Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Steadman says Scotland could be 'a force' in 12-18 months

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 November 2008
THERE was a familiar refrain from a coach new to the Scotland Test environment yesterday when Graham Steadman stated that the current national squad could be "a force" ... in another 12-18 months.
The new defence coach, appointed alongside Mike Brewer in August, pinpointed where Scotland were off the pace in Saturday's 32-6 defeat, but insisted that Scotland were much closer to their first win against New Zealand than the result suggested and
had the personnel to beat South Africa this weekend.

"We feel it was a great opportunity that got away from us," said Steadman. "The score didn't reflect how close we were."

The former Great Britain rugby league stand-off was reminded that Scottish supporters have endured many bad-luck stories and optimistic talk of the future, hand-in-hand with pleas for time to change from some coaches in recent years, but the straight-talking Yorkshireman replied: "I'm being genuine; I'm not one of those coaches.

"When I came into the job I looked at the potential of this squad and what was coming through. We're pulling from just over 9,000 players in Scotland, and some top-class players overseas and in the UK, but I honestly believe that Scotland can be a force.

"It's not going to happen overnight, admittedly, but with what we've got at our disposal and with key players staying fit and healthy, and one or two others coming through and putting pressure on, I honestly believe that 12-18 months down the track we can be up there with the best of them.

"Obviously, while we're looking at the big picture of the Six Nations, in the short-term we're also looking for the guys to back-up what they showed against New Zealand against the big boys on Saturday, which would give us a great platform in terms of confidence, and put us closer to where we want to be.

"I know supporters and the media want instant success, and we want to be successful as coaches, but the reality is we have just played a team that won the Tri-Nations, came off a good result against Australia, are on a merry high and have everyone playing with confidence.

"We had a squad that came together in the space of 12 days, and with several different combinations and new coaches, but the players showed a maturity and understanding that they can build on. Everybody's hurting because they know the chance got away from them, but, actually, I've rarely felt as optimistic after a defeat because the score-line did not truly reflect how well we played."

Brought in after three years' spent tightening the Ireland defence, Steadman was already au fait with Scotland's strengths and weaknesses. He has analysed his first and the national side's 25th Test defeat to New Zealand in 27 games, and explained where he thought the players let themselves down, and why he remained optimistic.

"If you break it down in detail we made seven clean line-breaks (nine in all] and manufactured six quality opportunities to score tries against the tightest defence in the Tri Nations. They came up with six line-breaks, four clean, and scored off two speculative kicks.

"For their first try they took advantage of Nick (De Luca] being in the sin-bin and everything was executed to perfection. The second one was off a turnover where our 'safety net' guys from the right side of the field, Thom Evans and Mike Blair, were sucked in at the turnover, and the Kiwis got the bounce of the ball.

"One thing I would say is Piri Weepu was at scrum-half (at the start of the second try] and tracked the ball 55 metres to score, and these are the kinds of efforts you need at this level to score tries.

"The third try (at the start of the second half] was the one that hurt most, and gave me a sleepless night. It came after our guys put the stand-off under immense pressure, so he kicks speculatively high in the air – we're not close enough to it, they get a bounce straight into 13's hands and it's try-time. I felt our back-field coverage lacked urgency and we showed some naivety in our positional awareness.

"The last one was the only one that involved a few phases, and by then the game was beyond us. But the difference was their awareness of space both ball-in-hand and in behind our front-line defence, certainly off turnovers.

"What disappointed me was the information was given to the players as to what areas the Kiwis would be attacking, but it was our reactions and recognition of where the threat was coming from that was lacking. But, there is nothing in that that can't be fixed."

Scotland's set-piece platform provides genuine hope, providing this week's referee does not allow more than half of Scotland's scrums to fall to the ground without even a free-kick benefit and virtually all of the opponents to stay up, as was the case on Saturday. The first-up defence will need to be quicker and more aggressive to cope with South Africa, but Steadman expects improvement after another week's training and, most crucially, tries.

