Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Taiwan and China build trust



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 June 2008
CHINA and Taiwan have agreed to set up permanent offices in each other's territory for the first time in nearly six decades of hostility, one of the biggest steps the political rivals have taken to build mutual trust.
The agreement came as China adopts a softer public approach in the run-up to next month's Beijing Olympics. It also made positive headlines on the grim one-month anniversary of the 12 May earthquake in which more than 70,000 died.

The Taiwan deal followed the first formal talks between the sides since 1999. It lends momentum to efforts to build confidence and spur co-operation between the rivals, who divided amid civil war in 1949 and whose relationship has veered from strained to outright hostile.

"It's a very positive and healthy development in relations across the Taiwan Strait," said George Tsai, a political scientist at Taiwan's Chinese Culture University.

Mr Tsai cautioned, however, that the offices would be limited to dealing with administrative matters and would offer little direct help in dealing with core political differences such as China's threatening missile arsenal and Taiwan's desire for diplomatic recognition overseas.

Beijing's communist administration, which seized power on the mainland in 1949, considers Taiwan part of its territory and refuses to recognise the government in Taipei, which means that negotiations must be carried out by semi-official bodies.

The accord also opens the way for 36 charter flights to cross the 100-mile wide Taiwan Strait every weekend. Taiwan has banned direct scheduled flights since the 1949 split.

The expanded flights will be enough to shuttle several hundred thousand Chinese tourists to Taiwan every year – below Taiwanese president Ma Ying-jeou's target of 1 million, but far above the current level of about 80,000.

Charter flights are now limited to four annual Chinese holidays and are usually packed with Taiwanese residents on the mainland returning home to visit family. Mr Ma wants to gradually expand the charter schedule and supplement it with regularly scheduled flights by the summer of 2009.

Taiwan was also set to discuss what additional help the island could provide for China's earthquake relief efforts.

The move came as hundreds of grieving parents blocked the road into an earthquake-flattened town as police sought to quell a rising wave of public anger over schools that collapsed and killed thousands of children.

Volunteers were detained, schools cordoned off and reporters barred from destroyed classrooms in at least two other towns in another sign of the government's resolve in controlling the post-quake message.

Despite assurances by authorities that unfettered coverage would be allowed, dozens of police and paramilitary troops guarded the gate of Juyuan's destroyed middle school, as a crowd of about 50 gathered outside. And at a primary school in Dujiangyan, police and soldiers also stood guard to keep out parents and journalists.

The security measures underscore how much the public fury over the deaths of so many children is unnerving the Chinese authorities. Their attempts to rein it in contrast sharply with the relative openness Beijing displayed at the start of the disaster.

Across the quake zone, tempers flared among parents as they marked the grim anniversary. Wang Ping, whose 16-year-old daughter died when Beichuan Middle School collapsed, said: "I'm 40. All our hopes were in our children. Now they're dead. Our future is dead, too."

BACKGROUND

FEW families in hard-hit parts of Sichuan province in the nation's south-west escaped losses among those killed in the 12 May quake – close to 70,000 according to the latest count, with many more missing believed dead.

But the thousands of crushed children have become the most politically-charged legacy of the disaster, distilling public anger about corruption and lax regulation blamed for shoddy school buildings. Poor construction work is suspected as a reason for the collapse of the schools.

Anguished parents yesterday marked one month since the devastating earthquake, demanding answers about flattened schools and begging forgiveness from dead children buried under the rubble.

In a sign of political tensions in the quake-hit area, Chinese police expelled volunteers and apparently detained a local dissident who had offered to support the grieving families.

The full article contains 703 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2008 10:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Taiwan
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 13/06/2008 05:16:40
Expect some US engineered "incident" in the Straight soon. Hey, Tonkin Gulf worked for Vietnam.
2

Mashimaro,

China 13/06/2008 05:43:25
Spook... where to start with that. Do you really think China would want to "vaporise" the west coast of the US? China is not an aggressive country in the first place and probably doesn't have the capability of doing anything like this even if it was.
Try to be more open minded and rise above your western press propaganda.
3

,

13/06/2008 06:06:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 13/06/2008 10:54:07
#4 Bugsy

"China would be shooting itself in the foot, considering how much of the Chinese goods the US buys"

....Not only that, how would China collect the interest on the funds they loan to the US?

