Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 11th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Reliable Paterson puts boot in with a flawless display



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 March 2008
PLAYING Test rugby is invariably a test of nerve and one player who knows that more than most, Chris Paterson, believes it was a collective will to prove oneself that carried Scotland to another surprise Calcutta Cup victory.
It was incredible how the 29-year-old managed to retain focus while still picking up the intricacies of Test fly-half play and breathing new life into Scotland's attack, before an unexpectedly early shift back to the wing, yet still reduced his heartbeat sufficiently to coolly kick penalties and punish early English indiscipline. He took his tally to 30 successful kicks since last August, and for the second time in a row at Murrayfield Paterson emerged the match-winner over England.

The Borderer was typically self-effacing in admitting he fears he might miss a kick every time he places the ball, and that he worried about Saturday's gusty winds. Similarly, he insisted that while he relished starting at stand-off for the second successive Test match he was not fazed by the shift sparked by Rory Lamont's injury after just 20 minutes.

"We showed a much more mature performance," Paterson said. "With the kicking, for example, the wind was the big factor, but I can't think of any English kicks that hit the turf; we fielded them pretty well.

"In the past we've been guilty of trying to force them. In the first half we had three or four kicks back-to-back. That was maybe negative in some people's eyes, but it wasn't on to run; it was the right thing to do and, all in all, it was probably our decision-making that won the game."

He spoke of how they also chose to run at England with ball-in-hand in the first half when they felt it was on, after discovering how keeping ball through three and four phases made England back off in defence. This was new territory as all teams have rushed their defence at the Scots over the past two years to force mistakes, and too often Scotland have capitulated.

By keeping the ball in hand and cutting out the recent debilitating errors, Scotland unearthed new opportunity. That they still did not score tries remains a concern, although it paled alongside the all-important final result on Saturday, but one wondered what might have resulted had Paterson been able to stay at ten. The fact Scotland's attack tightened and, at times in the second half, retreated with Dan Parks pulling the strings underlines the need for Paterson to return to the pivotal role against Italy this weekend.

It was also interesting to appreciate the differing perceptions of Paterson, who started this championship on the bench, and Jonny Wilkinson, who may finish England's campaign among the replacements.

Paterson said: "It wasn't flash – it was never going to be in the weather – but towards the end we sat off them and tried to make them play, and that's quite a clever team decision. We realised we were giving away a few yards, but we were much harder to break down when we let them do what they wanted to do in front of us, and then made the tackles.

"That was a team that has got used to playing with each other. We're into the fourth week of the championship and, unfortunately, the things we were expecting to get right at the start of the championship, coming off the back of the World Cup, has taken until now to get right."

Such measured comfort was in stark contrast to Wilkinson's obvious agony. The England fly-half scored three penalties and missed a long-range effort, but he endured a miserable display with the boot in open play and lacked invention with ball in hand. He was substituted with his team behind, for the first time in six years, and had to watch as his replacement Charlie Hodgson enlivened the English team to the extent that Wilkinson may not start against Ireland next weekend.

He had the consolation of becoming the world's top points-scorer with his first kick, leaving behind Welsh marksman Neil Jenkins' total of 1,090, but that was of little comfort to a thoroughly dejected England veteran.

Wilkinson admitted: "It was a tough day for the guys. Scotland play those conditions very well; we have experienced that before and you do feel a little bit helpless at times out there, short of options and things to do.

"A couple of times during the game you would be looking around thinking 'what is the best thing to do now?' and it wasn't so much about choosing the best thing as finding the least damaging thing. When it is like that you know a team has got a good grip on you, and Scotland had that.

"The way you win those games is hang around in the right area of the field and get penalties because nobody really looks like scoring. But three points out there was very hard to find and we didn't make it quite as hard for them as we found it for ourselves.

"Every English player was keyed up and desperate to make an impact, but it didn't flow. When you are in that situation, the responsibility is on everyone to try and find the answers. Everyone out there has a massive role in finding their own percentages, but I don't think it's fair to say any of the guys let themselves down."

That may be hopeful thinking on his part. For Scotland, it remains true that much is forgiven by Scotland supporters when the national team wins this particular fixture, the oldest in international rugby, but it is similarly true that Scotland played well below their capabilities in the first three matches of this great tournament, and must prove now that they can lift themselves for more than purely the Calcutta Cup encounter.

