Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 26th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hadden right to predict bright future, but he's not man to nurture it



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 March 2008
AVOIDING the Wooden Spoon was a mere technicality, one which neither dampened Italian celebrations nor sent Scots heading homewards from Rome with an extra spring in their steps.
Similarly, had Scotland drawn in the Stadio Flaminio, or even sneaked a win rather than going down 23-20, it would have meant little in itself.

If the pack had got on top, if the backs had cut loose, if together they had constructed a resounding,
multiple-try victory, then we might at least be tempted to conclude the squad has made some kind of consistent if modest progress over the course of the championship.

But they didn't. The forwards conceded a penalty try, and the backs, despite the best efforts of Mike Blair, failed to spark into life.

Jason White and Nathan Hines, among other Scotland players, had said after the Calcutta Cup match that beating England would count for nothing unless they went on to beat Italy. That's not entirely true – beating England counted for two points, and showed that at least in certain conditions the team are still capable of raising their game. But White and Hines were correct in the sense that the win at Murrayfield has been revealed as a false dawn given no real progress came from it.

Frank Hadden seems to see things differently, however. Despite not being the most ebullient and optimistic of individuals, the Scotland coach still succeeds in interpreting events in a positive light.

Supporters might think the team has staggered around aimlessly for the past 15 months. Hadden wants us to believe that tangible improvement is just around the corner.

Last Six Nations, when Scotland did get the Wooden Spoon, the coach asked us to look forward to the World Cup. Then, when Scotland just fell short in the quarter-final, we were told we would see the benefit in the next Six Nations. Now, presumably, it's the summer tour we've got to look forward to.

"We are not far away from making a serious impact and punching well above our weight in future competitions," Hadden said after Saturday's defeat. He is right to suggest that sooner or later Scotland will get better, for history shows that even the longest of poor runs ends sometime. But he has done nothing to show that he can himself turn the team round.

On the contrary, the coach is standing in the way of progress, hobbling the team with his selections and tactics alike, with the shunting around of Chris Paterson being only the most glaring example.

We have not suddenly been landed with a generation of sub-standard players: they can and do play far better than they have done for Scotland over the past couple of months. What we have been landed with is a coach who cannot inspire men to excel themselves.

And, no matter Hadden's mealy-mouthed mutterings, it does not take years and years to get the best out of players. Look at Wales: demoralised after the World Cup (in which they at least died on their feet against Fiji), they bounced back in months to win the Grand Slam.

"It's probably down to the fact that everyone is scared senseless of Shaun (Edwards, the assistant coach]," the Wales wing Shane Williams said when asked to explain this rapid improvement. Are any of our players scared senseless of Hadden?

To be fair, striking fear into the hearts of a squad is just one way of provoking improvement: positive encouragement and inspiration can also help. It was Hadden's belief in his players which helped them recover from the Matt Williams era, but since then he has added nothing positive of his own.

Not being Matt Williams may be a virtue, but it is one which only takes you so far. Indeed, for all that he rails at the "negativity" of others, Hadden exudes that very characteristic himself. Far from growing into the job, the coach has simply become more defensive and small-minded. Instead of facing up to problems, he tries to redefine them.

Remember the France match, when bad luck and the strange shape of rugby balls were supposedly to blame for defeat? By Saturday, Hadden was talking down Scotland's performance in that game in an attempt to prove that progress had been made over the tournament.

"Considering the start of this competition and how far we appear to have regressed from the World Cup . . . we had to work incredibly hard to make the progress that I feel we have in this championship," he said.

Regressed from the World Cup? On whose watch? Hadden blamed external factors such as injuries and adverse weather conditions, but injuries happen to every team, and adverse weather is an annual occurrence this far north.

So even Hadden's attempted justifications after the fact do not stand up to scrutiny. Nor, more importantly, does his record in the 30 months since he became Scotland coach. There will be brighter times ahead for this generation of players, but a brighter coach is needed to help them get there.





