Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mercer family accept Salmond's apology for attack on former Hearts chairman

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 March 2009
THE family of Wallace Mercer have accepted an apology from Alex Salmond, the First Minister, and agreed to draw a line under the controversy generated by hurtful comments made about the late chairman of Heart of Midlothian by the politician.
Iain Mercer, Wallace's son, said the family had no desire to prolong the dispute after Salmond expressed regret for drawing comparisons between Mercer's tenure in charge of the club and Vladimir Romanov's regime. Although later insisting he'd meant n
o disrespect, Salmond did say he didn't like Wallace Mercer, his politics or his attitude.

Iain Mercer said: "It's an apology of sorts. He's tried to justify his comments. But, really, we've said our bit now and I think this knocks it on the head. We're not looking for anything more out of the guy."

Asked to explain his remarks, Salmond, a supporter of Hearts, said: "The question asked was if Vladimir Romanov is a safe pair of hands, and the point I was making is that football chairmen and owners often have a difficult relationship with the fans, for a variety of reasons. I meant absolutely no disrespect to the late Wallace Mercer, and am very happy to apologise for any offence taken by his family."

There was no doubt the Mercer family did take offence after Salmond told an English newspaper earlier this week: "Vladimir Romanov, for me, is a kind of 'Baltic States Wallace Mercer' – he is unsafe hands. When Mercer took over Hearts, the club was in unsafe hands. Wallace is dead and gone now, of course, but I didn't like him either. I didn't like his attitude, I didn't like his politics and I didn't like his attempt to take over Hibernian."

Iain Mercer added: "My Dad isn't here to defend himself. For the First Minister to say 'He's dead and gone now; I didn't like him either', well, I thought that was despicable. To pick on someone who is no longer around was outrageous.

"By his own admission, my father felt the attempted take-over of Hibs in 1990 was a step too far. He also knew the team needed more investment than he could sustain, as the Old Firm stretched further and further ahead. That's why in 1994 it was the right time for him to go.



The full article contains 393 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 March 2009 5:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Heart of Midlothian FC
 
1

Cammy,

Edinburgh 21/03/2009 00:28:38
"Might he pack up his tent pegs and go?",

I think the tent pegs were already being taken up before AS opened his big mouth. I see Kaunas are already being made ready for a swift exit.

Not that Vlad won't try and blame someone else for it, and any minor excuse will do.

I do think that AS was very foolish in his comments about Wallace. Mercer was always a Hearts man no matter how things panned out. I had met him myself and found him very pleasant. Comparing him to a man whose only interest in life is his own self publicity was uncalled for.

Although his fear of Romanov is understandable given the reality of the situation. I imagine most Hearts fans would agree if they're being honest.

PS: Talking of tent pegs, I'm a peg seller if you need any :-)
2

scorchio,

West of the Pecos 21/03/2009 07:27:43
The contrast between the Mercer family and Salmond is very evident here.
They show good grace and integrity, whereas "Eck" in his blabberings showed himself to be a caustic, insensitive and vacuous individual.
In future Alec,why not take a moment to consider the ramifications of such outbursts.
3

Phil C,

21/03/2009 08:03:56
Salmond was just being honest in what he said. Honesty in an unknown quality in most politicians. Admiration due. No need for any apology, even if the Mercers are a bit touchy! Leaving aside the most maroon-tinted set, of which even Alex is one, most people would be much more derogatory in describing Wallace Mercer, assuming they even knew who he was.

The Scotsman should be apologising to Oor Eck for having an go at him every day. They continually blow up trivial stories involving him and headline articles misleadingly, to slant against him. This story, yesterday and today, is typical.
4

Newcastle Jambo,

21/03/2009 09:16:02
#3 I agree. Mercer may have been a nice guy and much loved by his family and friends and yes he did save Hearts in 1981. His public persona (including his outspoken Tory supporting and his attitude in general)however made one of the most hated public figures of the 1980s and 90s and really strongly disliked by many Hearts supporters. And I haven't even mentioned the takeover fiasco.

