Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Independence? Let's get basics right

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 February 2007
DUNFERMLINE, birthplace of kings and captains of industry and once the royal seat of Scotland, today finds itself dealing with more common Scottish issues - joblessness, traffic and the dwindling prosperity of the town centre.
This is the birthplace of Andrew Carnegie and the final resting spot of Robert the Bruce, the home of ballerina Moira Shearer and Skids front man Richard Jobson. The town was once the centre of booming industries - first coal, then textiles, and naval shipbuilding.

Now locals say industry is deserting Dunfermline and nearby Rosyth - there has been a series of job losses - and the town's once-proud identity is being swallowed by its larger neighbour.

"We've become a dormitory town for Edinburgh," David Low, 39, tells The Scotsman as a cold wind whips through the High Street. "There's less and less industry here. Really, the closure of the dockyards in Rosyth was our death knell. Since then, we've just been fighting the inevitable. It doesn't really matter what party is in power."

Dunfermline has been on the receiving end of globalisation and people in the city make their feelings known. One schoolboy preparing for his Highers calls the place a "bit of a dump", complaining of second-rate shops.

Sky Television's call-centre is the biggest employer for school-leavers. The closure of computer printer firm Lexmark's factory in Dunfermline last year was the latest in a series of blows - 700 jobs were lost. Businesses don't seem to last very long, and what jobs there are will be found through friends, people say.

In a by-election last year, the Liberal Democrats stole a surprise victory in this Labour stronghold. The central election issue was ostensibly tolls on the Forth Road Bridge, but job losses were always in the background. The tolls were central because so many residents travel to Edinburgh to look for work.

John Stein, 56, an engineer, says work is the central issue in the town. "There isn't much. All the manufacturing industry is disappearing round here. The dockyard is almost shut down." A veteran of overseas jobs, he said: "If I could get work in this area it would save me having to work abroad."

Like many others, he was convinced Dunfermline itself is being badly run. "The centre of the town is a total disgrace because of the way the Fife region is actually running it," he said. "If you are not a bus driver, you can't get into town. At Christmas and New Year, if you come into shop in Dunfermline, there is nowhere to put your car."

Many people complain bitterly about the traffic system, the removal of the city-centre bus station and parking, and angrily describe local politicians as incompetent or worse.

They worry new housing to accommodate demand from Edinburgh will increase pressure on the overstretched facilities.

Myra Thomas, who has lived in Dunfermline all her 83 years, said: "It's a city in crisis. There's nothing going right."

The sun begins to break through and shine on the cobbled streets leading down to the magnificent City Chambers. Despite the grumbles, the residents of Dunfermline are still proud of their community - though they take some prompting to talk about the bright side.

"I lived in Edinburgh and I moved over here five years ago and I love it," said Sheena Davidson, pushing her grand-daughter Amelia. "It's like living in the countryside, but you are within walking distance of a town or city."

The Forth Road Bridge, with its tolls and the delays, is the biggest issue, she said. Her daughter, who works at Edinburgh Airport, has now bought a house in Edinburgh because she could not be sure of getting to work on time.

The same was true for Denise Christensen, a manager at Asda. "My man has to travel it every day. They should get rid of the toll - £7 a week it costs, and it takes an hour every morning to get across there, too."

Another contentious point the Fife Health Board's decision to close the A&E department at Dunfermline's Queen Margaret Hospital. The nearest casualty department will be at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, a 20-minute drive away.

"Our hospital was brand new and beautiful. Now the A&E is being shut down and people are wondering whether our local authorities even care about us. All the money and attention go to Glenrothes and Kirkcaldy, and don't tell me the latter isn't because it's the home constituency of Gordon Brown," Elisabeth Welsh, 70, said.

It is difficult to gauge nationalist sentiment here - there is growing impatience with Labour, who many blame for letting industry move abroad and also frustration with local government. But any talk of independence focuses on the distant future.

"I think our future is with independence, but there are urgent issues that need to be dealt with here first, such as how to replace the industry that is leaving. Any upheaval like [independence] may leave us struggling as companies move to Hungary and China because of the uncertainty," June Hastings, 54, says.

Graham Johnston, an electrician, was taking young son Jamie for a haircut. He is clear that union versus independence takes second place to local concerns, like the roadworks that delay his morning drive into the town. "I don't think it's put forward enough," he said. "No one has really come and said, 'This is why you have to vote for independence'."

But Jackie Fox, walking rapidly back to work after her lunch break, was as emphatic about independence as she was about "our council", who have "done everything wrong".

"There's a lot of our facilities that we don't get to use for our own benefit. Most of them are shipped out - our resources, our oil, our gas, it should be for us."

Patriots see need for changes in the flower that is Scotland
"Out of the folk in my modern studies class, four out of five people are for independence. They feel the Union isn't relevant to today's society, we've got what we wanted out of it, there's no reason why Scotland wouldn't survive as an independent country."

Steven Mill, 17, student at Queen Anne High School

"The area around Dunfermline could be cleaned up a bit. But the whole of Scotland is beautiful like a flower."

Donna Scott and Debbie Forrest, Dunfermline

"I think we should stay in the union. I was in the Royal Navy for 23 years and I served on two nuclear submarines. Scotland should be proud of the nuclear arsenal. What happens if we go independent? We won't have a navy or an army. So we'll still be dependent on others."

Robert Parker, 43

"I'm a true Scot, but a parliamentary union seems the best idea in this age of change, and Scots can still keep their identity."

Elisabeth Brooks, Perth

"If Ireland can do it, so can we."

Charlie Farrell, Dunfermline

"I don't want independence. I don't like that man that runs the SNP. I don't like his politics and attitude."

John Stein

"My general feeling is that there are too many unknowns about independence. Why don't we improve the Union as it exists? If the Scottish Parliament were doing its job, we wouldn't even need to be discussing independence."

Alan Hopkins, 66

"When I moved to Scotland from Redditch when I was 16, I could not believe how advanced the area was. I hadn't seen a dual carriageway. In Redditch we had an outside toilet. Dunfermline had electricity everywhere. But the problem is the town hasn't changed or advanced since then. I don't believe in independence, but something certainly needs to change."

Graham Merry, 74

"There is no way Scotland can compete on its own in the modern marketplace. The salaries in Dunfermline, for example, are way too high. That's why the jobs are going. To be honest, I think Scots are too lazy and don't want to learn anything to transfer themselves into the knowledge economy."

Lord Hughwright, 72

"Every country seems to be coming together at the moment. So I don't think we should be independent."

Carly Haldane

"I feel that Scotland should be an independent, neutral country, like southern Ireland. Maybe we should keep a token UN force but get rid of the nuclear bombs."

Rab Mercer, 46

"Why not independence? All this talk about being isolated from Europe - it's absolute claptrap."

David Lloyd, 75

"I think we should be independent because we face different issues, like our schools. But I don't think people my age are interested in the independence debate around here - a lot of them have bigger issues; they are pushing buggies and have kids."

Sara Turnbull, 17, Rosyth

"I think we should be independent because it makes you more patriotic. Americans think of Scotland as North England. If we were our own nation people would work harder because of their pride."

Laura Turnbull, 19

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 00:35:55

Same old 'Scotsman' - pick your quotes.

You're in for a fright on May 4.

2

www.mevbrown.org.uk,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 00:47:47

The only reason the economy has been doing so well is because Gordon Brown has been privatising the NHS, particularly pushing through PFI contracts which means big bucks to the private sector.

Gordon can’t rely on wearing a red tie forever.

There will come a time when people will see him for what he is. It isn’t a question of the union not being relevant – it is a case of Gordon Brown not being relevant.

Watch this space: www.mevbrown.org.uk

3

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 00:49:52

The SNP would be a bigger disaster than LIB/LAB .. and that is already a pretty darn big disaster!

Hopefully the quotes are right .. people would do well to be skeptical about the figures SNP produce .. being told 'aye, aye it'll be alright' by the charming but fundamentally wrong Alex S is not a basis on which a nation should trust this politically selfish, ill conceived and unworkable agenda.

It is a huge leap of faith - the consquences of getting it wrong are dire .. even if they get it right, which they won't, I'll absolutely guarantee there will be no difference to our standard of living exepting that large amount of immigrants allowed in from europe and their rediculous rules.

4

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 01:17:00

3 - Wish I wiz as good and clever at politics as you!

Pity yer Tories ain't comin' back.

And add a wee bit o' racism aboot immigrants to confirm yer credentials.

Aye, ye've inspired me wi' yer wisdom, so ye huv.

As ye say 'rediculous'. (Sic!)

5

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 01:20:58

It Is Time
It is time our MSPs were held accountable for their actions even in-actions on behalf of constituents.
I cannot find an MSP in this country willing to help investigate the actions of SCCRC.
View link below and read all comments please.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

6

employer,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 01:54:05

I have no confidence in the SNP, (having said that I have little confidence in any politician). However as always I find it sad when someone like Bill has to attack another person personally because their views differ. So Bill have a go at me, I employ people, I make a profit and I am a Tory. I also support the Union and whist I have little time for Westminster I have even less for the morons through in Edinburgh. I have found most SNP supporters to be somewhat akin to religious zealots and your post at #4 is pretty typical. And finally just my view, I feel my business will suffer as will the economy if we went for independence, this would mean I would employ less people.

7

www.scottwebb.co.uk,

27/02/2007 02:19:32

Comment@6 Employer, hi mate....here is a few things you may want to ponder on....1. Knowledge.....is such a subjective thing these days.....especially when those that thought they were part of something are now having their doubts(rightly so)
2. Quote: DUNFERMLINE, birthplace of kings and captains of industry and once the royal seat of Scotland, today finds itself dealing with more common Scottish issues - joblessness, traffic and the dwindling prosperity of the town centre...........i think we are hearing this wherever The Scotsman.....van of joy brigade go(denotes a country wide problem)
3. Ideology and quality of information of said ideology..........
I have absolutely NO DOUBT that every political leader shares at least one thing in common(i will let the rest of you work that one out :) )......but if we get one in that at least on the surface, professes to be up for independence......we can always re-enact the Wicker Man if he fails to follow through on what he promised to deliver.........that..... as the people wake up to the reality we live in, progresses, i have no doubt in :)

8

www.scottwebb.co.uk,

27/02/2007 02:24:06

Comment@5 Big Wullie, watched the video link you put up the other night.......i thought you conducted your protest very well mate and wish you every success in clearing your name

9

Scullion,

Canada 27/02/2007 02:35:00

I've said it before, the same reasons that drove Scotland to the union 300 years ago, commercial interests, are likely to ensure they stay in it in May.
The SNP must get on their horse to convince business of the benefits of independence. However, I fear the SNP's socialist background will not stand them in good stead.

10

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 02:52:51

6 - employer

Your last sentence says it all, "I feel my business will suffer as will the economy if we went for independence"

Money!

I don't know what business you are in, but unless it's only about making union flags, you COULD be much more successful in an independent Scotland - or had that thought never crossed your mind?

Voldemort is quite big enough to defend himself - however his comments at 3 were not based on fact, but on his personal opinion alone, which he has a perfect right to expound, (as do we all) and equally be liable to criticism, which I supplied.

You may find it strange, but I too am an employer, but I have always been a socialist - some years my employees make more than me. Does that make me a bad businessman or a good employer?

I have no problem with you being a unionist, most Tories, (large and small c's) are, driven by fear of change.

