Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


SRU still paying for Netherdale, but no games planned there this year

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 January 2009
WHEN the Scottish Rugby Union pulled the plug on the Border Reivers professional side in 2007, chief executive Gordon McKie insisted that the union was not turning its back on the rugby-playing region.
However, there are growing concerns that the SRU has done exactly that with confirmation that it is to persist with last year's policy of staging no major representative fixtures in the Borders in 2009, despite continuing to plough funds into one of
the country's best pitches, at Netherdale in Galashiels. At the heart of that approach appears to lie a contract to maintain the Gala pitch.

On the re-introduction of the Border Reivers in 2002, the union requested tenders from clubs interested in hosting the pro team. Gala beat off a rival bid from Hawick with plans for a new state-of-the-art stadium to be built over the next decade.

The SRU put in place a 20-year agreement to maintain the new international-quality pitch with undersoil heating they insisted must be installed for Gala to host the Reivers. When the team was closed by the SRU five years later due to a lack of finance, McKie insisted that the agreement would be terminated. Nearly two years on and it remains in place, much to the SRU's frustration.

What makes the issue particularly odd is the union's reluctance to make use of the facility they continue to maintain.

More than 4,000 people watched the last under-21 international played at Netherdale and before that the ground was famous for attracting five-figure capacity crowds for representative matches.

However, the SRU has kept under-20, Scotland A and women's internationals in the central belt, Falkirk and Perth, with Aberdeen handed a first full international in November, costing the SRU in rent.

The Scotsman understands that one of the Dundee football clubs is in the running to host an international match this year, but McKie confirmed that Netherdale remains out of the picture.

Even an Edinburgh back-up game with Georgia agreed for Netherdale in November was played instead, under SRU instruction, at Meggetland, Boroughmuir's home ground. It was abandoned after 20 minutes due to floodlight failure and while the Edinburgh and Scotland squads continue to flit between capital facilities owned by private schools, football clubs and Edinburgh City Council, as the Murrayfield works continue, Netherdale remains unused through the week and pro players grow more alien to Borders rugby supporters.

While Gala were reluctant to discuss the issue, a club official confirmed that angry comments from the SRU's finance director Eamon Hegarty, in which he is alleged to have stated that he would personally visit Netherdale and "rip the pitch up," have heightened the belief that the SRU is both shunning the Borders due to the row over the 20-year agreement and the backlash over the closure of the pro team.

McKie insisted: "That is not true. We have taken the view that the under-20 team should play in enhanced facilities, with undersoil heating and floodlights, of the football stadium variety. That has been supported by John Jeffrey (Scotland U20 manager] and this year we will play at two football stadiums.

"The Scotland A team has a history of playing at McDiarmid Park in Perth and we are keen to return there and continue developing our positive relationship with the football club and council. We will look at 2009-10 season, and maybe age-grade and A team games could be played there in future."

Despite his leadership being keenly finance-driven, McKie was similarly unconcerned at paying for one pitch, but ignoring it while paying to use others. He added that the SRU did not invest in facilities in Glasgow anymore than it did in the Borders, which is, in itself, raises questions over the union's investment in rugby facilities as a whole. The cost of new 3G and grass pitches at Murrayfield was borne by the City of Edinburgh Council through tram-line and Water of Leith flood defence compensation.

It should be viewed positively that matches are being staged in Caledonia, the other significant part of Scotland neglected by the SRU in its professional development, but what benefit is there to Scottish rugby in ignoring the Borders?

It is understood that Gala RFC have offered to terminate the contract at the centre of the dispute, on receipt of a one-off payment, rumoured to be less than £200,000. The SRU put a figure of £1.7million in its accounts as their remaining liability under the contract over a year ago, but has refused any pay-out, insisting that that would have to be taken from already stretched payments to club rugby. But McKie insisted that the contract was not causing him undue concern, even with some claims that the SRU was stopping rugby from taking place at Netherdale.

