Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fears for football clubs as Setanta crisis deepens

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2009
THE directors of sports broadcaster Setanta were locked in desperate talks to save the business last night, amid growing concerns that its demise could prompt a major crisis in Scottish football.
The Irish firm, which defaulted on a £3 million payment to the Scottish Premier League (SPL) earlier this week, cancelled its subscription services for new customers yesterday, after failing to raise desperately needed fresh investment.

As Setanta's board met in London to consider its next step, the accountant Deloitte was already on stand-by to act as administrator.

The broadcaster's demise could have dire consequences for a number of Scottish football clubs that rely on the income from television rights to remain solvent. The Scottish Football Association (SFA) said last night the game would survive whatever happened to Setanta – but warned that some clubs could be casualties.

Asked if clubs could go out of business, SFA acting president Campbell Ogilvie could give no assurances all would survive and admitted: "We have to accept that people and companies are affected, so there will be some impact on the game.

"We know there are problems within the game in general and that some clubs have maybe overspent at certain times. In any organisation, you have to allow for downturns. In football, as in business, there is risk management."

The SPL, which has already paid out £3m from its emergency central funds this week to its 12 member clubs, now faces a desperate effort to secure a replacement television contract in time for the 2009-10 season. But it has little hope of negotiating terms anywhere near as lucrative as the ones it has with Setanta.

The existing £13m-a-year contract had been due to expire in 2010, when a new four-year deal, worth £31m a season, would begin. The first indications of Setanta's financial difficulties emerged earlier this year, when it asked the SPL to renegotiate the terms of that contract.

Setanta, which also shows cricket, golf and rugby union, has been badly hit by the loss of most of its English Premier League (EPL) rights to rival British Sky Broadcasting.

The Irish broadcaster is losing an estimated £90m a year. With no prospect of being able to come up with its next scheduled payment of £30m to the EPL next Monday, administration started to appear inevitable.

In its attempt to piece together a rescue package, Setanta asked Sky for a £50m interest-free loan in return for access to its 46 live EPL matches next season as an add-on option to Sky Sports. The request was firmly rejected.

"Our job is not to fund other companies," Sky's chief executive, Jeremy Darroch, said yesterday. "This is a huge amount of money. We have been talking to Setanta, and trying to work with them and help them. But at the end of the day, we are not a bank. We are a broadcaster, not a supplier of working capital to a business and rights holder."

Mr Darroch denied Sky would be happy to see Setanta go out of business. "Quite the opposite," he said. "A rising tide lifts all boats. The more sports broadcasters there are, the better for sport. It is additional competition, and we welcome it."

ESPN, the Disney-owned American broadcaster, has been monitoring the situation and may step in to try to secure some of Setanta's contracts.

New customers attempting to access Setanta's online subscription service yesterday were met with a message saying: "Oops! Something has gone wrong…" Its customer services confirmed new subscriptions were unavailable but hoped the situation would have returned to normal by today.

SFA chief executive Gordon Smith admitted the Setanta situation was a concern but tried to play down the possible implications.

"I wouldn't use that word 'crisis'," he said. "We don't really know what is going on. It is an SPL broadcasting deal, but obviously it is a concern if there is a problem for the league.

"We have listened to what has been going on, but we have had no discussions with the SPL. So we have no real comment except to say that we hope it works out well. We know how important it is when you have a broadcasting deal that it works out."

The EPL should not be too badly affected should Setanta go into administration as the company won only one of the six live broadcast packages for 2010-13.

The Football Association, which has a £150m deal with Setanta for England internationals and FA Cup games has more significant problems, even though its agreements have been front-loaded in terms of cash being paid in advance.

Under a pre-arranged deal, ITV would take over the rights to up to eight England away friendlies for a pre-agreed sum. The FA Cup would provide more problems but it is understood the FA would approach ITV in the first instance to see if it wanted to take over any live games.

Setanta's sports

• English Premier League – 46 live and exclusive Barclays Premier League games, plus European league action, internationals and live FA Cup games.

• Scottish Premier League – Setanta dominates the market in Scotland, with exclusive broadcasting rights to all SPL action.

• Blue Square Premier – Setanta was set to screen more than 50 matches live this season of the top division of the Football Conference.

