Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


So what did the Romans do for us? Give us a new World Heritage Site

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 July 2008
SCOTLAND'S greatest remnant of Roman occupation was last night granted World Heritage Site status – ranking it alongside the pyramids of Egypt, the Great Wall of China and the Taj Mahal.
The Antonine Wall, which runs from Bo'ness, in West Lothian, to Old Kilpatrick, in West Dunbartonshire, received the official designation at the Unesco world heritage summit in Quebec, Canada.

The Antonine Wall, widely seen as Scotland's answer to Hadrian's Wall, is the fifth site in Scotland to be recognised by Unesco and the first since New Lanark in 2001.

The 2,000-year-old wall, built in AD142 to keep Scots tribesmen at bay, is widely seen as one of the most significant Roman remains in existence. For a generation, until about AD165, it was the north-west frontier of the entire Roman empire.

The route of Scotland's largest historic monument goes through Falkirk, Kirkintilloch, Polmont and Bearsden, although in some places it is interrupted by roads and railway lines.

About two-thirds of the wall, which was made up of 12ft-high turf ramparts on a stone base, fronted by a deep wide ditch, has survived.

There are also remains of the forts which were built at roughly two-mile intervals.

Perhaps the best example is at Rough Castle, near Bonnybridge, where there are the remnants of a fort with ramparts 20ft thick, which would probably have provided accommodation for 500 men, and in Bearsden, where there are the remains of a bath-house.

Dr Mechtild Rossler, the head of the European Unit for the Unesco World Heritage Centre, said the Antonine Wall had been officially designated a World Heritage Site and was also approved as an extension to the trans-national Frontiers of the Roman Empire.

She said: "It is really quite an accolade for the Antonine Wall, which is a hugely important territory because of the understanding it has given us of Roman military architecture.

"We really hope its World Heritage Site designation will increase greater awareness of it and help to preserve it for future generations to enjoy."

The bid to have the wall recognised as a World Heritage Site dates back five years and had to secure the backing of Holyrood and Westminster before being considered by Unesco.

Scotland's culture minister, Linda Fabiani, said: "I'm delighted the Antonine Wall and its archaeological and historical significance have been recognised by the World Heritage Committee. The decision reinforces the Antonine Wall's international status.

"The Antonine Wall represents an incredible part of Scotland's history. Its inscription as Scotland's fifth World Heritage Site – the highest accolade of a nation's heritage – should be celebrated by everyone both now and in the future."

Edinburgh's Old and New Towns, the St Kilda archipelago, New Lanark and Orkney's "Neolithic Heart" are already recognised as World Heritage Sites.

It is hoped that the granting of World Heritage Status could lead to tours of the Antonine Wall, helping it to become as popular an attraction as the West Highland Way.

The wall is roughly half the length of, and 20 years younger than, Hadrian's Wall, the barrier the Romans built 80 miles south in Northumberland.

On a par with the Pyramids and Taj Mahal

World Heritage sites include:

IN SCOTLAND


New Lanark
Edinburgh's Old and New Towns
Heart of Neolithic Orkney
St Kilda

UK

Hadrian's Wall
Durham Castle and Cathedral
Westminster Abbey and Palace of Westminster
Giant's Causeway
Stonehenge

WORLD

Great Wall of China
Taj Mahal, India
Great Barrier Reef, Australia
Pyramids, Egypt
St Petersburg, Russia

The full article contains 596 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 July 2008 11:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

08/07/2008 00:39:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Guga II,

Rockall 08/07/2008 01:01:50
Why bother listing a wee bit of a dyke built by Roman barbarians? We should have done to it what the Germans did to the Berlin wall, as it merits the same consideration.
3

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/07/2008 01:35:03
What is this World Heritage garbage anyway? If it had been awarded earlier, caves would be selling for over inflated prices.

Geez, get real. If you want to live in a museum then do so but spare me the public expenditure required to keep you in there.

Look at the photo - yep, a pile of stones. Sell them to the Tate Gallery and please let us get on without wee gold stars on our charts.
4

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/07/2008 01:39:11
I've got a great idea,

Let's begin collecting union memorabilia
5

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/07/2008 01:50:17
Yep, that looks exactly like the same pile of stones that all roads use. The Clerk of Works and Design Engineer are a lot larger today than those portrayed in the graphic though
6

Arctic Ian,

Anchorage 08/07/2008 03:47:31
"and in Bearsden, where there are the remains of a bath-house."

