Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Worsening drug toll prompts huge study

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 January 2008
THE biggest study of heroin and cocaine abuse in years has been launched amid new indications that Scotland's drugs crisis is now worse than ever.
The Scotsman understands that the number of people who died from drug overdoses last year is likely to be well over 400, and could be the highest ever.

There were 421 drug-related deaths recorded in 2006, a record figure that compared with 336 th
e previous year.

The need for toxicology reports to confirm causes of death means the final 2007 figure will not be known for some months. But The Scotsman understands that by the beginning of October the figure was about 20 higher than that for the same period the previous year.

It had been hoped that the unusually high number of drug deaths in 2006 would turn out to be a blip, but the indication that the number of deaths last year is likely to be even higher has raised serious concern that it could be part of a trend.

The Scottish Government has now commissioned a massive study into the number of heroin and cocaine users.

The study, which is costing about £175,000 and will be led by Dr Gordon Hay, from the Centre for Drug Misuse Research at Glasgow University, is the first of its kind since 2003.

That research concluded that there were 50,000 serious drug users in Scotland – about 1 per cent of the population.

But nobody knows what the current scale of class A drug use is. Experts say this is hampering action to tackle a drugs problem that is among the highest in western Europe.

Dr Neil McKeganey, the centre's director, yesterday called for an independent review of drug misuse.

"If the drug death figures show an increase on the previous year, or are even on a par with 2006, it really must generate a very detailed review of the thrust of our drug treatment services in Scotland," he said.

Tom Wood, chairman of the association of drug action teams in Scotland, warned it would take years to turn around the number of drug deaths.

"It's going to be difficult to envisage a great reduction in drug deaths in the next year or so because the people who are dying are dying at the end of a substantial career of drugs use. The typical profile is a 38-year-old man who has a ten year history of drug and alcohol abuse.

"They're usually not dying because of what they did yesterday, they're dying because of what they did for the last ten years."

A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: "We are determined to ensure better quality data and recording systems to monitor and evaluate best practice in treatment.

"We also want to see the development of a more robust national evidence base."

GRIEVING SISTER URGES HELP

THE sister of a man who died from a heroin overdose called yesterday for more support for addicts.

Kevin Morgan, 30, was found dead in the toilets of a McDonald's in Edinburgh last September, days after he was released from a short prison sentence for stealing to fund his habit.

Tracey Johnston, 36, of Gifford, East Lothian, said her brother's life had spiralled downwards following the death of their mother. She said: "The prisons are getting better at stopping drugs getting in, but I don't think there's enough support when they come out. He was just a lost soul. He had a heart of gold when he wasn't on drugs."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 January 2008 11:47 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Alan Reid,

NZ 15/01/2008 04:46:43
Taking back hanging for the dealers, might help slow the supply somewhat!
2

Clan-destine,

kyoto Japan 15/01/2008 08:39:00
#2 Exactly!!Make it legal on the NHS but methinks it's too obvious to be attractive...it would work and it does in other countries where addicts are registered with the Authorities.Perhaps far too advanced for wee narrow minded intolerant folk?
3

Fairfax,

15/01/2008 08:55:57
Clan-destine (3): "Exactly!!Make it legal on the NHS but methinks it's too obvious to be attractive..."

I have some sympathy with the liberal route too, but it may not remove the problem. For example, Switzerland's drug policies have had some success, as can be seen from the Lancet report on Zurich:

http://www.policyhub.gov.uk/news_item/drugs_switzerland.asp

However, although the number of heroin addicts in Zurich has declined, it has done so only by 4%. If we made class A drugs available legally, then it would certainly remove the economic incentive for drug dealers, but we might still have a large (and possibly larger) addicted population to support.
4

an interested party,

15/01/2008 08:58:45
at least they are actually looking at it
though i do wonder how restrictive the scope is

sure drugs can be a problem but there is not need to make it as much of a problem as we currently allow.
5

Derek23,

Norwich 15/01/2008 09:15:53
"But nobody knows what the current scale of class A drug use is." That says it all really.

Of course, the joke is these drugs are supposed to be "controlled substances". Well, if they were controlled in any plain speaking use of the word we would know exactly what the level of use is. Not only that but we would know who's selling the drugs, what doses people are using and everything else.

Illegal drugs are not controlled drugs, simple as that. Prohibition is a brain dead way to try to tackle the problem and has caused a massive public health issue that we can't even measure.

The only way out of this mess is legalisation, proper (real) control and regulation.
6

Allan(handofgod137),

15/01/2008 10:31:28
So the war on drugs is still being won by the people taking them.
7

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 14:44:18
Thats funny Gordon, I can't find anything about Norway executing drug dealers. Perhaps you can?
8

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 15:42:42
Its a shame to see someone lose their marbles, and Gordon seems the latest to do so.
9

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 16:10:58
The insult is, I think deserved, Gordon. Given your very odd, and point missing post at number 11, what else am I to assume?

The attention seeking is a very good point. Why else do you continue to post on threads about global warming etc, insulting people who write reports for the RSPB, etc, except that you desire attention?
Of course, that is one hypothesis. Others include that you are a crabbit individual with a chip on his shoulder about something.

Anyway, your continued lack of sensible commenting reflects badly on yourself.
10

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 16:33:00
Ahh Gordon. If only you could actually produce any evidence that I expect people to take my word as gospel.
I don't, of course. That is one reason why I back my arguments up with reference to other sources.

11

Stickman,

15/01/2008 17:00:09
#9. One big problem with your solution is that in the eyes of the law, everyone who shares, gives, or supplies a drug to another, with or without money changing hands, is a drug dealer. The gallows would be doing a roaring trade. Everyone who has ever passed a spliff to another to share would have to be dealt with in the same manner as someone who sells drugs on a large scale to the wider community.
12

Scientific Method,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 17:53:05
#9 Chairman Gordon

So who is meant to pay for the upkeep of the almost 40% of the community that have used illegal recreational drugs while they are sectioned?

Your arguement would be better suited to the letters page of the Daily Record, nestled amost the rest of the ridiculous knee jerk comments.
13

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; CA a captured Mexican territory 15/01/2008 19:28:01
Hey Dudes ,

Aside form being so-called professional squawkers and claims of "all knowing".

How many of U ever in your lives helped a person who had a drug problem.

Alcohol. Nicotine, Cannabis and other illegal substances.

Like did you spend hours or days with them . talking to them socializing with them, helping them, to stop.

If you did not that's how much you care about helping them ....................NOTHING

So Squawk on dudes...maybe U will get help when u hit the skids.

Or you think u are all skid proof..

GC

14

Walkerman,

15/01/2008 21:57:44
Anyone who honestly believes that a civilised society should be executing anyone who gives someone a puff of their joint must be an idiot.

A large number of 15 year olds (not to mention thousands of adults) in Scotland would have to prepare to meet their maker then, because they have admitted to using AND sharing with their mates.
15

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 16/01/2008 00:26:29
number of deaths from OD up ......... Darwin wins again .............

I have said it before and so have others, compulsory drug testing at work and in the school, first fail help given sdecond fail jail plus help third jail for a long time (any one providing drugs to inmates gets life)

but the human rights people will say "nobody has a right o test me"

Starting with the coke taking lawyers and so called upper class, the teachers and the rest.

If you want to legalise it fine ........ then what peados?? they have been making inroads to what they want.
16

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 08:35:28
Once again Chairman Gordon makes stupid arguments. Execute people! he cries, look at Norway they get it right. Norway of course, does not execute drug dealers. Oddly enough Gordon forgot to mention that.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.