The full article contains 855 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 March 2008 10:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Six Nations
 
1

Sir Saltire,

17/03/2008 01:52:16
Excellent Mr Bathgate, pay heed Mr McKie. Resign now Frank, please.
2

Aligator,

17/03/2008 02:54:48
Frank Hadden has been good for Scottish Rugby after the Williams period and he has much to be proud of. But his, ultimately limited, approach and skills have now run their course. The SRU needs to look ahead as to who can lead us to the next World Cup competition. It is not Frank Hadden. But who? The SRU has to step up to the leadership plate and a find a successor by the time of the next 6 nations. They also have to put a market salary in the equation, if we are to even hope to attract the right candidates. Can Lineen or Robinson step up to this - perhaps. But we need to see success from them in Scotland with their present 'City' charges first!!!!
3

parks is colin nish,

cape town 17/03/2008 05:19:30
dan parks has put hadden in a corner with his enept displays. FH blames the media for being harsh, but we (fans)are not stupid and all can see that parks is not up to it, carrying on picking parks, who lets be honest nobody wants in the team, is not fair even on parks.Since FH picked a b team to play nz in the world cup he proved then that his 'goal' was to achieve the minimun required to save his job.
if the Sru has any guts(which i doubt)it should be filling in some p45's this morning
4

bawcus,

benthehoose doon in the dumps. 17/03/2008 07:51:53
2. Alligator.

I agree with your comments about Frank Hadden He lifted Scotland after the Williams debacle. Thank you for that Mr Hadden. However, it is now time for you to go.

The question is do the SRU have the vision and passion to appoint a man of proven ability and as Alligator says, "pay the comensurate market salary"? My choice, if he would take the job, would be South Africa's Jake White.

A succesful Scotland will fill Murrayfield. If nothing positive is done now, in the future it will be empty and Scottish International Rugby will descend to abysmal depths.

SRU, please do not let that happen.



5

Touchline,

17/03/2008 08:27:49
It is a shame that we are acting like football supporters, I never thought that I would blame management for losing games.....

Mr Hadden I am sure is a proper gentleman, but has now got to get in the taxi along with Dan Parks.

I think we have plenty home grown guys who could do the job, Sean Lineen and either Ian Paxton or John Beattie............Good cop, Bad cop......the present squad are the sort of people who will react to the experience of former scottish players who have been there and got the T-Shirt............
6

parks is colin nish,

cape town 17/03/2008 08:29:55
unfortunatly,jake white will be the next england coach
7

John Brown,

Glasgow 17/03/2008 08:34:14
Why do we need to pay "market prices"? Why do we need a Scotland coach and backup team, costing around £500,000 p.a. (and more if an international coach is brought in)? The SRU currently employ 2 teams of coaches already. Magners league matches are not played during International blocks in Spring and Autumn. Use existing resources in a restucture of the SRU company, after all was Mr McKie not employed for his past experience of management restructures or was that just another con!
8

Egg Chasing Ape,

17/03/2008 08:35:13

Thanks Frank, but here's your coat!

SRU should appoint Lineen and Robinson for Argentina and gauge if this combination will work. We shouldn't forget that Robinson too had his limitations when England coach and he shouldn't be a shoo-in....Glasgow's back division hardly sets the heather on fire either under Lineen, although that may be down to that huddy Parks and 'thrombo' Henderson (slow moving clot).

You only need to watch Gloucester, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Sale to see that the talent is there, it just needs coached properly or left to xpress their talent.
9

gordonium,

weege 17/03/2008 08:40:01
I am sorry, but all the clamour for andy robinson, leaves me more concerned than if hadden were to stay!
A few good games as coach for edinburgh, and everyone forgets how AWFUl he was at england, worse record than hadden!! good coach, good knowledge of how to beat england, head coach for scotland? that would be a seriously backwards step.
personally? sean lineen head coach and backs, with robinson forwards coach, keep tait and graham as specialists, with john beattie into scare them!!
10

Cynical? Pah!,

17/03/2008 09:09:26
Well while the knives are out I want to take this opportunity to thank Frank Hadden. A couple of years back these guys were so down-trodden that there was no hope and early retirement. Now they finally believe in themselves and believe they can win. But progress is what we need now and it is definately time to move on.