That is a challenge the players and coaches were themselves quick to disseminate in the aftermath of Saturday's uplifting result, that this should not be a one-off, but the point on which to build.

"When you win a big game that's why you play," said Paterson. "Now we have got Italy and Rome seems to be harder for Scotland than anywhere else, because we've had a couple of defeats there.

"But now we can go on from here. It was really important to have that monkey off our backs before we go to Italy."

What the players said in the aftermath of famous victory

MIKE BLAIR

"It's a funny feeling; different emotion to 2006. There's relief. There's been pressure on us and we're just pleased to put in a performance. The defensive effort was outstanding and our defensive kicking was impressive, but I thought we brought a lot to the game as well. We knew it had been a disappointing campaign and I still think there's a lot to work on which is a positive for us now. We all have to work hard to get our skills up to world-class levels like Chris (Paterson] has (in goal-kicking]."

JASON WHITE

"The crowd was fantastic and definitely helped, though I was concentrating too much to notice (the roar] when I came on. We had something to prove, mainly because people have been saying we're rubbish. Matt Williams kept telling us we were rubbish, so we know there's a danger that eventually you believe it unless you keep reminding yourself that you're all good players, just focus on the match and leave all that stuff behind. Now we want to go to Italy and win again."

ALASDAIR STROKOSCH

"We knew we were going to have to defend and front up physically against a heavier pack and I think we did that. You have to take the physical side away from them if you want to beat them and that's what we did. If you enjoy a bit of physical confrontation that was the sort of game you would want to play in. We've not suddenly turned into the best team in the world, but it is good for our confidence and we can look forward to the Italy game now."

HUGO SOUTHWELL

"I thought I'd broken my jaw (in Jamie Noon challenge], but I wasn't coming off – Mike (Blair] told me I wasn't going off as well because there was no cover! I'm delighted. The atmosphere at the final whistle was great, but we're not finished yet. We've had three average performances and we knew this was our last-chance saloon to prove to the public that we are capable of putting a performance together. I think Italy will play more rugby and probably cause us more problems than England."

ALLISTER HOGG

"We knew we could perform. We've been saying for weeks that it's basic errors, individual errors that you can't afford to make at this level and still win, and we cut them out against England. Just two missed tackles in 105 – that's what you have to do at this level. But you also have to believe in yourself, and the players around you, and we hadn't lost that."

FERGUS THOMSON

"The dressing room was buzzing afterwards. It was always going to be physical, but we can match anyone in the forwards and it was good to get stuck in about England. What I enjoy most is getting the ball in hand and running at players, and I got a chance to do that. Hopefully, the win will build up our confidence and momentum leading into the game against Italy."

NATHAN HINES

"(Repelling] the English lineout drives were big, big moments. Had they scored then they'd have been on the front foot and us on the back foot. We took confidence from that and then felt pretty comfortable, especially towards the end. The beard? After the Ireland game I thought I'd shave it off; we hadn't won a game and I thought 'why not?' I have no plans to grow it again."

GRAEME MORRISON

"It was great to be back and unbelievable to win. My parents had flown across from Hong Kong for this one, which made it even more special. I felt surprisingly calm before the game and I'm quite a laid-back guy so when I'm not that nervous it's a good sign. When I first got capped (in 2004] I was having sleepless nights and not eating, so it's definitely a sign that I've matured mentally, as well as physically."

The full article contains 1760 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 March 2008 10:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Calcutta Cup , Six Nations
 
1

inoui,

Jomtien 10/03/2008 07:42:24
Makes Jonny look past it!
2

voltaire's janny,

10/03/2008 08:53:07
Nothing less than a convincing win against the Azurri will make this a positive season.

There have to be tries for and none against, an early lead and widening gap. We need a 15 point margin early in the second half so we the supporters can enjoy a game without gnawing our finger nails.

Wales showed the way. If you front up for a 10 man game against Italy you struggle. It's time for our wide game to function.

3

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 10/03/2008 09:03:57
Franks coments about it eing for supporters and not critics doesn't wash, you can be both, moreso the better you understand the game!

Headline says it all, was Patersons boot.