Why does that line make me laugh?
7

somerferg,

perth 08/07/2008 06:03:59

Check your facts Hootsman - there were NO "Scots" in "Scotland" in AD142. The Scots didn't arrive from Antrim until the 5th Century led by their king Fergus setting up the kingdom of Dalriada in Argyle !
8

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 08/07/2008 06:36:12
#8 So the Scots were the next imperialists? #3 Get a life, the Antonine Wall is an important historical feature of our country's past.
9

Buttress,

08/07/2008 07:09:45
So let's hope that this one is treated better than Edinburgh, which is to receive a UNESCO investigation visit as it's worried it isn't being looked after. See yesterday's news.
10

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 08/07/2008 07:24:15
I suppose it gives people something to do, drawing lines on a map and having more relics to talk about! As one archaeologist said to me, "I don't know what the fuss is about, these stones have been moving around the landscape for millions of years". So the stones the Romans used were gathered from far and wide, from little mounds dotted about which could have been cairns or settlements, that eould make the Romans the biggest vandals on Earth and we celebrate that? Funny things these humans. What did the Romans do for us? Er... slavery, slaughter, soldiers, senators, sin.. the list is endless.
11

Louis Catorze,

08/07/2008 08:29:01
"It is hoped that the granting of World Heritage Status could lead to tours of the Antonine Wall, helping it to become as popular an attraction as the West Highland Way."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.....it starts in BO'NESS.(!) and goes through POLMONT and BONNYBRIDGE.(!)

ha ha ha ha ha


As popular as the West Highland way....do these people think before they open their....no...silly me...why did I even ask that?
12

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 08/07/2008 08:29:19
Can't believe the comments on here. Does no-one want to preserve Scotland's history?
13

BK,

Cyberspace 08/07/2008 08:39:19
#3 We did - that's why there is practically nothing of it left. Nowhere near the two thirds mentioned in the article!
14

wayne bijlyeerheid,

08/07/2008 08:58:24
Is the "journalist" really so ignorant of history? Does he really think there were "Scots tribesmen" (funny how they never say "Anglo-Saxon tribesmen") in Caledonia in the 2nd century AD?
At that time the island now known as "Ireland" was "Scotland" and the term "Scot" and "Gael" were interchangeable.
15

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 08/07/2008 09:55:39
quyote:
"The 2,000-year-old wall, built in AD142 to keep Scots tribesmen at bay, i"

There were no Scots in this island in AD142 - only Brythonic Celts (Picts and Welsh). The Scots did not arrive in Scotland until the 4th Century.
16

Logie Almond,

08/07/2008 09:58:29
Usual sloppy Scotsman stuff! "The 2,000-year-old wall, built in AD142 to keep Scots tribesmen at bay". It was abandoned about 900 years before either Scotland or England existed as political entities.
17

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 08/07/2008 10:00:28
#3 Guga:
"Roman barbarians"?

The Romans were rather more advanced than your barbarian ancestors Guga. When your lot (and mine) were running around dressed in skins, with painted faces (Pictii means 'painted people) the Romans had the following:

Monthly salaries
Pensions
standardised weapons manufacture
medical services and pharmacy
architects, engineers, scribes

In addition they built roads from London to Edinburgh, Chester etc. that have lasted 2000 years.

They did all this while your ancestors were using grass for toilet paper.
18

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/07/2008 10:40:48
Lots and lots of historical ignoramuses posting today.

They would not know an historical and culturally important site if their wee drams depended on it.

Numpties all!
19

wayne bijlyeerheid,

middle of ffing nowhere 08/07/2008 11:13:17
#21 "Briton" also means "painted person".
"Brittania" the name given by the Romans to their colony on this island means "land of the painted people".
Picts" is a much stronger term used for the Caledonians, a sure sign that they were a source of trouble to the Romans. Compare racialist terms for black people.
If our ancestors were using grass for toilet paper it was at the same time yours were were still in the German forests chewing woodlice.
#26
You're obviously a genius, thanks for taking the trouble to let us know.
20

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/07/2008 11:46:55
27

You do me an injustice. I am merely a student of history and have my doctorate in history.

