Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Biggest surge in Scots population since days of post-war baby boom

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 August 2008
SCOTLAND has seen its biggest population increase since the "baby boom" created by demobbed soldiers returning from the Second World War, figures yesterday revealed.
Statistics showed migration into the country in 2006-7 was by far the largest contributing factor to the upward trend.

The latest population "head count" shows a total increase of 27,300 people – 16,800 from overseas and around 8,800 from within t
he UK.

The increase is the highest since such records began in 1951.

Adjustments in the figures take into account the movement of military personnel and their families.

The figures, from the General Register for Scotland, also show that the population has increased for the fifth year running. In June last year the total was 5.144 million – the highest figure in 25 years.

Duncan Macniven, the register general for Scotland, commenting on his Annual Review of Demographic Trends said population "records were being broken".

He said: "The most interesting thing in this year's report is that the increase in population between 2006 and 2007 was the highest single-year rise since just after the Second World War.

"The most important factor is migration. An increase in birth rate contributed a bit but that would only increase the population of Scotland by about 1,000.

"In fact, the population increased by about 27,000 and the remaining 26,000 was because the number of people coming into Scotland exceeded the number of people going out.

"It's a trend that can be seen over the last five years.

"Whether it continues or not is the 64,000-dollar question."

The population increase is a significant because it helps to allay fears raised in 2004 that Scotland's population was on course to fall below five million by 2009.

Jack McConnell, the former first minister, warned that Scotland was facing a "demographic time-bomb" and introduced a number of initiatives to turn the trend round.

These included the Fresh Talent initiative, which allowed students to apply to stay and work in Scotland for two years after the end of their course without the need for a work permit.

Other initiatives were aimed at increasing the number of apprenticeships for young people to offset possible skills shortages in the future.

Meanwhile, four out of five births in Scotland last year were to Scots-born mothers. The age at which women gave birth was linked to socio-economic class, with mothers in "managerial" and "professional" categories showing a marked peak in childbearing in the 30-34 age group.

Those in lower-paid jobs described as "routine" or "semi-routine" were the most likely to have children in their 20s.

For the first time, the review contained a report on fertility by academics at the universities of Edinburgh and St Andrews.

They debated whether Scotland needed a "fertility policy" similar to those in France and Sweden to arrest the long-term shrinkage of the population.

Population numbers are expected to begin falling in 2056 and to be below 5 million by 2076. They said all the evidence suggested couples in Scotland wanted at least two children but often revised these goals downwards due to financial constraints and practical difficulties – including factors such as childcare and house prices.

While pointing out that other nations' fertility policies had not necessarily been successful, they flagged up future problematic scenarios if fertility rates did not increase.

These included a deficit of young talent in the labour market at a time when the ageing population was likely to increase demand for services such as healthcare, meaning more trained doctors and nurses would be needed.

There was also concern over a recruitment deficit in key areas for the economy, such as IT.

Religion 'plays a role in less than half of marriages'

LESS than half of all marriages last year were religious ceremonies, according to figures released yesterday by the Registrar General.

Around 48 per cent of couples opted for religious weddings while about 52 per cent had civil ceremonies. This compared with 55 per cent and 45 per cent respectively in 1997.

Figures also showed humanist marriages had risen for the third year running, despite only being made legal three years ago.

Ron McLaren, vice-convener of the Humanist Society of Scotland, said: "The main reasons we are seeing this increase is that there has been a major decline in church attendance and young people feel a bit awkward in engaging with a minister of religion when they don't attend church."

The annual statistics showed that there were 29,866 marriages in Scotland in 2007, almost exactly the same as in 2006, but considerably lower than the typical number of 40,000 in the 1970s.

The highest total of weddings recorded in recent years was 32,154 in 2004.

"Tourist weddings", for couples who do not live in Scotland, accounted for just over a quarter of the marriages in 2007. Almost half of those marriages took place at Gretna.