• IPL cricket – this year Setanta showed all 59 20/20 cricket matches live.

• US golf – The Setanta Golf channel follows the US PGA Tour, plus the Champions, Nationwide and Asian tours.

• Boxing – Setanta has deals to screen David Haye's biggest fights exclusively live in the UK and Ireland and has coverage of top US fights.


The full article contains 959 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 June 2009 3:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: SPL troubles
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/06/2009 00:14:46
What mince. I am sure that the loyal supporters of any sporting club worth the name would rally round if the club was unable to continue to benefit from the money from these television people.

I am not a football aficionado myself but if I were I would be perfectly happy to turn out with my rattle and supporter's scarf and cheer on the chaps, even if it was at the local municipal park rather than some plush stadium. Certainly, I wouldn't expect the foreign players to stay but I am sure that there are enough likely lads willing to turn out on a Saturday - or is it Sunday now? - and put on a good show.

In my opinion we should go back to the days when football - or "fitba" as I believe the pawky characters of yesterday dubbed it - was a game for gentlemen in roomy short trousers, and all the supporters wore suits, hats and raincoats. It didn't cost a king's ransom to go and see "the gemme" and there was a habit of lifting small boys over turnstiles.
2

The Strategist,

10/06/2009 00:15:12
As long as ITV shows the British Touring Car Series, BBC1 shows F1 and Motors TV shows the SMRC races at Knockhill and elsewhere then I really don't see the problem in Setanta going bust.
3

Iainbroch,

10/06/2009 00:20:59
Not surprised by this, it was coming for months! Time for some clubs to get real. Never had either provider,Sky or Setanta in the first place so it makes no differnece to me.

However the dominance of Satan in the sporting media does disturb me!

Although with Setanta falling out of the picture it might open up the market for others - who knows?
4

Barney Thomson,

Reading 10/06/2009 00:49:00
Post #2
You said it first - mince
If you know SFA about Association Football, the obvious course of action is to say SFA about it.

Supporters have rallied round in the past (e.g. Dundee) and are doing so at present (e.g. Stirling Albion). I know these teams are not currently directly affected by the Setanta problem but there will be a knock on. It will not be easy for ordinary fans to find enough spare cash in these straitened times to keep clubs going.

I have litle interest in your fantasies about gentlemen in roomy trousers but take it that you appreciate that this is a sport with a great history. It is the most popular amongst the people of Scotland and the UK. The lack of finance from the demise of Setanta could mean that much of our sporting history is lost.
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 00:54:24

It is sad News, as opposition is always Healthy, and now has gone, and plenty of the public will loose out.
According to News-Night,Sky could have Helped, but refused to do-so, NO Surprises there!
I am in this Industry on the television side of things, I will never forget the demise of the once-was BSB, it was a real advanced system away ahead of its time,101% Digital in 1979.
Demise was caused by the power of Sky's Empire, it was all Political at the Time.
We must remember 'Murdoch' is a very powerful Man!

6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 00:59:16

Forgot to say! the "demise" that I talked about, cost me Thousands of Pounds!, at the time, in a space of 24hours. :((

7

Barney Thomson,

Reading 10/06/2009 01:25:08
#6
I merely picked examples. There are more.
Good luck to PT
8

jamtart,

Beechboro Western Australia 10/06/2009 01:26:05
It may not be bad news for you guys in the UK but it's bad news for us now living outside the UK.Setanta is the only one showing SPL in OZ.Mind you unless your team was playing one of the ugly sisters you were very rarely on,so maybe it's not all that bad will save me $145 a year-enough for 4 slabs of the foaming nectar.

Wooppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

MON THE JT'S

yogi and his suits must stay
9

Fraser MacDonald,

Hitchin 10/06/2009 03:14:40
#1 "I ain't getting Sky in coz it is a complete rip off.."

A rather strong allegation, suggesting if you pay them they keep your money and give you nothing in return!

