Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 18th July 2008 Change Date

Free Monet Print with The Scotsman

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

World first as Scots hospital tests new online healthcare



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 January 2008
SIT down, plug yourself in, look at the screen. The virtual doctor will see you now.
The future face of healthcare was unveiled yesterday, a virtual-reality doctor's surgery in a box – a dramatic breakthrough in telemedicine, currently being trialled in a Scottish hospital, which is set to revolutionise the delivery of healthcare.
Within the next few years the diagnostic booth could be fully functioning and serving Scotland's remotest communities, transforming the way that patients in the country's most isolated areas can be assessed by both doctors and specialist consultants without ever seeing each other face to face.

Using the latest advances in computer and medical technology, doctors will be able to examine and diagnose the conditions of patients living hundreds of miles away – monitoring a patient's heartbeat, their temperature, blood pressure, and carrying out a number of detailed medical examinations without having to leave their surgeries.

And eventually it is hoped that the virtual-reality surgeries could be housed in dedicated booths available for use by the public in community hospitals, community centres, and even supermarkets – improving the triage assessments currently being made by the out-of-hours NHS 24 service.

The system, known as "Health Presence", has been developed by the leading American technology company Cisco and is being assessed in a series of world-first patient trials at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in partnership with the Scottish Centre for Telehealth and NHS Scotland.

Currently the system is being tested in a small room within the accident and emergency centre at the Royal Infirmary with the "virtual-reality" doctor in a separate room only a few yards away.

The first fully fitted booth is expected to go on trial at a more remote location later this year – probably within a dedicated medical facility in Aberdeen – but eventually it is hoped that hundreds of virtual-reality GP surgery pods could be used to cover the country .

Mr James Ferguson, an emergency consultant and a leading specialist in telehealth, said that the system was set to herald a revolution not just in the delivery of telemedicine, but for health services throughout Scotland.

"We know it's going to work, but before we put it into the remote sites we are trying it in a controlled environment – an emergency medical department where the patients will be seen twice so that we can determine if there are any problems," he said.

"We have found in every case we were able to make the right diagnosis at the end of the day."

Gordon Peterkin, the director of the Scottish Centre for Telemedicine, said the system was part of the centre's drive to provide new solutions through innovative technology to provide better care.

He said eventually it would not simply be used to help patients in remote parts of the country but in urban areas as well.

Nick Augustinos, the global health solutions director for Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group, said:

"We have an experience that is as close to real life as possible.

"It is designed to make patients feel comfortable and secure in an environment where they will receive effective care."

She could look in my ears or take a peek up my nose

I HAD been expecting one of the weirdest experiences of my life – talking to a virtual doctor on a screen a few inches from my face while she gave me a full medical.

There I was taking my own blood pressure, hooked up to a machine monitoring my heart rate, blood oxygen, temperature and pulse.

But I was perfectly relaxed. Far from a feeling of being trapped in some sort of oddball video game, it seemed absolutely normal chatting to a doctor I had never spoken to before, as she checked my vital signs through a virtual-reality GP surgery that is set to revolutionise the delivery of telemedicine.

In her "remote" surgery – in fact only a few steps down the corridor at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary's accident and emergency unit – Dr Fiona Mair, a seven-year veteran of telemedicine, was checking on a series of readouts that showed how I was faring.

She could have peered down my throat, looked in my ears or taken a peek up my nose with the high-resolution cameras at my side on the table.

I was, she assured me, going to live for a few more days at least. I had a pulse of 90 and a blood pressure of 143 over 107.

Dr Mair, whose virtual reality bedside manner was impeccable, said: "Your readings are up, but that's because you are in an unusual situation, and is a normal physiological reaction."

She was, she said, delighted with the new system.

"On the whole the public like it. It means they don't have to travel, they are being seen by a senior doctor, and there is no waiting time. It's a win-win situation," she said.

