Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Inside Holyrood: Instead of adding powers, SNP subtracts



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
"WHAT the SNP have achieved is an argument for more powers for us and less for them."
This off-the-cuff quip from a senior councillor was about the dispute between local authorities and the Scottish Government over free school meals, but it adds to a growing doubt over what the SNP's strategy in government is actually achieving.

C
ould it be that the actions of Alex Salmond & Co have somehow undermined the case for more powers for Holyrood?

The issue that brought this whole business to a crunch is as follows: councils promised to provide free school meals as part of the "historic" concordat signed last year, pointing out the concordat gave them the freedom to spend money as they wanted.

So the concordat's unintended consequence was to rob the Scottish Government of its ability to enforce key policies, leaving ministers to grudgingly admit that if councils do not provide free school meals, there is nothing they can do. This has made the Scottish Government look like a mere middleman – a conduit passing on cash from Westminster to councils.

The concordat did deliver a council tax with a hefty bribe which, it seems, may have cost more in authority than the sum proffered from the Scottish Government's coffers.

It has not helped the SNP that as councils made the administration look irrelevant, a global crisis has posed the question over whether an independent Scotland could save its banks. Most analysts believe it could not, and when it came to bailing out Scottish councils for losses incurred in Iceland (local government finance is devolved) the SNP turned to Westminster for aid.

There are things the SNP administration could do to tackle the consequences of the global crisis when it hits the real economy – when many businesses may fold and a lot of people could lose their jobs – but the Scottish Government is yet to initiate an action plan.

One thing said about Mr Salmond is that he stands up for Scotland on many issues – Olympic Games money, prisons money and so on. But if getting a fair deal from Westminster is all Scotland needs, then wouldn't Scottish MPs suffice?

Opposition parties claim the SNP ignores Holyrood's powers and concentrates on reserved issues to manufacture a case for independence.

However, this skirmish with councils has shifted the ground to an uncomfortable place by making the Scottish Government's will an irrelevance, leaving a question over whether it needs any more powers at all.

Now there is something for the National Conversation to muse on.



The full article contains 429 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 October 2008 11:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

GW,

Aberdeenshire 13/10/2008 00:14:09
This is a very strange argument indeed! The Scottish government does a deal with councils and may then look powerless if the councils go back on the deal? Perhaps that is one interpretation, though I tend to think that it will be the councils who are seen in a poor light if this happens.

Of course, the Government can 'force' the Councils to put free school meals into place by getting the parliament to pass legislation - the Labour party would not dare to vote against such a popular piece of legislation!
2

Oldnat,

13/10/2008 00:17:29
What an incredibly stupid article!

It's Labour with its centralist agenda that wants to corral all power to the centre. The Concordat was specifically designed to devolve power to LAs.

Maddox is truly inane.
3

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 13/10/2008 00:46:39
Maddox. Stay out of the midday sun with your pals.

Remember, remember, the 6th November.
4

subrosa,

13/10/2008 01:00:09
Another press release from the labour party. Still they'll be less after 6 November thank goodness.
5

Col. Blimp­IV*,

13/10/2008 01:06:41
I think this article has given me lockjaw.

Maddox said; "But if getting a fair deal from Westminster is all Scotland needs, then wouldn't Scottish MPs suffice?"

Where has he been these past 300yrs?

And; "This has made the Scottish Government look like a mere middleman – a conduit passing on cash from Westminster to councils."

Yes bozo - That is exactly what devolution is about...Letting the Hicks from the Sticks have some pocket money and telling them not to spend it all on cider and chewing tobacco.

Does this fool think it should be something more meaningful?

Apparently not!

He also says; "However, this skirmish with councils has shifted the ground to an uncomfortable place by making the Scottish Government's will an irrelevance, leaving a question over whether it needs any more powers at all"

Bizarre.

Perhaps this Paper should cut out the middleman and be delivered directly to the Chip Shops.

Now there is something for the board of J Press to muse on.



6

Cabbie,

Glenrothes 13/10/2008 01:12:49
Another doom and gloom story from the unionist, they never learn, do they?
The more they keep talking Scotland down the more the SNP gain.
7

Col. Blimp­IV*,

13/10/2008 01:39:51
J Press shares are selling at 34p, a year ago they were £2.49.

The whole shebang could be bought for around £217 million, it was worth nearer £1.5Bn not so long ago.

All this after a £170million rights issue in June.