You may perceive Sky as expensive or poor value for money, but that doesn't make it a rip-off. It's arguably much better value for money than Setanta (£10.99 for 1 channel on Freeview!).
10

tomi,

10/06/2009 03:24:35
I personally know about Setanta's busness practises, and they are a crowd of crooks!
If they are forced out of busness, good riddence!!: they are only getting a taste of their own medicine.
11

Pride&Passion,

10/06/2009 03:51:56
The problem is you guys who claim to be supporters and dont even go to watch your clubs. Get out your houses and take your kids, your pals, your wives to footy and put the money back to the club. If everyone goes to games rather than sits at home the problem goes. Look at Man Utd. Rolling in it
12

Ex-Pat Stanton,

10/06/2009 04:06:47
#7,8, did it really now???

Funy cos BSB or British Satellite broadcasting was actually owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Sky was Maxwell's baby, and Murdoch bought it out when Maxwell went for a swim...

Care to stop talking rubbish now.

Oh incidently Anne Kantor, Ruperts sister, is my ex-wives Great Aunt, so i do know more about his'evil' empire than most...
13

Greens,

10/06/2009 06:40:09
#14 Afraid your memory is off. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Satellite_Broadcasting
14

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 10/06/2009 06:47:43
#13 Man United are actually up to their bahookie in debt if you care to look at the figures.

United published accounts for the 2007-08 season for three companies incorporated in the UK; Manchester United Football Ltd, effectively the football club; their immediate parent, Red Football Ltd, the vehicle set up by the Glazers to hold their interest in the club; and Red Football Joint Ventures Ltd, the ultimate UK-based parent.
United and the Glazer family chose not to comment on results that showed debt with the ultimate parent company had spiralled to £699 million.
Although Manchester United remain the pre-eminent money-maker in English football, profits at the football club level are wiped out by the need to service rising levels of debt.
When the Glazers bought the club for £828 million in 2005 they borrowed £556 million to help them do it, securing about 70 per cent of that against the club. As of June last year, according to these accounts, that debt stood at £699 million.

That's not exactly "rolling in it" by my definition !!
15

Mallory,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 06:59:00
As long as the BBC doesn't try to throw more money after overpriced 'sports rights' does anyone really care?
16

Scoop in the City,

10/06/2009 07:05:37
#14 Ex-Pat. Afraid that the sun is affecting your memory, you got that completely wrong. Have a lie down - or you might start hallucinating about Hibs winning the cup in the mid-eighties.
17

therevd,

Vientiane 10/06/2009 07:25:51
No sympathy with Setanta. I am sure I by no means the only person misled by their offer of a free month's TV, and then having to pay for TV for a whole month that I no longer wanted. I feel this is certainly a case of what goes around comes around. Beware of smooth-talking Oirish bearing gifts!
18

The new waspy,

10/06/2009 07:33:32
Rumour has it that ESPN is ready to step in to take the contracs as it is keen to get a share of the UK market
19

Ex-Pat Stanton,

Melbourne 10/06/2009 07:37:08
#21, Scoop, my bad and the memory is not what it once was...

Fact still remains Charles was talking through a hole in his head as the companies merged because of massive losses and Maxwell/Bond both being found out.
20

Ex-Pat Stanton,

10/06/2009 07:38:14
Oh yeah, Scoop we did win the cup in the 80's...

Shame it was the 1880's...
21

They call me mr positive,

Corstorphine 10/06/2009 07:54:35
You stay at home couch potatoes should come into the real world.

Whether you pay £9.99 a month or £12.99 a month for Setanta, its nothing. 2 or 3 peronis in George Street.

A platinum seat in the Wheatfield Stand for the Celtic game in April was £34. Gees, thats nearly 3 months Setanta subscription!!

The bottom line here is the loss of revenue for the SPL is serious. Who will want to take over the TV rights for a country which does not have a big population?

22

Phil C,

10/06/2009 08:12:58
#10 Jamtart

I can see the benefits of not being able to watch the Whinecastle Grinders!

Yogi might be the man and his suits might shine. If they don't, he won't stay! OK? Chill out man!
23

tog,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 08:18:09
Surprised that we have not heard anything from the SNP about this yet. Sounds like just the sort of thing they like to issue statements on. They can't blame London for this and I suspect they don't want to call on the BBC to rescue Scottish football or talk about setting up a Scottish sports broadcaster as it would surely fail so I suspect they are still trying to work out an approach to this. I'm sure they would be grateful for any suggestions.
24

Old Cartha Boy,

10/06/2009 08:56:42
"...a number of Scottish football clubs that rely on the income from television rights to remain solvent".

