Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


MacAskill should have seen system was going awry for a long time

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2009
PROFESSOR Spencer is to be congratulated on a seminal report, full of refreshing common sense, also rushed out in double quick time.
In the process he may have bought some much needed time for the embattled justice secretary, but in the longer term, assuming his recommendations are acted upon, he has started the delicate process of recreating some confidence in the open prison
s.

Establishments such as Castle Huntly and Noranside never really have been suitable for short-term offenders – they exist only to make the public safer in the longer term, by preparing serious offenders for final release onto our streets. Over the past decade, prison bosses such as former chief executive Tony Cameron and his area directors have gradually lost sight of this fundamental purpose, as they experimented to get more value from the small number of uniformed staff involved in running what essentially is a halfway house.

Under huge pressure from civil servants and politicians to save money, despite more and more offenders being locked away by the courts, they even took the daft decision to give one governor the responsibility of running both establishments, despite being many miles apart.

They also underestimated the scale of the damage to public confidence as things began to fray. Matters were probably compounded by closed prisons not carrying out thorough enough risk assessments before sending prisoners to the open estate.

Kenny MacAskill's mistake was to inherit this situation and to continue to trust his staff to get the detail right. An unforgiving public, however, will not forget and despite the Spencer report, almost certainly he is toast if there is another high-profile escape.

Doubtless there will be some who say other heads should roll. My view is that it is too late for this and therefore pointless. But all the same, a few wicker baskets, strategically placed in St Andrews House and Scottish Prison Service headquarters , might yet do some good.

• Clive Fairweather is a former chief inspector of prisons





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2009 10:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish prisons
 
1

,

25/06/2009 23:02:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

TWC,

exLabour 26/06/2009 08:07:37
#1. You are right, even when the Statistics and facts are obvious it appears that the reporter is intent on spinning the story.
I must be naive but I think most of the current politics is exciting enough just as it stands .

Politics students from all around the world are watching developments in Scotland (and the press spin)
3

,

26/06/2009 08:33:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

mr broon,

Edinburgh 26/06/2009 12:22:34
Why are there no comments from the Labour and Tory Justice Committee members about this report by the former HM Chief Inspector of Scottish Prisons?

After weeks of sniping by the Scots Tory Mr. Magoo, and Labour "toon cooncillor" Baker, the non-partisan report by the fiercly independent Mr. Fairweather clearly states that MacAskill inherited a "dugs breakfast" of a system from the previous Scottish Government!

MacAskill's cardinal mistake was to place his Ministerial trust in insufficient checks and balances set in place by the previous Labour/Lib-Dem administration, and which subsequently failed to prevent escapes from the Open Prison Estate.

This was an accident waiting to happen.
5

redcliffe62,

04/07/2009 06:16:45
it would have been less biased had the comment been made as commented above that 10 years of lib-lab politics had seen things go downhill, from aporr level to start with, and it is understood by all aprties that it takes years to improve matters in this area.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.