Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Half of Scots cod catches being thrown back into sea



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 September 2008
SCOTTISH fishermen are being forced to dump almost half their catches of cod at sea because of the apparent abundance of the once-fragile stock.
If the trend continues until the end of the year, a staggering total of 12,000 tonnes of marketable cod, with a potential value of £25 million, will have been discarded by the fleet, The Scotsman can reveal.

Marine scientists at the government's Fisheries Research Service in Aberdeen have told skippers that a survey, carried out between January and June, has shown that 40 per cent of landings of cod by weight are having to be discarded to prevent the fleet breaching tight quota restrictions.

In what fishermen's leaders have called a "monumental moral disaster", at least 90 per cent of the catches are above the minimum marketable landing size being thrown back dead.

The shock statistics will form the backdrop to a special summit meeting on discards involving industry representatives, scientists, environmentalists and policy-makers in Edinburgh next Thursday.

At the meeting, leaders of the Scottish White Fish Producers' Association (SWFPA) will be seeking support for a radical plan to prevent cod stocks being ravaged by allowing them to catch less fish by landing more for sale at the market.

They want the fleet to be given an increase in next year's cod quota in return for a series of management measures which will be implemented by the fleet, ranging from cuts in the number of days they spend at sea and fishing ground closures.

Mike Park, the executive chairman of the SWFPA, said scientists had informed the industry that around 40 per cent by weight and 80 per cent by number of all cod catches were being dumped at sea.

He said: "Because of the abundance of cod on the ground we are having to discard huge amounts of fish. And if we don't respond to the situation by increasing the total allowable catch (TAC) next year the level of cod discards will be far greater.

"We estimate that 95 per cent of the cod we are discarding are fish above the minimum landing size. And they could all be sold at the market if we had the quota."

It was, he said, an "absolutely crazy" situation which was likely to result in £25 million of marketable fish being dumped at sea by the end of the year.

Under proposals being put forward by the SWFPA, Scottish fishermen would be given a quota increase next year which would allow them to land the cod they catch. As a consequence, they argue, they will need to spend less time at sea, helping protect the remaining stocks of cod and other white fish species.

Richard Lochhead, the Scottish Fisheries Minister, is backing the need to dramatically reduce discarding.

He said: "I am not alone in believing that discards are an environmental and economic waste – fishermen, scientists and the public are all in agreement on this issue."

BACKGROUND

SCOTLAND'S white fish fleet was awarded an 11 per cent increase in its cod quota for 2008 – the first rise in the total allowable catch for ten years.

Under the restrictions, the fleet is limited to catching 23,000 tonnes of the valuable species, which is fetching an average £250 per kilo at quayside auction markets.

The quotas are averaged out over the year and fishermen have to discard any fish landed above the set limit. The new quotas for 2009 will be set at the December meeting of European fisheries ministers.

The full article contains 594 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 September 2008 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

Resolutions,

20/09/2008 00:16:33
These quotas are a caper. Throwing back dead fish can hardly be described as 'conservation'.
2

Brodric,

20/09/2008 00:36:25
This is absolute madness.

What could the benefit possibly be of throwing dead fish back in the water, when it could be used to feed poor people, who can hardly afford to get a taste of a fish from their fish fingers. Or it could be used by schools to offer healthy lunches to fat kids.

But to throw it away, come on......
3

jerrymanders,

20/09/2008 00:47:49
Stop fishing for them. You've caught your quota.
4

Guga II,

Rockall 20/09/2008 01:13:44
Yet another good reason to get out of the CFP or, preferably, out of the EU altogether.
5

Mark Renton,

Edinburgh 20/09/2008 02:22:28
A disgusting waste... Don't they know that cod are people too?
6

Black Five,

edinburgh 20/09/2008 07:12:52
We should be getting out of Europe.What a stupid lot they are.This country has went down the drain since the minute we joined the E U .Time to get our act together and get out.
7

Boy Wonder,

20/09/2008 07:22:21
The codfish lie dead in the ocean
The codfish lie dead in the sea
It's all because we're over-quota-ed
Says an EC bureaucracy

Don't fish, don't fish
Just limit your nets with your batch, your batch
It's a directive
The EC is monit'ring your catch!!!

8

Nevsky,

Moscow 20/09/2008 07:37:03
Personally i think they should land everything (including all the whiting, plaice, whitebait, skate that is thrown over a low value catch) and put the whole lot on the market.

Scotland is too picky about fish, the Spaniards eat everything that is caught and i would say 70% is thrown back into the sea in Scotland.
9

Sinead,

Tanunda 20/09/2008 08:00:19
Greed, greed and more greed! Stop when quota reached or Freeze/smoke the excess. What I'd give right now for some cod.
10

Alphadominus,

West Lothian 20/09/2008 08:07:39
"which is fetching an average £250 per kilo at quayside auction markets."