Your post, and previous ones, put you in the same train of thought as Erchie Stirling - you KNOW you should be in charge, but for this damn democratic bit about winning votes.

11

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 03:36:07

11 - Blimp

It works both ways of course! ;)

12

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 03:42:27

#9 Scullion: "I fear the SNP's socialist background..."

Is this the same SNP that used to be referred to by Labour as "Tartan Tories"? How can that be? They are socialists and conservatives?

Looking from the other side of the world, it seems to me that Scottish people are looking for real change. The SNP seems to be the party that offers that, and the party that is most likely to replace the current government, if they are to be replaced.

When you look at this forum, and the articles in the Scotsman, you never get any serious, intellectual debate from those who support the concept of the UK. It is always a case of scaremongering and using emotive language.

I have never seen a single reasoned argument from "unionist" politicians or their supporters. This genuinely puzzles me as I would have thought that 300 years of partnership would have brought many benefits to modern Scotland. And yet, the people never get told what they are. All they get is personal attacks on Alex Salmond and a reminder that Scotland and its people are too dumb and poor to be able to run their on affairs.

It seems to me that Scotland will never get independence as there are too many politicians, media publishers, newspaper editors and journalists who are very keen to run the place down and keep the people thinking that they are wrong to have ambition for their country.

Your comment about the SNP being a socialist party would suggest that you have swallowed a lot of the tripe that the government and media have thrown your way.

But I am happy for you to prove me wrong. Why do you regard the SNP as being as a socialist party (as opposed to a social democratic type party)?

13

Malachi Malagrowther,

27/02/2007 04:57:01

I wring my hands with frustration whenever I hear Scots talking about not being able to go it alone. Try taking a holiday in a small country next time and ask yourself this: how come this lot can do it, and we cannot? If we can run an empire, we can run our own country. What part of the Scottish psyche is it that sees our relative poverty to London after 300 years of union and does not blame the same union, but rather something defective with the people?

How much of the financial boom of the City of London in the eighties was built on the management of new oil fund billions flowing from Scotland?

Now imagine what Scotland would look like today if it had been independent for the past thirty years.

14

Robbie,

New Zealand (where some pompous Scots live) 27/02/2007 06:36:36

1. Bill, Dunblane
“ Same old 'Scotsman' - pick your quotes.”
Bill I am honestly sad that there is so many ‘doomers and gloomers’ Dunfermline Unionists’ quotes to pick from.

"I think we should stay in the union. Scotland should be proud of the nuclear arsenal.” Robert Parker, 43
"I'm a true Scot, but a parliamentary union seems the best idea in this age of change.. Elisabeth Brooks, Perth
"I don't want independence." John Stein
"My general feeling is that there are too many unknowns about independence. Why don't we improve the Union as it exists.” Alan Hopkins, 66
“I don't believe in independence, but something certainly needs to change." Graham Merry, 74
"There is no way Scotland can compete on its own in the modern marketplace.” Lord Hughwright, 72
Not one analytical reason for their beliefs. Quite inane ’statements’ that really imply that they have given it no serious study at all. I much more appreciate those Unionists who we may disagree with but at least put up arguments with which we can debate, and at times show some evidence of an education, rather than Carly Haldranes unbelievable inaccurate summary of the World, "Every country seems to be coming together at the moment. So I don't think we should be independent." Carly Haldane
One gets the feeling that they have never given independence any serious thought and have no idea what other small nations have achieved especially in QUALITY of life. Honestly these peoples’ remarks could turn me to ra booze. Umm disregard all I’ve said; hurray!! for Carly and his mates.

15

Robbie,

New Zealand 27/02/2007 06:42:06

14. Malachi Malagrowther
How, Malachi, does one get through to the 'we're far too stupid to be self-reliant' crowd. Lucky at lot of them are so politically naïve that they won’t show up on 3rd May.

16

Pete39,

Tassy 27/02/2007 06:47:51

The common denominator of the SNP is not so much political since it has members who cover all the spectrum of present day political parties. It is a belief that we can do it better, by doing it ourselves. A belief that was not hammered into the ground by the Labour councillors, but the political dogma of the mainstream parties. If you get independence then you will have socialists, communists, liberals, conservatives and other wee wild guys, all with the belief that Scotland can do quite fine on its own. God love you all, but only if you are the good guys.

17

eric,

27/02/2007 07:37:58

You never hear English employers supporting the union ,mmm

18

Brianwci,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 08:00:34

6: Employer says: I have no confidence in the SNP...

But employer, it's not down to the SNP to run Scotland after Independence, it's down to the people of Scotland to run the country. So it's not the SNP you are showing no confidence in but your own people and that of course includes yourself.

Remember what the Unionists said before Devolution...it would be the end of civilisation in Scotland as we know it....the same auld cauld keel is being served to us again re Independence and again their are people falling for it in their droves.

Open your eyes and see the benefits of devolution, we have more finance houses here not less. We have more international conferences here e.g. G8, not less; Scotland is much more on the World Map, not less. Why would that progress suddenly stop because of Independence?

Answer: It wouldn't. All we need is a bit of confidence in ourselves. Just remember the huge part Scots have played in World Affairs and in the progress of science and medicine. Will that genius suddenly dry up after independence? I don't think so.

On May 4th we have the choice of waking up to 'More of the Same' or to the most exciting development in Scotland's long and proud history. Don't you think we deserve a future? Let's dare to hope. Let's give the nationalists a real chance and vote SNP on May 3rd.

19

Conan,

Here 27/02/2007 08:03:27

Enough talk - Independence NOW!

20

Sgritheall,

Switzerland 27/02/2007 08:09:30

In my humble opinion, the first step to Scottish indepence would be to get the UK independent of the US. All this talk about independence is just ridiculous, as long as there is a foreign army on British soil.

21

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 08:12:41

June Hastings said ‘I think our future is with independence, but there are urgent issues that need to be dealt with here first’ linking to the title of the article.

How can this possibly be a valid argument against independence? This just proves again that the status quo is not working. Does this mean that they will vote for the same people anyway or not vote at all ? I hope this is not representative of the people of Dunfermline.
Wake up people!

Yes, becoming independent is a scary step for a lot of people and it is clear many just ‘don’t trust’ (Who does?) )or ‘We won't have a navy or an army’ – (just out of hospital for the day were we? ) or ‘too many unknowns’ (Well try to find out a bit more then – idiot. Maybe those folks are relatives of Donald Rumsfield - ‘unknown unknowns…’).

There are many knowns about the Union though – Known and documented systematic lying and cheating about Scottish Economics by Westminster for decades. Repeated Political decisions taken against Scottish interests. Known that either Labour or Tory will be in Power in London after next UK GE and both of them will go on to make more decisions against the wishes of the Scottish electorate in Key areas eg. Trident.

When Unionists say we are ‘too small’. Yes we are to small a voice in the Union to be able to do anything about what the rest of the UK decides and the Scottish electorate has a completely different opinion to the rest of the UK on many issues but we get outvoted.
Is this Democratic – Yes. Is it serving Scotlands interests – No!

22

Archie MacT,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 08:13:44

Oh that old chestnut. You vote SNP for independence then they miraculously disappear. You trying to tell me that baw face Alec and nippy sweetie sturgeon will pack up and exit stage left once they achieve independence? not a chance. They want to run the country and will cling on for grim death.

To all the Nationalists posting incessantly on here. Remember pride comes before a fall. The lessons of Scottish electoral history show that high SNP poll rating usually evaporate when people get in the polling booths. Scotland will have its say on May 3. Then we will really know what it is time for.

And if by chance it isn't time then watch the Nats either blame the media for their failure or turn on their fellow Scots and call them thick, scared or brainwashed. Happens every time.

It's time.......to stand or fall on the strength of your argument.

23

decent one,

27/02/2007 08:25:12

Scotland seems to be in a mess with the Union, can things really get worse after independence. We have the worst diet, highest number of teenage mums, worst underage drinking problem, massive drug problem, no discipline in school, increasing violent crime........
We must take a few steps backwards (because independence will be tough in the beginning) to take a lot of steps forwards.
Anyone who votes for Labour or the Tories in May must agree with the war in Iraq, surely the voting public can't be so heartless.

24

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 08:35:19

Lib Dems won the by-election and going on the reports from the people living there they have done zilch.
The quotes attributed to John Stein in the article seem sound to me, too many unknowns, Scottish Parliaments dismal failings.If a clear explanation was given of what independance will actually mean, it would be better accepted, but all we get on this board is rhetoric and raving if you dare not agree with the independant view, hardy an advert for independance. So in my opinion, all the ranting and raving on this board will make no difference come the election, because peoples apathy in not going to the polls will result in more of the same.

25

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 08:38:02

#23 Archie MacT: As an independent observer, who clearly won’t be voting in these elections, I am curious: what's your point?

- Are you saying that you will not vote for anyone?
- Are you saying that you will not vote for SNP?
- Are you saying that you will not vote for Labour?

It is not clear to me what your post is about? You seem to be implying that you would vote for the SNP if they then disbanded after being elected?

I am confused. Sorry.

Are these elections not about the regional government in the Scottish Parliament? Even if the SNP is elected, the Parliament still comes under the control of Westminster and Tony Blair (or his replacement). So what is the point in the SNP being elected and then resigning?

As for the position at a future date, if the Scots vote to leave the union, then surely the Labour/Liberals, Conservatives and SNP will find that they are at a new political dawn. Experience elsewhere in the world has shown that new political groupings and parties emerge and the electorate gets different options (though not necessarily better).

It seems to me from following the press that Scotland feels that it needs change. Surely the best way to get proper change is to take back control of your country and make change happen?

Anyway, I would genuinely be interested in knowing more about your thinking behind your posting. What is it that you support and what is it that you oppose?

26

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 08:38:26

#23. True for May election result, we all have to wait and see and there is a good chance you will be correct. However are you saying to say that if SNP win then they will abolish elections and remain in Power forever? Yes they will remain a party but oppositions parties wont disappear. Unionists seem to think that everything will disappear after voting for the SNP- Jobs, armed forces, currency and now even all other political parties. Now I know why Labour does not want open debate with Alex S. maybe they will just disappear!

27

Robbie,

27/02/2007 08:43:24

19. Brianwci, Edinburgh
“We have more international conferences here e.g. G8, not less; Scotland is much more on the World Map.” Yep Brianwci, This is such a biggie that many Scots cannot see. You are virtually non-existent on the World scene. Have no individually voice at the UN. Cannot sit with countries of your own size and often more similar philosophies than that of British might and neo-imperialism. Count all the sovereignty nation members of the UN - Scotland must eventually be there too as a mature social democratic state always ready with the hand of friendship to peace-loving member states which will hopefully include a sovereign England.

28

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 08:51:02

#4

The SNP, like other political partiys, have their fair share of racists too.

29

fimo,

27/02/2007 08:52:32

Can anyone explain how the 2.5 million people who work in Scotland can support the 2.5 million who don't work (Residents under 16, residents over retirement age and the unemployed and sick etc -census website), whilst at the same time supporting Scotland's extensive infrastructure, maintaining the life styles of the people who want to live on the Islands, the running of the already over stretched health trusts and funding the expansion of our cities?

30

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 08:59:48

#30

Don't have scooby fimo, but apparently in an independent Scotland every ill will be cured, pensioners will not die and every child will be happy and loved.

