Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Population to reach 9.2bn in 2050 as humanity ages

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 March 2007
THE Earth's population will reach 9.2 billion in 2050, with nearly three times as many people over the age of 60 and virtually all growth in the developing world, the UN Population Division has said in its latest report.
Hania Zlotnik, the division's director, said an important change in the new population estimate is a decrease in expected deaths from HIV/AIDS, because of the increasing use of anti-retroviral drugs and the downward revision of the prevalence of the
disease in some countries.

The new report estimates 32 million fewer deaths from AIDS between 2005 and 2020 in the 62 most affected countries, compared with the previous UN estimate in 2004.

This change contributed to the slightly higher world population estimate of 9.2 billion in 2050 in the 2006 estimate, compared with 9.1 billion in the 2004 estimate, the report said.

The new 2006 report also confirms "the very huge changes" that the population of the world is about to experience, mostly as a result of the reduction in fertility in developing countries, Ms Zlotnik said.

Fertility has dipped below replacement levels in 28 developing countries that account for a quarter of the world's population, including China, the report said. China's average birth rate between 2005 and 2010 is estimated at 1.73 children per woman.

According to the 2006 estimate, world population will likely increase by 2.5 billion people over the next 43 years from the current 6.7 billion - a rise equivalent to the world's population in 1950.

If fertility levels are slightly higher than projected, global population would reach 10.8 billion in 2050; if slightly lower, it would hit 7.8 billion, the report said.

The growing population will be absorbed mainly in less developed countries, whose population is projected to rise from 5.4 billion in 2007 to 7.9 billion in 2050. The populations of poor countries such as Afghanistan, Burundi, Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Niger, East Timor and Uganda are projected to at least triple by mid-century.

By contrast, the population of richer developed countries is expected to remain largely unchanged at 1.2 billion. The figure would be lower without expected migration from poorer to richer countries, averaging 2.3 million people annually.

But 46 countries are expected to lose population by mid-century, including Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and most of the countries in the former Soviet Union.

Population growth will remain concentrated in populous countries, with half the projected increase from 2005 to 2050 in eight countries listed according to the size of their expected growth - India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Congo, Ethiopia, the United States, Bangladesh and China, the report said.

Half the rise in world population between 2005 and 2050 will be the result of a rise in the over-60 population, while the number of children under 15 will fall slightly.

Today, just 8 per cent of the population in developing countries is over 60 years old, but the report said that by mid-century the figure will rise to 20 per cent. "Population ageing is, in fact, the result of a success - the success of humanity in controlling its number," Ms Zlotnik said. "The only thing we can hope is that ageing continues and that society can adapt itself."

She said most countries in Asia and Latin America have reached the "relatively beneficial stage" of having more workers than children or elderly, "and they will remain in that stage for at least two more decades".

But then their populations will start ageing more, which is where Europe and North America are going, she said.

African countries will have a lot of workers by 2050, but the continent's population will nearly double from 2007 to 2050.

"So it is the continent that is going to have to absorb a very high increase, and it will have to absorb it at levels of development that are the very lowest that we have in this world," Ms Zlotnik said.

GAINERS

• India
• Nigeria
• Pakistan
• Congo
• Ethiopia
• US
• Bangladesh
• China

LOSERS

• Germany
• Italy
• Japan
• South Korea
• Most of the countries in the former Soviet Union



The full article contains 699 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 March 2007 11:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's population
 
1

Androsthenes,

Edinburgh 15/03/2007 01:38:19

I suppose the Green party will point out that this is
2.5 billion more CO2 producers and will demand that they're strangled at birth.

2

Scullion,

Canada 15/03/2007 02:24:47

The population "explosion" has backed off but the population "momentum" is to blame for the increase.
Canada, with a population of 31M, has a birthrate so low that any increase in the future will have to be through immigration. This means that this country will substantially change and its European heritage will have to make way for newer ones. Some people won't like it, but it cannot be helped.

3

American,

USA 15/03/2007 02:38:37

Maybe we can all start smoking again in public!

4

American,

USA 15/03/2007 02:52:57

#2- Scullion -"the future will have to be through immigration"- we have millions of immigrants we can send your way if you want.

5

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 15/03/2007 03:45:29

The problem with living in a world with 9.2Bn people is that even if you are a man in a million there are 9200 of you!!!!