Last year, almost 8,000 civil ceremonies – more than a quarter of all marriages – were conducted at "approved places" instead of registration offices, an option introduced in 2002. There were 688 civil partnerships registered in 2007 – 339 male and 349 female couples.

This compared with 1,047 registered in 2006, the first full year of the new legal status.









Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 August 2008 9:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's population
 
1

AM2,

Scotland,UK 16/08/2008 00:04:42
Tremendous news. In a "per capita" sense, Scotland is far higher up the European economic growth rankings than most people seem to realise. In purely statistical terms, a stagnant population has been our major limiting factor.

PER CAPITA ANNUAL GDP GROWTH 1994-2004
(Western European countries, 3m to 12m population)

1. Ireland 9.3%
2. Finland 5.9%
3. Norway 5.7%
4. SCOTLAND 4.9%
5. Austria 4.7%
6. Sweden 4.5%
7. Portugal 4.4%
8. Denmark 4.1%
9. Belgium 4.0%
10. Switzerland 3.1%

Source: WHO/ScotPHO HfA database (latest year is 2004)
2

truthsleuth,

16/08/2008 00:51:11


A low birth rate will be seen to be best for Scotland and elsewhere.


...four out of five births in Scotland last year were to Scots-born mothers.
Means 60% of births were to 'foreigners ie immigrants or 'health tourists'
At this rate the kilt and bagpipes will be 'banned items of aan extinct culture. within a few decades.
3

AM2,

Scotland,UK 16/08/2008 01:12:54
#2 truthsleuth

One out of five is 20% (not 60%). How are you defining "foreigners"?

Here's a breakdown of the population of Scotland from the 2001 census.

90.36% Scots
8.08% English
0.66% N.Irish
0.33% Welsh
SUBTOTAL: 99.43% BRITISH

0.24% Other European
0.12% Asian
0.08% North & Central American
0.06% Oceanian
0.05% African
0.01% South American
SUBTOTAL: 0.56% NON-BRITISH.

And that's by birthplace. Many of the 0.56% will be new Scots, so not foreign.
4

Guga II,

Rockall 16/08/2008 01:14:14
#1 AM Squared.

"OUR limiting factor".

Are you talking about Scotland or Northern Ireland?
5

AM2,

Scotland,UK 16/08/2008 01:15:26
I'm talking about Scotland, obviously.
6

Guga II,

Rockall 16/08/2008 01:15:35
#3 AM Squared.

Quite a few of us object to your racist remarks, classing the Scots as "British".
7

Guga II,

Rockall 16/08/2008 01:17:34
#3 AM Squared.

What about the Irish? Don't you consider them at all? There must be quite a few Irish living in Scotland , apart from Northern irish like yourself.
8

AM2,

Scotland,UK 16/08/2008 01:18:15
*sigh*

Goodnight, Guga.
9

,

16/08/2008 01:18:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 02:15:20

"Scotland's population soars"

NO surprise here then! 'of course' the population has soared, immigration and the immigrants having Babies, something we don't want anymore.

May as well tear down the Scottish Flag and replace it with a European Flag, may as well stop all whisky production and start producing vodka, may as well, burn you kilt!

Scotland NO MORE, as we knew it that is.

So don't anyone come crying wolf, I say good luck to our immigrants, who make the best of Scotland, unlike us that have brought into ruin
11

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 02:22:18

re; thread, that for all that missed it, same topic on here yesterday,...


http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Scotland39s-population-soars.4396306.jp
12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 02:24:04

My commment as an answer ~24 as above,....

Jock Tamson ~16,

You picked my post up wrong at ~12,

Not for one minute did I think that you were referring to DYW or I, infact I was agreeing with your post.

What saddens me, when you go out these days, and see a newborn, the parents are, 8times out of 10 are Polish or our other immigrant's, my post is talking about our, moral values.
Which I am afraid have changed so much, see's babies and children as an unwanted part in their lives, money being the most important.
13

Andra, Dundee,

16/08/2008 02:37:41
#6 Guga II
Surely if you are born in Europe then you are European, if you are born in Britain you are British, if you are born in Scotland you are Scottish and if you are born in Dundee you are Dundonian and all of above.
You can give a preference to your identity but you can't deny the facts. You always seem to me much more racist than AM2.
14

Chaplin,

Edinburgh 16/08/2008 07:13:41
Guga

The anti-English/British comments sometimes get a bit tediuos. Post #6 from Andra sums the situation up quite well.