This has nothing to do with Maddox...but I would sack him anyway and if the shares continue to tumble at the same rate...I will give it my best shot in the near future.
8

Guga II,

Rockall 13/10/2008 07:28:33
Yet another propaganda article from David MadDog and the Hootsmon on behalf of the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party (North British Branch).
9

1745,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 08:06:37
THe Labour party don't require a press officer while this guy Maddox (approptiate name) is on the loose.
10

Marga,

Fife 13/10/2008 08:36:52
"more powers for us and less for them." IF this quote is true and not just journalistic expediency which sadly we're all too used to, then it's a sign of what's wrong with UK politics.

I'm sick of this confrontational, institutionalised, party-hangstrung attitude to politics. Power-sharing means sharing responsibility, responsibility needs maturity, the SNP is working with the LAs to help them grow up. However, under the new unelected Czar Murphy they are going to be enticed back into their stupid ways before the message has had a chance to sink in.

How can so many politicians put a thirst for power and the need to "win" before their duty to citizens? Starting with the PM, of course. And then they wonder why people don't vote ...
11

Linda,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 08:38:27
Modern Latin

Mad Madder Maddox
12

Linda,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 08:40:15
More powers to local councils is a good thing and they should be allowed to raise more of their own money through Local Income Tax so that they become more accountable to voters.
13

Alasdair,

13/10/2008 09:42:59
A while ago I posted up a little bit explaining to readers about the policy within the Scotsman and SoS of getting hacks to write under multiple names. This has come about because the papers, particularly SoS, are embarrassingly short-staffed (a self-perpetuating problem, as their meanness in hiring and keeping staff has led to others leaving, and the paper not being an attractive employer).

That all being the case, I wonder if the Hootsmon has considered saving on one more wage expense? David Maddox is utterly indistinguishable from Hamish McDonnell.. do we really need two people filling the pages with identikit anti-SNP rantings?
14

SEUMAS,

fearn 13/10/2008 10:21:57
McWHIRTER'S article---110
Maddox================13
Go back Maddox and think again, in fact, just think!!
15

Sassi,

13/10/2008 10:29:10
Forgive me for my obtusity, but "councils promised to provide free school meals as part of the "historic" concordat signed last year", so doesn't this mean that the council's signed a contract then?
16

Christina, Aberdeen,

13/10/2008 11:10:21
Duh? Makes you wonder what Maddox is on? Is he living on the same planet as the rest of us?
17

Vivas,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 12:37:26
I don't have any problem with Mr.Maddox trying to outdo Alan Cochrane. Thats fine, we're all big boys and girls here.

I would just like clarfification on whether his role is to pass non-objective comment on the Scottish political scene, or whether he is (still) employed to write objective journalistic pieces on the parties and players.

It's one or the other surely. It's fine to write pieces such as these, but we could hardly expect him now to write an impartial report on the SNP or Alex Salmond.
18

Arfur,

13/10/2008 13:18:41
Where did the hootsman dig up this halfwit?
19

ThomasP,

13/10/2008 13:31:11
The Councils were allowed more freedom to spend their cash along as certain commitments made by the SNP were supported (free schools etc).

The Councils have demonstrated WHY they were never allowed greater freedom before.
20

danielrober,

13/10/2008 13:43:00
# 10 Marga,Fife

Well I'm glad the 'SNP are working with LA's to help them grow up'. But is that not a little like grandchildren telling grandma about s*x.

LA across the countries of the UK have built fantastic schools, hospitals, libraries and town halls. Personally i love Glasgow central library. For me its up their with St Paul's. But this one was built for books, great. ;-)
21

,

13/10/2008 17:37:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

bully wee alba,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 17:43:46
Has the Hootsmon also been taken over by the Labourtory Government and is now obliged to publish only inane drivel masquerading as objective comment?
23

danielrober,

13/10/2008 18:18:25
# 21 The McKellarator

So they did not build it, but they keep it going through the worse years. Is it still a library - I hope so. Glasgow is a city i admire and i like the Glasgow attitude to life. Survival is the first step. Very important.

Some LA's have done wonders with no cash - Glasgow. Others well, they have not. The SP is new and it might do very well to take some advice from the LA's.

Instead -some- SP people are acting like consults conducting assessments of a company, who have little experience of the business. Lets change the logo. Well okay but its not quite enough is it.
24

Nevsky,

Moscow 13/10/2008 22:09:52
hahaha very funny article from Maddox. Reading it does make me laugh, it looks like the little ugly thing scours these boards and picks up the comments and tries to defend his unionist position.

Maddox of couse makes the elementary mistake that Scottish banks are operating in the uk so applies the uk situation to independence and says we could't afford it...what a dunce!

Still smarting from Alex making him look like a fool i guess?

25

,

13/10/2008 22:58:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.