Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Rubbish maths' is selling pupils short

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 May 2009
CHILDREN are being taught "rubbish maths" with too much focus on counting and calculation, according to veteran children's presenter Johnny Ball.
Ball, who made his career enthusing youngsters in maths programmes such as Think of a Number, said schooling was too locked into the idea that numeracy is everything.

He said: "Everyone thinks maths is just numbers and being able to count and cal
culate but maths explains everything – how the world works and science and technology and art and music.

"We spend just too long getting kids to add, subtract, multiply, divide and do percentages."

Last year, the Trends in International Maths and Science Survey report (TIMSS) said Scotland fared far worse than many other western nations.

The 71-year-old presenter is author of a new book, Mathmagicians, which will be published in July and aims to inspire children in the subject. He says other departments in schools should be "maths aware".

Mr Ball added: "In art, if you understand the maths of how to make a drawing look three- dimensional, suddenly you are a much more powerful artist.

"We're teaching rubbish maths. We are going over and over it again, we are asking kids to learn maths, then testing them, then asking them the next year if they remember it and we are not being ambitious enough."

He said the technology around us which uses maths could be inspirational for children.

"Everybody's got satnavs these days, but does anybody know how a satnav works?

"No they don't, and it's terrible. You need Einstein's maths to explain how a satnav works.

"It's ambitious to talk about these things and we need to get kids to say, 'Wow'.

"How do building's stay up and how do we get arches the right mathematical shape so they stay up? It's interesting maths."

Ball said children needed to learn that maths can take them further than their ordinary lives. He added: "We have to teach them that maths can produce scientists, technologists, engineers, physicists, chemists and people who will cure the world of its diseases.

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said the new Curriculum for Excellence, due to be brought in next year, would challenge and stimulate children by introducing maths teaching within other subjects.

She said: "Mathematics equips us with many of the skills required for 21st century life.

"Learning across the curriculum will make lessons more relevant so that children and young people will see the value and importance of maths in a wide range of settings."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2009 9:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Teaching
 
1

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 29/05/2009 06:57:56
What a load of rubbish.
2

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 29/05/2009 09:19:27
Agreed. In order to apply maths the way the author is suggesting requires a base in numeracy, which has been declining severely over the past decade. And numeracy can take you so far: algebra, geometry, trigonometry, calculus, all of these should be covered in school. Forget the dippy-hippy "feeling the numbers" rubbish.
3

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 29/05/2009 10:39:15
The problem is that too high a percentage leave 7 years of primary school and have not even a decent base of numeracy to be able to understand what goes on at secondary or tertiary education levels. The basics have been chucked out to accommodate the latest fads and theories of educationists.

A large part of this is that classrooms need to have a degree of peace and quiet to get on with what can be difficult and exacting work which teachers have been conned into thinking is not "exciting" enough. Cure:-

1) Get the discipline back
2) Stop being afraid of repetition and demanding expertise in basic numeracy.
3) Then build on that - otherwise frankly it's all an expensive waste of time - demonstrably.
4

Iain Mac,

29/05/2009 13:07:03
#3 - yes, beat them to a pulp, that will sort them.

#2 - numeracy aint everything. Some kids can do their tables etc but have difficultly with time or with shape and measurment. Some can tell you lots about position and movement but not now basic tables.

The answer is getting kids to break up the ideas and explore them. Repitition has it's place too but we need to build understand and not just memory.
5

Lisa Ann,

Newburgh, IN 29/05/2009 19:13:38
Wow. We have this same debate in the U.S. I taught for 10 years, and I have to agree with Former Mr. Angry and his supporters. Also, how is it that all 6 of my brohters and sisters went to the same schools, but one is a cop, another a CPA, another is an electrician, one works in parts sales, one works in a nursing home and another is a cashier. All of my cousins and nieces and nephews attended public schools. Two are in computer science, One teaches computer science at UCLA, one is a photographer, another is an accountant. The only common factor in our lives is that we had parents that valued education, and knew how to use tough love when needed.
6

,

30/05/2009 05:22:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Finlang,

Liaoning 01/06/2009 03:06:10
#3 The Former Mr. Angry

I taught primary children in a wonderful school in northern England 30+ years ago. Teaching maths was my favourite, as I could combine an ability to draw explanatory ad hoc diagrams, with the patient enthusiasm to explain in easily understood language. Explanation is all in teaching. I learned, from the hated "lessons" of one sadistic bully of a secondary maths teacher in Scotland who made my 12/13-year-old life absolute hell, of how not to teach.

Vis-a-vis the report, I left that school on promotion to another area and inherited and was forced to use a totally dumbed-down county-wide maths teaching program which demanded nothing of the children. Not even the least able. (This was the era of equality for all - no failures, blah, blah - expounded ad nauseam by the in-house Head Madwoman, or Mad Headwoman.) I partly overcame that aberration by upfront teaching, which was widely appreciated by the children.

The "rubbish maths" of the headline above would cover that appalling experince exactly. The children were bored rigid with its undemanding simplicity and stupidity, which ultimately led me to frustration and despair. After 18 months of being daily bombarded by a PC mindset I left what was a great career for pastures new. I am still in touch with past pupils and their feedback continues to fill me with joy.

