Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Satellite tagging for killers in Scots open prisons

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2009
MURDERERS and rapists who are in Scotland's open prison system should be fitted with GPS tags to cut the chances of them going on the run, a major new report has concluded.
The investigation, ordered by the Scottish Government after an armed robber was allowed to abscond for a third time, concludes that the current system is failing. It has now recommended further safeguards to ensure that the most dangerous criminals do not simply walk free from the open estate, where there have been repeated and successful high-profile escapes in recent years.

Between 2002 and 2009 there were a total of 397 absconds from Huntly and Noranside.

The report by Professor Alec Spencer said long-term inmates must only be transferred from secure institutions with the approval of governors or their deputies. He also said there should no longer be a place for short-term inmates at Scotland's two open prisons.

His recommendations come in a review of the escape of Brian Martin, nicknamed "The Hawk", from Castle Huntly earlier this year. It found that tough new rules introduced last year governing how inmates are transferred were not followed by the Scottish Prison Service.

Prof Spencer found a catalogue of errors and oversights surrounding Martin's escape from the Dundee facility.

Despite clear warnings over his criminal record and history of escapes, police intelligence was "overlooked or ignored" by the specialist group who recommended his transfer from HMP Shotts, he said.

The report found that the panel of senior prison officers, psychologists, and social workers at Shotts who approved Martin's transfer had used the old versions of forms which should have been replaced when assessing his suitability for transfer to open estate. Despite the fact the 51-year-old's history of absconding was asked for, it was not included on the form. It was also found that warnings from Fife Constabulary that Martin, who was serving ten years for firearms offences, had previously escaped were not passed on to the relevant authorities.

Prof Spencer wrote: "The SPS will have to understand there is no force-field restraining a prisoner in open conditions while he bides his time waiting for further assessments, reports or management plans.

"Once transferred he is out of secure custody. If staff are uncertain about the risk he poses and want to leave it to the judgment and assessment of open prison staff, then he should not go."

The report has been broadly welcomed, although doubts remain whether it will be financially feasible to implement the recommendations in full.

Justice secretary Kenny MacAskill, who has come under pressure over the issue, said the government will consider the report's conclusions and respond in the autumn. But he also warned the SPS there must be no further "lapses", and accused the body of failing to follow "robust measures" he instigated in the wake of the case of Robert Foye, a prisoner who raped a schoolgirl while on the run from Castle Huntly.

Opposition parties fell short of their earlier calls for Mr MacAskill to step down, but Labour maintained yesterday that the public have "no faith" in the justice secretary's ability to fix a "broken system".

The report detailed other aspects of Martin's "extensive" criminal history, which included assault, robbery and theft, dating back to 1976.

Martin had also absconded from Noranside open prison in 1987 and slipped his prison escort at Bridge of Earn Hospital in 1989. He was jailed for three firearms offences and assault to injury and danger of life in 2006. Martin was transferred from a "top end" facility at HMP Shotts to Castle Huntly, near Dundee, in April and went on the run just weeks later.

The fugitive gave himself up to police one week later – but not before a damaging political row. However, Mr MacAskill made clear guidelines brought in after the escape had not been followed.

He said: "It is clear that Martin's previous absconding history was either overlooked or ignored when that decision was made. In all likelihood, if that information had been known, Martin would not have been transferred. I have made it clear to the SPS that this is not acceptable, and that such lapses must not be repeated."

A spokesman for the SPS said: "Prof Spencer has identified that the rigorous processes put in place last year for the transfer of prisoners to the open estate were not followed in this instance by SPS. We accept this and we are putting in place recommendations made by Prof Spencer to ensure that improvements are made to the process."

Richard Baker, Labour's justice spokesman, said: "The report makes it clear that the system is broken and changes will have to be made."

Tory justice spokesman Bill Aitken said: "The relaxed regimes in the open estates should be an opportunity for such prisoners to adapt to the concept of freedom, but they should not be without restrictions."