"South Africa will pose an entirely different threat in terms of their physicality," he said, "but also their kick-and-chase because they have two flyers on the flanks and will put a lot of pressure on our back three so we'll have to be more decisive.

"We have to be hard on ourselves in training this week and not accept mediocrity. We have to learn lessons and harsh lessons, but I believe that with the quality of personnel we have at our disposal this week we can cause what would be an upset against the present world champions."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 November 2008 10:51 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Border Terrier,

terra firma 11/11/2008 08:54:29
Total confusion in the coaching camp ... "I honestly believe that 12-18 months down the track we can be up there with the best of them." In the meantime, we were very unlucky to lose to the All Blacks, and have what it takes to beat South Africa on Saturday.

Which is it? This weary Scottish supporter - weary not least at hearing this sort of drivel - is fed up to the back teeth with pleas for patience, alongside declarations that we can beat the best in the world. Do your talking on the pitch - not in the press.
2

AN OLD SCRUMHALF,

EDINBURGH 11/11/2008 09:12:05
Another Matt Williams in the making
3

Lone-eye,

11/11/2008 09:27:41
This is the guy they should be dope-testing, not MacLeod!
4

jdships,

Edinburgh 11/11/2008 09:57:29
2 AN OLD SCRUMHALF,

From another "old scrum half" - agree !
Have heard it all before
Pathetic !
5

hadden is a cack,

cape town 11/11/2008 10:22:30
is he for real
so if we are 12-18 months away from being world beaters what the fk has hadden been getting paid for over the last few years. Apart from talking b*llocks after every defeat.
i really pray we don't get humped on saturday but i fear the worst.
6

Fluffy bunnies and rugby ballls,

11/11/2008 10:25:55
#5

You shouldn't fear the worst, you should know the worst!

All we can hope for is a try or two to not make us look like the biggest bunch of gimps this side of the border. Glad I'm not paying £50 to watch it though!
7

Doc Martin,

Dundee 11/11/2008 11:10:15
Strange this.... 6 posts with every one in total agreement. SRU are you reading this.... what the hell have you been doing the last 6 years.

#5 You called it right on the nose.
"so if we are 12-18 months away from being world beaters what the fk has hadden been getting paid for over the last few years."

How come Gatland can turn Wales round in 3 months and Hadden still hasn't done it in 3 years???
8

J.A.,

11/11/2008 12:01:41
#7 the main reason Gatland has managed to turn Wales round is that they have more strength in depth. 4 pro teams!!!
I am far from being a Hadden lover but sometimes we should be realsitic about our prospects.
9

Doc Martin,

Dundee 11/11/2008 12:35:57
J.A

4 pro teams or not am I right in saying that he inherited a team that came bottom of the 6 nations?? and turned them into the winners the next season. Ok so we are not going to have it turned around in one season, but for the most part the 6N campaign over the last few years is only ever one match that seems to be of any importance (Italy and Scotland for the wooden spoon).... that is really going to get the youngsters flooding through the gates of Murrayfield

I appreciate that we have to be realistic, but like most, I am sick to the back teeth of being spoon fed sound bites, and meaningless stats in post interviews to cover short comings in coaching methods, tactics and man management skills.

10

Doc Martin,

Dundee 11/11/2008 12:39:00
Apologies

My mistake Wales came second to last in 2006
11

Jedforest,

Lowestoft 11/11/2008 12:39:31
Gents
All doom & gloom, with very little constructive being posted.
I am a realist, and do not expect much from a very small professional playing base. Break the game down into manageable chunks, and we were good in some facets i.e. the scrummage, where the ref was extremely poor, in not penalising the All blacks. There is something to work on with this squad, so hang on in their, and get behind the team.
12

jbascotinengland,

11/11/2008 13:03:21
Good post #11

The Coaches aren't going to rip into the players in the press in the week before a match against the world champions.

