Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SRU ready to unveil Robinson as new coach

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 June 2009
EDDIE Jones and Jake White were never in the running for the Scotland head coach's position, but New Zealanders John Mitchell and Steve Hansen are understood to have been the men who provided the SRU with an alternative to Andy Robinson.
The three contenders on the short-list have now been whittled down to one, however, and it is widely expected that Robinson will be confirmed as the new Scotland coach before he departs next Tuesday with the Scotland 'A' squad for the IRB Nations
Cup in Romania.

A newspaper report linked Jones and White with the role, and the SRU refused to confirm or deny it at the time which only fuelled the speculation. It suited the SRU's purposes to have two such high-profile and successful figures as the pair who masterminded South Africa's recent World Cup victory linked with the position.

However, a source close to Jones has told The Scotsman that while the SRU did make contact with the former Australia coach earlier this year, and apparently asked if he would take over the Scotland helm from Frank Hadden for the last two Six Nations games were the team to lose to Italy, Jones was not interested in the head coach role. He has signed a lucrative five-year contract with Suntory in Japan, and begun luring leading Australian internationalists. He was apparently open to providing consultancy work, but that was as far as his involvement would go.

White was never in the frame, having not applied nor shown any interest in the position. However, there is speculation that Mitchell, the former England, New Zealand and current Force coach, was on the short-list, with another source stating that current All Blacks assistant and former Wales coach Steve Hansen was the third man.

The final interviews were conducted by a five-man panel of SRU chief executive Gordon McKie, SRU chairman Allan Munro and former Scotland captains Andy Irvine, Andy Nicol and Gordon Bulloch over the past fortnight and reached a conclusion last week with board ratification of their top candidate.

Robinson was always held in high esteem, but the main debating point appeared to be determining where Scottish rugby most needed him: to build on two promising seasons at Edinburgh or take a grip of the national squad's dwindling fortunes. The SRU was acutely aware that a vote to go with the former would lead to the ambitious coach quitting Scotland when his contract with Edinburgh expired in 2010, if not before, for a more lucrative and/or international position elsewhere.

The latter presented the issue of who would maintain Edinburgh's improvement under Robinson. However, the fact that the Scotland team rakes in around 90 per cent of all income for Scottish rugby through the RBS Six Nations attendances, and the shares of broadcasting and sponsorship monies linked to that tournament, the autumn Tests and the Rugby World Cup, has persuaded the board to put Scotland's needs first.

Robinson is understood to have been offered a contract through to the 2011 Rugby World Cup with an option to continue longer-term, with Gregor Townsend and Graham Steadman to continue as assistants. But, with no director of rugby appointment yet imminent, there is also a remit to work more widely across the Scottish game in an effort to influence the development of the professional teams and the development of talented young players coming through the academy system.

In truth, there was no-one better placed among the candidates to take on that sort of role.

Robinson knows what resources he has to work with, having spent almost two years in Scotland building bridges around Edinburgh and with coaches in the pro and amateur games. He has knowledge of the Magners League, Heineken Cup and Six Nations, the demands they place on Scottish players and the expectations they carry.

Having led England to the Rugby World Cup in 2003 he understands what it takes to win at that level, and appreciates why teams lose in the southern hemisphere, having also coached the Lions in 2001 and 2005.

Perhaps the most persuasive aspect of his interview was his enthusiasm; knowing all that, and the lack of resources and strength in depth in Scotland, the 44-year-old still wanted to take the helm and believed he could steer Scotland up the Six Nations table, the IRB rankings and out of a pool featuring Argentina and England and into the quarter-finals in 2011 in New Zealand.

The new era of building a competitive Scotland team will begin as did the last in Romania and the thrusting of young talents into Robinson's mind for the challenges of the next two years.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 June 2009 11:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: SRU
 
1

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

03/06/2009 00:05:56
Thanks for clearing all that up, David.

As for the rumours about Jones and White, we get dis-information and dat-information an' hey man we jus' don't know what is right any more...?!

Singing
"What shall we do with the drunken journo,
What shall we do etc."
2

The Real Truth,

03/06/2009 00:57:42
Mm, not too sure about his source. I too have a very good source and let it be known to everyone that White, Jones and Mitchell were in the frame a few weeks ago now. I have no reason to beleive my good source was lying. I'm not so sure about this article. Doesn't matter at the end of the day - we will have an englishman in charge of our national team for the 1st time - its a sad day when we cant provide any decent home grown coaches to fill the void.
3

Scota Nostra,

South of the Wall 03/06/2009 06:49:08
Does it really matter where the coach comes from so long as he produces a winning team? If it is to be Robinson, then good luck to him. He has a very difficult task trying to take Scotland into the top eight rugby nations.Lets all get behind him and wish him well.
4

Border Terrier,

terra firma 03/06/2009 08:41:33
All of which poses the question - why do the SRU imagine it's necessary to mislead the press, who then feed that misinformation to their (Scotland's) supporters? Why pretend that Jones and White are among the final contenders? Is this simply how the mandarins at the SRU get their jollies? Or might it be that they are just making a few smoke screens and introducing red herrings to hide the fact that right from the
start it was always going to be "the price is right" Andy Robinson. Cost-saving McKie must be delighted that Robinson has already announced that he won't be replacing the specialist forwards coach, after Mike Brewer's resignation.