Reacting to the idea of tagging, he said: "If they are so dangerous and at risk of escaping that they need to be tagged, why are they in the open estate?"

Andrew Welsh, the SNP MSP whose Angus constituency includes Castle Huntly, said: "This lapse in standards must not happen again."

FACT BOX

THE key recommendations in the report are:

• Open prisons should only be used for long-term prisoners.

• GPS tagging should be considered for long-term prisoners in open conditions.

• An electronic "flag" should be placed on an offender's file to make staff aware of any history of escapes.

• The transfer of an inmate to an open prison must be approved and signed by the prison governor or the deputy governor.

• Prisoner record files should be reviewed prior to any transfer.

• A police liaison officer should attend the selection meeting into a transfer and provide any police intelligence input into the discussion.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2009 1:39 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish prisons
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2009 00:26:54

These Satellite tagging systems are deadly accurate, I downloaded Google maps for the mobile phone, just in-case I get lost :)), being serious, it was to see what it is like.
It is totally Amazing, it can pinpoint where you are located to about 80meters, and much less than this at times, it gives you a street view, the same as Google Earth, it also shows the way you are walking.

The Prisoner's, will have no escape!



2

,

26/06/2009 00:45:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Herman The German,

26/06/2009 01:33:00
#2,
Unfortunately a lost cause.


Charles, "over the counter" Sat Nav has been around for at least 10 years,welcome to the 21st century.
4

Anthony,

Glasgow 26/06/2009 01:37:49
This proposal does sound quite illogical.

If they are a danger to the public they should not be in an open prison in the first place.

If they are in an open prison however, because they are no longer deemed a danger, then tagging them is not only a waste of time and money, but it could be counter-productive - 'Aye Mr Bloggs, you've made fantastic progress, we trust you no longer to be a danger to the public...now just hold out your leg til we tag you!'
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2009 01:38:14

3 ~Herman The German,

Read correctly please!

"Mobile Phone Use", to-which has NOT been around for in the last 1year never-mind 10years, and Google Earth, "street-views", which has only been on the go, in the last year.

Now who feels silly?




6

Finlang,

Hong Kong 26/06/2009 02:37:57
#2 Bucket

You're up against it there. I've tried and clearly failed to get him to whip his grammar and punctuation into shape. And all that strange capitalization.

As for murderers and rapists in open prisons ... Wake me up when this bloody nightmare is all over.
7

Tom Cambeul,,

North 26/06/2009 03:45:13
Open prisons, one of the more moronic ideas of the Scottish government. Why even bother with incarceration?
8

Pocket Dictionary,

26/06/2009 06:52:42
When this technology first came out the tracking software placed a council van in South Africa.

Apart from that we can't comment on FF Majors or M Jackson and a few other stories.
9

McNasty,

Edinburgh 26/06/2009 07:13:16
The tag should be fitted around their neck and have a winding mechanism. This slowly winds in the further they are from Castle Huntly.
10

paulr,

edinburgh 26/06/2009 08:09:08
More to the point, why was a dangerous criminal in an open prison in the first place, especially as he had absconded twice before?
11

drunken proffet,

Tassy 26/06/2009 08:22:10
I seem to remember an old sentence called excommunication. I could be wrong but it involved removing the protection of civilised society from wrongdoers. A good idea, and something to think about, but I do not reckon it worked too well in those days either.
12

Tracker,

26/06/2009 10:43:34
Anything that helps us to track convicted criminals is a step in the right direction. Perhaps in a few years we will be able to implant tracking chips inside criminals that could only be removed by a skilled surgeon.
13

Allan(handofgod137),

26/06/2009 10:45:57
Another failure, the tags are very easy to remove.
14

Observer,,

Glasgow 26/06/2009 10:50:56
Usual chronic journalism from the Scotsman; this article bears to relationship to the reality of the situation whatsoever.
15

Observer,,

Glasgow 26/06/2009 10:52:57
Oops I appear to be suffering from Charles-itis. That should read this article bears no relationship to the reality of the situation whatsoever.
16