He said: "There is a written contract, an agreement between Gala and the SRU, that amounts to a 20-year lease for the Border Reivers. We continue to honour the terms of that agreement fully.

"It would be nice to set it aside without having to pay out the remaining (13] years of rent, but the reality is that discussions continue – there is no dispute. The terms of the lease were that the only teams that can play on it are the Border Reivers and Gala RFC and it's important that we stick to that because we have to ensure we're not being sent bills or invoices willy-nilly for maintenance to the pitch necessary because other teams have been playing on it."

In fact, the responsibility for who uses the pitch does not lie with the SRU nor Gala RFC, but the Netherdale Sports Club – a five-man body of two representatives each from the SRU and Gala RFC and chairman Drew Tulley, a former leader of Scottish Borders Council, formed in 2002 to manage the sports ground. While there does not appear to be a solution on the horizon, it would seem the SRU is cutting off its nose to spite its face in failing to make more of a facility it is maintaining.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 January 2009 10:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: SRU
 
1

legless,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 08:18:19
Play international games at Netherdale, Yes that's agreat idea! If you are willing to restrict the crowds to a few thousand. As for playing Edinburgh backup games at Netherdale......don't make me laugh, the locals couldn't be bothered turning up to see their own team, I'm guessing they are even less likely to care about the big bad Toonies.
2

scooter,

09/01/2009 08:56:13
legless? Think the sauce has impaired your comprehension too.

1. It's not saying play full internationals at Netherdale. But if the rationale for playing A / age group games away from Murrayfield is to "take the rugby to the people" then why not include the borders?
2. Average border crowds weren't much lower than Edinburgh/Glasgow (in fact I think about the same as Glasgow iirc).
3. This bears all the negative hallmarks of McKie's intransigent downside. Gala are, not unreasonably, looking for some compensation for the SRU backing out a deal they entered into jointly. (Compensation which, incidentally, should not come from club funding since it's about a pro agreement).

Borders rugby isn't a paragon of virtue: it has problems too. But McKie and crew seem to be actively shunning the only part of Scotland where rugby is the first choice sport. That position is slipping and the SRU's petulance is at least partly to blame. Not a good situation.
3

Sconey,

Galashiels 09/01/2009 08:57:39
Re Legless comments - you have just the right mindset for ruining the game, do you forget that the borders is a massive rural area? The Scottish Borders is 1831 square miles with a population of approx 100K, Edinburgh is approx 130 square miles with just under 500K - Do the maths!
As for SRU maintaing the Gala pitch - I beleive the budget for it was slashed and they do not maintain the under soil heating. The SRU have turned Netherdale into the white elephant of the borders. Its a joke that no other teams can make use of the pitch, we could have fantastic rugby days out by having the Gala 2nds who are doing well this season as a prelude to the Gala 1st team game. It should be less about politics and more about creating enthusiasm for the sport.
4

legless,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 09:10:01
Re Scooter: "The Scotsman understands that one of the Dundee football clubs is in the running to host an international match this year, but McKie confirmed that Netherdale remains out of the picture."
no mention of junior or womens team in that statement. This just appears to be a muck raking exercize by the Scotsman to recruit some new Borders readers.

Re Sconey: That's right the Borders is amassive rural area and who still holds the record for the lowest ever League gate. My point is that if they can't get enthusiastic about their own team why does the Scotsman think they will welcome Edinburgh?
5

Robin Purdie,

09/01/2009 09:12:26
#1 Dont be an @rse.

No-one would ever expect the SRU to use Netherdale for a full international or an Edinburgh back-up game. But for them not to take an A-team or age group international to the Borders is nothing more than a petulant Mckie sticking 2 fingers up to the area.

Gala should hold out for every penny that they can get from the SRU, even if it takes the remaining 13 years.

And as for Hegarty's "alledged" comments, what a tube. Hard man eh??!!
6

Sconey,

09/01/2009 10:09:47
Legless - I see what you are saying, but take it in context, we are enthusiastic about rugby, pro or amature in the Borders, but the demographic shows that the area size vs the population will not constitute massive gate sales. Why should we have to travel to Edinburgh and beyond to see pro rugby.