You don't have to be so sarcastic.

IN DEFEAT DEFIANT. IN VICTORY VENOMOUS

NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT
21

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 08/07/2008 12:04:44
No.28:- In fairness to No.27 you came on at post 26 and made a sweeping, and rather rude statement with no evidence to support your purported learned position.
22

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/07/2008 13:59:03
29 Nell

I really don't feel I am accountable to you or anybody else.

NEVER COMPLAIN. NEVER EXPLAIN

Got it, you presumptuous person?
23

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 08/07/2008 14:54:59
No. 30:- I dont really see where you get the idea that I am presumptuous. My comment at 29 is a statement of fact, I am not presuming anything.
You are an argumentative tw@t.
What did Canada do to deserve you?
24

M.Corleone,

2nd Vatican State...... Coatbridge 08/07/2008 15:15:31
#30
I think the idea here is to communicate your views to others and by definition an element of explanation is then required...especially if you claim they are half wits (or similiar) anyway, so an even clearer explanation would therefore be necessary in order to educate those less fortunate or gifted than yourself
25

Pilrig.,

Livingston 08/07/2008 17:31:51
13 - They are products of Scottish education, in particular the Henry Ford/Peter Peacock school of non-history.
The Romans didn't do much for what became Scotland but the Antonine Wall is important in that it marks th extent of an Empire that stretched from Mesopotamia to Bo'ness and Milngavie
26

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/07/2008 17:56:54
32 M. Corleone

Is that a compliment or an insult?

Your meaning is nebulous and maybe I am dim IN THIS REGARD ONLY so could you please elucidate.

Nell is a mind-numbing nutter with ideas above her station.

27

Media 1,

cape town 08/07/2008 18:19:49
The Romans were an amazing people. Their inventiveness and their dedication to success and progress is unbelievable and must always be respected.
When a people advance, invent and progress they are without doubt worth the praise, but when they fail to progress, fail to advance and fail to invent they must be ridiculed and shamed.
The Romans MUST be praised for their epic contributions.
28

M.Corleone,

2nd Vatican State...... Coatbridge 08/07/2008 18:22:35
#34

It is neither Tim...... only a comment on communicating clearly with others in order for your point of view to be as fully appreciated as possible.

If your audience can't understand what you say, they can't appreciate it, and so remain ignorant.
29

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 08/07/2008 20:43:02
Oh dear, what a stushie.

TimW1234, if you have a doctorate in history why do you write "an history"?

The other thing about the 'istoric artefact, as depicted, is that, as anyone who has worked in civils knows, the likelihood of that pile of stones bearing any resemblance to that which was actually discovered by arhaeologists is zilch.

What you see in the photo was put there, shaped up and compacted by a red diesel driven mechanical excavator.

But feel free to carry on believing.
30

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia Alba 08/07/2008 20:46:29
Just think, the stone the Romans used is probably the same stone as we use on our roads today - except it was much younger then.
31

Pilrig.,

Livingston 08/07/2008 21:18:25
35 Media, they did their level best to slaughter oor ancestors
32

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 09/07/2008 09:52:25
Jock Tamson

Nowhere in my postings did I write "an history".

The closest I got to that is "... AN historical and culturally important site..." at my posting at #26.

Perhaps you misread the posting.

Since there is no spellcheck on this site your spelling of "archaeologists" as "arhaeologists" is just a slip of the fingers on the keyboard. No big deal.

It takes imagination, reading of "learned" texts, and some computer graphics to depict what the Antonine Wall looked like when originally constructed.

This is what archaeology is all about and is a sometimes very esoteric subject to pursue that most persons find as boring as the dust that digging up ancient remains entails.

Since I have travelled extensively I have always been interested in ancient ruins and their restoration and how accurate their depiction is in movies such as "The Mummy", "Apocalyto" and even the howlers in "10,000 B.C." to name but a few.

Curiouser and curiouser. I don't know what I am supposed to keep on "believing" and, pray tell, what is a "stushie"?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.