Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Immelman leads from front to win Masters



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 April 2008
AS IF the nerves and pressure of securing the first major title of his career were not enough to contend with, the addition of a gusting wind and quickening greens at Augusta yesterday made life devilishly complicated for Trevor Immelman as he became the first South African in 30 years to win the Masters.
The slippery conditions were so treacherous that the 2008 tournament resembled a giant game of snakes and ladders in which every advance seemed to be countered by a calamity of tumbles. Immelman, who had coped with the lead or a share of the top spot since Thursday, was steadier than any of his rivals on a day when par was glorious.

Signing for 75 and 280, eight under par, Immelman even had enough leeway near the end to survive a few wobbles and close out the competition. His nearest rival, Tiger Woods, finished three shots adrift. The measure of the South African's achievement was that he became the first player since Seve Ballesteros in 1980 to lead the Masters from first to last.

"It was so tough," recalled the new champion. "I was trying to be tough myself and hang in there. There was a disaster waiting to happen around every corner. I got a message from Gary Player who told me to believe in myself. That meant so much."

In charge of a major going into the back nine for the first time, Immelman acknowledged he hardly knew what to expect. When he holed a notable par-saving putt on the ninth green, however, his sense of conviction was enhanced. As long as he didn't make any huge gaffes, Immelman wasn't going to be caught. Still, like everyone else, he slipped occasionally. His tee shot on the 12th was long. The leader made bogey and his advantage was trimmed. The South African also visited the pond at the short 16th and racked up a double. When he was bunkered at the 17th, the up and down for par came as a mighty relief. He found a huge divot on the 18th fairway but made light of the inconvenience. The bonus for Immelman was that everyone else was shipping strokes at a swifter rate. Brandt Snedeker, who started the day at nine under, carded 77 and fell back to a share of third. Steve Flesch imploded on the back nine. And a birdie from Stewart Cink on the 16th was good enough to help the even-keeled American Ryder Cup player finish in the top three. Padraig Harrington was fifth but found little solace in a high finish.

Serendipity has been woven into the scripts for the Masters for so long that Immelman would not have been human if he didn't spy a connection between his own triumph and the occasion of compatriot Player's record-breaking 51st appearance here. Immelman has known Player since he was five years old. There's a bond of respect between the last African to win the Masters and the latest champion from that continent.

While Player declines to take any credit for Immelman's emergence as a player worthy of the major company of Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, the veteran sees a comparison with another Augusta legend. "Trevor's swing is the closest I've seen to Ben Hogan," ventured Player. "And I always thought that Hogan was the best striker of a ball from tee to green that I've ever seen."

Certainly, Immelman's ball striking in the wind was less prone to the quirks of swirling fortune than his rivals. With a low centre of gravity, Immelman was steady over the opening holes after a bogey at the first and kept his nose in front of the pack. He birdied the fifth and gave one back on the eighth. Otherwise, he was in control.

While the British challenge was cast away on the breeze – Lee Westwood, in a share of 11th, eclipsed both Paul Casey and Ian Poulter who were mired by mistakes – the expected charge from Tiger Woods, 72 for five under, didn't materialise until the end because of a barrage of missed short putts. "I hit the ball well enough all week to put pressure on Trevor but I just didn't hole the putts," he rued. "I didn't do my job."

Conditions in terms of distance control were so tricky that not even the world No 1 could press the accelerator and narrow the gap between his own position and Immelman through aggressive golf. At an event preceded by speculation about a potential grand slam season, Woods fell at the first hurdle. Slow out of the blocks on Thursday and Friday, Tiger's belated injection of pace on Saturday proved insufficient when the weather made matching par a feat of endurance. That said, Tiger did hole a gigantic putt on the 11th and a fine birdie effort on the last. In other words, he remained alert enough to pick off the wounded. But this wasn't a major where the man at the top was about to fall on his own sword.

Immelman spilled a shot on the first hole while Woods was bunkered at the second and failed to make birdie. Given that the par 5 was playing downwind and should have been within eagle range for the world No 1, Tiger's failure to better par and send a message of intent to the rest of the field was a turning point.

After executing a lovely sand shot on the fourth, Tiger missed a short putt for par. Woods didn't read the lines as astutely as he usually does and the long putt which died on the lip of the fourth confirmed this wasn't destined to be his day. In the end, perhaps, his hopes of the slam were undone by an unduly cautious start.

The player who ignited the first rumbling roar of the afternoon was Snedeker when he located the putting surface at the second. His 35 foot putt for eagle, which moved off the green and back on again, was exhilarating. He briefly matched Immelman but took 39 to the turn and continued to squander shots.

All the contenders faced a sapping test of patience. For Casey, the challenge was to prove his mettle. Bunkered at the second, the long hitter neglected an early opportunity to move forward before engaging reverse. Starting the final round on seven under, Casey was six shots worse off on the 12th.

Casey's collapse began when he left his first wedge shot in the bunker at the par 3 fourth. The Englishman took two to escape from the sand and ran up a double. He then went into a tail-spin. Between the fourth and the ninth, he added four bogeys to his initial double. Meanwhile, Justin Rose, the first round leader, blamed putting woes for his collapse to seven over.