-----------------------------------

Guga was seen outlast night !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csCexYYUhow&feature=related
15

,

16/08/2008 08:50:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

16/08/2008 10:09:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

The Canadian,

16/08/2008 11:10:51
18

How right you are. No european could be a Maori, unless they were born into a Maori family as the lifestyle, language, culture and attitudes are so very different.

Why is it then that so many Scots, try to be English rather than Scottish and go out of their way to despise what is Scottish, especially the Gaelic language.

Maybe on the other hand the Scots are so ashamed of who they are, that they would like to be called Scots while at the same time being English to the core.

There are some in the First Nations communities in Canada who liken people of this frame of mind to an apple; red on the outside and white on the the inside.
18

Mcsnagpile,

16/08/2008 13:02:52
Last year I could not spell Humanist now I is one.

We are all relieved to know that the Australian rabbit has been imported into Scotland for demographic reasons.
The new Scottish passport will have an elongated photograph to include the ears.
19

Mcsnagpile,

16/08/2008 14:07:27
No22

The UK expresses its demography by ethnic group. Official government statistics are racial, stating how the percentage of racial and religious groups even to the point of mentioning percentages of Irish, a British race indigenous to the British Isles.

Many government and private company employment forms are racist by asking the ethnic origin (including Irish) of applicants. Are we not all just British?
Of course the USA is worse, expounding multiculturalism but certainly not practising it, refer to CIA statistics.
20

,

16/08/2008 14:23:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Guga II,

Rockall 16/08/2008 16:37:58
#23.

A bit like yourself.
22

Andra, Dundee,

16/08/2008 21:19:57
#18 The Canadian,
I'm maybe not quite following you - possibly due to an error with numbering of posts.
Are you getting "Scots" mixed up with English?
I hold my hands up to being much more "Scots" than "Gaelic". It's not a major priority for me but I resent the spending on promotion of Gaelic while the Scots culture is ignored by Government. My culture and identity are much more Scots (Burns, et al, the Scots Language", etc).
At the same time my culture is much more British than than the whining "Anti British" that plagues this forum.
23

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 16/08/2008 21:35:28
People can be classified in different ways simultaneously, and few people are pure anything:
(1) Citizenship - the state/s which has/have granted a person certain rights, and which may in return demand certain duties. (2) Personal state political allegiance. Some Scots are UK citizens, but state that their allegiance is to Scotland alone. (3) Genetic profile. Most British people belong to a single continuous genetic domain, that has a Celtic pole at one end and a northern Germanic pole (Anglo-Jutish-Saxon) at the other end, but neither of these extremes is in any sense "pure". A huge number of other highly complex genetic profiles exist in immigrant and mixed populations. The sheer complexity of these profiles renders any simplistic system of racial classification ludicrous. (4) Home language/s. (5) Other cultural traits such as religion.
All of these categories can be mixed together in an unpredicatble fashion; I know of a young woman brought up in England who has an Egyptian Muslim father and an Irish Catholic mother. Anyone who wants to pigeonhole people should find another time-wasting pursuit.
24

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 16/08/2008 21:45:10
Just for the record: I am Scots-born and nominally Scots, but in the past few generations of my family I have apart from Scottish ancestors: one English ancestor, at least one northern German ancestor, at least two French Huguenot ancestors, and some Dutch/Flemish ancestors. It has now been shown that the indigenous Irish people (Gaels) are genetically indistinguishable from the Basques, so confirming their long held beliefs and folk tales of having settled from the Iberian peninsula in prehistoric times, more specifically from Galicia - hence the term Celt-Iberian, which now has a real biological sense.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.