6

williamx,

Delta 15/03/2007 03:59:44

There is of course the small question of food supplies. If oil is gone by 2050 then scientists in the fertilizer business have suggested that the world could feed 2.5 billion people. Presumeably the US will be OK since in God they trust. The supply of loaves should be easy but the fish?

7

williamx,

Delta 15/03/2007 04:01:38

I notice Britain is not on either list above. Is this because the Scotsman feels that after May Britain may not exist?

8

Sinnerman,

Another Planet 15/03/2007 04:16:10

Does this study take into account the efforts in Africa and Iraq to reduce their populations?

9

,

15/03/2007 04:57:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

15/03/2007 07:00:09

Waken up and smell the roses........you don't think the Cancer rates etc and absolutely no cure to anything while making billions giving people false hope is just coincidence do you :)

11

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

15/03/2007 07:01:25

And the real joke of it all is there is real tech out there that would already have us populating planets in other star systems :)

12

Atlas,

15/03/2007 07:30:13

We need a global cull. 3rd world countries should be refused medical aid for a couple of decades.

13

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

15/03/2007 07:33:12

Heres a wee vid worth the watching on the subject of health and who's behind it :) http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=1584

14

,

15/03/2007 08:02:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Encephalon,

15/03/2007 08:22:30

I tend to agree with the view that when man destroys nature nature fights back and then mankind tends to get rather the worst of it.

The planet already is overpopulated as evidenced by the quality of life-lack of clean water etc-of a large number of its inhabitants. Don't know if I would go as far as James Lovelock's analysis but I do believe mankind is due for a rather rude awakening very shortly.

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/ethicalliving/story/0,,...

16

Cadgers,

Perth 15/03/2007 09:08:27

The age of Soylent Green is fast approaching folks.

17

Cadgers,

Perth 15/03/2007 09:12:42

#12 Scottwebb, we can't even get our own house in order and you're suggesting we do a Captain Kirk?

18

lisa,

perth 15/03/2007 09:23:07

I thought the sperm count was dropping dramatically so who is the dirty so an so who is impregnating all these women?

19

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

15/03/2007 09:31:49

Comment@18 Cadgers, hehe have a look at this :) http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=852068584983744...

20

Truth Finder,

15/03/2007 09:52:36

We should be sterilising all third world populations. Who needs them!

21

stonepark,

Lanark 15/03/2007 10:01:04

Go back to Malthus, the population can only expand until it is limited by resources. In case people haven't noticed global surplus grain stocks are decreasing (and a greater percentage is being turned into fuel), fish stocks are decreasing, oil itself has peaked or is peaking, drinkable water is decreasing (water avaiablitily per capita is dropping rapidly with underground reservoirs decreasing fastest) etc

The only way for 9 billion to survive is if we all eat a small handful of rice/grain a day with 1 oz (28 grammes) fish or meat. And I don't see us doing that while we still have armies.

22

bill-alba,

fife 15/03/2007 10:14:29

they will be able to use these nuclear weapons that everyone is so fond of (not).

23

Swilly Tisher,

Loch Maree 15/03/2007 10:15:51

Global warming will soon put paid to the population explosion ; just in the Old Nick of Time , I reckon

24

Dougie, Edinburgh,

15/03/2007 10:59:47

Scullion, Canada
You're right, Canada's European heritage will have to make way for other cultures. Your country will increasingly resemble the countries that these immigrants come from - China, India, Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, and Pakistan. The ethnic conflict south of the border that Canadians so like to deride will increasingly become a feature of life in Canada too.

Of course, the alternative of keeping your population stable would be unthinkable wouldn't it?

25

Carolyn 1,

15/03/2007 12:00:54

#12
ScottWebb
Maybe the problem is the other planets are populating us...
you must have a video of it?

26

Carolyn 1,

15/03/2007 12:11:51

Buckminster Fuller, a genius as far as I'm concerned, theorized the effects of overpopultaion decades ago... and we're still here... amazingly.
Aids was supposed to kill us and didn't. We're too smart to die, at least not the rich and famous of us.
All those old people, with the blue chip stocks to do it, will be living on luxury cruise ships and floating cities to get away from the poor starving people in the cities.

27

Neil,

9% Growth Party 15/03/2007 12:26:56

This is a lower figure than used to be calculated. Overall population growth in economicaly successful countries is not a problem. Differential population growth in failed states & cultures may be the greatest problem the world faces. On current trends by 2050 Yemen will have a larger population than Russia.