Thanks for some (slightly) memorable wins!
11

JonnyS,

Edinburgh 17/03/2008 09:23:40
Get rid of Graham - our scrum and lineout are the worst they have been in years
12

MacBog,

Glasgow 17/03/2008 09:23:55
Selecting a number of players who were clearly not match fit for the first match and excluding one for the same reason shows the confusion behind Hadden's team selections. Murray and Hamilton shouldn't have been expected to become match fit by playing internationals and it is hard to justify the continued selection of
Parks or Henderson. It's certainly true that Hadden steadied the ship after Matt Williams glaring failure, but, as Dirty Harry said, a man's gotta know his limitations. France seem to be capable of promoting former players to successful coaching roles and it would be preferable that we do the same. John Beattie and Ian Paxton have already been mentioned and it may be wise to let Sean Lineen continue his job with Glasgow, but the only other candidate that springs to mind is Craig Chalmers.
13

SHELDON THE CRACK DEALER,

17/03/2008 09:24:18
Hadden instilled confidence in the team post Williams and made a decent job (for a while) of being a caretaker manager.

Scotland need something else to take them further, but why would Jake White wish to step down from coaching the world cup winners into a job with a union which could only just afford him and a team which could wreck his reputation? Stranger thigns have happened, but the England job is probably going to open up soon.

If there are going to be changes it'll probably come from the current domestic set up -Andy Robinson, Sean Lineen, maybe John Beattie.

Andy Robisnons has a reputation as a great coach but poor selector. Does he need a manager to help him on this front?
14

Larry Hagman,

17/03/2008 09:27:22
#11 you are absolutely spot on. Tait is obviously doing a good job but Graham is a waste of time. We have the heaviest Scotland pack ever (and in most cases in this 6 nations, heavier than the opposition) but the most fragile scrum and a faltering lineout.

Time for Hadden to go and to take Parks with him. Both totally inept and out of their depth.
15

Colt,

17/03/2008 09:47:44
It would be totally unbelievable if FH was allowed to continue. But then again, this is the SRU so what price a fudge with FH becoming the Director of Rugby and the two pro team coaches taking on the coaching of the national team???
Yes, absolutely ridiculous and embarrassing but bear one thing in mind, Hadden was selected by McKie, McKie is an accountant so his aim is to get an affordable solution, not necessarily a successful one. All the long term stuff about filling Murrayfield with a winning team does not get him out of the mire financially in the short term so be prepared for a sticking plaster.
FH is becoming a fall-guy for the wider failings of Scottish Rugby - note that the U21s collected their 6N wooden spoon; ask anyone about the "strength" of club rugby; pro teams bottom and second bottom of their Heineken Cup groups etc.
Accountants have to be accountable so lets hear what the grand plan is and how much it will cost. Anyone who imagines a competitive salary will be on offer to a new coach is absolutely kidding themselves.
16

Jockbok,

17/03/2008 10:15:48
I agree Colt #15. Fudge and penny piching will be the order of the day. But any future coach will be faced with a small group of players to choose from with precious few coming through the system worth a pro contract.

The problems at national level are plain to see. Hadden was to blame for Saturday's performance, but the problems run far, far deeper and must be addressed. The problem is by whom. Frank as Director of Rugby? McKie? Hardly. How then do we make real change happen?

The situation at every level of Scottish rugby must be re-examined. Drastic action must be taken. I really do fear for the long term future of the game. Change must involve every level of rugby from minis, clubs, pros and the national XV. If not the game in Scotland will fade away. There were 50 supporters at Watsonians for an SHE cup match. Would any prospective sponsors really be interested in supporting that?
17

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 17/03/2008 10:35:21
I feel little chance of Hadden doing the honourable thing - maybe a wee volunteered to resign but turned down statement by SRU will be forthcoming??