Having looked like a contender when he began with some fine golf over the opening 36 holes, Poulter, 78 for four over, was another Englishman who couldn't get the job done. After returning to the first page of the leaderboard when he birdied the second, Poulter fell into a black hole of mistakes from which he could find no escape.

After dropping a shot at the third and doubling the fifth, Poulter's fate on the short sixth was typical of his misfortune. With the pin placed front left on the par 3, the Englishman missed the green on the left and hit a poor chip onto the upper tier of the putting surface. With 35 feet to the hole, he three-putted and ran up 5.

There was more bad news to come with doubles on the seventh and 11th and a bogey at the 12th. In 11 holes he'd shed nine shots. His confidence frayed, Poulter cut a forlorn figure.

The players of substance who made moved in the right direction were Padraig Harrington and Stewart Cink, 72 for 284. The Open champion's chip hit the flag at the second and tapped in for birdie. At the third his approach spun back to five feet and the Irishman carded 72 for a share of fifth. Robert Karlsson, thanks to an eagle at the 15th, clambered up to eighth while Phil Mickelson's 72 for 286 was another stalwart effort.

SELECTIONS

Completed totals at The Masters, Augusta National, Georgia. US unless stated, par 72

280

Trevor Immelman (Rsa) 68 68 69 75

283

Tiger Woods 72 71 68 72

284

Stewart Cink 72 69 71 72
Brandt Snedeker 69 68 70 77

286

Phil Mickelson 71 68 75 72
Padraig Harrington (Ire) 74 71 69 72
Steve Flesch 72 67 69 78

287

Robert Karlsson (Swe) 70 73 71 73
Andres Romero (Arg) 72 72 70 73
Miguel Angel Jimenez (Spa) 77 70 72 68

288

Paul Casey 71 69 69 79
Nick Watney 75 70 72 71
Lee Westwood (Eng) 69 73 73 73

289

Vijay Singh (Fij) 72 71 72 74
Sean O'Hair 72 71 71 75
Stuart Appleby (Aus) 76 70 72 71

290

Mike Weir (Can) 73 68 75 74
Retief Goosen (Rsa) 71 71 72 76
Henrik Stenson (Swe) 74 72 72 72

291

Justin Leonard 72 74 72 73
Bubba Watson 74 71 73 73
Brian Bateman 69 76 72 74
Zach Johnson 70 76 68 77
Boo Weekley 72 74 68 77

292

Jeev Milkha Singh (Ind) 71 74 72 75
Arron Oberholser 71 70 74 77
J.B. Holmes 73 70 73 76
Adam Scott (Aus) 75 71 70 76
Ian Poulter (Eng) 70 69 75 78
Angel Cabrera (Arg) 73 72 73 74
Stephen Ames (Can) 70 70 77 75
Richard Sterne (Rsa) 73 72 73 74

293

Jim Furyk 70 73 73 77
Nick Dougherty (Eng) 74 69 74 76
Heath Slocum 71 76 77 69

295

Justin Rose (Eng) 68 78 73 76
Todd Hamilton 74 73 75 73
Johnson Wagner 72 74 74 75

296

Niclas Fasth (Swe) 75 70 76 75
Geoff Ogilvy (Aus) 75 71 76 74

298

KJ Choi (Kor) 72 75 78 73

299

Robert Allenby (Aus) 72 74 72 81
David Toms 73 74 72 80

300

Ian Woosnam (Wal) 75 71 76 78

302

Sandy Lyle (Sco) 72 75 78 77

The full article contains 1713 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 April 2008 12:57 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: US Masters golf
 
1

Mackie,

Leith, The Home Of Golf 14/04/2008 09:47:44
Well done Trevor, and a timely wee wad for my back pocket too!
Thanks.
2

Black Five,

edinburgh 14/04/2008 11:19:18
What a boring last day.Even Tiger got bored too.If he had holed half the putts he usually holed it would have made a nearer finish.As it was no one really put pressure on Immelman who showed at 16 he was vulnerable to pressure.What did not help was the pin positions the Masters comittee had laid down for the last day.It was a bit like Shinnicock Hills two years ago,a joke set up.Also to take over 5 hours for a two ball was utterly ridiculous.There has to be something done about this slow play.Good greif it wasn`t that long ago we were moaning about taking 4 hours ,now it`s up to five.It`s not on and I `d say if you stayed up to the bitter end last night you had to be some kind of insomniac.I`ve caught up with the last 4 holes this morning.All in all a rubbish last day and any more of this ,it will do golf no favours at all.Thank goodness we have by far the best golf tournament in the British Open.Don`t let the slow players spoil it.
3

Media 1,

cape town 14/04/2008 11:20:03
I was hoping Woods would win, but well done to Immelman. He is a tremendous player and he joins the elite list of SA golfers to win a major.