31

Mikey,

27/02/2007 09:06:20

#30, and how do the English do it? With subsidies, I suppose? People like you just refuse to see the wood for the trees. It has already been proved that we subsidise England. There have been numerous citations. Try googling.

If the MWPs are doing such a good job, why are we in such a mess? Could it be the Union to blame, maybe?

32

Robbie,

NZ where at least most people vote 27/02/2007 09:06:48

25. jim lad, the capital “peoples apathy in not going to the polls will result in more of the same.”
You have pinpointed a real disgraceful factor. I find it difficult to understand why voter turn-out has sunk so low especially among those who need sympathetic politicians.
This website shows of the 10 seats with the smallest turnouts in the 2001 general election, four were in Glasgow.
All under 44%!!!!!!! <http://www.tutor2u.net/politics/content/topics/elections/...;
Compare this with the high about 88% in New Zealand and most of Europe and up to 95% in Australia. (All Australian citizens over the age of 18. with exceptions, must be registered to vote and show up at the poll on election day. With secret ballots, it's not really possible to prove who has or has not voted so this process could be more accurately called ‘compulsory turnout‘. What makes the citizens of Scotland ignore what their forebears fought and died for the universal franchise. It is mind-boggling and very, very depressing and extremely disheartening.

33

Mikey,

27/02/2007 09:07:30

Peter #32, no point in stating the facts. The ignorant only see what they want to see!

34

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 09:09:58

#30 fimo: It's called economic growth and taxation. This is exactly the same as everywhere else in the world. But if you look at the UK governments own statistic then you would be right to be concerned – Scotland’s government has not been able to create the conditions for meaningful growth. Your country is stagnating.

Look over to our part of the world and you see Singapore. A tiny little place, that has to rent land from Thailand, so that they can train their troops. And yet they are one of the wealthiest places in the region and have enjoyed almost 40 years of uninterrupted growth. But perhaps they would have done better if those nasty Japanese had not invaded and caused the empire to crumble. I would suggest that the Singapore model is one that Scotland could pursue.

The problem with your thinking is that you seen to see independence as being about more of the same. If that is the option on the table then the Scots would be right to reject it. What you need to do is clean the slate and start creating your own vision for Scotland, with the taxation infrastructure that will support it.

And, get this: Taxation can go down as well as up you know. I bet that Gordon Brown has never told you guys that!!!!

35

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 09:12:01

peter,


the SNP policy is to shadow the the BoE and the £. So in in your expert opinion what would be the major changes in economic changes.

Is wee Eck proposing that business rates in Scotland be slashed and if so by how much and how is it going to be funded.

Regards point 3 im sure that Nicola sturgeon could relate to that statement also.

36

Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD,

Dar-Es-Salaam Tanznaia 27/02/2007 09:20:09

No 4
Bill you dont have to be good in the poltical game. You have be a lousiest guy around. Then you are called a good politicains. There are no colleges to make you politicans. You learn by exeperiences by hammering many guys going to jail three or four times and then the jail birds tell you what you ought to do.
That is not diificult. The law helps a lot as you can bend this or break the ruudy thing

37

Doh,

27/02/2007 09:21:27

#25 - Jim - your out of touch - just like when the SNP claimed they were going to win and then went on to get just 20% of the vote.
BTW - other than the fanatical SNP supporters who dominate the site . So I widnae trust yer judgement for a start.

38

Apoplectic Insouciant,

Aberdeen 27/02/2007 09:22:08

May the 3rd 2007, Combined Parliamentary and Local Government Elections.

64 Days left to convert the 40% undecided. 64 days to remove the uncertainty and therefore the fear of change.

If we look at what will not change this may give us more confidence that the world will not come crashing in on us on the 4th of May, if we are impudent enough.

The Sun will still be in the sky, occasionally breaking through the cloud cover that provides us with our plentiful supply of water to help us survive, produce whisky , drive our electric turbines, maintain our beautiful countryside, etc etc. The North, South, East, and West Winds will still blow and sustain our new age windmills and keep our lights shining. North Sea oil will still flow in volume for many years to come. The waves will still roll against our shores and supplement our reservoir of renewable energy sources. The land will not be submerged overnight by increasing height of the sea.

We will still produce our high quality foodstuffs. We will still produce a number of world class sportsmen and women. We will still produce outstanding Scientists, Doctors, Engineers and Architects. We will still have and enjoy the best golf courses in the world. We will still have the beautiful scenery and heritage to continue to attract ever increasing tourist trade. We will still have our universities and education system. We will still have our legal system. And most of all, way more than anything else, we will still have our people.

The supermarkets will not close, the shops will not shut, and the banks will remain open. Shareholders will not be disenfranchised, The postal service will still run. Newspapers will still be published. The internet will not close down. Buses will still run, pensions and benefits will still be paid.

What will be different on the 4th of May is that we will start on a brief and exciting journey at the end of which we will breathe 100% Scottish air, drink 100% Scot

39

Billy,

Germany 27/02/2007 09:22:08

Astonishing how many people don't realise the SNP
WILL disband should independence be achieved. They would then stand, depending on their political beliefs, for their own particular parties. They would not be the Scottish Goverment. Why are we so unsophisticated as an electorare ?. Stop believing everything Labour , the party of pathological liars, are saying.

40

Robbie,

NZ where at least most people vote 27/02/2007 09:23:57

31. davieboy144
“ apparently in an independent Scotland every ill will be cured, pensioners will not die and every child will be happy and loved.”
This is a very shrewd and interesting remark, Davie boy. Who are you quoting? Who fed you these hyperbolic claims? I wait with baited breath for you to cite your sources.

41

LyonHearts,

27/02/2007 09:25:43

Hometown of Andrew Carnegie and eeerrr...WHO???
Richard Jobson of The Skids!!! The former made millions and gave away millions more ( including the the building of thousands of libraries across America) What exactly is Mr Jobson's legacy? A few dodgy and pretentious punk albums and a far from spectacular career in the media! How can you rate the two together?

Although apprently RJ was the inspiration behind The Undertones classic " My Perfect Cousin" which maybe we should be thankful for!

42

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 09:32:08

For the record, watching from this distance, I do not think that Scotland will vote for a change of government. So the whole argument about independence is quite futile, including my own comments.

Scotland fascinates me as it has so much going for it. It is beautiful (especially in the north), the people are generally nice in nature, it has some world class products, strong tourism and is self sufficient in natural resources. People talk proudly of their country and its past achievements and yet, at the same time, have such a spectacular lack of belief in your ability to run your own affairs.

You never hear people saying:

"ah yes, we will remain in the union because Scotland's continues to enjoy record levels of growth" or

"ah yes, we will remain in the union because Scotland's views and economic interests are strongly represented and protected by the UK government."

People seem to be genuinely discontent with the current set up and yet are terrified of being left alone. It is like a movie where someone has reared a tiger from birth and then gets to the point where they have to take the tiger into the wild and let it go. When released, the tiger follows the jeep as it knows of nothing else. It does not know what is best for it and is scared and confused. But once it gets out there and sees how good it is to be its own master, well that is where the happy ending comes........

Your people's psyche must be a therapists dream :-)

43

Pioneer,

Fife 27/02/2007 09:35:12

Render it down to the simple facts - we've had years of Conservative mismangement of Scotland followed by years of Labour mismanagement of Scotland.
It's time to give the SNP the opportunity to take the reins - they couldn't be any worse.

44

LyonHearts,

27/02/2007 09:35:55

My family originate from Northumberland and Cumbria! We are Viking is ancestory! Why should we be forced to have kinship with people from the west coast and cut ourselves off from our ancestors! I am all for diversity, but I don't really feel much affinity with the rest of Scotland! Living in France doesn't help, but I am from Edinburgh first, Scottish second! I think maybe the " Europe of the regions" idea is better for everyone and will break down outdated ideas of nationalism, which created so much destruction in the last century!

45

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 09:36:34

#42

Im just reading all the posts from the SNP supporters saying how wonderful an independent Scotland would be when the reality is that the only thing that would change is that the socialist in red tie would be replaced with a socialist in a tartan tie.

46

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 09:42:15

#46 LyonHearts: "...so much destruction in the last century!"

Have you not been paying attention to the first 7 years of this century?

47

Robbie,

27/02/2007 09:44:50

44. Mr Thai Land,
Good analogy. Allowed to go free (sovereign self-government) but Oh! so afraid. If entrepreneurs, from the dawn of history had been like some of these Scots (not prepared to believe in themselves and their ability) humanity would still be living in caves.

48

LyonHearts,

27/02/2007 09:51:45

#48 Yes I apologise, this is very true! This seems to be part of the same problem I mentioned though wouldn't you agree?

I think I would be for an Independent Scotland if it could be a model for social equality! Why on earth was all that money spent on the parliament building when just up the road there is a council estate which I'm sure is in desperate need of repair! It certainly was when I used to live nearby in St Mary's Street!

49

Doh,

27/02/2007 09:53:45

#41 - Billy are you being sarcastic? - The SNP have never said they would disband after independance. Sadly Scottish politics will continue to overshadowed by a party that is above reproach - unless your a craven unionist fearty.

They have wrapped themselves in the flag - then proceed to denigrate their fellow Scots for being "submissive" to the English.

It is derisory to be in favour of the European Union but pretend there is no benefit for remaining part of the British Union.

We are a free people, by free choice a member of a Union between two nation states for mutual benefit.

50

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 10:00:26

#50

One of the central arguments the SNP & their supporters is that interest rates are set for SE England. however now it seems that in the event of an independent Scotland that the status quo would prevail in the short term at least with a longer term expectation that Scotland would join the eurozone where the interest rates are set for the whole of Europe with no lee-way to micro-manage the Scottish economy.

So the question is, what is the difference going to be with that respect?

51

bill-alba,

Fife 27/02/2007 10:01:23

Davieboy....every post you make is sarcastic..
I am an SNP support (but would normally vote tory) I do not for a minute think that everything will be smelling of roses when we achieve independence and neither do I think you have read anywhere that nats do think that...
However by the original comments some people saying that before independence we should sort out the problems...These problems exist NOW...so the much praised and wonderful union isnt working...
Independence will at least give us a chance to fix things that have been ignored because we are a backwater as far as Westminster is concerned.

52

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 10:02:52

#53

Independence is the only major difference between the 2 partys, apart from that they are a couple of 2 bob tax & spend dinosaurs

53

Mr Thai Land,

Bangkok 27/02/2007 10:04:21

#51 - Sorry, I do not know enough about the housing problems in Edinburgh. Too far away from it and only get to see what is reported in the Scotsman and on other internet news sources.

But I thought that Edinburgh people were given the opportunity to have their housing revamped and voted against it? But I do not know the ins and out of that.

As for the money being spent on the Parliament building, I do not know of any country in the world that would not have done the same as Scotland. It is inconceivable for a country not to make its Parliament iconic. The building should be a statement about the nation.

I do not understand why Scots are so hung up on the cost of it? Sure, the project was a disaster, but it seems that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Donald Dewar took the decisions on the procurement route, not your MSPs.

The UK is spending 9 billion pounds on the Olympic games. And how much did the new offices at Westminster cost? And what about Wembley stadium?

As for Scotland being a model for social equality, why can this not happen? People seem to have firm views about what an independent Scotland will look like. The reality is that you will not know until you go there. All good things in life require a leap of faith. Perhaps some people are born without faith.

