Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scientists offer hope for North Sea fishing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 March 2008
STOCKS of North Sea cod – said to have been on the brink of total collapse only six years ago – could return to sustainable levels, according to a new report published yesterday by Scottish marine scientists.
The new assessment by scientists at the Government's Fisheries Research Services (FRS) laboratory in Aberdeen is part of a detailed report on the state of fish stocks in Scotland's waters.

But the scientists warn that the rebuilding of the precio
us stocks can only be achieved if fish mortality remains at its current low levels.

In 2002 an international committee of marine scientists claimed that every white-fish fishery in Scottish waters would have to close for up to 12 years if cod stocks were to have even a remote chance of recovering from complete commercial collapse.

The Advisory Committee of the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), the group that advises European fisheries ministers on the state of the stocks, warned that a blanket catching ban would have to last at least five years to replenish stocks from a record low. Up to 60 per cent of the fishable stock was being removed annually from the North Sea.

But the new report by the FRS has given the most upbeat, though still guarded, assessment of the health of North Sea cod stocks since the "doomsday" forecast by ICES six years ago.

The report states that the stock is still at risk of being harvested unsustainably and suffering reduced reproductive capacity.

However scientists continue: "Fishing mortality has shown a slight decline since 2000. The 1999-2004 year classes (juvenile cod) are all estimated to have been well below average; the 2005 year class is estimated to be more abundant, but well below average levels.

"The 2005 year class is below average but large enough to represent an opportunity to rebuild, with the potential to increase the spawning stock biomass."

The report adds: "Reports from the 2006 fishery indicated that current regulations are beginning to control the level of under-reporting, but increased levels of discarding were also being recorded.

"Rebuilding can only be achieved if fishing mortality is sufficiently constrained at a very low level."

Bertie Armstrong, the chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, welcomed the report's findings.

He said: "This is certainly the most optimistic report there has been for years and that in itself is good news."

The report, he claimed, showed schemes to take vessels out of the Scottish white-fish fleet and the technical conservation measures implemented by Scottish fishermen were beginning to pay dividends.

Mr Armstrong added: "Our efforts have been redoubled. We want to see cod recovered and we want to see discards reduced and both of those issues are being worked on together."

Dr Bill Turrell, the FRS fisheries management programme director, said the principal aim was to provide an accurate summary of the current state of commercial fish stocks.





The full article contains 492 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 March 2008 10:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

carrottop,

Dumfries 13/03/2008 09:32:49
The cost of tying up a fishing fleet would surely pay for the mass introduction of young cod reared in tanks all over the Scottish coast. Surely better to pay a fisherman to solve the problem of his unemployment than pay him to sit at home.
2

Spicey,

Glasgow 13/03/2008 09:37:51
Not entirely related to the article but wondering if anybody could answer a coupla questions bout farmed fish.

Why are they more prone to disease/pests which they then get blamed for passing on to wild fish?

Why is there an outcry when they escape from their cages and interbreed with wild fish - are they not the same fish just reared in a cage?
3

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 13/03/2008 12:38:40
Now if only your government and those of Canada and the USA and Scandinavia could control the over-fishing of all fish stocks by Portugal, Japan, some South American countries, and other countries with no sense of shame in depleting stocks for financial gain.

They deplete the stocks and then complain about losing jobs and employment for their rogue fleets.

Have they no sense or decency or awareness of ecological matters or is the greedy pursuit of fish at all costs the over-riding factor?

We went through a cod crisis here in Canada and our government of the time declared a moratorium on cod fishing.

Smart minds in the fishing fleets of Newfoundland realised the intelligence of the ruling and SLOWLY the once-gargantuan cod schools are returning.
4

Resolutions,

13/03/2008 12:41:38
Spicey some of the fish are not quite the same breed and do not have the 'survival' skills of the wild fish, so I am told.
As for the disease bit,- disease in aanimals including us spreads rather fast in crowded conditions

I just wonder if the scientists are beginning to realise at last, that they must work in co-operation with the fishing fleet to sustain the industry(including their own jobs) They used to do this a good while ago and then 'they' promoted themseves to being the be-all and end-all(Thatcher's generation?) we know everything types.(And a lot of not very well done research) There seems to be a change thankfully.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.