Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bush wistful at brief encounter with Blair

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 June 2007
HAVING spanned seven years, their relationship can hardly be described as a brief encounter.
But yesterday's farewell from George Bush to Tony Blair could have rivalled for its poignancy the final goodbye between the adulterous lovers at the heart of the 1945 film by David Lean.

As the Prime Minister prepares to climb on board the train
of retirement from politics, Mr Bush made clear his life would be left a little emptier without the man he once fondly greeted with "Yo Blair" by his side.

The US president described his feelings as the pair stood shoulder to shoulder for their final official summit ."This is the last meeting I will have had with him as prime minister. It's a nostalgic moment for me," he said.

"I'm sorry it's come to be, but that's what happens in life. We'll move on," the president added.

Mr Bush also recounted their last meeting at the rose garden in the White House grounds.

They had talked about "how our efforts are going to lead to peace and to a better world for a lot of people," Mr Bush said.

But the Prime Minister played down the attention lavished on him by the president.

Asked later if he was equally as sad as Mr Bush, Mr Blair said he was too enmeshed in the details of tackling climate change at the G8 to think about his imminent departure.

"To be absolutely frank, I'm so into the difference between various linking systems of emissions trading that I haven't the time to feel nostalgic or anything else," Mr Blair said, in remarks that show playing hard to get is sometimes the best strategy for getting a partner to divulge their feelings.

His official spokesman also insisted that Mr Blair had little time to reflect on the end of the official relationship.

"These are normal working days, we are getting on with the job," he said.

Mr Blair will leave Downing Street on 27 June after a decade in power, which has been punctuated and - critics believe - sullied by his close ties to the Republican president.

A moving van was seen in Downing Street this week, showing that there will be no going back for the Blairs as the family members prepare for their new life.

Mr Bush and Mr Blair have always enjoyed a chemistry.

Even detractors of the president concede he has a high "emotional intelligence" quotient, diffusing awkward questions with humour - a tactic deployed more articulately by Mr Blair.

They both also have a strong sense of faith.

After seven years, there is no sign of the fabled "itch" that strikes many couples.

Little wonder that Mr Bush is reluctant to move on: it is unlikely that Gordon Brown will be as ready a bedfellow for him.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Tricia,

08/06/2007 01:16:10

The writer of this article left me peeved. It makes you want to take a shower with the fake inuendos.

2

Jane K,

Eastwood 08/06/2007 01:22:37

Mr. Blair is a good man and will be missed.

3

Tatties ower the side,

Johannesburg 08/06/2007 05:41:06

#2 Spot on Jane K ....... but stand by for a shower of abuse when the regular bloggers on this paper spot your post!!!

4

Conan,

Here 08/06/2007 06:56:53

Blair is a far better man than the British public in their current bad mood deserve.

5

,

08/06/2007 07:09:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

puskas,

East Kilbride 08/06/2007 07:11:10

I notice a great deal of sarcasm towards Bliar in the early posts ...

Richly deserved.

7

Honest Opinion,

France 08/06/2007 07:37:35

"To be absolutely frank" says Blair. If that were only true, it would be a first!

8

The Journal of Record,

UK 08/06/2007 08:21:22

6. puskas, East Kilbride

It's not sarcasm, it’s called sincerity, something you may not know anything about.

9

Dragomir,

08/06/2007 08:59:25

I think Bush and Blair should come out and get married.

10

Cadgers,

Perth 08/06/2007 09:23:14

Gosh, indeed a "pass the bucket moment".

11

,

08/06/2007 09:26:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 692545, Article id was mapped to record!
12

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 08/06/2007 10:24:28

-- I think Bush and Blair should come out and get married.

Filmed as "Brokeback Economics" and brought to you by Warner Bros. G8? Spinning by your multiplexy. Would the Spice Girls make the sound track? A cameo part for the Hiltons?

13

,

08/06/2007 11:16:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

drew 33,

edinburgh 08/06/2007 12:37:35

Nice for Tony that someone other than Cherie regrets his going. I wonder if his closest political "friend" Gordon is broken hearted at Labour losing its most successful ever leader? Just kidding!

15

Jefe,

Honduras 08/06/2007 14:34:31

How sad to see so many bitter anti Bush & Blair types. Some people are not happy unless they are complaining.

16

Administrator,

08/06/2007 15:32:06

11. thatscottishwoman 2

110000110000011111000000011111100111100001111110000000011111111000000110011110000111111000011111000111100000100100000011100000011

17

Ailsa Craig,

Near Arran 08/06/2007 18:59:52

# 19. Jefe.

We have a VERY GREAT DEAL to complain about. Yesterday the illegal Iraq War notched up the death of the 150th British soldier. What a tragic waste of young lives!

The Iraq War is widely recognised as the worst British foreign policy disaster since the Suez debacle in the 1950s. Tony B.liar thoroughly deserves to be impeached - but that won't happen now.

# 2. Jane K.

What on earth gives you the impression that Tony Blair is "a good man"?

He is a highly professional CON-ARTIST. Thank God he's going!