.... or perhaps a little less !!

11

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 20/09/2008 08:08:27
I agree with #10. Land and sell the entire catch. This dumping of good food is a scandal.
12

Anonym,

20/09/2008 08:28:34
I also agree with #10.

Perhaps prawns should be more expensive, and cod somewhat less so?

The quotas are obviously WRONG if meeting one quota means another has to be massively exceeded... leading to such terrible waste.
13

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 20/09/2008 08:50:54
Every so-called Fisheries Minister of the UK government (Ben Bradshaw for one), every so-called Fisheries Minister from the Scottish Executive (Ross Finnie for one) and every EU Fisheries Minister (German, French, Belgian or whatever) - ALL of them announce that they are GOING TO STOP the discarding of dead fish and implement real conservation measures. NONE OF THEM has done ANYTHING! This story comes around every year like the horses on the Princes Street Gardens Merry Go Round.

None of them has done anything because none of them has ANY power to change the situation. These waters belong to the EU; these fish belong to 27 different countries and the ONLY way to stop it would be to take back our waters - which could only be done by using the navy and force - as the Icelanders did in the Cod Wars of the 1970s. None of the Scots in residence in Downing Street will do it - because they sold their souls to the EU long ago. None of the Scots in Holyrood will do it - because - regardless of what they spout to the media - Europe is their longed-for paymaster and Fat Alex's only model for Independence is a nice comfy berth inside Brussel's pig trough. The problem will only be solved when we have a UK party with the guts to withdraw from Europe - or when the EU collapses under its own bureaucratic-fascist state.
14

Chris,

Edinburgh 20/09/2008 09:14:37
#6, Pinball Wizard: That is exactly what "Trawlermen" is - a show. Modern fishfinders are capable of being interpreted by experienced fishing skippers so that they can adjust their operation to target specific species. Yes there will be a by-catch of other species, but fishermen know that haddock swim further off the bottom than cod for instance. Saithe show up as a greater density than cod etc.
The Norwegians do not allow discards. Under the Norwegian system, all catches have to be landed and are counted against the quota; the sale value is given to the marketing organization.
15

carrottop,

Dumfries 20/09/2008 09:49:51
A good day to be a seal.
16

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 20/09/2008 10:22:45
Fish swim to where it's agreeable for them and where there's food. These discards are no way good for fish of fishermen. Scots need to run their own sectors, take initiative!

Fishing is a competitive game, but mutual also. Any skipper would cease operations and go to the rescue of a stricken boat (or yacht). And we've come to understand that this resource needs strict regulation of fishing methods and perhaps no-fishing zones according to time of year to rejuvenate these stocks of fecund fishes. We're all in it together, or not at all.

A good European is for certs against the direction, the EU power brokers are taking us. Can we return it to a useful european economic community? Can we have our country back?
17

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 20/09/2008 10:29:38
There was a moatoriium on cod fishing off the Newfoundland Banks some years back but I think cod are being allowed to be caught WITHIN LIMITS if the Japanese and Russians don't get greedy again and deplete our stocks.

At one time in the 1800s it is said you could put a bucket in the North Atlantic there and get cod without using nets or hooks. Amazing!

Let's hope that human greed and lack of supervision and proper management will allow these cod stocks - and othe fish stocks - to flourish once again to the benefit of us all.

Throwing back perfectly edible fish is just plain insanity and shows a lack of judgment on those who have enacted such ridiculous fishing laws.
18

stoatsnest,

Ham 20/09/2008 10:43:53
I'm not sure I believe this story, or the one about putting buckets in the sea and pulling out cod.
My daughter tells me we should eat pollock in preference, as their jaw structure is such that they filter out bad stuff, whereas cod are bottom feeders which eat a lot of rubbish which is unhealthy for us.
19

Robbierunciman,

Romney Marsh 20/09/2008 11:01:15
i am puzzled, why do they have to throw the fish back? If they have caught enough to make their quota in one trip - why go out again?

Sounds like its not the policy but the habits of Fishermen that are the problem. I think young cod float around in the plankton layer and move around - they would grow in response to water temperature in a suitable habitat. So abundance in one area does not neccessarily mean that the overall abundance throughout their range has increased.

Its good that a body like the EU exists to take such a holistic view of a population otherwise it would be impossible to manage an ocean with competing national interests.
20

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 20/09/2008 11:03:59
Why are they wasting time and diesel catching fish that they allow to die before throwing them back into the sea to pollute our waters? The world has gone mad.
21

Anonym,

20/09/2008 11:34:05
#19 and #20

This was explained in a post earlier this morning which has since dissappeared. Basically, too much cod is caught in the process of meeting other quotas, eg for prawns.