"In the past I have been able to look at ECGs and X-rays. Now I can physically look inside your ear or mouth and see if there are any skin lesions. I can listen to your chest and I can listen to your heart.

"And the image quality is almost as if I can touch you.

"Yesterday we had a woman who examined her hand and wrist herself using the camera. There was a possibility of one of the bones in her wrist being broken. It was the correct diagnosis."

'YOU CAN'T BEAT FACE-TO-FACE CONTACT'

THERE is a lot you can learn from face-to-face contact with patients, writes Dr Murray Macpherson.

In medicine, much can come down to non-verbal communication which, as doctors, we are taught to pick up on. You can pick up from various visual cues that a patient is anxious or unhappy about something and may want to tell you more.

You can get a sense that a patient may be talking about one problem, but there is something else also bothering them.

For example, a patient may visit with a sore throat. Through speaking to them face to face and encouraging them to open up, you may discover they have a family history of throat cancer which is why they are so worried. It is important to have eye contact with patients to encourage them to open up like this. You lose that sitting at a television screen.

You cannot truly look into their eyes, you cannot see the tears well up which suggest there is more troubling them.

Having the actual physical presence in the room with a patient is also very important. You can put an arm out to somebody to help comfort them. You do not even have to touch them, but the act of leaning forward, making them feel comfortable in your presence, helps in the consultation.

It is about having empathy with what is happening to them.

Physical examinations are also important when making a diagnosis. Being able to feel a patient's abdomen or listening to their chest is not possible by remote link. Being able to carry out an examination of a patient via a video link is not the same as having them with you in the surgery.

I can see a place for these types of new technology, particularly in rural areas where patients have to travel long distances to see a doctor. But I don't think you will ever really replace that bond you get from sitting next to somebody and talking to them about their problems.

Talking to patients through a screen is not going to be the same.

Dr Murray Macpherson is a GP in Erskine, Renfrewshire



The full article contains 1280 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 January 2008 8:42 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

Ian Bliar’s biatch, Brett Lovegrove,

31/01/2008 00:34:34
I have never met a GP who is worth £110,000 a year.
2

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 31/01/2008 00:37:08
Brilliant absolutely Brilliant, science fiction coming True! :-DD

It will be a Number,1. 'Hit-Site'!

Now the two Problems!

1; It cant be as good as the real thing,
Personal touch and care our GP's give us.
Well!..'Or is It'.?

2; Are GP practices becoming a part of history.?
Gp's ARE going to make this scenario all become,
'Too Real' with their attitude these days!
Why are they instigating, their ultimate demise..,
That IS the QUESTION..??????

GP surgeries are worse than,..'FORT KNOX'
Unless you are Unemployed, or Soo OLD, you Don't Know what, Day of the Week it is!
Every Possible, Barrier,..Obstacle-Course' is set into action, So We Cant See our Doctors! that are assigned to us under the HNS!


"The doc.com revolution".??

Yes this WILL Be our, 'Number-One' for our personal health worries, very soon!
Backed up by the REAL and only Doctors, that care!
The ones in our Hospitals!!

General Practitioners, (GP's)
It will be such a shame, to see this service go.!

But what can we 'DO', when they wont stop digging their own 'Demise'.??
3

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 31/01/2008 00:46:40
You CANT Even These Days, Phone your Doctor For advice!
For something that's really worrying you, like a Sick Baby or Child or Loved One!
(Never mind your own Health!)
What Does that tell you.??
I Know!, what it tells Me!
4

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 31/01/2008 00:49:51
..THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE COURSE EVER..!!!
5

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 31/01/2008 01:49:41
'Family-Practice'.??
Dont look like we have them these Days!
6

Roberta Burns,

31/01/2008 02:16:21
If they taught basic first aid in primary schools, and advanced practical medicine in secondary schools, we would only need doctors for the more serious illnesses.

I think it's a great idea. My doctor called me back at my work on one occasion, diagnosed sinusitis over the phone and arranged for me to pick up a prescription. What's wrong with that?

