Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


BBC to cut pay of top stars

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 June 2009
TOP BBC stars were called to a meeting during which they were warned to expect wage cuts, it has been disclosed.

Jeremy Clarkson and Sir Terry Wogan were reportedly among about 100 famous faces at Monday's gathering with executives at Television Centre in London. It was reported that those on screen or behind a microphone earning more than £100,000 a year fac
ed a pay cut of 25 per cent when their contracts were renegotiated. It was also claimed that for some highly paid stars, the salary reduction could be as much as 40 per cent.

The meeting follows recent speculation that Jonathan Ross's earnings were set to be cut if and when he signed a further deal with the corporation. Ross, who is believed to earn £6 million a year, was not thought to have been present at the meeting.

The corporation's director-general, Mark Thompson, addressed the celebrities on a range of topics.

A BBC spokesman said: "No organisation is immune from the economic climate, and we have to find substantial savings.

"Talent fees are not excluded from the economic pressures faced across the organisation, and these will be reflected in our ongoing negotiations. This was an internal event as part of our ongoing dialogue with the artists and presenters who work for us."

The BBC would not comment on individuals' contracts. In an interview last month, Mr Thompson said: "We will reduce the total amount we spend on top talent, and have already agreed some new contracts for less than we have paid in the past."

The recession-hit market for "talent fees" has changed, with commercial broadcasters also thought to be offering less money than before.

The BBC is making efficiency savings totalling £1.9 billion over the licence fee period. It now has to find a further £400m of "painful" cuts.

An unnamed celebrity said: "I thought we were going in for a sociable glass of wine and canapes, but instead there was this very grim meeting. No-one was left in any doubt what they were getting at."





The full article contains 351 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 June 2009 9:05 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

11/06/2009 00:57:47
I am sure that people of all political affiliations and none will welcome this good news heartliy and without bitterness or rancour, and without trying to engage in banal one-upmanship.
2

Anonym,

waiting for the talent to flee 11/06/2009 01:03:59
What happened to the argument that it is necessary to pay big money to retain the talent?

If you don't pay, the argument goes, then the talent goes elsewhere with their boundless earning potential.

Besides, if that 'elsewhere' happens to be another channel, then you can see them on there instead of on the good old BBC.

How about reducing the license fee by 40%. Better still, scrap it altogether?

Must be 'painful' getting by on 75 grand a year. How to pay for all the canapes and glasses of wine?

3

Boy Wonder,

11/06/2009 01:42:59
As a "talented" bio-organics scientist, working among other even more "talented" scientists working on the problems Mankind faces ... how is it I and THEY are not earning over £1,000,000 per annum???

Are BBC executives, actors, presenters and DJ's more important to the Human Race than we are???

Indeed ... I shall bring this up with my colleagues ... and when we lay down our test-tubes for a little more dosh ... will we be treated with any more respect than these parasites??

I'm obviously in the wrong job!
4

Jo Flo,

Can't get my arms wider 11/06/2009 02:57:18
I would like to be an exroverte

I'm assuming

You lot don't like it
5

Jo Flo,

positveville 11/06/2009 03:01:26
Dreams and real time

That's all we need
6

donald,

glasgow 11/06/2009 03:17:45
Can't understand why anyone would wish to watch Jonathan Wossy interviewing Luvvies and airheads with nothing to say
7

Willie Mor,

11/06/2009 03:56:44
Even with a 25% pay cut many of these public servants will still earn too much.

Yes, so the long suffering licence payer will now pay the Russell Brands and the Johnathan Ross's of the BBC £4.5m a year instead of £6m.

And maybe we can also look forward to some more of these overpaid monkeys being granted peerages and places in Mr Browns cabinet of un-elected ministers.

Ho ho you would laugh if it wasn't so damned outrageous. Yeah that's it Mr Brown, make the little people happy.
8

Jim A,

11/06/2009 05:06:07
#3 Boy Wonder, "Are BBC executives, actors, presenters and DJ's more important to the Human Race than we are???"

Looks like it buddy, the figures don't lie ;-)
9

Mallory,

Edinburgh 11/06/2009 05:39:35
Can we now have some explanation for the gross obscenity of ever-rising 'legal costs'?
10

gus1940,

Edinburgh 11/06/2009 08:07:05
Cut back on all the football cr-p.
11

brianmca3,

auld reekie 11/06/2009 08:48:37
the BBC more repeats than a vindaloo curry
12

Andrah,

Embrugh 11/06/2009 09:12:31
The Beeb, obviously running scared, having seen what happened to the MPs. The same level of scrutiny applied to this biased and bloated outfit would provoke similar uproar, and surely inflict a mortal wound on "Auntie".