54

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 10:06:57

#51
So the Vikings/Norse of the Northern and Western Isles and Caithness/Sutherland you have no affinity with? I assume you have your bloodline registered with Crufts to back up your 'claims'?

55

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 10:12:21

#55

I'm not for one minute saying that we live in a land of milk and honey, however what I am saying that to pass control from London to Brussels (which is current SNP policy) is not independence.

Also, I do not believe that voting for left of centre politicians will create wealth as from my experience they only have experience of spending it and not very wisely at that

56

Miss Jean Brodie,

27/02/2007 10:14:32

‘Robert Parker’
Anyone who thinks Nukes are are a sollution to anything needs their head examined?

‘a parliamentary union seems the best idea in this age of change Elisabeth Brooks, Perth’
‘My general feeling is that there are too many unknowns about independence. Alan Hopkins’

Fear is no reason to retain something!

"There is no way Scotland can compete on its own in the modern marketplace." Lord Hughwright, 72 - this is ignorance!

I don't believe in independence, but something certainly needs to change." Graham Merry, 74
Independence is a state all will find themselves in a some stage in life - How can you not believe in it?

"I don't want independence. I don't like that man that runs the SNP. I don't like his politics and attitude." John Stein
Imagine putting a persons face before the thought of a nation - Clearly a big brother fan ignorance of reality here!

The arguments against Independence are forever becoming more shallow and determined by fear - these statements are testement to that - Identity in a Global age is where it is at - Scotland Independent - is a Start!

57

Malachi Malagrowther,

27/02/2007 10:14:37

16 Robbie: “How, does one get through to the 'we're far too stupid to be self-reliant' crowd” Good question.

My old man is a good case in point. I’ve always found it almost impossible to get through to him. His opinion of the day generally comes from the Daily Record. You control the tabloid press and you control the election.

I think that there needs to be a pro-independence tabloid in Scotland. It would sell like hotcakes. It would need backing, and I think a lot of corporate Scotland would love to see Scotland independent. I think that they know that it couldn’t be any worse than it is now, and resent the SE England economy being subsidised to the extend that it is by defence industry and national British government agencies. They know that that kind of investment leads to ancillary benefits that knock on to the wealth of the community.

A profound change in thinking is required at a grass roots level in Scotland. Maybe a really well-made documentary would do it. They seem to be in vogue at the moment.

58

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 10:17:12

46. LyonHearts states, “….break down outdated ideas of nationalism, which created so much destruction in the last century.”
The 19th and 20th century were the centuries of imperialism - trying to destroy nationalism. The Russian, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, French and British Empires suppressed small nations and ethnic groups who dared to desire nothing more but to live in their own sovereign states. Nationalism and Liberalism went hand in hand with was then considered ‘Freedom’. Only in the unification of Italy and Germany was nationalism a uniting force to create larger territories. Take the Irish, the Greeks, the Belgians, - they were fighting for what? -to conqueror, England Turkey, Netherlands? No simple struggling for their right to exist as independent countries. Often called sentimental romanticism by Unionists. Who must explain, why did the more powerful nations wish to maintain control over these smaller nations? To help them gain prosperity? - as in the Potato Famine?
Who fought so many battles all over poor Gallant little Belgium, dubbed "the battlefield of Europe"? The small nations or the major powers? It was always the big guys who bullied, invaded and caused wars and conflicts. Most small nations wish peace and friendly relations with all their neighbours. Political unions can be belligerent and history shows that areas in the periphery, away from the capital usually suffer economically. Economic and neighbourly unions are quite different and Scotland, England any-land could enjoy.

59

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 10:18:49

#34 Robbie
Thanks for the background on your electoral system, it's long been argued here that compulsary voting is not possible for whatever reason. I agree the apathy here is shocking but none the less true. Some sources claim more people PAID to vote in the final of the X factor than voted in the general election, if true what does that say. I make no claims to know the answer but nothing is surer if the trend continues then nothing will change come May. Have a good one!

60

Robbie,

27/02/2007 10:19:36

46. LyonHearts states, “….break down outdated ideas of nationalism, which created so much destruction in the last century.”
The 19th and 20th century were the centuries of imperialism - trying to destroy nationalism. The Russian, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, French and British Empires suppressed small nations and ethnic groups who dared to desire nothing more but to live in their own sovereign states. Nationalism and Liberalism went hand in hand with was then considered ‘Freedom’. Only in the unification of Italy and Germany was nationalism a uniting force to create larger territories. Take the Irish, the Greeks, the Belgians, - they were fighting for what? -to conqueror, England Turkey, Netherlands? No simple struggling for their right to exist as independent countries. Often called sentimental romanticism by Unionists. Who must explain, why did the more powerful nations wish to maintain control over these smaller nations? To help them gain prosperity? - as in the Potato Famine?
Who fought so many battles all over poor Gallant little Belgium, dubbed "the battlefield of Europe"? The small nations or the major powers? It was always the big guys who bullied, invaded and caused wars and conflicts. Most small nations wish peace and friendly relations with all their neighbours. Political unions can be belligerent and history shows that areas in the periphery, away from the capital usually suffer economically. Economic and neighbourly unions are quite different and Scotland, England anyland could enjoy them.

61

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 10:20:54

Sorry not sure how it went in twice. Getting senile and dopey better vote for a Unionist party.

62

Doh,

27/02/2007 10:21:42

#59 - Peter - for you I re-read my post - and dont see answers to it in my post - so here is another attempt at a clarifcation - and since you claim to be voting SNP for the first time you might wish to consider them.

1. Do the SNP intend to disband after independance yes/no?
2. A party (any party, but in this instance the SNP) that claims to
represent a Nation- that is everyone regardless of political beliefs is rather difficult to argue against without being casigated as anti-patriotic - good or bad thing - yes/no?
3. We choose to belong to the British Union, just as the SNP long to belong to the European Union, can you see no parallels at all in these goals - yes/no?

BTW I never called anyone xenophobic. Of course politicans that slip into such a petty jibe should apologise and get back to discussing policy.
As for the Union surving in its present form - not I would wish it to adapt and become more modern - a truly federal union between two nations - a real possibility now that we have our own parliament.

63

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 10:22:30

#60
Certainly not 'Milk and Honey' at the moment, more 'Wind and Pee'.
The common thread that runs through the Scotsman 'Tour of the Outback' is the crumbling infrasturcture, the despair, the disillusion, the lowered expectations, the lack of power at the grass roots.

The Legacy of the Union.
The Legacy of conservatism, of the Tory or Labour variety.

Lift your heads people of Scotland and look around the world, and tell me you would not be better off running your own affairs.

64

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 10:36:17

#67 Robbie - those really in power love the fact that less and less people bother to vote.
The reason?
A small political elite are the unchallenged 'ruling class'.

Westminster is returning to it's pre-Edwardian status of representing the Landowners, Bankers, the Merchants and the legal profession.....the proles dont bother to vote any more, and so deserve to be ignored. Resources are being poloarised to satisfy their needs and their infrasctuctures.
We are just the herd to be managed.

Holyrood is not independent of Westminster so the same rules apply.

The fact is day and daily we see by their actions, the sheer greed, the lying and the they are in it for themselves and don't represent us.

If the people had something to believe in, had the glaze removed from their eyes, then Independence will win the day.

65

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 10:38:30

39. Doh
Ok few personal remarks about Jim and people wrapping themselves in a Saltire but I await to hear what you believe in and your arguments to sustain those beliefs. You believe in the Union - why exactly - you don’t give much reason. Let’s all leave out the personal comments and keep to debating issues.
47. Davie boy
“ the reality is that the only thing that would change is that the socialist in red tie would be replaced with a socialist in a tartan tie.” So all those wonderful benefits enumerated earlier will not come to pass, Davie.
No change? Well if things did not change but as you declare will stay the same - let’s go for it. At least we’ll meet new friends at the UN (who don’t even know where we are) and increase our tourism. Also

66

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 10:46:40

#39 Doh
You say i am out of touch and how do you come to this little gem of wisdom. All i said was a full explanation of independance has in my opinion never been forthcoming from the great A Salmond yet we are expected to vote for the unknown. As with most of your postings i can't get my head round what your postings are trying to establish. I'm away to watch QVC, i find it more interesting than your rambles at least i can turn it off when i want.

67

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 10:50:27

65. jim lad, the capital #34 Robbie
Hi Jim “I agree the apathy here is shocking but none the less true…..I make no claims to know the answer…”
Have you had a look at this Wikipedia site < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout>; it states, ‘In general, low turnout may be due to disenchantment, indifference, or contentment.” and scroll down and it gives various interesting socioeconomic factors. As has happened traditional supporters of a particular party (Labour) are so disgruntled with their betrayal and incompetence they decide not to vote for them. They cannot be completely disloyal and will not vote for any other party. Not ’swinging voters’ (unless Solidarity adherents) - they prefer not voting to betraying their so call working class ideals. Sad but unfortunately true..

68

Justin T!me,

Saughton Jail 27/02/2007 10:50:36

I could tell the meaning of a word like serene
I got some ’o’ grades when I was sixteen
I can tell the difference between magarine and butter
I can say saskatchewan without starting to stutter
But I can’t understand why we let
someone else rule our land
We’re cap in hand

I could get a broken jaw from being in a fight
I know it’s evening when day turns to night
I can understand why Stranraer lie so lowly
They could save a lot of points by
signing Hibs goalie
But I can’t understand why we let
someone else rule our land
We’re cap in hand

We fight - when they ask us
We boast - then we cower
We beg
For a piece of
What’s already ours

Once I thought I could make God a bribe
So I said I was in his lost tribe
Getting handouts can be so frustrating
Get in line son,
there’s five million waiting

I can’t understand why you let someone else rule your land
You’re cap in hand.

**************************************
It's time for change boys and girls. Let's get on board and see what happens. Sadly, we might have to leave Dunfermline behind - it can become the People's Republic of Gordon Brown. After all, he is burning his bridges both sides of the border. He can play at being President of Dunfermline.

69

Miss H,

27/02/2007 10:54:29

The quotes are 50/50 - of those who express a preference.

Perhaps it would be more worthwhile to look at what the quotes tell us.

For example why does one person believe:

'There is no way Scotland can compete on its own in the modern marketplace.'

While another person believes:

'If Ireland can do it, so can we.'

Is it actually related to personal self-confidence?

70

Miss H,

27/02/2007 10:55:31

76 the fact that you need to have the concept of independence explained to you is sad.

71

Justin T!me,

Abusing Power 27/02/2007 10:56:00

I could tell the meaning of a word like serene
I got some ’o’ grades when I was sixteen
I can tell the difference between magarine and butter
I can say saskatchewan without starting to stutter
But I can’t understand why we let
someone else rule our land
We’re cap in hand

I could get a broken jaw from being in a fight
I know it’s evening when day turns to night
I can understand why Stranraer lie so lowly
They could save a lot of points by
signing Hibs goalie
But I can’t understand why we let
someone else rule our land
We’re cap in hand

We fight - when they ask us
We boast - then we cower
We beg
For a piece of
What’s already ours

Once I thought I could make God a bribe
So I said I was in his lost tribe
Getting handouts can be so frustrating
Get in line son,
there’s five million waiting

I can’t understand why you let someone else rule your land
You’re cap in hand.

**************************************
It's time for change boys and girls. Let's get on board and see what happens. Sadly, we might have to leave Dunfermline behind - it can become the People's Republic of Gordon Brown.

