Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Revealed: 70 types of seafood 'you should not eat' to conserve stocks



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 September 2008
FROM king prawns and anchovies to Scottish haddock and cod, almost 70 types of seafood should remain in the sea and off the dinner plate, according to new recommendations from a conservation group.
The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) today publishes its annual list of which fish to eat, and which to avoid.

It gives advice on more than 150 species, recommending 69 stocks should be avoided because they are unsustainable due to overfishing,
poor management or because the method of harvesting harms other species.

New to the list of fish to steer clear of this year is haddock from the Faroe Islands and the west of Scotland.

Instead the MCS suggests shoppers should choose haddock from the north-east Arctic, where stocks are healthy and harvested sustainably.

Other new fish added to the not-to-eat list include common and Dover sole from the North Sea or Irish Sea, albacore tuna from the Mediterranean and South Atlantic and certain types of Atlantic cod.

Other fish not to eat include Bay of Biscay anchovy, any type of king prawn that has not been caught organically, Chilean seabass, conger eel, Atlantic halibut, wild Atlantic salmon, many types of shark, and nearly every type of skate.

All types of tuna should also be avoided – apart from albacore tuna from the American Albacore Fishing Association in the South Pacific and skipjack caught by pole and line methods in the Maldives or the western and central Pacific – according to the charity.

However, clams and Pacific cod and salmon certified by the Marine Stewardship Council have moved into the category of fish that is best to eat, along with scallops from farmed stocks.

The MCS hopes the list, available in full online, will help consumers make the right choice at fish counters, restaurants and takeaways.

However, it is concerned that labelling is not good enough to enable shoppers to make informed choices.

While EU legislation demands that retailers display various details on seafood, they think labelling of processed products and at fresh fish counters, takeaways and restaurants remains poor.

Sam Wilding, the MCS fisheries officer, said: "Labelling of seafood sold in the UK is lacking detail, and as such is not fit for purpose.

"This is leading to confusion among consumers, who really want to make the best sustainable seafood choice.

"It is vital that consumers are given better information to act upon if we are to reduce the tragedy of overfishing."

He said cod is one example of why detailed labelling is important, because stocks vary in abundance in different regions, with cod from the north-east Arctic a better choice than from the North Sea.

However, Philip MacMullen, head of environmental responsibility at Sea Fish Industry Authority, said it was difficult to rely on "eat and avoid" lists because of the complexity of fisheries.

"Fish stocks are dynamic and can change their status quite quickly," he said.

He added that seafood lovers should be reassured that fish for sale in the UK is subject to strict quota systems that protect stocks.

OFF THE MENU

Anchovy

From the Bay of Biscay. Stocks are at an all-time low.

Tiger prawn

Only eat if it has been organically farmed. Otherwise try coldwater prawns.

Haddock

From the Faroe Islands and west of Scotland fisheries. Choose haddock from the north east Arctic instead.

Herring

From West of Scotland, West Ireland, and Great Sole fisheries. Chose herring from Norway instead.

Wild Atlantic cod

Except from north east Arctic, Iceland, Western Channel, Bristol Channel, South-east Ireland and Sole.

Wild Atlantic salmon

Choose organically farmed Atlantic salmon or MSC certified Pacific salmon from Alaska instead.

ON THE MENU

American hardshell clam

Manila clams are also good, as long as they are from hand-gathered, farmed sources.

Pacific cod

Must be MSC certified and from the Bering Sea or Aleutian Islands only.

Coley

Must be MSC certified and only from Norwegian waters, where they are harvested sustainably.

Common mussel

Should be rope-grown or hand harvested, as this causes less disturbance to sediment. Blue mussels are also good to eat.

Alaskan salmon

All five species of Pacific salmon caught in Alaskan waters are certified by MSC as environmentally responsible.

Albacore tuna

Must be MSC certified and from the north or south Pacific, where stock is above safe limits.

Read the full list of recommendations here (opens as a PDF file).



The full article contains 741 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 September 2008 11:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

muppetfinder,

04/09/2008 00:24:05
"any type of king prawn that has not been caught organically," how do you catch fish organically? wear sandals?
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 00:48:46

*Edititorial Error Correction*

Should read,...

..."71 types of seafood 'you should not eat'"

The seventy-first, being our Boy Wonder, when he is acting the,...

...'Sea Monster'!

If one remembers my previous post on this one!

3

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 04/09/2008 05:34:22
Avoid the Stonefish at all costs :0)
4

Boy Wonder,

04/09/2008 07:18:44
Octopus Surprise

The surprise is ... it's still alive and Chucles Linskaill is its next meal!!! :D
5

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 04/09/2008 09:39:52
Next time I'm in for a fish supper I'll better query whether the haddock is "From the Faroe Islands and west of Scotland fisheries. Choose haddock from the north east Arctic instead." Maybe the greenies go out and label them with a wee ticket to make things easier.

Do you get the impression that the MSC needs a job to do? One way of tackling this mince is to chuck out other nations' trawlers from our fishing grounds and so conserve valuable stocks, ahem for ourselves for a change. Oh hang on there's two of them with similar acronyms the Marine Stewardship Council MSC and the Marine Conservation Society MCS. Confused? I was.

But there's another crowd involved as well - you couldn't make this up. "However, Philip MacMullen, head of environmental responsibility at Sea Fish Industry Authority, said it was difficult to rely on "eat and avoid" lists because of the complexity of fisheries.

"Fish stocks are dynamic and can change their status quite quickly," he said."

You bet. Maybe because they're fish and, ummm, do tend to swim around a bit and not fit neatly into sea areas?



6

Destroy the Planet,

04/09/2008 09:59:44
As sponsored by the Alaskan fisheries board
7

donald,

glasgow 04/09/2008 10:31:50
Just have to eat the bater instead. Are Mars bars on the on the list. Which oceans do they inhabit?
8

Poetess50,

04/09/2008 13:31:12
Just another example of government interference.
I eat meat, I smoke, & I wear fur. DEAL WITH IT!!!
9

Duncan in Edinburgh,

04/09/2008 14:50:59
#8 Oh dear. Do you sh1te in the street as well, whilst loudly proclaiming your right to do so?

Anyway, the MCS is not a government body. This is in fact just another example of a conservation body offering useful advice.

DEAL WITH IT!!! Or not, it's up to you.
10

Geomac 1,

Scotland 04/09/2008 16:52:53
Yawn!!!
11

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 17:07:53
Some of these conservationist types would see us all starve rather than allow us to catch and kill something or grow something.

Surely, if the situation was that bad, legislation would already be in place to deal with it? Just a thought...
12

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 04/09/2008 20:33:42
donald, glasgow #7,

Fraid I don't know the answer tae that Donald. Ye'll hiv tae ask the Master baiter :0)
13

Bidderdal,

Somewhere 05/09/2008 12:17:51
#11 - If MCS wanted us to starve they wouldn't produce a fish to eat list!! And the reason legislation isn't in place is because the EU government can't manage the fisheries effectively.

I agree that the UK should have control of its waters out to 200nm, but that won't happen unless we pull out of the EU (not that I would be upset with that!).

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.