Remember when he bought the ticket office for about £30k and leased back to the club at several times that per year? He paid himself a 6 six figure salary for years and walked away with £3m for his shares that he had bought for £350k 13 years before, having wracked up a substantial debt. Let's keep these things in mind rather than make Wallace into some kind of saint.
5

Bleeding Heart,

21/03/2009 10:23:39
Let me make clear my view on Salmond's comments: I think it's ridiculous to compare Wallace Mercer's tenure to that of Romanov.

However, an apology has now been given, so let's accept that as the Mercer family has done.

What really disturbs me is the quote from Salmond, when he said...

"The question asked was if Vladimir Romanov is a safe pair of hands..."

WHO asked this question? Not a Weegie "newspaper", by any chance? Not on the eve of an important match against Rangers, by any chance?

More importantly, WHY was Salmond so naive, so stupid, to have entertained a question of this nature in the first place?

What has THIS got to do with his position as First Minister?
6

Bleeding Heart,

21/03/2009 11:42:31
#7 - I think the real question is whether the "financial model" Salmond criticises is unworkable.

Surely this is the successful model employed by the Old Firm clubs?

It's a cyclical thing. You pay top-dollar for quality players, you win trophies, you compete year-on-year in Europe, you make big profits, you pay top-dollar for quality players, and so on...

What went wrong with this model from Hearts' point of view was very ably articulated by Phil Anderton the other week.

So, I'd argue that it's not the model that's wrong. Our problem was/is Romanov. The man who thought he knew better than football professionals.

In my view, for Romanov to fully redeem himself, I'd say he needs to openly admit his error by going back to the start and installing a top-quality coach (maybe Laszlo is the man?) and providing the quality players that will allow Hearts to successfully compete.

Now, of course, with the financial climate providing a perfect smokescreen, Romanov can avoid doing that. But even without this smokescreen, would Romanov be big enough man to eat "humble pie"?

Personally, I doubt it. Maybe this is where there is indeed a question-mark over whether Romanov can be described as "safe hands"?
7

Bleeding Heart,

21/03/2009 13:07:57
#9 - I'm not sure I've completely followed your line of thought, but I will say that it was YOU who introduced the "financial model" aspect of Salmond's statement into the discussion - was it not?

And quite rightly so, I think.

I've merely developed the theme by suggesting that the "model" in question may not be, in itself, the problem: that it's how the "model" is used that determines how successful it will be.

I think it is clearly linked to the "safe hands" question.

I agree with Phil Anderton when he says...

"..one thing Mr Romanov got right is I genuinely think Hearts can challenge the Old Firm with the right people and investment."

But I think Romanov, having tried to direct footballing operations and failed miserably, has now lost interest and to a large extent, has decided to "take his ball back".

This means that the levels of investment we saw previously will probably never be seen again.

So, whilst I'm not suggesting Romanov WELCOMES the current financial recession, I do think it provides him with a ready-made excuse for NOT investing further in HMFC.

Of course, perhaps I'm wrong; perhaps once the recession eases Romanov will be big enough to admit his past mismanagement and invest heavily in the team..?
8

Bleeding Heart,

21/03/2009 16:39:01
2-2? Time for a Rangers penalty yet, then...
9

ses,

Pencaitland 22/03/2009 22:46:45
I don't know about Romanov, but Mercer was to Edinburgh football what Hitler was to Poland. I don't see why Salmond should have to apologise for comments he makes about any greedy, arrogant Thatcherite, living or dead.
10

Bleeding Heart,

23/03/2009 20:23:30
#14 - "...Mercer was to Edinburgh football what Hitler was to Poland. I don't see why Salmond should have to apologise for comments he makes about any greedy, arrogant Thatcherite, living or dead."

What an ignorant, intolerant, petty, risible, piece of bilious sh*te.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.