The same guy Hadden dropped a few weeks back!
4

Lederblix,

10/03/2008 09:35:00
So much of the talk is about Jonny Wilkinson (great player, great guy) - but I can't help feeling that if Mossy had been playing at 10 regularly for say the last 3 years he'd probably be at least as accomplished as Jonny. Even as it is, I feel he's growing into the position with each game; hopefully he'll be able to round off his season by playing 80 minutes at 10 on Saturday and masterminding a victory through running rugby. It may sound like wishful thinking but Blair/Paterson with Morrison/Cairns could develop into a pretty good combination if they get time to settle together.
5

HEN BROON 5,

10/03/2008 11:02:23
Balshaws tackle on Rory Lamont was illegal, dangerous, and a cynical cheap shot. At no point in a rugby players career are they taught to slide into a player who is in possesion with both knees up, for the very reason that we saw, and the potential for fatal results. Balshaw is lucky he is not in jail. He should have been red carded and cited.

If as the excusers of Balshaw are claiming it was an accident:

Why did he take the ball from the arms of an unconcious Lamont and play it?

Why did he not put the ball out of play, and ensure that Lamont received immediate treatment?

Why did he slide in feet first with his knees up instead of jumping over Lamont and coming back on side?

Lamont has been criticised for not kicking the ball out, rubbish. He was obeying his natural instinct as a rugby player and taking possesion of the ball with a view to keeping it in play and preventing the line out and attempted rolling maul by England.

White and Hines were immense and out muscled the thuggish tendency of England shocking them into humility and taking the game into their faces, which they do not like as they are to arrogant for their own good.

Well done lads you have made your nation very proud of you and SENT THEM HOME WARD TO THINK AGAIN :o)

ALBA GU BRATH.
6

Delboy29,

10/03/2008 13:58:54
Agree that Wilko looks a bit of a spent force - thankfully!!

Balshaw/Lamont incident was NOT deliberate. Lamont seemed to be in two minds whether to fall on it or hack it into touch and eventually went down later (and more awkwardly) than he should have.

#5 were you sitting behind me on Saturday - or was it a different extra from Braveheart - constantly anticipating the result as a stick to beat those English tw*ts etc etc ad nauseam? Jeez! will we ever shake the chips off our shoulders?



7

KA 1871,

Edinburgh 10/03/2008 15:21:11
I dont know who wrote the caption under the photo on this article, but Chris didn't play at centre and hasn't done for a long time
8

rilumsde,

London 10/03/2008 15:21:36
I'm sure that Balshaw didn't mean to fracture Rory Lamont's skull, but by sliding in feet first with his knees up what did he expect to do - merely leave stud marks on Rory's legs? It was dangerous play and the only way he (and others) will learn to not do it again is for him to be suitably punished.
9

Bordererinengland,

10/03/2008 15:53:28
Remind me never to buy a car from Hadden as his definition of "immaculate" is at the opposite end of the spectrum from mine! He obviouly goes to the toilet for an "immaculate"!

Hadden's bench nearly cost us the game. Paterson started well and,as soon as we had an injury in the backs,he had to be shifted. What tremendous foresight on Hadden's part. I agree that being able to bring on a better kicker may seem like an advantage given the conditions but I didn't see any evidence on Saturday that we brought on a better kicker....quite the reverse in fact.

Yes it was an exciting game to watch as England, despite their woeful performance,were always close enough to put doubts in the mind. Having stood at the old clock end and witnessed Gavin Hasting's botched RWC semi final kick against England you take nothing for granted! However,let's be realistic. Yes we won with a fantastic Scottish defensive display but where are the indicators of progression apart from better ball retention round the rucks and mauls and the defensive display?

I thought Morrison looked like he might be more creative than Henderson (not saying much), Paterson looked like he might be able to spark something and Blair was immense but we were really only the better of two poor rugby playing sides (defensive performance apart).

Parks when he came on only demonstrated why he shouldn't have been in the squad in the first place. I wasn't at the game so can't really say where the booing was coming from during the delay for Lamont's injury but my immediate reaction on hearing it was that it was Scots fans booing Parks appearance on the field. He was obviously coming on at that point and Paterson was being shifted to the wing as we had no one else. Anyone else think that?

Team for Italy:

15 Cairns
14 Walker
13 De luca
12 Morrison
11 Webster
10 Paterson
9 Blair (capt)
8 Taylor
7 Barclay
6 Strokosch
5 Mcleod
4 Hines
3 Murray
2 Thomson
1 Jacobson

Ally Hogg has to be the
10

Bordererinengland,

10/03/2008 16:11:21
Sorry above was posted on this thread in error before it was completed.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.