72

Justin T!me,

Saughon Jail 27/02/2007 10:58:00

Sorry for the double posting. My Browser Bar must have malfunctioned (if you'll pardon the expression!)

73

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 11:00:38

73. James, Dundee
"If the people had something to believe in, had the glaze removed from their eyes....

Aye James but how do you get people more interested in their future than the football results - love to remove the glaze from their eyes. Even if some voted for the Mcgillicuddy Serious Party, I rather that, than not read learn and use their franchise. The midnight hour approaches and it’s time for the scratcher after one more comment.

74

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 11:05:35

#76
Do you not vote for 'the unknown' each time you cast a cross on a ballot paper?

The problem is whilst most people on the forum will vote, and need no persuasion, the energy is mostly heat and not light. Getting the non-voters out their scratchers on the day is something the SNP must concentrate on if they are to win the day.

It's time to get knocking on the doors of the disaffected and get the message accross.

'Give us your vote and we WILL make a difference'.

Offer to bus them to the polling stations on the day.

75

Doh,

27/02/2007 11:08:17

#75 Peter - since you did me the courtesy of answering and keeping it polite I will try and reply as well

1. I dont know if SNP will implode after independance - but seems to em there are 2 routes to independance consensus and a single party approach. The SNP favour the later - I do not.

2. I dont think all parties claim to represent the nation equally - most are class based - especially Tommy Sheridan.

3. You say "but then political reality is that the EU exists and it is probably better to be inside than out." My feelings about the British Union exactly.

Accusing them of wrapping themselves in flag is not the same as an accusation of xenophobia. It happens all over the world, and I dont approve of it anywhere except on the sports pitch. My point was that it is difficult to be oppossed to any SNP policy without being accussed of being patriotic. Personally I cant imagine how policy gets discussed within the SNP under such circumstances.

cheers
Doh

76

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 11:13:14

62. Malachi Malagrowther
Hi MalachI, your comment, “I think that there needs to be a pro-independence tabloid in Scotland. It would sell like hotcakes.” is excellent but unlike the ‘The Scots Independent’ would have to be a bit more ‘populist ‘rather than completely politically. Need cartoons, articles, crosswords, letters, sport and unfortunately to keep it going as a weekly or daily ‘adverts’. I believe even large circulation can not keep a paper afloat - it needs advertising revenue which then of course can make it beholding to its advertisers. But something like a popular newspaper with a large readership and with independent sympathies would be invaluable.

77

LyonHearts,

27/02/2007 11:13:20

I've got blond hair and some ginger in my beard and I know that I am a " Heinz 57" in terms of my ancestry - probably like most people!

I just think that the new Europe should develop along the lines of regionalism rather than nationalism! Good luck to Scotland if they decide to go it alone, but I hope they vote more with their heads than their hearts!

I would like to see Scotland model it's parliament on the " rights of man" and invest in housing, schools, hospitals etc... rather than grandiose buildings! For instance I heard that the window cleaning bill alone is around £20K for the SP! Surely a scandal in anyones language!

78

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 11:19:20

#77 Robbie
Just had a look thanks, but do you not agree that it all finishes as assuptions so i don't think we are any closer to knowing the real answer. Do you think the politicians are as concerned as us or pehaps they know that if it stays this way they will still be in power and power is all. Good speaking to you and look forward to hearing from you in the future

79

Maxie,

27/02/2007 11:20:48

I fail to understand how any unionist can be encouraged by this straw poll in Dunfermline.

It was fairly evenly split between unionists and nationalists despite being a Labour stronghold and despite the Scotsman being a pro-union "paper."

The unionist should be worried that their number has so dwindles over the years:

I liked the quote from the 17 year old student, Steven Mill:

"Out of the folk in my modern studies class, four out of five people are for independence. They feel the Union isn't relevant to today's society."

80

Robert12,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 11:22:17

Trust the people of Dunfermline to be so negative about their town.

Being originally from Dunfermline I remember the whinges: "High Street has crap shops", "cinema is too small", "bus station is manky". That was 6 years ago and despite the knocking down of the old bus station, new Leisure Park (with Multiplex cinema) and beginnings of an extension to the Kingsgate Shopping Centre people still manage to whinge about something "I have to get my bus from elsewhere while they build a new bus station", "There's a big hole in the ground where they are extending the shopping centre" etc etc Some people will never be happy! Thank God for people like the woman who has moved from Edinburgh who can see the positive aspects!

As for industry - it's become apparent that there is a centralisation of industry around the major cities for years now. This is something that needs to be addressed. Why build yet more offices in the likes of Edinburgh Park causing traffic chaos when you could build them in somewhere like Rosyth where there are plans to build along the waterfront?

Incidentally, I was in Dunfermline last week with an hour to kill and found the shops to be great. I was able to go from looking at clothes to nipping across the road look at carpets and beds!

81

Justin T!me,

Saughon Jail 27/02/2007 11:30:08

#87 mkmitch: Are you serious? Why would want to compare Scotland - an allegedly equal partner in a political union - with English regions. I know that the Westminster government officially classifies Scotland as one of the UK regions, but we are a country.

The point about defence is futile and one that Alex Salmond and his predecessors have been asked about before. Each time he has been able to give a credible answer. And each time, the unionist politicians have not been able to make any political capital out of his answers.

An indepedent Scotland, like many other countries in Europe and elsewhere in the world, will not have a nuclear arsenal or a fleet of warships that can blast Iran off the map. We are not going to be a world military force. Why would we want to match defence funding pound for pound? The agenda changes to a Scottish one as opposed to that of a Christian lunatic who wants to be a world leader.

I guess what you are saying is that an independent Scotland will not be allowed to remain in Nato. An independent Scotland will not be able to work with England and Ireland on a strategy to protect the British Isles? That the Yanks and major European countries will want to isolate Scotland and leave us open to being courted by the Russians. Give me a break!

Your problem, as I see it, is that you appear to have no real aspiration for your country and do not appreciate the extent to which it is in decline - politically, economically and socially. Scotland has some serious problems that are threatening our very existence long term. It is time for Scots, and those who have migrated here, to stand up and take control of their own affairs.

The English can continue down the path of self destruction if they want. Scotland is starting to recognise that it has other options. Hopefully people will decide to pursue them in May.

In the meantime, you should try to do more research about what is actually going on u

82

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 11:32:10

#80 Miss H
Not nearly as sad as you who is prepared to walk into the unknown armed only with a fundamentalist view about the SNP, at least i am asking questions, forewarned is forearmed.I want rid of labour like so many others, but not at any price.

83

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 11:36:14

#85 Peter
You are only correct on one point i am not in favour of the status quo.

84

Lock,

27/02/2007 11:46:16

I implore everyone to vote SNP in May. Personally I am indifferent as to which bunch of incompetents are running us, but a referendum would at least give us a decision by the nation.

What that decision would be? Plenty of people have jobs. Everyone has a car. For all people tell us about relative poverty there is hardly any absolute poverty. People can afford to go on holidays, go to the pub at the weekend and eat fish suppers as much as they please. If everyone is so badly off then why do I see so many drunk, overweight smokers?

My point being that while people have cash in their pocket they will not vote for a change. Just my opinion.

85

Gordon, Canonmills,

Please come home William McIlvanney! 27/02/2007 11:54:40

THE COWARDLY LION
(A parable: March, 1979)

There was a lion dormant, with the mange.
Its roar was out of practice and its teeth
Were brown with eating scraps or something worse.
There was a smell of carrion on its breath.
Asleep, it dreamed a past that never was;
Awake, lapped spirit from a drinking bowl
The keepers had allowed it, walked its cage
In which a full length mirror was installed.
All day it watched itself and practised rage,
Whispered “I am a lion”, bared its fangs
And sometimes snarled so fiercely that it ran
In fear of its own image to the end
Of its small cage, and hid its head and then
Peeped out, approached the mirror once again.
“I can remember being strong,” it said.
Then it lay down again and licked the wounds
It didn't have and thought of all the cubs
The keepers took away and taught strange tricks.
Throughout the world those cubs had won great fame,
Performing always in the keepers' name.
And wondering where they were, where was its soul,
It would return to find it in the bowl
And gather strange, imaginary strength
And roar and fill itself with its own terror
And beat itself unconscious on the mirror .

But lions will be lions and one day
It saw behind it in the mirror keepers laughing
At its preposterous enactment of itself.
They giggled, winked and nodded and it turned
And in an instant lionhood was formed.
The roar was real. In the eyes a dark past burned.
It saw its own horizons without bars.
It saw that keepers only keep the past
And it was present and its powerful paws
Could free it from injustice of the laws.
It took its strength and ran and the bars shook.
The keepers were afraid. They mustn't lose
The cubs and revenues the lion gave.
It was a prize exhibit in their zoo.
They watched it lying down, ignore the mirror

86

Gordon, Canonmills,

... your country needs you! 27/02/2007 11:55:34

The keepers held a conference. A plan
Was needed or the lion would escape.
It wanted freedom. Why not give it some,
Extend its compound but still keep it trapped?
Some nodded sagely who were not asleep.
They would pretend to free it but still keep
It as their pet. And even some of those
Who loved the lion said the plan was good.
These in their cunning thought they understood
The lion would escape this half-way house.
This was a lion. It was not a mouse
To be content with just a little room.
The compound was constructed. Every stone
Was argued over fiercely. Like a tomb
It never would escape the thing was made.
Still those who loved it acquiesced. They said
In private, “Things will work out very well.
Give it one sniff of freedom and we'll see.
The lion will be a lion and will be
True to itself again. Don't be afraid.”
Some sleepers wakened briefly and agreed.

The day of 'freedom' came. The cage-door creaked
Out on its ancient hinges and swung open.
In awe the keepers waited. What would happen?
Would the lion attack and had they been too bold
In their decisions? Would the compound hold?
The lion approached the door. Its head emerged
Noble and proud, its snout raised to the wind.
It smelt the terrible distances of freedom,
It felt the risk of being not confined,
It knew the pain of hunger unmassaged,
It sensed the emptiness where self is found,
It heard the bitterness where life is waged.

Slowly the keepers relaxed into a smile
And giggled and nodded again, were winking while
Those who loved the lion had nothing to say.
For the lion had turned to its cage and slunk away
And lives still among stinking straw today.


William McILVANNEY (In Through The Head)

87

Gordon, Canonmills,

NEVER AGAIN! 27/02/2007 11:56:47

for Willie!

for Scotland!!

for all of us!!!!

Vote for Independence!

88

Maxie,

27/02/2007 12:08:43

#95 Jim lad

You are quite right to ask questions. However, embarking on self-determination is hardly walking into the unknown.

Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, Latvia, estonia, lithuania and numerous others manage quite well with a similar or smaller population to that of Scotland, many of them having fewer resources than Scotland.

Its a tried and trusted form of government the world over.

What is "the unknown" is 5 million Scots having to wait with bated breadth to see which party comes to power at Westminster after each general election, whether we vote for that party or not.

89

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 12:10:11

#04 Peter - My experience is that big is ineffective.
You must not be doing it right !! :)

In terms of currency and EU etc. There will be a referendum. Being a Scottish referendum will mean the majority will get what they have voted for. Just another thing that Scottish voters often dont get as a small player in the Union.

At least we are starting to see some half decent Unionist arguments on here. However please tell me what Policies and or Decisions taken by Westminster has benifited Scotland either equally or better than the South East? If the Union is so good for all members there must be many? Please also tell me what decisions you think may not have been in Scotlands interests - Probably none?