Since he robbed a full stadium at Murrayfield, who paid significant prices for tickets against NZ, of a competitive game by fielding reserves, he shows he has no integrity!
18

Mr Toad,

17/03/2008 10:53:43
Time for Captain Haddock to hop into the fryer at the Ben Hur.
19

Venachar,

17/03/2008 11:21:43
France at Murrayfield was an example of what was to come, I left 5-10 minutes before the end as this was so far removed from Edinburgh on a friday night as to be positively frightening - I have been critical since and proved right.

However the 6 Nations are behind us now, but I will look at a number of postives.

1 Mike Blair - proved under trying circumstances being the Captain did not phase him. Improved game through the competition.

2 Graeme Morrison - eventually put into the team and proved worthy of his place.

3 Alasdair Strokosch - another late inclusion but superb, my player of the team. His disappointment and frustration on his face at the end of the Italy match says he is the type of player we need.

4 Scott McLeod - proved once more he can cut it, more than held his own in the line out.

5 In John Barclay or Ross Rennie we could have our own equivalent of Martyn Williams.

Thank you to ALL the players for your efforts in the competition.

The SRU now need to show positive leadership. Mr McKie has seen fit to bring in a business model. Targets in this model have clearly not been met so it is time for action.
Opinions are split on Sean Lineen and Andy Robinson. Personally I believe both should be allowed to develop both Glasgow and Edinburgh.

This disbandment of the Borders as a team is now showing up to be a huge mistake. We are short of options in key personnel most notably in the three quarters, the Borders team could have helped resource such players. Steve Bates the former coach is doing very well with his coaching of the England Saxons.

Sponsorship should be reassessed. Edinburgh will lose the Magners team sponsorship at the end of the season.
Perhaps Sir David Murray would have been better to sponsor Edinburgh than get his name on the Scotland strip.
We do have major international companies in Scotland. RBS made £9.5 billion profit last year. Standard Life exceeded everyones expectations by over £200 million. What would
20

jockinexile,

armchair 17/03/2008 11:23:04
I agree with most of the previous comments. There is talent in the team but the selection was awful - that man Parks again - with no innovation (eg promoting more of the A team). Leaving Parks out of the team would have been a major step forward. Thank God I've still got the video of the 1990 Grand Slam to watch!!
21

Venachar,

17/03/2008 11:26:39
Part deux

What would £15 million over three years do for a Borders team.

Craig Chamlers column in April's Rugby World would indicate that he is more in tune with how Scottish rugby should be played. As a flair player himself and former British Lion he may just be right.

22

Bordererinengland,

17/03/2008 12:15:45
Hadden moved upstairs is not the answer.....as outlined yesterday in Iain Morrison's thread we need a NEW head coach working with Lineen (Backs),Robinson (Forwards) and Tait (Defence) with Lineen and Robinson keeping their roles with Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Thank you Mr Bathgate for saying it as it is. Yes Hadden does have some positive attributes but again as I posted yesterday inspirational he ain't!
23

dg seville,

Northants 17/03/2008 12:31:47
I really think Hadden has let himself down by persevering with Parks! I simply do not understand it. Maybe he's pig headed about it, maybe Paterson is not good in this role in training, I do not know but it is so disappointing. We lost to Italy for one reason this six nations and last six nations and that is Dan Parks. It is not his fault but that of those who pick him because he simply does not cut it offensively or defensively.

So because of this misjudgment Hadden has to go.

I also do not like the fact that the Scotland jersey is being tarnished by Murray, if this is the case in my opinion he should stick to the true Blues at Ibrox and not stick his nose in the non sectarian sport of rugby union.
24

Aubrey W,

Fyfe 17/03/2008 20:40:12
Not fair to compare Wales with Scotland. Sure, Wales were down after the World Cup (where they played as if they were in a Ba Ba game) but they have substantially more talent than Scotland because their regional teams are better and there are more of them. So it was a case of organising them better. Scotland has a more fundamental problem of lack of high class talent in most positions.

Matt Williams was probably right in his analysis that Scotland is some way from an ordinary international side, although he offered no solution. Frank Hadden is clearly re-creating reality in his off-the-wall explanations of Scotland's failures.

Is there someone in the middle out there?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.