The article is correct in what its saying, by removing pro rugby from the Borders, pro players are becoming more alien to the Borders.

It would be interesting to see what effect the closure of the Reivers has had on youth rugby take up in the area, I know for a fact that the mini section at Gala have less participating members now than when the Reivers were in the Borders.
There was always a large youth contingent on the terraces at Netherdale from all over the Borders which was very encouraging.Its a shame to have lost that.
7

Dissillusioned Supporter!,

09/01/2009 10:15:50
Surely, if you were running a business at a loss, with huge debt, and a (pro) product that has had more than 10 years to work - but hasn't, and then on top of this you were locked in a deal for a premesis which you decide not to use, but insist on paying for other premesis... then the Bank must tell you what to do. Or render them bankrupt or as it is a sport - get in some governmental people to get rid of the inept employees and re-evaluate everything! Good rant!
8

IaininSelkirk,

Edinburgh today again. 09/01/2009 10:17:20
#1 - Get a grip man. We've long since had the post mortem on both The Borders team and the spectator numbers in The Borders. Do try and pay attention!
Reports show that spectator numbers at club level are still strongest in The Borders where Selkirk for example, with a population of around 6000, can consistently boast gates of 1500. Contrast that to any Edinburgh club where they consider themselves lucky to get 3 or 4 hundred, with little or no atmosphere during the game or in the clubhouse after. Fact is Borderers do support “there own team”.
9

IaininSelkirk,

Edinburgh today again 09/01/2009 10:18:49
Sorry - "their own team"
10

Alistair Macintosh,

09/01/2009 10:25:05
What the SRU has done to Borders rugby is a disgrace. Simple as that.
11

MM,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 10:32:01
Why on earth have they "taken the view that the under-20 team should play in enhanced facilities, with undersoil heating and floodlights, of the football stadium variety."

What benefit can they get from playing on (typically) narrower pitches that restrict an expanded game. Is it mayve to get them used to playing in an empty Murrayfield later in life?

U20 matches are a prime example of games that I think would be well attended at somewhere like Netherdale, and would be vaulable for encouraging youngsters in the area too. I would happily consider making the trip down for a game like that.
12

J.A.,

Gala 09/01/2009 11:58:20
There are a few narrow minded idiots out there who share the same point of view as LEGLESS.
This is a very important issue which should be debated and I congratulate the Scotsman for raising the issue.
The SRU say that the pitch can only be used by Gala RFC and the now defunct Reivers. But the fact is that Gala R F C is restricted to using the pitch only once a week for training and for their home games. It does not look likely that the Gala contingent within the Nerherdale Sports Club would want to restrict its use in such a ridiculous way.

Once again McKie has managed to skirt round the issue, why are no representative games being held in the Borders? If Netherdale is causing a problem, there are a number of excellent grounds at other Borders clubs which could quite easily hold age group and A internationals.

“McKie insisted that the contract was not causing him undue concern” It would appear that nothing about the plight of Borders rugby causes him undue concern. He may be an excellent accountant and very good with figures but he is far from the ideal man to be leading Scottish rugby.
13

heppy heppington,

Langlee Drive 09/01/2009 13:24:46
I’m not saying too much other than there’s been many a Thursday night when I’ve seen an SRU officionaldo in the Langlee flats with a pair of binoculars overlooking the lads training on the Gala pitch to make sure they keep within the restricted time allocation. Bean counters extraordinaire.

How in any way does the SRU’s actions encourage rugby involvement?
14

Sconey,

09/01/2009 13:37:31
Here Here J.A.!
15

Middlemarch,

In the Middle March 09/01/2009 15:04:06
I beleive the priority for use of the pitch was

1/ Reivers/Gala
2/ Other Gala teams/clubs
3/ SRU matches

Could be wrong but if right then the reason Netherdale isn't being used is becuase they would then have to let junior and youth rugby use the pitch with lights

The pitch is designed to take several games a week if it maintined properly, but that costs money.