90

Billy,

Germany 27/02/2007 12:14:46

What is it about my post you thought was sarcastic ?
You do seem very aptly named.

91

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 12:26:20

98 - 100 - Gordon

Yes.

92

Doh,

27/02/2007 12:32:30

#94 - Peter, I follow your reasoning but not your conclusions.
I dont think many of these matters of over centralisation would change with independance - the EU - would still be there - England would still be there and our largest trading partner. We would still be in bed with an elephant but we would have given up any say on that bed was made.

I think we can both agree that the world is very complicated and interdependant. Better to share responsibility and power with our
neighbours in England and Europe, rather than just pick up the ba and walk out.

I dont think independance or government in general can make that much positive impact on the economy. If it was that simple we should just pass a law to make us all millionaires.

I dont think wee Eck is the next Mussolini, if he was I am sure Voldemort could spare him his vote.

93

no-name,

Dunfermline 27/02/2007 12:42:20

Just to clarify a couple of points:
The town centre is being redeveloped which will give Dunfermline a much larger (and hopefully) much improved Shopping Centre. To achieve this the Bus Station is being relocated, not shut down.

94

davieboy144,

27/02/2007 12:45:06

#102

The right to buy your own council house & an integrated transport system for starters

95

Malachi Malagrowther,

27/02/2007 12:49:54

Robbie, 88. I think you’re right.

TV is also a huge part of the problem, with fifty years of the BBC saying “and now over to London, where someone who is highly trained in speaking with a contrived accent will read out the Really Important News that your accent prevents you doing.” (Received Pronunciation is an invention of the BBC in the 1920s – it was regarded as being a bit common by the upper class at the time)

I think that over time this wears a people down and creates an inferiority complex. That is part of the reason why educated Scots who should know better, who see the mistakes of Edinburgh since 1997 think “this wee bit of independence hasn’t worked so the whole thing will not work,” in spite of the evidence of Ireland, Norway, Denmark, etc doing perfectly well, thank you. These Scots are utterly convinced that Scotland is a special case that by some miracle of geography and DNA simply cannot stand on its own feet.

But we haven’t had independence. All that’s happened is that little Johnny’s been given freedom to decide how he spends his pocket money. He’s still not allowed to speak to other adults unless spoken to.

96

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 13:05:58

#101 Maxie
Agree with most of what you say, my point was simple we don't live in a one size fits all world, independance has been a disaster in lots of countries around the world and all i am saying is it would be foolhardy to plod ahead without asking plenty of questions, theres nothing wrong with that. The points you put forward and in the context of your post gets no arguament from me all i am suggesting is we look at the bigger picture.I am not an SNP fan or supporter but what worries me in the various postings is many SNP activists are coming over as fundementalists whilst others are more moderate.I want change and if it is SNP then i will accept the voice of the people but i don't feel the need to hammer my beliefs down peoples throats and i don't like the idea that because i don't happen to agree with someones politics i am somehow at fault. I find your post to be of the moderate type and one i would always be prepared to listen to and respect.

97

Billy,

Germany 27/02/2007 13:37:13

examples of independence being a disaster please
jim lad.

98

democracy,

Selkirkshire 27/02/2007 13:40:24

davieboy 144, I suspect you are just a mischief maker pretending to add to the debate, but if not, I would suggest you return to school and study the difference between Nationalism and autocracy and you will go someway to realizing where Scotland's future lies.
But I fear it is all above you, being only a pseudo intellectual and is the main reason you give no hint as to where you are from, so this medium for debate suits you perfectly!! Yours Rob.

99

Sedov,

Scotland 27/02/2007 13:51:51

Its not what country you are born into that matters is what class you are born into, and the working class is international. Change can only come about about by the unity of all working classes. Nationalism divides that unity into nation states. The good news is that the global economy dictates that there is no such thing as independence, the bad news is that the nationalists cannot get that into their heads and could lead Scotland from the frying pan into the fire.

100

Doh,

27/02/2007 13:56:03

#108 you say

"These Scots are utterly convinced that Scotland is a special case that by some miracle of geography and DNA simply cannot stand on its own feet."

Of course Scotland can stand on its own two feet - are you saying by some miracle of geography or DNA we cannot and must not cooperate or find common purpose with England?

Not so unique either - what about the Basques, Catalans, Bavarians, Saxons, Walloons - they are all parts of larger multi-national states as well.

Pointing to other smaller nations is worthwhile but not conclusive.

101

jim lad,

the capital 27/02/2007 14:00:56

#110 Billy
The tone of your question leads me to think that you are of the SNP persuation which is fine, but if you think i am going to respond to your question your up,a gum tree.At no point earlier in my debate with others did you feel the need to join in and now when you see something that doesn't suit your beliefs you want to jump in and have an arguament, well find someone else because you wont wind me up. Your not worth the effort.

102

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 14:02:51

Just to add fuel to the fire....
Based on the content of the article, the Title instead of 'Independence? Let's get basics right', could just as easily have been:

'Keep the Union? Even the basics aint right

103

Steve McGregor,

Liverpool 27/02/2007 14:07:40

Thanx to Iron lady Thatcher the great, for making the wee men up North take their true place, and realise that the size of their stature reflects the size of their brain.
You were destined to be part of us, and we will always remain your upper class boundary. For those who know mathematics understand it better. Come on England, keep ruling the roost...

104

Hamilton West & Earnock,

Hamilton 27/02/2007 14:13:34

The bottom line in the Independance arguement is that for to many years the people of Scotland have been lied to. We have been lied to for that long that many folk take the lies for the truth.

Think about a couple of the lies we have listened to over the years -
The oil won't be worth anything! 1974 McCrone report http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4238744.stm which was unveiled under the 30year law shows this to be the biggest lie.
Scottish business will suffer! - if it suffers anything like Ireland, Norway or Denmark then that will do for me. Ask yourself if business tax levels in Scotland were half that of England/Wales as they are in Ireland where would you have your business?
Scotland will not be a member of the EU - Yes it will with the same rights as every other member state.
The Labour party are investing in education and health - no they are not they are attempting through PPP/PFI schemes to bankrupt the country. Paying between and 3 and 4 times as much over 30years for a school or hospital does not make financial sense unless you are the businessperson making the profit.

The majority of Scotland are beginning to see through this tissue of lies, we are in the middle of a massive sea change of opinion. So instead of sitting at your computer shaking your head while you read this - read what I've said and think about what I've said. Don't close your ears - open your mind to what could be and what will be.

ITS TIME FOR SCOTLAND.

105

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 14:52:22

#113 you chose your examples well. None of your examples have the History and Identity of the Country/Kingdom of Scotland, whith the briefest of exceptions.

Basque 'Country'
There was never a Country orignally a confederation of the Dukes of Vasconia which was lagely under the influence of the Frankish Kingdom, with encroachment from the south by the Moors. That which is Spain then came under the indluence of firstly Navarre and then Castille.

Catalonia
1258, by the Treaty of Corbeil, that the king of France relinquished his feudal overlordship over the counties of the Principality of Catalonia to the king of Aragón.

Wallonia
was never a country, but originated as a Frankish region firstly under the Merovingians and then the Carolingians, and indeed Luxembourg was historically part of this region.

The Duchy of Bavaria (created as part of Holy Roman Empire) was briefly an independent 'Kingdom' created (1806-66) as a regional buffer state between Austria and Prussia by old Boney himself but was incorporated into Germany in 1866.

The Electorate of Saxony was again created as a 'Kingdom' with the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 by Napoleon, and was in fact a vassal state to France. It didnt last as long as Bavaria, being divided and gobbled up by Prussia in 1813 part of the settlement after the Napoleonic wars, and incorporated into Germany in 1871.


Also, the Walloons might be happy but are the Flemish?

Scotland is it's own case in point.
There ar plenty of examples nearer to home where Independence was both desired and has had a positive effect.

106

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 14:52:46

Doh - #39 and #113. You seem to be one of the few Unionists who can stick around and put up some good arguments but I neg to differ in some of your posts.

SNP did not get 20% but 28% down 8% points from previous result. This is still a poor result I agree but they were and still are at worst the 2nd party in Scottish politics by a good margin. Given the media coverage they get you would think they were running way behind the Tories! Some of your comments also indicate that the Pro Indep group on this site are ‘fanatics’. Some are more extreme than others but its hardly as extreme as the Basques you mention or others. Everyone still abides by the ballot.

You also say that EU and BU membership amounts to the same thing. Firstly the EU is a large group of independent states with no one state having the vast majority of power. There are still issues where the core economic powers have too much control but many small countries still want to join up and have. Not quite the same process in the UK I don’t think!
Secondly Scotland is effectively a State within a Union (UK) within a Union (EU). Scotland is a member of a Union (EU) with no voice in that union. When UK joined a bigger Union it many ways removed the need for the British Union.

I therefore give your argument back: If you believe in being a state in the EU then it should be possible for Scotland as a Country to have state membership? If you are against the EU in principle then the same goes for the UK. Sorry but imo the only aberration here is the structure of the UK union, which no one democratically voted for and fewer and fewer believe is a good and fair structure.

107

open,

LJPR LEGAL JUDICIAL POLITICAL REFORMERS 27/02/2007 14:56:56

SCOTLAND BEING DESTROYED BY ESTABLISHMENT LACKIES

Scotlands impoverished people have been oppressed for centuries by the establishment monsters acting NOT in the best interests of Scottish citizens but for the crown,monarchy and other hangers on who control the banks,insurance and multi nationals.

1.Mill(school janitor but now controlling Scotland as the crooked godfather of the Law Society of Scotland)and his mob.

2.Hamilton(New Head law lord for the notoriously corrupt Scottish Appeal courts previously controlled by Cullen) and his mob.

3.Boyd(Lord advocate who turns a blind eye to crimes by his pals at the Law Society)and his mob at the crown office. (resigned)

4.McConnell (First Minister who fails Scotland over and over by allowing this mob of legal crooks to destroy Scotlands infrastructure)and his mafia party.Add in the leaders of the other ESTABLISHMENT parties who will fair NO BETTER.Most have been hand picked by the elite Scottish establishment and funded by millionaires to ensure the rich are assured whoever wins an election they will be well looked after.

5.Scotlands Chief Constables who fail time and again to act on criminal collusion by the monsters at the law society.

6.Scotlands social work departments who make children a money making racket for corrupt lawyers.

7.Scotlands legal aid board who fund the criminals who disguise themselves in wigs and regalia in our courts.

8.Scotlands under class derided for being poor Filling our jails with people who from birth NEVER stood a chance of bettering themselves thanks to all of the above.Lawyers make a fortune from legal aid defending serial criminals who are pushed into crimes from a young age thanks to a lack of ANY funding to break the cycle of decay in our inner cities.