Pomodora,

Gravesend 26/06/2009 10:55:50
Convicted rapists should be in solitary confinement and chained to the floor.
17

BunchOfMorons,

26/06/2009 11:04:55
Fantastic. The implementation of a costly system will allow absconding prisoners to be traced exactly as far as the nearest junior hacksaw.
18

Warden Resurrected,

26/06/2009 11:27:41
It's incredible how those people getting out early were already tagged but these others slipped the minds of the Scottish Government. HOW?
19

Warden Resurrected,

26/06/2009 11:31:13
18- These things are wonderful, tamper with them and they give out a signal. It would have to be quicker than a junior hacksaw.
20

ddmc,

26/06/2009 12:14:37
#14 yes they are

#20 yes they do have anti tamper capabilties, but when you use Serco to monitor them .......by the time its reported the lag is long gone with no GPS to track them.
21

Observer,,

Glasgow 26/06/2009 12:20:21
19 You're talking about two different things. Most people transferred to the open estate are coming to the end of long sentences and it's a step in the process before they are released. Most people let out under tagging orders have only been incarcerated for a short period of time and are effectively serving part of their sentence in the community.

The majority of absconders from the open estate pose no risk so I think tagging them is a waste of time and money. Prisoners who do pose risk shouldn't be transferred to the open estate, unless they are on the verge of release in which case they should be tagged.

22

ukrefusenik,

hiding from the baying mob 26/06/2009 12:53:06
whenever there is a story dealing with drugs or single mums , dole scroungers or criminals in or out of jails , the heavy breathers arrive en masse . the inadequates that post on these threads seem to wish to emphasise to each other (mostly) their inate moral superiority to the "trash" ,who are in reality our brothers , sisters , daughters and sons . i'm afraid we are the trash , the trash are us , mabye they belong to a different race "h*mo somebodielses" ?
23

ukrefusenik,

falkirk 26/06/2009 12:57:02
hey ho ,they wouldnt let me write ho mo , ho ho . if anyone sees richard leaky , tell him its bobo africansus he found
24

BunchOfMorons,

26/06/2009 14:27:54
#19

The more serious point being: the tags offer no additional security whatsoever. If the subject doesn't want to abscond, it's an expensive bracelet. If he does want to abscond, he will easily remove it, not caring for the anti-tamper mechanism and then put it on a bus heading in the opposite direction to which he is going.
25

Number 6,

Germany 26/06/2009 16:25:50
They should be fitted with a device that can remotely deliver an electric shock.

They will think twice about absconding then.
26

CANUCK,

26/06/2009 19:04:27
What about a nice big heavy " Ball and Chain" attached to their ankles
27

Jo Flo,

prison of my choice 26/06/2009 21:52:46
ukrefusenik,
I'm with you.
god forbid some of the posters here found themselves on the wrong side of the law

As Observer has observed, these people are coming to the end of their sentences and need an good opportunity to get back into civie life, under supervision and support.

Folk do get in a froth and spout opinions so easily when they think they can peer into a part of society which they have no idea about, and hopefully will never have to experience.

Taking away freedom is the biggest punishment a civil society can hand down. And those found guilty serve that time.

Eventually some (not all) serious criminals, having served that time, must be rehabilitated back into public life.

In particular, prisoners serving long term sentences require support.

Open prisons are a step towards the "real" world. And many prisoners have contributed towards many community projects.

If new technology is helpful in keeping/supporting those in this programme, while protecting the public, is welcome as long as it's funtion is reviewed and continually re-assessed.

28

Teofilio Cubillas,

27/06/2009 00:20:58
#24

Mmmm, very right on, but....

I've never felt the need or had the desire to rape someone, murder someone or stick a shotgun in their face while robbing them. So yes, by definition I suppose it does make me morally superior to those that do indulge in these activities. And they're not MY brothers, sisters etc.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.