or small deer, but there seem to be none in the northwest. Golden Eagles from central Asia perhaps? There is a new Hamish MacBeth episode in this I'm sure - The Killer Burds of the 39 Steppes.



20

eamon,

03/11/2009 15:32:57
#18+19

Nice link, thanks. I was watching one recently between Ardnamurchan and Tobermory, but this one was far more efficient. It came through a flock of seagulls who had their minds on some fish, plucked one out of the air, and was off without any effort at all. Amazing sight.
21

EdwinB,

Glasgow 03/11/2009 16:02:56
Fab clip thanks Ken
22

warthog,

edinburgh 03/11/2009 17:49:11
Apologies for coming to this so late in the day...

A few points....firstly sea eagles do take lambs, including small live ones - thats been proved on Mull [even this report mentioned lambs carried to nests - being studied to see what killed them]...

The reason they turn to mammals [including rabbits and hares + deer and goat carrion] is that we have consistently wrecked our inshore fish stocks since the times when sea eagles went extinct...

The last sea eagles were however almost certainly killed off by sheep interests [as well as egg thieves, trophy hunters and the ubiquitous shoot to kill gamekeeper] - but this was at a time of subsistence farming...if the eagle got your lamb you got no food...its a wee bit different today!...so theyve no doubt always taken the odd lamb....and goat kid....

Why are we always surprised when nature takes advantage of our habit of artificially increasing predators food supplies and then leaving it out in the open!!...see lambs, pheasants, grouse, partridge, free range hens etc....in some other countries sensible country folk cage in their pheasants and partridge - we carry on with our pre-wildlife conservation practices such as entire grouse moors where all predators are killed....utterly ridiculous Victorian arrogance....

Lastly...those greedy fools who exaggerate this kind of problem actually destroy the chances of decent crofters in getting realistic help to conserve nature and their way of life....the whole debate gets polarised through lies...and no one trusts anyone.

23

Angus,

Alexandria 03/11/2009 22:15:43
Why do they need to introduce sea eagles? It seems it's just for tourism; for visitors to ooh and aah at.

All these introductions are costing the taxpayer a small fortune.



24

eamon,

03/11/2009 23:25:51
To right a wrong from the past. I ooh and aah at them too, and I am from the West Highlands.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.