7

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 31/01/2008 08:26:22
Charles Linskaill

Good VERY EARLY morning.

Here there is such a shortage of GPs that there may have to be a lottery to get one in the future.

You have to know one from a friend and is accepting new patients or if your GP is retiring or having a sabbatical because of burnout from patient overload you MAY be transferred to another GPs office IF your previous doctor remembers or cares to forward his patient list.

You CANNOT see a specialist without a referral and I had to drop names and cite epidemiological studies I had been on to get to see one of Ottawa's pre-eminent endicronologists and lipid specialists.

I felt guilty for name-dropping and such but you won't find me cancelling appointments with this doctor because I am just grateful to be able to be squeezed into her practice.

It is a sorry state of affairs and one ALMOST wishes one were a Christian Scientist and could 'think away" any ills or ailments. But that is not an option for most people.

Has Mrs. Eddy made any phone calls lately or received any from "beyond"?
8

ddmc,

31/01/2008 08:34:52
telepresence repackaged for the health care industry, it mabye a world first for Cisco, but other vendors have similar solutions
9

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 31/01/2008 09:18:55
#7. Good-morning Tim.
From your comment, I can see we are NOT far-away, from the dilemma you have over your side.
10

Rob7,

England 31/01/2008 10:07:45
What I would really hate is if it's like the phone service now!

Press 1 for a 'Cold', 2 if you are dying, 3 to return to the previous menu!
11

GP,

31/01/2008 10:31:42
Most of theese posts are nonsense. This could provide access to SPECIALISTS quicker than wasting time with GENERAL PRACTITIONERS. GP's are mostly there to slow the process down and reduce the burden on hospital specialists not to actually cure or help.
It astounds me when people actually think that GP's do anything more than (a) prescribe medicines that msotly do not work and (b) make mistakes and delay ill people from getting the attention the need rapidly.

Removing or reducing the GP process will impriove health across the country as I hope the system will not be able to provide sick lines nor suggest incacacities for the benefit of political dogma.
12

Gothic Rose,

31/01/2008 11:42:23
10#Rob :)))That will keep me going for today.xxx
13

ddmc,

31/01/2008 13:02:19
#11 how could it speed up access to consultants, if they already have 3 month+ waiting lists ?
14

subrosa,

31/01/2008 13:14:54
#13

Because, as #11 says, GPs are mostly there to slow access to specialists down. That's why we're told we must see our GP first for referral. I know, been there, got the Tshirt. Not a good experience either.
15

ddmc,

31/01/2008 15:31:33
#14 i have also got that t-shirt, but even when hospitalised & got to see the consultant, it was still a 3+ month waiting list as an out-patient. No GP's were involved at that stage.
16

SILVANA,

glasgow 31/01/2008 16:26:09
I have a briliant GP and my referals to specialists are not held up by her but by the waiting lists. Not all cases require physical examination but a lot do....does it become a virtual examination?
17

The Strategist,

31/01/2008 22:52:34
The only clever thing about this has been Cisco's ability to persuade the Scottish NHS that this is new technology. Obviously none of them have broadband at home!
18

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 31/01/2008 23:04:26
So, when I do manage to get past the dragon lady at my local clinic and when I do manage to survive the two weeks and actually see a doctor, he/she has about three minutes to spend with me.

Given that, how will the 'virtual clinics' enable doctors to 'see' more patients?

Even if the technology does - magically - allow doctors to diagnose more patients, is this desirable? Given that higher workloads increase error rates, if Cisco's latest whizzo technology allows, say, a doctor to spend forty-five seconds with a patient (instead of three minutes) isn't there a high risk of error creeping in?

If that's not the case and doctors will still spend the 'normal' amount of time with patients, then why aren't the doctors where the patients are? Because the patients are in an unattractive location? But wait, I thought we pay the doctor's wages so why aren't they sent where they're needed?

So many questions.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.