If that is the basis on which Scottish football is currently funded and "supported" by loyal fans, the game in Scotland is clearly a busted flush. Let the weak go to the wall. Outrageous salaries for run of the mill footballers is now being revealed for the sham that is Scottish football.
25

The Strategist,

10/06/2009 08:56:52
#28

The problems that Setanta have are nothing to do with the Scottish Govt.

That said, reducing interest in football could lead to less bigotry, less violence and less generally bad behaviour particularly amongst youngsters and could be a good thing. So maybe it should be part of the Scottish Govt's policy to downplay the importance of the sport.

Discuss!
26

Rosscobhoy,

10/06/2009 09:02:50
#5

The best example would be Clydebank FC. A club now run by the fans, for the fans.
27

gus1940,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 09:04:15
So-called serious newspaper and what do we get as the lead story - another effing cr-p football story.
28

the niz09,

edinburgh 10/06/2009 09:04:41
Well if theres no TV money watch the clubs raise there prices on people who have not got season tickets , games will proberly cost you £40 now.
29

Thistledhu,

10/06/2009 09:08:53
reminds me somewhat of the ITV digital collapse overpriced overpaid players leading to overpriced tv rights.

What will the armchair old firm fans do now ??

How about get out of there armchair and go and see there OWN local team instead of professing allegance to a team that has nothing to do with them other than perceived religouse loyalties
30

The Fat Jannie,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 09:56:28
Endless fitba on TV is a bore to the majority, so only the minority will be knashing their teeth about this. As for the survival of the clubs, limit players wages in the SPL to £1.5k per week MAXIMUM, and correspondingly less in the lower divisions. Fans could choose to support their clubs by paying at the gate in greater numbers. Clubs that can't survive on a professional basis could go semi-pro or even amateur. Let's see how much genuine "support" there is out there for "the beautiful game". Just let clubs that can't survive self-sufficiently go to the wall. Who cares? It's only a game.
31

Louis Catorze,

10/06/2009 10:31:39
#5....Fifi has her tongue in her cheek perhaps?
32

Douglas,

Bathgate 10/06/2009 10:34:47
Could I be forgiven for thinking that UK football clubs have an exaggerated sense of their own importance given that any televised club match not involving the top few teams show gaps in the crowd.
If the draw of the game is so powerful and the clubs so well supported, where are the fans?
It's a game for big lassies commentated on by rabid halfwits.
33

brianmca3,

auld reekie 10/06/2009 10:50:05
#1 i did it this morning and the guy at the bank,told me every third call was a cancel subs to satanta
so looks like it is done for now
only ones to suffer biggest loss is the OF as they were never off the screen,hooking in the lions share of revenue
if someone takes over,they should allocate matches evenly and spread tv revenue accross the 12 clubs not just the 2 great unwashed
no doubt that will have them foaming at the mouth
but even the BBC scotland was just as biased to those two than any other team
34

sonofcosmos,

glasgow 10/06/2009 10:51:39
imagine all the matches being on at 3pm on a saturday....finding out through the radio how your rivals are getting on...happy days..
35

DAVID,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 11:15:01
Scottish banks - brought to their knees due to inept Scottish management who kept on making 'unwise' lending decisions and acquisitions in the face of an economic downturn.

Scottish football - brought to its knees by inpet Scottish managers who got greedy in accepting the highes offer for their rights from a young, unstable upstart company (Setanta) rather than accept a lower offer from a mroe stable company (Sky).

Discuss.
36

Rolland,

10/06/2009 11:55:20
#40 Not true, Sky actually offered more the SPL knocked it back then when they went back to Sky to take it the offer was no longer on the table. Sky took coverage of Scottish Cup games and Setanta took the SPL games and at less than Sky had initially offered.

Team may not start there own subscription service or SPL TV could be about to happen, perhaps with a pay per view / game option.