9.Finally the devil worshipping secret society mobsters, many who join the ranks of all of the above, who sinisterly control , bully and enslave Scottish citizens by

108

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 15:25:58

Eben I phoned you a while ago Infact it was last year when i was appearing at High Court.
I told you i could not get my case refered by SCCRC to Appeal Court because of link to who i was complaining of. Mr Taylor not only represented the Lockerbie Bomber he also sat on SCCRC board while my case was investigated but resigned two years later to allow SCCRC to remain Independent and Impartial into their investigation of Megrahi's grounds.
What does this say about how they investigated my case? At the very least it says it was not Independent and Impartial Like Megrahi's.
Their reasons for Non Referral of my case are not stateable, This is the view of my defence team.
My God my solicitor Jim Keegan did not interview 17 of 19 defence witnesses and still they have never been interviewed 25 years later SCCRC refused to interview these witnesses they never even asked Keegan About this, What is going on in their Office?
They agreed my Id Parade was not of a standard acceptable today but refuse to apply their Current Law Policy.
They agreed the Judge Misdirected my Jury by telling them to only compare the evidence of Myself and Louise Morris against the Crown evidence as she was the only person to see me between 1 and 6 O'Clock, When witnesses said they saw me on a 31 bus at St Enoch Square at 5.15.
heir reason for non referral here was in their own words: It would only take half an hour to travel from Livingston to Glasgow Cross (What a Joke) This could not be done now never mind in 1982. SCCRC make no mention of where they got their times from but it was certainly not from any Expert.
They refused to interview my witnesses saying their evidence was hearsay, Would they not have to know exactly what these witnesses were saying before deciding if it was hearsay?

109

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 15:37:50

The Robbery i was convicted of in Livingston in 1982.
There was no issue at trial of the car having gone to Glasgow, It was chased from Livingston to Newbridge then was abandoned in Kirkliston which is nowhere near Glasgow.
How can SCCRC refer to timings from Livingston to Glasgow.
Crown Failed to release a statement from one of their witnesses saying the driver of the car was Forty Years old with brown hair and moustache, At the time 25 years ago i was only twenty with Black Hair.
SCCRC also failed to see the significance of the conduct at my ID parade with the arresting officer assisting with witnesses, they also never even replied when i said there was people on the parade who ought not to have been as there was one with Curly Hair one with a moustache and one with blonde hair i had Black hair and still cannot grow a moustache.

110

Doh,

27/02/2007 15:59:38

#119 - David

According ot Wikipedia - it says 2SNP 1%. Check it out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunfermline_and_West_Fife_by...

Anyway by the by - of course the BU/EU comparison is not exact - but I that the argument cuts both ways is exactly my point.

Scotland could be a nation-state (I realise we are not that now - and that is your aspiration) as part of the EU - but I dont think it so strange or terrible that we remain as a nation part of the BU.

As I said before we now have our own parliament and the people are regarded as sovergn , not Westminster.

#118 - James - all the examples I gave were of viable independant "nations" - none of which have (as yet) chosen
"independance." I am not sure what you think makes Scotland a
more unique nation than any of my examples.

I beleive all but the German states (unified by Bismark) have active nationalist movements - so you better tell them that they are out of order!

I dont think there is anything particulalrly peculiar about Scotlands position.

111

Doh,

27/02/2007 16:00:25

#119 - David

Ooops typo -
According ot Wikipedia - it says SNP 21%. Check it out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunfermline_and_West_Fife_by...

112

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 16:30:17

#124. point taken. Apologies but my figures are from the Scottish Election results. I thought you were speaking about National elections. My figures were from the Electoral commision website. http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/election-data/index...

What about my other points though?

113

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 16:33:45

My Appeal To High Court after SCCRC refused to refer my case.
My application was denied to lodge grounds ou of time under section 111,(2)
This was refused on the premise that i was afforded an appeal in 1982 which is far from the truth.
In 1982 my application was merely for leave to appeal which i can prove by way of letter from Mr Michael O,Grady High court judge now, His letter clearly states that my hearing was only for leave.
Anyway High court cannot produce any opinion from 1982 and on this note i should be allowed to appeal.
What happens if in 1982 there was no obvious grounds and now there is, Like Anderson V HMA.
in 1982 you would never have been allowed to claim you were defectively represented

114

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 16:45:51

My opinions of SCCRC are that it is not what you know with them, It is who you know.
They have referred the cases of Kidd And Gair which is similar to mine, Failure to Disclose Material imformation at the time of trial.
Can they be allowed to refer some and not others with the exact same grounds?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

115

open,

LJPR LEGAL JUDICIAL POLITICAL REFORMERS 27/02/2007 16:56:01

SCOTLANDS ELUSIVE DEMOCRACY

How can you totally CONTROL a population without having to be answerable to them?

Scotland has the most sinister system of mafia terrorism in place thanks to secret societies who have absolute control .

They began historically by indoctrinating various individuals in a country to swear secret oaths of allegiance to each other and secret cults then letting them out into the community to work in all fields of society without exposing their true loyalties, if they hadn't already been railroaded into joining .

Preferably they should be in very powerful self regulated professions such as judges,chiefs of police,lawyers,bankers,politicians,government officials,military leaders,secret service spies,social workers,and especially doctors and psychiatrists who demean anyone who suggests such a conspiracy as being mad and RUBBISH anyone who challenges their unaccountable tyrannical control.

The judiciary are so powerful in society yet their self regulation and self appointed independence are not part of the supposed accountable democratic process.Their decisions destroy millions of lives every year while propping up the crown and monarchy who head the secret society mobsters.Also they ensure that most of the court decisions do not include a JURY, as the system would fail if a lay jury of our peers was in place to ensure impartiality was available to the common man.

Also give the PEOPLE supposed democratic elections as long as each of the establishment lackies picked for election are members of a secret society, ensuring whoever is voted into power complies with oaths sworn before they obtained positions of power.Also make sure EVERYONE in power can be blackmailed from their past histories so their sworn oaths of allegiance are not broken if they change their mind or are pressured into doing something not in the best interests of the MASSIVE and CORRUPT brotherhoods coffers.

Scotland has bee

116

Doh,

27/02/2007 17:05:06

#125 David,
Apologies accepted, anyway in some ways you should be pleased it actually says the SNP vote went up to 2%.
Tried to answer your other points - Scotland can exist within the EU or the BU or both (my preference). Our representation within the BU is at Westminster with directly elected MPs, not as you say at a governement level as it would be within the EU.
That could change, a federal settlement may well be the outcome
of the establishment of the Scottish parliament, it answers and always has answered the West Lothian question.
Of course federalism is not emotive and it takes two to tango.

117

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 17:11:46

# 8 Scottwebb.co.uk
Cheers mate.
It is comments like yours that keep people like myself going, It is much Appreciated.
There will be future protests in regards to my case until i get the answers deserved.
Like for instance...
SCCRC refuse to answer me when i claimed i was defectively represented by my defence team not calling Vital forensic Evidence.
Exactly what is their problem with this ground?
It is the same As Hemphill V HMA, Which was successful at Appeal.
Does there exist different laws for the poor of this country than exist for the Rich. This is in ref to the QC resigning when Megrahi appealed but did not do this when my appeal was accepted.

118

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 17:19:49

SNP.
Is there any of their MSPs willing to stand up against Injustices.
I contacted Sturgeon and ran to Govan to see her and she ran out her door fifteen Minutes early and refused to see me.
Kenny MacAskill Said i was outwith his constituency as he represents Lothians.
Next day hi is in the papers calling for Enquiry into conduct of Barlinnie Prison officers.
Has Barlinnie moved to the Lothians Recently without anyone in Glasgow seeing this happen, Doh
He should have been honest and just said he was frightened of becoming involved.
Is it because this will change the public's Perception of the Body set up to cure Miscarriages of Justice

119

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 17:25:20

It is to be expected that one Labour MSP would not turn against another Labour.
Like Paul Martin would not ask Justice Minister to investigate my complaints of Malpractice and Misconduct in SCCCRCs Ranks.
I cannot believe that with all the MSPs in our country none are willing to entertain this arguement.
Then again it was asians that Kenny MacAskill was shouting for an enquiry into Barlinnie for.
Are SNP Biased?

120

David MacVicar,

The net 27/02/2007 17:42:03

Doh - Sorry, I missed your post #123 earlier!!
However I did not say representation in BU is 'governement level' - please clarify? - I said at EU representation is from UK.

Also Sovereign Scotland is not. Devolution is not Sovereignity. It is a beurucratic layer of government with limited powers. Definitions of Sovereignity below:
1. Supremacy of authority or rule as exercised by a sovereign or sovereign state.
2. Royal rank, authority, or power.
3. Complete independence and self-government.
4. A territory existing as an independent state.

Also, yes it is clear you preference is both Unions though it is not really clear why you feel this is better? What for example is your stance on the McCrone report? Also Yes I want independence. I probably want Scotland as part of EU and Euro, this would be a referendum decision and I would accept any outcome.

121

James,

Dundee 27/02/2007 17:43:41

#213 Dough!

Never questioned their entitlement.

What I was questioning was your comparison to the 'regions'.

Scotland is not a region, but a country.

#Wullie Good luck, I know you'll need it!

122

Robbie,

27/02/2007 17:55:08

93. Justin T!me
“….no real aspiration for your country…”
This phrase and others expressed by posters is really quite succinct in describing Scotland’s problems - the apathy of so many of its voters. NO REAL ASPIRATION . Good summing up, Justin.
No belief, no hope, no faith, (charity they have), no ambition, no self-respect, no ability to examine other lands and learn, no goan antwayers.

123

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 18:12:51

90. jim lad, the capital
Re voting turnout, Jim, it is interesting how many smaller prosperous nations have a high voter turn out, with percentages in the 80s whereas the world’s largest democracies, India and USA are in the 50s. Could be in the States something to do with their disenfranchising weird particular version of FPP system.
Perhaps politics or at least the history of Political Philosophy should be taught in schools. It need not be partisan and simple enough to begin with eight year olds. Just about past attitudes to government and how people have
Struggled to gain the vote. You’re likely right Jim, knowledge is not something that throughout the ages the ruling elite have wanted the plebs to benefit from.

124

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 18:31:33

113. Doh
“… are you saying by some miracle of geography or DNA we cannot and must not cooperate or find common purpose with England?”’ Nowhere does any supporter make such a ridiculous claim.
Over and over it has been emphasised that most believe Scotland and the Scottish people will enjoy a better relationship with England and many other nations who at present don’t know or are unsure about, Scotland’s very existence.

125

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 18:55:39

What is Indepenence
There is no such thing, The poor will always be didtated to by the rich and our country will always be run by Dictators who when the law Does Not Suit Them, They simply change the Laws
Are the general public that naive to think there will ever be independence?

126

Doh,

27/02/2007 19:01:45

#134 - James - just to be clear I regard all the examples I gave as potential nations - not regions.
Scotland is indeed a nation, not a region, that is why we have Union between two nations and not a merger.

137 - Robbie - you might be right, but I really doubt it. Just as I believe the EU has brought European nations closer and not torn them apart.

Sorry - I have to go now - but thanks for the discussions.