This was the reason the Bells Lawrie Gala Academy v Stew Mel match was played in the afternoon on the almost unplayable back pitches.

SRU devleop rugby?????
16

The Doc5,

09/01/2009 15:06:49
No 12 "It would appear that nothing about the plight of Borders rugby causes him undue concern."

Come on, JA -what do you expect from a guy who admits he prefers football to rugby, and whose main concern often seems to be to make sure that his coaching pal keeps his job?!!
17

Alistair Macintosh,

09/01/2009 15:50:08
When a governing body becomes as completely unpopular and distrusted in the way the SRU has, it is time an entirley new team takes over. McKie is just the figurehead at the top of an organisation which has completely lost the confidence, support and trust of the Scottish rugby public.
18

THE DREADED SILVER CROC,

Cutting a (deep) furrow for "HardMan" Hegarty, etc 09/01/2009 16:00:28
Anyone doubting the SRU's description as a "busted flush" would do well to reflect on the Netherdale situation, and the current hugely-remunerated incompetent Murrayfield Mandarins' role in the entire mess.

Clearly, McKie and Munro are dead men talking. They'll get their just deserts sooner or later in return for their vaulting self-interest and the damage they have inflicted on Scottish Rugby. (Maybe they'll be joined in disgrace by the famous White Sardine, too! But, that's another story.)

Let's not forget the focal role played in creating this messy scenario by current SRU Secretary Graham Ireland when he was SRU Director of Finance....... You'll easily make your own minds up about the competence and abilities of the self-same Graham Ireland as the SRU's longest-serving financial and administrative professional. Think about it - the only former SRU executive from the bad old days(?) to have held on to his job / a job / any job - some say because of the hair-raising inside stories & damning evidence he had collected and documented over the years on so many of the influential bufties with the power to save his skin.

No fate would be too bad to inflict upon this sorry bunch of self-serving, self-interested incompetents.
19

THE DREADED SILVER CROC,

Snappy, as ever........ 09/01/2009 16:07:40
Please get back on this string if anything in #18 was unclear!

NB - for the avoidance of doubt, in his previous "professional" executive role, current SRU Secretary Graham Ireland was a prime party to establishing the Netherdale arrangements now hoisting the sad SRU up and over its own pitiful petard.
20

THE DREADED SILVER CROC,

An invite for "Hopeless" Hegarty.... 09/01/2009 16:12:42
Come to Netherdale, pal. We'll keep a welcome in the hillsides - just for you. Warm, maybe - or freezing cold. Perhaps we'll make you spend a few magic moments listening to the fabled Jesse Rae, before he shoves his sharp shiny thingy right up your innermost ledgers!
21

JBA,

09/01/2009 17:14:47
If the alleged comments by Hegarty are true it is an absolute disgrace when coming from a top official. Maybe it is a pity he did not come down to Netherdale especially on training night to carry out his threat and possibly the SRU would then have had to appoint a more responsible finance director.
22

OnTheFence,

09/01/2009 19:43:49
mr mckie for prime minister....the less rugby seen in the borders the better....
23

Doon hamer,

HAWICK 10/01/2009 14:13:12
Forget McKie because he has nothing to do with people interested in watching rugby. Think of all the youngsters who used to regularly watch, not only Borders players but quality opposition from Munster, Northampton, Cardiff etc. How far would the same enthusiastic future players have to travel to be inspired by players of the quality of Bruce Douglas, Scott Mcleod etc. I know we get fairly good crowds watching games in the Borders but it's not the same as watching the pros in action
24

J.A.,

Gala 12/01/2009 09:48:08
This whole matter is a damn disgrace, and irrespective of what some small minded individuals may thing, the SRU appear to be deliberately taking representative rugby away from the Borders and that is an appalling situation.
The long term implications of degrading a district which has rugby as its main sport will not help Scottish rugby at all.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.