All clubs will struggle as a result, mines included some are better placed to ride it out, it is a worrying time and doubtful that anyone will want what is served up in Scotland anyway.
37

Chief King Bonga,

10/06/2009 12:08:48
Fifi,

Even if grounds were full every week, and turning supporters away, it is the boards responsibility to maximize funds to improve the club, through TV and sponsorship.
I dont think Setanta brought much to the table sports wise, like the BBC, its sports coverage is dated and seems stuck in an eighties timewarp, whatever your opinion of subscription TV, SKy Sport have raised the
standard of the coverage of all sports, especially football, and are about to do the same with cricket, if you like sports, Skysports cannot be beaten.
38

PR,

Dublin 18 10/06/2009 12:08:53
Hardly surprising that Setanta's in financial meltdown given that the country of its origin is going down the toilet too.

Don't really see our corrupt (allegedly) Fianna Fail friends propping up Setanta the way they did with The Angol Irish Bank though.
39

Tartan Viking,

10/06/2009 12:21:51
Setanta lost my vote when they forced people to take out subscriptions, rather than watch on a match-by match basis.

It used to be great on a Saturday (or Monday, or whatever) being able to decide to watch the game on tv rather than travel. A simple phone call and a very reasonable price (think it was £7.99 per game) and you could watch the game in the comfort of your own home with a pack of beer. Very civilised. Then they stopped this and made everyone take out an annual subscription.

However, since most games they covered featured Rangers and Celtic, it is not really an option for a non Old-Firm supporters like me to take out subscripions. Therefore, they have lost out in my opinion. I used to watch five or six games a season. Multiply that up for everybody and it mounts up.
40

Rolland,

10/06/2009 12:30:49
#44 Yeah, for non old firm fans what was the point, the live games your team were involved in were mainly at home agains one of the ugly sisters, better of going to the games and supporting your team.
41

Ronald Penman,

Glasgow 10/06/2009 12:57:02
Like we give a damn! Who the hell cares about "ra footie" anyway - other than total plonkers like
Gormless Gordon and "Captain" Daring?

Boring! Boring! Boring!
42

common sense voice,

10/06/2009 13:01:53
46, well said... maybe the players got stiffed during the 50's to 80's but it ain't half gone the other direction now. the agents use the TV money arguements, but since they're on fixed %'s they would do... no company that I know of.. outside Hollywood splits the profits amongst the worker like football does... a bonus used o be a "bonus"... Outside the OF should any player in the SPL really be getting more than a grand a week? the OF... 3 to 5k tops... it's football folks..
43

common sense voice,

10/06/2009 13:04:44
PS. over here in Asia we all buy pirate satelite and can watch more football than you all can imagine for 50 quid/year...
44

JT,

10/06/2009 13:22:13
Its not just sports fans that will lose out if and when setanta go bust, any cable customer will be paying more (monthly package costs have just gone up or about to go up) for less. Nor will it be the SFA losing out, the SRU will lose out as well as there wont be a friday night game to watch when Im not at Murrayfield cheering on the boys, Mind you like the bias towards the OF with its coverage Setanta are guilty of always showing one of the irish sides friday night game.
45

Andy Ritchie's left boot,

10/06/2009 13:40:25
I'm a football fan but I agree that there is too much football on TV nowadays. I've got to the point where I watch very little televised football. Match of the Day which has highlights of the English Premiership, and all the goals, and Scotland internationals. myabe the occasional Champins League game but even those tend to be tedious and dull.

TV football has its attractions but I'd far rather be in the cowshed at Cappielow watching a real game of football.
46

Rolland,

10/06/2009 14:02:37
#49 Yeah great but that is part of the problem, pirate service just push the price up for everyone else, just like the guy selling pirate DVD's round the boozers it forces cost up for those paying for the service.
47

Iainbroch,

10/06/2009 14:23:30
re30

You call what Rangers and Celtic offer up football - I thougt it was some form of TV sponsored torture!
48

Louis Catorze,

London (light blue touch paper and retire...) 10/06/2009 14:29:42
#53...I suppose Wick academy v Rothes would be a better game?

22 mishapen individuals lumping a ball about something little better than a field?

Give me the old firm any day.
49

Rolland,

10/06/2009 15:35:15
#54 Did you see the old firm this season ? How grim was it, my eyes were hurting it was that bad is it no wonder the English don't want them.
50

Moder8,

EDINBURGH 10/06/2009 17:49:08
Surely this doesn't mean footballers will have to take a cut in pay! Their grossly inflated wages will have to be shored up by increasing season and turnstile prices. We cannot have them down to their last £1500 per WEEK!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.