It's not that I think Andy Robinson won't be an adequate coach. It's the smoke and mirrors bit that's getting to me.
5

KD,

03/06/2009 09:00:49
Agree with #3. If its AR, then let's get behind him and the team. He's a good man, a good coach and will work tirelessly to make his team successful...best of luck to him!
6

ballinj,

glasgow 03/06/2009 09:47:04
Got to love the scotsman. " A newspaper source" - wasn't it the Scotsman that broke the story and know that it is wrong trying to pretend that it wasn't them. Absolutely hilarous
7

Factotum,

Edinburgh 03/06/2009 09:59:59
Think it was the Sunday Times that broke the story. Reading old Scotsman stories, they only seem to have commented on the possibility of having Jones and White, without ever confirming it. But keep on laughing!
8

Armageddon,

Tobermory 03/06/2009 11:22:32
I dont care who is appointed, just that we lose Gordon McLie....oops ....slip of the tounge. However, what are we thinking of putting Mr Ego in charge of anything.
9

Saltireblue,

Out Here 03/06/2009 14:19:01
Border Terrier:

The SRU didn't mislead the press. The SRU refused, and refuses, to confirm or deny who applied for the position.

McKie believes, as I do, that the application process should be kept confidential. It's the media that build stories.
10

Colt,

03/06/2009 16:53:46
Who stands to benefit from the best coaches in the world being linked to the Scotland job?
Who needs to argue their organisation remains relevant in the world game?
Who needs to prove their search was worldwide and not just a chance discussion in the Murrayfield car park?

No, of course the SRU would not leak the story, no surely not, even if such a leak could only benefit them. No, they are far more honest and upstanding than that, just ask Carruthers or Gala RFC or those involved with the Borders team.
#2,#9 you probably also believe there is no way the SRU would also try to get a national coach to have a wider remit with pro teams and academy, or more accurately put, get someone to do two jobs for the price of one and save appointing a Director of Rugby.
McKie promised an open and exhaustive process, his words so why use "open"? Clarifying unsubstantiated rumours does not affect the confidentiality of a process that someone is not involved in. Once the story was leaked the convenient answer was always "no comment its confidential" so the story ran unchecked by the recruiting organisation, all of which suited SRU.


11

Saltireblue,

Out There: 03/06/2009 17:08:40
Colt:

Anything about the grassy knoll? How many shooters? were green men involved?

The SRU said the PROCESS would be open. That doesn't/didn't extend to naming those who applied.
12

Border Terrier,

terra firma 03/06/2009 17:36:52
Saltireblue - if the SRU wanted this process to be confidential, then presumably they would have told their employees, including the Edinburgh Coach, to button it. Instead, Andy Robinson has been allowed, or perhaps even encouraged, to state his own case. Equally, Mike Brewer felt free to inform us that he had thrown his hat in the ring.

You state: "McKie believes, as I do, that the application process should be kept confidential. It's the media that build stories."

Quite right. Journalists build stories from what they've been told. And those who are involved have the right to confirm or deny what is being said. In this case, they decided to do neither. Thus fuelling the speculation.

That aside - how do you know what McKie believes? Where did he tell you? At his weekly staff meeting?

13

Colt,

03/06/2009 17:53:15
Saltireblue - no one asked for the names of those who had applied. That is the whole point - White and Jones never applied.
Leaking the rumour implied the job was so fantastic the best in the world wanted it so supporting claims about a worldwide search. That seems to have started in one office and ended in another in the same building. How convenient and coincidental.
Letting the rumour run suited only the SRU who could easily have commented without fear of compromising a process that neither of the two was involved in.
Hamfisted attempts at spinning the story are just signs of the type of organisation the SRU is.
14

Saltireblue,

Out Here Still: 03/06/2009 18:45:16
Border Terrier:

Firstly, McKie didn't just tell me. He told everyone who would listen during a BBC interview that they would respect the confidentiality of the process.

Secondly, if any applicant wants to announce his candidacy, then it is his right to do so; as did Brewer and Robinson. This does not negate the SRU's commitment to respect confidentiality.

Stop looking for conspiracies, for heaven's sake!
15

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

03/06/2009 21:56:50
I think either John Mitchell or Steve Hansen would have been good choices, and leave Robbo where he is.

By promoting Andy R the SRU just give themselves another headache - who will take over at Edinburgh?
16

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

03/06/2009 22:02:26
#15 Excellent question...! Wonder if Iain Morrison could write his answer on a post card and mail it to all the Scotsman readers?? ;-)
17

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

03/06/2009 23:11:37
#6 You are right... It appeared in some detail in the Scotsman two Sundays back under the headline "Dream team's wake-up call".

#7 Whatever speculation there was by the Sunday Times (Tomes?!?) I think it was no more than that...
18

Border Terrier,

terra firma 04/06/2009 08:43:43
Saltire: It's not about conspiracy theories. It's about how the SRU do business. Arguing the case for confidentiality, while allowing their own employees to break confidentiality - and while refusing to confirm or deny press reports from "sources close to" or whatever - is bad business practice at a time when the SRU need to rebuild their supporter base - not irritate them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.