I'm not sure if this estimate includes the assumption that life expectancy will continue to increase by 1 year for every 4 that passes, as it has for a century. In fact there is a strong possibility that we will have been able to develop some treatment to end, or even reverse, aging - in which case all bets are off.

28

Dragomir,

15/03/2007 12:38:55

Should be interesting to see who we feel the feed these billions once oil resources diminish heavily.

29

Truth Finder,

15/03/2007 12:45:45

Many tens of millions will try and get into Europe and North America when the full affects of global warming take shape. The white West will be swamped like never before.

30

www.scottwebb.co.uk.,

15/03/2007 12:53:01

Comment@26 Carolyn 1, glad you asked :) http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-38094637931512...

31

mike - across the pond,

a little self loathing? 15/03/2007 14:34:09

water...
global water supplies are decreasing...
lol oh please anybody ever stood at a shore and LOOKED out at the ocean... understand that in hawaii they have a desalinization plant that produces a MILLION bottles of water a day, from saltwater... the desalinization technology has progressed THAT far...

food,
a person properly trained in sustainable agriculture can produce enough food on ONE ACRE every year to be self sustaining....
given ONE ACRE per person, starting in Florida, only considering "airable land".... assinging one acre to each man woman and child on the planet... you wouldnt make it to the rocky mountians before you ran out of people... leaving about 95% of the planet untrodden by human population... so food isnt really a problem...

oil...
150 years ago, wood and coal were our big energy sources... petroleum was barely a blip on the radar... only an utter lack of imagination would lead you to think in 40 years that will still be the case... and IF it is, well maybe we SHOULD be in a crisis... and besides last "oil reserves" estimates I saw projected that under current consumption rates we would run out in 250 years not 40...

lets go nuclear!!!! if we could only get hollywood to STFU.... nuclear, the "greenhouse gas" problem goes away.... and you have enough power to desalinate the entire worlds oceans... if that was what we needed... which we dont....

9.2 billion is an interesting number... but not really one that overly panics me...

32

wicked_grey,

Miami, Fl 15/03/2007 16:58:43

Perhaps this is the answer:

http://www.vhemt.org/

LOL!

33

Allan(handofgod137),

15/03/2007 17:44:13

To quote Bill Hicks " The human race is a virus with shoes"

34

American,

USA 15/03/2007 18:18:55

#29- WHAT?

35

Finnking,

Finland 15/03/2007 21:22:01

3: American, USA

"Maybe we can all start smoking again in public!"

;-)

In our dreams only!

36

Finnking,

Finland 15/03/2007 21:29:49

SOme scientist (so it MUST be true!) did a study on thousands of the world's species, present and extinct. He (could have been a she, I don't know) reported that the average life expectancy of each species was around 100 000 years. Homo Sapien: "Happy 100 000 birthday to you, happy 100 000 b...."

So as not to offend the US Christian Fundies: Everything will be okay! Jesus loves you. We are only 10 000 years old. Nothing to worry about. Really, it's all OKAY.

Was this article was funded by Viagara! Just what we need, eh? More erections!

37

Miss Jean Brodie,

16/03/2007 01:32:01

2050 won’t happen - the human race was run by then - and when I get in to power - nuke the f*ckers!

38

US Mother,

middle US 16/03/2007 03:50:01

TSW - do you not think that all the pollutants in the air, sea and land have had a huge effect directly in the increase in cancer?? Your post seems to say that cancer is diliberately caused so pharm companies can make $$$ - have you ever worked in a hopital and seen first hand the tireless care given to cancer stricken patients by the doctors and the pharmacists who seek to find every avenue they can to help the patient??? Granted, the pharm companies are just that - companies- and they are not "not for profit" companies either- but then they say it takes over $40million and 20 years of research to produce one new drug. But by then mother nature often has mutated the cause-agency and the drugs no longer have the efficacy they had hoped for.
Maybe the unsustained drain on resources will mandate better birth control, but again many contries are so uneducated about population control that the poorest regions of the world often have the highest population, but not for many decades, as the those regions often have a shortened life span expectancy.
The US and many other industrialized countries will very soon have a huge elderly population, and therein will lie a huge problem to the countries who have not prepared for increased life span.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.