Just consider the single case of Wossy, who makes even Sir Fred, with his legendary pension, look a pauper.

Joe Bloggs £19kpa, MPs £63kpa, Sir Fred £600kpa+, Wossy £6000kpa.

In case you have forgotten, you will be required to pay even more TV tax under threat of prosecution next time round, even if you have been thrown out of a job or suffered a pay cut.
13

P I Staker,

11/06/2009 09:50:21
Hmmm, shurely a contravention of Trades Description to mention 'talent' and 'Jeremy Clarkson' in the shame shentence.
14

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 11/06/2009 09:55:55
Cut Brucie's embalming allowance now!
15

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 11/06/2009 10:06:48
"painful cuts"?

I think not.
16

Mike S,

11/06/2009 10:11:31
The BBC need to review all the salaries. I recall that when Foulkes was being interviewed on the 24 hour news channel thwe woman newscaster was pushed to say what she earned and it was over £90K a year so multiply that by all the newscasters and then some. How many people does it take to relate the news and how much do they deserve? Time for a thorough review throughout the BBC. Commercial channels pay what they can afford based on audience figures and advertising and that has dropped recently. BBC claims it pays what the opposition pay so NOW REDUCE ALL PAYMENTS.
17

JG,

Fife 11/06/2009 10:42:45
It's like anything else - things are only worth what people are willing to pay for them. These over-inflated salaries only occurred because the BBC agreed to it. Where will Ross, Clarkson et al find an alternative now? Pay them a more realistic salary and if they don't like it, then they can leave. Commercial channels are also cutting back so the options are few. The Jonathon Ross radio show on Radio 2 was better when Lisa Tarbuck presented it.
18

Grumpy,

11/06/2009 11:17:39
(14) - Surely the same can be said for Jonathon Ross and Bruce Forsyth.

(16) - You're right - Lisa Tarbuck was much better
19

Tartan Viking,

11/06/2009 12:19:34
TV Newsreaders must get a few bob. A BBC Radio Scotland reporter admitted recently she was on £90,000 a year. £90 grand to read the news on the radio! who's to say she doesn't buy a few newspapers, curl up in bed in her jammies and phone in a report?

Anyway - back to on-screen newsreaders. Bet they are on £200 grand or so.
20

Stan Butler,

11/06/2009 14:00:15
20 Tartan Viking

I think you're referring to someone called Carrie Gracie who works for BBC TV, not Radio Scotland.

She was quizzed by your pal Lord Foulkes and admitted to earning £93,000 pa.
21

Sgian Dubh,

11/06/2009 16:23:50
#2,
'If you don't pay, the argument goes, then the talent goes elsewhere with their boundless earning potential.'

The 'boundless earning potential' doesn't work with the BBC 'Talent' because the earnings are paid for by the viewers through the licence fee. The BBC therefore has as much income as it is going to have with or without the big names. They are in a win/win situation. They cut the big salaries, and the big names have no bargaining cards. The viewers can't complain either if they don't want to chuck out their tv's.
The point I would bring up is that the big name celebrities must surely not be thinking they are immune to the 'credit crunch' effect.
22

Tartan Viking,

11/06/2009 16:42:06
#21 Stanley.

Come come. Lord Foosty in no pal of mine I'll have you know. How do you reach that conclusion dear boy?
23

Joe Macdelta.,

11/06/2009 16:53:56
#2 Talent, this is Jeremy Clarkson, Jonathon Ross, Terry Wogan etc,so where is the talent. If they decided to go somewhere else, I think I will manage not to get upset about it, so yes go ahead and cut their overinflated pay.
24

gus1940,

Edinburgh 11/06/2009 17:51:39
Last night I watched a 90 minute documentary going over Rick Stein's life as a chef - brilliant program even though it was a cut and paste job of excerpts from his various cooking programs with added links. Quality TV.

Compared with the money splashed out on bl--dy football, so-called reality rubbish and the likes of Clarkson and Ross it must have cost peanuts.

A couple of years ago on a saturday morning I wathched a program featuring John Simpson wandering around Paris stopping and talking to people in the street and in shops.Probably only required him, a guy with a hand-held camera and maybe a sound man. Cheap to make but far more interesting than most of the
cr-p on BBC TV.
25

Tartan Viking,

11/06/2009 18:53:48
#25. Well said gus.
26

nostress,

grangemouth 11/06/2009 23:50:39
Do you konw how the BBC could save even more than by cutting Jonathon Ross' pay by 25%? Sack him, that would do it. After a couple of days, no-one would even notice the sewer-minded little sod had gone.

Same goes for Wogan, Clarkson and the rest of them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.