127

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 19:03:29

SCCRC claim to be Independent But.......
Their sole sponsors are guess who?.......
Yes Justice Department
Who Appoints Them?.......
Yes the head of Crown Herself Yes Her Majesty.
How can they even try to claim to be Independent????.
The Meaning Of SCCRC..................
Scottish Criminal Cases Review Coverup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

128

The Guzz,

Fife 27/02/2007 19:59:59

It was great that the labour stranglehold over the Dunfermline area of Fife was broken at the last election held here. It is unfortunate though that the vote went to the LibDems. Especially since Willie Rennie got in by opposing the proposed £4.00 bridge tolls that his own party were in fact trying to introduce. This is hypocrisy of the highest order and changed nothing in the scheme of government we are getting. In May we have another chance to put things right, not only for what has become a depressed area, but a depressed country.
What the Scotsman has done about this is to travel the country with a unionist biased ‘state of the union debate’ that is certainly not representative of the nation’s views, and follows them up by publishing the views of a ‘selected’ cross section of the public; making sure that there are a good smattering of those whose comments are in themselves unworthy of argument one way or the other.
Robert Parker was in the RN for 23 years and served on 2 nuclear submarines. Because of this he thinks that Scotland should be proud of the nuclear arsenal. He worries that we will not have an army or navy post independence so we will still be dependent on others. We can still be involved in the UN & NATO without being a nuclear terrorist ourselves. Our army and navy will be sized and equipped to suit the needs of Scotland and the saving to our economy will be very beneficial to the country. We do not need to police the world.
"I'm a true Scot, but a parliamentary union seems the best idea in this age of change, and Scots can still keep their identity." No change for this age of change then and as for Scots keeping their own identity, Elisabeth Brooks from Perth should travel a wee bit further than Dunfermline to see what the Scottish identity is to the rest of the world.
"I don't want independence. I don't like that man that runs the SNP. I don't like his politics and attitude." This is a w

129

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 27/02/2007 20:00:37

What does Independence bring ?

Apart from huge set up costs (scottish parliment costs will be pale by comparison and doubtless this transition will be handled with the same level of competence!) ...

We then get run by Brussells and are wholly subserviant to their rediculous ideas - our new SNP Scottish masters will eat every drop of poo sandwich brussells give us and tell us it's good for us.

LIB/LAB tax, waste, spend money on themselves, and ban suff because they think it'll upset the toffs or it will be good for us - rather than letting us decide for ourselves!

SNP's vision of Scotland is exactly the same LIB/LAB's 'centre left ' gang except we have Europe pulling the strings not our own in westminster (listen to the accents of the top guys in westminster - they are our countrymen!!! - seems weird, perhaps bordering on insane, that you want to elect their lesser dim witted cousins up here!)

Scotland's GDP is not enough to support any sort of infrastructure - plain and simple ... the government in it's current form is TOTALLY UNSUSTAINABLE (it costs too much for the Scottish people to afford without an enormous tax burden). The number do not work unless there is a miraculous influx of private sector companies - that ain't going to happen with the business hostile attitude the scot exec, councils and most MSP's seem to have.

Your not voting for Bannockburn here your voting for Culloden ...

130

The Guzz,

Fife 27/02/2007 20:01:18

"When I moved to Scotland from Redditch when I was 16, I could not believe how advanced the area was. I hadn't seen a dual carriageway. In Redditch we had an outside toilet. Dunfermline had electricity everywhere. But the problem is the town hasn't changed or advanced since then. I don't believe in independence, but something certainly needs to change." Graham Merry as an Englishman may not believe in independence for Scotland but even he can see that it is time for a change.
"There is no way Scotland can compete on its own in the modern marketplace. The salaries in Dunfermline, for example, are way too high. That's why the jobs are going. To be honest, I think Scots are too lazy and don't want to learn anything to transfer themselves into the knowledge economy." Where did they dig up Lord Hughwright an obvious old relic of the empire? If this person is a Scot, then he should be ashamed of his own views. Scotland is a leading exponent in the “knowledge economy” and has been for centuries.
"Every country seems to be coming together at the moment. So I don't think we should be independent." Just what planet is Carly Haldane living on?
All of the others who answered the question at least had sound reasons for their answers. Funnily enough they all favoured Independence. Another vote for the LibDems in this area is another vote for the same old same old and another delay in the process of gaining an independent Scotland. The only way Scotland is ever going to progress in the world is as a free and independent country stating her own case and not by hanging on to the shirt tails of a union that has not only destroyed Scotland, but is dragging the rest of the countries of Great Britain down. It really is time.

131

Malachi Malagrowther,

27/02/2007 20:18:28

113 Doh: read my post again. Of course Scotland can stand on its own. That’s my point.

139 Doh again. You sound like one of those Scottish unionists who desperately hang on to the delusion that Scotland has it good: that we were never conquered, that the union was voluntary and that we ran the empire. We now know the Union in 1707 was a sell out, and in spite of Scotland’s elites sallying forth to run an empire, all the evidence now suggests that the Scotland they left behind is in fact the last colony of London, and it doesn’t even know it.

Because the state is called Britain, it disguises this fact. Look at Scotland today and compare it to the colonial situation of Africa and Asia before they woke up to the reality: the elites bought off and persuaded to assist in their proto-state’s subjection, asset stripping of resource wealth disguised by the occupying power (see the McCrone report), locals convinced that they need the colonial government and that they could never look after themselves, colonial control of the media to stifle all debate and discredit all suggestions of independence, and promotion of all stories that divide the people (eg, keep the Old Firm rivalry as alive as possible.)

Before anyone starts ranting “Anglophobe”, I haven’t said anything against the English. I happen to like them very much. It’s not Anglophobia, but a quest for identity, democracy, the ability to sort out your own problems without having one hand tied behind your back or having to ask someone else’s permission.

132

Miss Jean Brodie,

27/02/2007 20:23:04

Politics hasnae been so Excitin - since the Convention of the Three Estates began on the 14th of March 1689 in the Great Hall of Parliament House!

Unfortunately from that event, it eventually lead to the Demise of an Independent Scotland - Much tho John Graham o Clavers did his best to prevent it !

But with a bit o Bloody Battlin’ we could see Scotland Independent again!

There’s nae shame - oh there’s nae shame!

133

Robbie,

NZ 27/02/2007 20:56:09

138. Big Wullie, Glasgow What is Independence
“The poor will always be didtated to by the rich and our country will always be run by Dictators…”
A bit pessimistic Wullie. The argument that ‘the poor will always be with us’ and that of ‘make poverty history’ both debatable points. The poor or poverty is relative to the standard of living in any specific nation and may be of different levels of severity. Being poor in Norway may be ‘better’ than being poor in Bangladesh. Being poor in an independent sovereign nation with optimism that one has even a little more control over one’s destiny is surely at least somewhat preferable to having another nation being always one’s mouthpiece at World forums.

134

Miss H,

27/02/2007 21:42:52

I hate to tell you this post 95 but we are all walking into the unknown!

None of us has any idea what the future will bring, whether we remain in the UK or become independent.

But common sense tells me that we will be better prepared for it of we have the same powers as other countries and have the ability to take decisions for ourselves.

135

Miss H,

27/02/2007 21:44:49

142 what set up costs?

We will be saving money not needing more!

No Trident

No Olympics.

No troops in Iraq or Iran which is where they will be heading next.

That's just for starters.

136

The Guzz,

Fife 27/02/2007 22:00:39

# 127 & 140 Big Wullie - Followed your links and have read all your threads in the past weeks. More power to your elbow big man. Go sic 'em.

137

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 22:24:25

#146 Robbie
Exactly what control over destiny do you mean.
Remember i was taken from my home after being awoke early one morning and was sentenced to six Years for something i was totally Innocent of.
Exactly what control was me and my Family Afforded when this can happen.
We are supposed to be more open with FOI but sorry there is no such thing as our government being more open.
They will only be open with issues when it suits them, not when it suits someone seeking closure to lengthy issues like myself.
Crown Office i am told do not have to reveal documents under FOI Even when there are cases such as Gair, Kidd Even Nat fraser and myself.
Crown have always had a duty to reveal exculpatory evidence So why are so many cases now coming to light of Crown Withholding evidence?
Scotland will never be Independent it will always and the people will always answer to our Government no matter who is in power.
They all promise the world until elected.
Bangladesh i am told is no Different you can actually pay to have someone locked up on trumped up charges.
There's a thought eh

138

Bill, Dunblane,

27/02/2007 23:35:05

Newsnight Scotland just showed the front page fae ramorra's Scotsman.

'Nuther hour or so and we'll see the SNP even further ahead in the latest polls.

Baron Foulkes - THANK YOU! We coudna' hae done it without your performance on Question Time.

To all NL ministers, thanks also - the more you try to put us down, the stronger we become!

It's time!

139

Urban Clearway,

Tyneside 27/02/2007 23:55:14

All this chunter about independence amounts to nothing more than lowland colonial imperialism over the Gaelteachd. It is an old story that dates back to the destruction of the Lordship of the Isles and the ensuing genocide of the clearances.

I have no patience for pathetic kilties who sport the debased accoutrements of an enslaved people and their culture, pretending they are Gaels, while all the time prattling in a equally debased version of English.

I look forward to an independent Gaelteachd that is free once more of the Edinburgh yoke.

Is teann leam innear an eich air an arbhar!

140

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 27/02/2007 23:58:49

#149 The Guzz, Fife.
Missed your post earlier mate so sorry.
Your comment is really appreciated and ones like this will only continue to serve to spur me on.
SCCRC cover-up merchants will not know what has hit them with my next protest.
How many appeals against this dodgy Keegan Lawyer do they need before they will investigate him.
Three to date and they have only been going since 1999 well at least three that i have heard of recently including mine.
Mr Jim Keegan should now give up practisisng Law and stick to being a sheriff why defend someone one week and the next week could be sentencing him. Give it up Keegan Too Many Complaints About You

141

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 28/02/2007 00:03:30

Miss H - think about it ...

Set up costs will be huge .. your little list isn't just for starters - it about it - what more Scotland is not bearing the cost of these events you mention alone ... which is the great thing about the union.

We need army, navy, airforce - perhaps not with nuclear capability but nevertheless.

We'd need to set up a home office, inland revenue services, we'd need to set up embassies and consuls throughout the world or at least a few other countries.

We'd need to buy or develop the software that runs our social services, NHS, home office - hundreds of millions just right there. That stuff is westminsters.

Scotland would require to set up coastguard services, redefine the police, NHS workers, Social services - all public servants contracts - there's another few hundred million. Not to mention

We have a government that we could not possibly afford - about 20% of our population is directly employed by the state with another 39% dependant on the state for income in one way or the other.

That's just for starters .. it all adds up to 'not practical' and certainly not in the public interest when our MSP's can't even decide on the colour of shhhhhampoo !

Recipe for disaster? .. call Miss H and the likes for details ...

142

Robbie,

NZ 28/02/2007 01:56:47

150. Big Wullie
I wish you all the best in seeking justice and will go through you post more thoroughly.
I feel that a nation’s sovereignty is still a perquisite to justice and civil liberties. New Zealand and I believe Iceland came top as the World’s least corrupt nations but of course even here there are dodgy polis men, bent lawyers and MPs on the make ( I just don’t know them). However innocent men have been freed and large compensation paid for wrongful arrest (new DNA being now as important proving innocent as guilt) and one thing I’ll give our NZ media they have shown documentaries on our controversial cases where people are still in gaol but there is still debate over evidence.

143

Big Wullie,

Glasgow 28/02/2007 20:51:57

#155 Robbie
Great to see my Message is travelling so far and wide. It is more importabt to know that people are thinking and supporting my Quest for Justice.
Heaven Knows why no reporters want to print this story.
I can only assume because of who Defectively represented me. It is a can of worms.
It is a sad fact in this country they prefer to cover matters up instead of being Honest and Man enough to admit their wrongs.
You only have to visit The site Of SCCRC to see the amount of cases now being referred back to Court, They don't publish ones they refuse. although you can view the amount they recieve.
once again thank you for your kind words.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4
Big Wullie


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.