Gary Player - 9 majors
Ernie Els - 3 majors
Retief Goosen - 2 majors
Trevor Immelman - 1 major

And there is still potential in Tim Clarke, Rory Sabattini, Charl Schwartzel and Richard Sterne to name a few.
4

Black Five,

edinburgh 14/04/2008 11:22:32
Ps.... As for our great British hopes they`ve reminded us just how good the likes of Faldo ,Woosie,Sandy,Langer and Seve were.This lot are like reformed alchoholics....nae bottle....heaven help us come Ryder Cup if this is anything to go by.
5

Media 1,

cape town 14/04/2008 11:24:47
Black Five

I disagree with you! I think the pin positions were tremendous, they have worked for many years and they still do.
Augusta is a truly great course, nothing in Britan compares to it. Yes links golf is different and whilst St Andrews is undoubtedly the home of golf, it is still a council course!
The play is not slow, it could be quicker but its not that bad. These guys are good, and they take more time because they can execute so many different shots, so taking the time to decide which one would suit the situation is paramount.
Woods didnt make the putts, so he couldnt put pressure on Immelman, end of story!
6

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 14/04/2008 11:42:25
#5 - do you just tke the opposite position to everything for banter? Play is slow - very slow - players skills have not increased that much, best shot makers were when players that had clubs and balls that didn't make game slightly easier and they went round in 70% of the time.

5 hours is ridiculous, with so much money between even lower placings, each shot costs significant money and that is the root of it. Where players in title contention would take more time in final few holes, it is now every player, almost from day 1.

Also - nothing in Britain compares to Augusta and decrying St Andrews as a council course shows your contempt for the game and it's traditions.

7

Black Five,

edinburgh 14/04/2008 12:26:29
Media you talk as much rubbish as you do about the Hearts That reminds me don`t hear you praising the great dictator now .Five hours to play a round of golf is ridiculous.Thing is the youngsters copy these guys who bore us to death with their fannying about.So with that we all have to suffer.Let me remind you that once when John Daly went of with a marker ( I think it was Turnbery in 1994 ) he took 2hr 40 mins to play a round and still shot 71.This lot now are beyond belief.That guy Immelman would be a cure for insomniacs.As for your St Andrews comment,it sums you up.Plonker.
8

Media 1,

cape town 14/04/2008 13:20:49
Graham

I disagree. The game has changed and it's a better game now that it was before. The world is golf mad, it is no longer a sport for the elite, it is a game that all people from all walks of life can enjoy, which is what the spirit of the game is all about.
5 hours is long, but not to me!
When I play golf here I arrive at one of the many truly stunning country clubs at our disposal. We arrive, our clubs are taken to the tee by our caddies, we have a drink on the course at one of the many watering holes (mobile bars) we can order our lunch from the 9th tee box and when we get to the turn we stop off, crack open a cold one, eat a choice of 5 or 6 meals and have a blether.
Then we do the back 9, when we finish our clubs are taken to our cars after they are cleaned and its off to the bar for a few schwallies...That takes about hours and its awesome!
Its what golf is all about, the craic and the time with your mates in the sun...canny beat it

I only called St Andrews a council course because it is. It is rugged, it is not manicured, there is no half way house or a caddy to carry your clubs. It is a hinderance to play any of those courses in Scotland. But it is a pleasure watching the best in the world make their way around it...I love watching them manufacture shots, but for the amateur, its a nonsense.

I am a humble 10 handicap! And I detest playing at Carnoustie,St Andrews, Troon etc.......I much prefer the manicured course, we all do!
9

Dekester,

Canada's westcoast 14/04/2008 20:07:47
I have played Carnoustie and St Andrews and grew up 5 miles or so from Carnoustie. I will never get to play Augusta.

Give a club member from the UK a secret ballot and ask them which course they would play above any other, and my money would be on the majority picking Augusta.

As regards the Masters. Yes it was dull if you are a Tiger fan. However leading wire to wire in the Masters. After he missed the cut last week, and so recently after having a tumour surgically removed. Hardly boring.

Play is pitifully slow though. I grew up on the three hour round, however those days are gone.

All the best.

10

Black Five,

edinburgh 14/04/2008 21:16:35
Media you get even worse if that`s possible.Caddies taking clubs to tee ,meals at half way houses,watering holes everywhere.I suupose the caddies are all of a certain colour too.Golf you say is a game of the people ,not over in that place of yours I`d say.There Are caddies at St Andrews,usually hired by wealthy Americans and Japanese who come all the way to play at the home of golf in it`s excellent best.I don`t see them coming to your country club paradise.That`s not what they want.You talk utter rubbish and to discredit a great course as some kind of council tip is downright snobbish.You can keep Augusta for me as it sounds like your lot.The caddies to are all of a certain colour which I suppose makes the types like you feel better.Give me our real type of golf,3 hour rounds,rain and wind to your kind of surreal golf.Ask Tom Watson where he`d rather play and his answer would be a Scottish Links course.As Jack as well who called his course Muirfield.You say you detest playing the likes of Troon,Carnoustie.What a bore.You`d be so lucky to afford playing them and by the sound of you couldn`t .You probably would be too p...to play anyhow after all your watering holes which has surely scrambled your brain.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.