The comment Rules and I agreed with is now a different number (currently number 8 - Nevsky, suggesting that the entire catch be put on the market.)

Must be a glitch with the interweb.
22

JCA REID,

Annan 20/09/2008 12:04:56
Scotland being ripped off yet again!!! I bet you the French & Spanish boats ain't doing this!
I was surprised to learn that Scottish waters, NOT British/English waters etc. makes up HALF of ALL EU waters. I bet we don't get half the catches , or half the monies.
They're pi**ing down our backs telling us it's rain & to be grateful!
23

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 20/09/2008 12:22:30
18

This is not an "urban myth" or should I say "marine myth".

If you Google cod, Newfoundland banks, cod stocks all wll be revealed.
24

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 20/09/2008 12:48:19
This story is sick. Let's get the hell out of Europe now.
25

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 20/09/2008 12:51:55
We don't let the Spaniards come and drill for oil and gas in the Moray Firth so why do we let them come and steal all our fish?
26

Anonym,

20/09/2008 13:53:55
It's life but not as we know it...

I'm not sure that 'letting the Spaniards come and steal all our fish' is the problem here.

The problem is the no doubt unintended effects of rubbish legislation from Brussels, leading to too many cod being caught, and then dumped, so as not to fall foul of quotas.
27

danbob,

20/09/2008 15:00:43
25# Has anybody told the fish that they are scottish.
28

Lloyd,

Nashville Music City USA 20/09/2008 15:10:59
Don't the fishermen know how to take a few days off? (Actually, I'm sure they do...)

Everything caught should be landed, accounted for, and sold into the appropriate market. When quotas are met for a particular species, if they're still coming up with the nets, the fishing technique should be changed to reduce the bycatch. If the fishermen can't alter their systems, they should dock their boats and wait until the bycatch quota opens up again! Too bad if another quota goes unfilled; learn how to land the targeted species WITHOUT taking everything else along with it!

What's truly disgusting about this -- besides the absurdities caused by regulations -- is that OTHER fishermen are out there dredging up the seabed to catch species specifically to be ground up into fishmeal for fishfarming operations. Why not use the excess here for THAT quota? They're already dead; USE THEM!

Really, it's well past time for a European revolution....
29

Sanny,

Glasgow 20/09/2008 16:43:50
Why not keep and land all the fish, but dump the brain dead politicians that dream up this nonsense. The politicians might then serve a useful purpose - feeding the fish!
30

Sanny,

Glasgow 20/09/2008 16:46:01
28 Lloyd,
an eminently sensible proposal!
31

Nevsky,

Moscow 20/09/2008 20:03:39
28 Lloyd#

If you can devise a system that specifically targets species of fish then eveyoe would be very interested to know.

Instead of posting on subjects you clearly know nothing about i would advise a bit of knowledge first.

In catching any speciaes apart from pelagic such as herring and mackerel you will ALLWAYS have a by-catch.

If you trawl on grounds for prawn (soft ground) you will also catch lots of small fish, whitebait, immature skate, codling etc.

If you trawl for whitefish such as cod and haddock you will also have a bycatch of all sorts and sizes of fish.

The problem is not the trawling it is the quota and the 'preference' system. By preference i mean 1 box of cod is worth 50x more than 1 box of whitebait and small fish...but you CANNOT catch 50 boxes of whitebait to make your boat profitable...so the valuable catch is kept and the less valuable catch discarded...no surprise..you would do the same with a £2 million mortgage and 7 crew which equated to 19 people to feed and put money on the tabel.

The solution is to land all the catch..everything but also to develop markets for it. Whitebait etc can be used for fish fingers or re-constituted products..but you will need first to invest in infrastructre such as processing plants to do this as well as changing the eating habits of the population.

Another 'myth' you have to forget is that trawlermen trawl up every inch of the seabed, they don't. A very small proportion is suitable for trawling with most being solid rock.

Lots to think about..but the waste should stop..no question..it could account for maybe 50% of fish consumption if managed and marketed properly.
32

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek Australia 21/09/2008 03:24:48
Export it to Australia, we have been starved of good cod for years.
33

Friar Tuck,

21/09/2008 20:51:13
250 pounds per kilo? That's over 113 pounds per pound. Who can afford to buy cod at that price? I know I can't.
34

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek 22/09/2008 00:56:41
#Friar Tuck, you have got to be joking, who buys it at that price? 250 pounds per kg is about Aud$500, please forget my earlier post.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.