It has been said of the Scotland team that they lack self belief. I reckon that was in evidence on Saturday with the inability to score tries. when Scotland got close to the line they looked like they knew they weren't going to score. Compare that to the AB's who looked like they were expecting to cross the line everytime they got the ball, even in their own half.

A bit of concentration and belief in the last 3rd of the pitch and we may see a rare Scotland try on Saturday!
13

Doc Martin,

Dundee 11/11/2008 13:25:43
I am not knocking the players or their abilities and i genuinely believe that we have the makings of a good team. When the team plays I get right behind them and cheer them on for all I worth.

What annoys me is that we have had 3 years of Hadden. A new assistant comes in and still says that that we are 12 - 18 months and we could be 'a force'. Under Haddens tenure, not sure that the emphasis should be on 'a force', instead we should be highlighting the 'could'
14

hadden is a cack,

cape town 11/11/2008 13:34:10
#11
no one expected us to beat the all blacks now but the rugby we have played over the last few years has been depressing, how parks still gets on a international pitch is beyond me. hadden has been saying we are improving after every failed campaign we will be better next time. Well we haven't, we will not be able to judge this squad till the next 6 nations whatever happens on saturday(if we get humped hadden will say its a great build up for our 6 nations!surprise surprise!)but if the negative rugby and lack of tries continue then murrayfield will be half full at best of scotland fans
15

daffy_b,

11/11/2008 13:37:00
the after match comments/soundbytes from Hadden and Gatland really say it all about their attitude:-

HADDEN:- We did really well in patches, we had 60% possession, we beat them on line breaks, we really were better than them for long periods, we were unlucky.

Gatland:- I am absolutely furious about our performance today.

Which coach's team got humped by the All-Blacks reserves, and which coach's team very narrowly lost to the world champions after dominationg large parts of an exciting game??

Hadden is at best a runner-up and is happy to accept any defeat so long as he can quote "numbers" to show he is trying.

Gatland is a winner - and nothing else will do (regardless of how well you play)!!
16

hadden is a cack,

cape town 11/11/2008 13:54:50
spot on 15
come 6 nations we will play negative rugby that will keep hadden in a job. Any coach that hangs his assts out to dry to save his own skin is a joke.
17

Doc Martin,

Dundee 11/11/2008 14:47:46
And so say all of us!
18

Aubrey W,

Fyfe 11/11/2008 21:02:07
Wales won two Grand Slams in three years with two coaches. So, they clearly have access to more talented players.

I do think that there is a balance between over-hype and being positive and I think that - yet again - Scottish management have over-egged it. SA are not as strong as NZ, but they are playing a strong team and so it will be difficult for Scotland again.

I don't know how long a failing coach can be tolerated, but I think he has until the end of the season. In the meantime, getting within 10 points of SA will surely be regarded as just about success. But a few tries will surely come soon.
19

Johnny M,

Wing 11/11/2008 21:49:34
Heard all this before...about 18 months ago in fact. Why isn't Strokosch in the team, and is Taylor still injured or is he dropped?

we lacked pace in the pack against the ABs. Don't understand this selection.
20

La barrière de Senlis,

France 11/11/2008 22:57:12
Very frustrating, no tries, but the way Scotland played last Saturday was really better than usual.
At least we saw a bit of attacking, and i think the forwards were a bit more organised in the open play.
SCOTTISH FANS, please come to support your team, all the time.
I came from France to support Scotland last saturday, and i'll do it again, and again!
21

AndyC,

Stillorgan 12/11/2008 14:31:08
The players have to believe it. I don't think they do - look at them lining up before a match and there is a serious lacking of conviction on their faces, which is understandable when they keep getting told that in 12/18/24 months Scotland WILL be able to complete at the top level - i.e. the current players are not good enough!
22

Dr Drikus van Panzerfest, Saffer Shrink,

12/11/2008 22:48:42
Heard all this before...

NEXT!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.