#6 Vincent-W

Perhaps my story above will help expand what I thought Mr A made what is fairly clear to most lay-people's perception of teaching. You evidently have a different take on the matter.





8

Finlang,

01/06/2009 03:11:40
"experince" means I never learned to type properly!
9

,

01/06/2009 05:54:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Finlang,

Liaoning 01/06/2009 22:30:13
#9
"Throwing 'PC' at anything one disagrees with is pretty sloppy sloganeering."

Sloganeering?! Please ...

If you had actually tried to comprehend my post you would have eventually deduced that my "throwing PC" was a tilt at a very specific, very real, and very damaging situation - of which you know nothing.

Learn to detach your highly specific opinions from making erroneous shoot-from-the-hip accusations.

11

,

02/06/2009 05:56:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

02/06/2009 05:57:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Finlang,

Liaoning 02/06/2009 23:41:03
#11 Vincent

"real brama"?

Is that to do with bulls or Indians?!

Anyway ... I taught maths in my first school with all the enthusiasm of the convert, and then some. (Admission: that school demanded the highest standards; children were by and large the offspring of university academics and other professionals, and every day presented a new challenge, in which I revelled).

I made maths a pleasure to learn. I just loved the complexity - and the logic - of the subject and had pre-read comprehensively all the stuff I'd missed out on in high school, thanks to the sadist mentioned in my post above. Teaching algebra and geometry to the top class was expected in my first school and I found the way in to getting my pupils' attention and maintaining their interest, as I knew it would be minutely scrutinised at home. They were all well prepared for secondary school in a way that I wasn't.

Result: of my former pupils (in both schools, despite the ignorant antagonism in the second), apart from the doctors, scientists, barristers, computer programmers, musicians and psychologists, I seem to have enlightened quite a few other receptive little heads.

Sorry for any earlier misunderstanding.






14

,

03/06/2009 06:59:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Finlang,

Hong Kong 03/06/2009 23:59:18
Vincent

Many thanks for the kind words. Really, there's not a lot to it when you are committed to, confident and happy with, the challenge of the job. Everything is better when the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, and everybody benefits as a result.

But that was then. I left the full-time classroom many years back, but am still peripherally involved in education abroad. I still miss the bustle of regular everyday involvement but enjoy the less frequent contact nonetheless.

Your lad must be able to be doing maths at Edinburgh. I understand all too well his early obstacle with primary maths. Same here. For maths we were taught only arithmetic at PS and I was dead slow to catch on, although able with all the written subjects. (We had to struggle with the quagmire that was avoirdupois, and believe me it was a struggle! But I taught metric to my eventual pupils.)

High school and the beast that regularly beat me and made life hell for two miserable years should probably have put me off maths for life. Oddly, it didn't. Far removed from the horror of that classroom I taught myself, and the explorations eventually led to computer programming. Then into teaching via degrees in subjects that would have scared me witless way back then.

The classroom can be a lonely place for the struggler, but can equally be made worthwhile with a bit of effort - and crucially, understanding - on all sides. I learned almost all I needed to know from, and was encouraged by, a respected (and feared!) rookery of Scottish spinsters in primary. I also learned how not to teach from the brutality of that despised maths teacher in secondary.






16

Ross Barnie,

Gairloch 04/06/2009 01:07:54
The single biggest problem with education as a whole in the this country is the "no-one will fail" attitude. This attitude deprives all children, from primary to secondary level, of any real challenge or motivation. Failing is part of life and should be taught as being something to learn from rather than something that means you are stupid or incapable of achieving.
17

Finlang,

Hong Kong 04/06/2009 02:51:34
#16 Ross Barnie

Absolutely. If you read my post #7 you will deduce that that was the stupidity I had to put up with daily in that second school. "Everybody is a winner" was the vomit-inducing mantra I had to put up with there.

A typically classic speech from the deluded hierarchy to parents at public events was: "in this school the pupils come first, the parents second ... and the teachers a long way third." Great psychological morale booster for the teacher. 18 months later I departed that arena, disillusioned and utterly sick of a mad philosophy which has taken over once-rational minds of an entire country.

Celebrate failure and that's what you get. Failure. The ultimate freak-out for me was ... omigod there were too many to mention, but let's remember a couple. On taking the football team to their first game against local opponents I was criticised by the deputy loony for not being vocal enough. (Screaming from the touchline was never my thing.) And ... out of a squad of 20 every single one had to get a game. Imagine a game with no competition.

The ultimate idiocy for me was from the Head Goon ... I lined up my excellent choir on-stage. Girls in front. Boys behind. Normal setup from time immemorial. Rationale? Girls prettier, and better singers, and on height grounds. The lads were comparative giants. She summarised: "We live in an age of equality and in a multicultural society, and the choir line-up is sexist ..." That did it for me. I resigned shortly afterwards, utterly frustrated at being in the company of professional fools. The children thankfully survived and most went on to justify my short time there.

The madness persists though and the losers are our children. Society loses in the longer term as we allow another generation to celebrate failure.









 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Should school history lessons focus more on Scottish history?
Yes
No


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.