5

JayDeeTee,

13/06/2008 12:19:45
#3. Good post. Add to that China has culture. The West has not.
6

Bemused and above it all,

13/06/2008 14:25:41
So background to a story about political agreement from a large state and a breakaway republic should have the 'background' section basically a list of whats went wrong in 1 area of a massive country hit by a massive national disaster, worse than hurricane katrina, as the background to it?
In what way does this set political context?
7

,

13/06/2008 15:22:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Bemused and above it all,

13/06/2008 16:08:00
black
9

Mashimaro,

China 13/06/2008 16:32:42
#9 Because every chance they get they have to kick China. You can see this if you look at the reports about Tibet and the "crackdown" in Lhasa just before the Olympic torch was due to go through countries that would protest.
10

Bemused and above it all,

13/06/2008 16:53:48
#13 I dont agree with everything the regieme in china does, there are some fairly serious issues but I disagree with making bogeymen out of countries.
As for post #12 I was just trying to see if he would say white.
11

Ronnie McCulley,

Jacksboro 13/06/2008 20:09:11
Dear,Adminstrator.Im a Big Boy,would you please not remove comments,ths is not China.How nasty coud it Be,let me decide,dont hit me on my bottom now.
12

Ronnie McCulley,

Jacksboro 13/06/2008 20:13:13
Dear,readers if a comment is unsuitable for you dont hit the button.Report Unsuitable.Just close your eyes and go to another page or never come back.I Know what is good for me,I decide for no one but me.
13

Linus,

at arm's length 14/06/2008 02:57:50
#15 and 16 Ronnie McCulley,
You hit the nail right on the head. People losing arguments and people a little sensitive not only remove comments, they are in fact censoring what they deem unfit, and the administrator will take any excuse to have them removed. Unsuitable should mean something like racist or racism, foul language, physical threats, not disagreeing with somebody else's opinions. The rest of us don't even know what was said, therefore we can't reply with our thoughts on the matter.
Thanks for your input Ronnie, let's see if they will let it stand, or my opinion for that matter.
14

Mashimaro,

China 14/06/2008 04:07:18
People here agree with freedom of speech only if they like what you say. I wonder if the moderators read the comments they are deleting or just hit the button.
15

Linus,

at arm's length, 14/06/2008 04:35:57
#18 Mashimaro,China
Judging from your location, is this something that you're used to? We have been told in the west that in China there is no freedom of speech? Is that true?
We seem to be suffering from that over here as you can see on this thread.
Since you are commenting from China, I gather that you must have freedom of speech, or we would have never seen your comment.
16

Mashimaro,

China 14/06/2008 05:25:33
#19 Ah Linus, some people are afraid of the truth so they have to pick on people posting it and shut them up at any cost. But the people who have been silenced here will be back. They are the true warriors, shining a light of truth on the foetid mass of lies being spun about China in the west.
People in China do not have freedom of speech as you associate it in the west. That does not mean that they do not have justice or that they do not protest. In fact they do. These people have already protested. The government has already acted and answered their concerns. The people responsible for this will be brought to justice. The parents will be compensated. We are all shocked and horrfied at what happened. But protests like this cannot just be allowed to continue indefinitely and draw resources away from relief efforts.
17

Mashimaro,

China 14/06/2008 05:33:36
I feel I must repost my colleague's remarks to Nomad here...as we know the slimy coward will pretend not to read them there... so excuse me for being a little off topic

Here, Nomad, a history lesson for you. From Rogue State. William Blum. Page 126...
"China 1945 - 51
At the close of World War II, the US intervened in a civil war, takin the side of Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists against Mao Tse Tung's Communists, EVEN THOUGH THE LATTER HAD BEEN A MUCH CLOSER ALLY OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE WAR" (reference 1)
(Capital letters I make for you Nomad - Subodai)
"to compound the irony, the US used defeated Japanese soldiers to fight for its side. (reference 2) After their defeat in 1949, many Nationalist soldiers took refuge in northern Burma, where the CIA regrouped them, brought in other recruits from elsehwere in Asia, and provided a large supply of heavy arms and planes. During the early 1950s, this army proceeded to carry out a number of incursions into china, involving at times thousands of troops, accomapnied by CIA advisors (some of whom were killed), and supplied by air drops from American planes."
References:
1: David Barrett, Dixie Mission: The United States Army Observer Group in Yenan, 1944 (Center for Chinese Studies, University of California, Berkley, 1970, passim R. Harris Smith, OSS: The Secrety History of America's first CIA (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1972, pp. 262-3, New York Times, 9 December 1945, p. 24.
2. Quote from US President Truman:
"It was perfectly clear to us that if we told the Japanese to lay down their arms immediately and march to the seabord, the entire country would be taken over by the Communists. We therefore had to take the unusual step of using the enemy as a garrison until we could airlift chinese national troops to South China and send Marines to guard the seaports." Taken from Harry S Truman, Memoirs, Vol. Two: Years of Trial and Hope, 1946-1953 (Great Britain, 1956), p66.
-----
Very interesting what
18

Mashimaro,

China 16/06/2008 15:18:47
*watches the Nomad disappear in a puff of smoke* It's like Howarts I tells ya!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.