18

,

08/06/2007 19:21:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 695010, Article id was mapped to record!
19

Caora Dubh,

Dhachaigh 08/06/2007 20:37:17

Maggie pledged her troth with Ronnie in order to offer UK companies privileged access to the US market. The US govt could only offer access to significant roles in US military projects, but the UK, on its knees at the end of the 1970s, bought it. (At least the Tories did.) Once the UK's military-industrial machine had fused with that of the US, it was much too expensive to divorce. The relationship between the UK and USA is extreme: managers of UK & USA defence & govt companies shuttle between the countries in droves. NATO is nothing compared with the relationship between the USA & UK. Blair inherited this. Big business dictated that Blair continue to lick American boots. He should have gradually diverted R & D funds into civilian high tech projects & pulled the UK out of the "Special Relationship". We didn't need Iraq. The USA did. Our children needn't have died there. Was Blair a good leader? I can't think of a single concrete example of good leadership by him, can you?

20

thatscottishwoman 2,

08/06/2007 21:40:27

#17 Reading Public: Good evening!

Firstly, I am not a socialist, I am a libertarian who does not believe in political or social hierarchies.

My preferred "version" of democracy would be deliberative democracy.

http://www.deliberative-democracy.net/deliberation/

My opinion on Blair?

I believe that Blair's autocratic governance has done untold damage to the labour party during his time in office. I do not think they will recover from this damage. The people no longer trust the labour party to respect or represent their views and opinions. The recent elections here in Scotland are an indicator of this.

21

Doria,

Borsalino 08/06/2007 21:57:53

24. thatscottishwoman 2

I think we all know too well how much of a socialist you are.

22

Clippers,

Santa Monica, CA 08/06/2007 22:03:42

TSW #24

"I am a libertarian who does not believe in political or social hierarchies."

ROTFLMAO

23

57Nomad,

california 09/06/2007 14:43:05

#24 TSW

I went to the site you posted. I have a few questions and I was hoping that you could let me know your views on them.

First of all, it seems like one of the underlying assumptions is that the population is presently underinformed. Since we are presently drowning in information, should we assume that even though there is a flood of information already available that the sources are tainted so that the information is the fruit of a poisoned tree and not to be trusted?

Also, there is the notion of a selection of people to be in the groups. How is this process carried out? How are the representatives chosen and who does the choosing?

Then, having accomplished the first two goals, how is the will of the group made manifest?

TSW, you and I often have differing opinions but yours are always thoughtful, even if I don't share them so I'm not trying to start a contention, I'm genuinely curious. I live in California. The great majority of legislation that most affects the daily lives of Americans is made at the state and local, not the national level and each state has it's own way of conducting business.

In California we have the Initiative process that seems very similar to what you are espousing. Groups get together to discuss an item of interest. If it is felt that new legislation is needed or that present legislation should be done away with, the citizens can circulate a petition and if it gets enough signatures it goes on the ballot, completely bypassing the state legislature. We love it. Is this similar to what you have in mind?

24

57Nomad,

california 09/06/2007 14:53:50

#23 Coara D,

Coara said:

"Maggie pledged her troth with Ronnie in order to offer UK companies privileged access to the US market."

That may or may not be true. I've never noticed that the British have any trouble gaining a foothold in American markets in the first place. But they also did something else. They brought about the downfall of the Soviet Union, freed the countries of Eastern Europe, reunited Germany, and with Reagan and Gorby working together dismantled tens of thousands of ICBM's and IRBM's, including the fleet of Soviet SS 20's, many of which were targeted on Britain.

From our perspective it looked like Britain was mired in the socialist swamp until Maggie came along. It is now a vibrant and thriving economy. Plus, she was one tough customer, something that is a plus in any leader.

25

thatscottishwoman 2,

09/06/2007 16:39:04

#27 Reading Public: Apologies, I just had a re read of my post to you and it comes over as a bit nippy! I am busy with work at the moment so do not have much time for the fora.

I have posted a few links before on the subject of socialism versus anarchism (libertarianism) so apologies in advance to other posters:

http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/libsoc.html
http://www.powertech.no/anarchy/a_e_p_m.html

26

Suck+McCrunchie,

09/06/2007 17:02:33

30. thatscottishwoman 2

You are still a left wing socialist.

27

thatscottishwoman 2,

09/06/2007 17:12:33

#28 Nomad:

The link I posted was just an example of a deliberative democracy project in the US that I put up, for Reading Public, as an aid to providing a little more information on the subject.

I do not have enough time, at the moment, to do your questions justice so bear with me and I will get back to you sometime over the weekend (on another thread if this one is closed).

One point to ponder in the meantime:

The issue is not the lack of information but the authors and their "political" agendas.

Referenda, focus groups etc are useful tools to elicit the views and opinions of the people on proposed policy and practice, but they are not truly participative in that the people are not part of the original authoring or final decision making processes.

28

57Nomad,

california 09/06/2007 20:06:07

#32 TSW

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I don't think I was clear enough about the Initiative process, however. I'll try to explain it better.

In California, not in most states, but here, an Initiative is not the same as a referendum. An Initiative is actual legislation, i.e., a law, that is created solely by independent groups of concerned citizens. If it attains enough signatures, and the threshold is very low, just enough to make it financially possible to do at all, then that measure goes on the ballot. If it passes, it then becomes state law. It is a form of direct democracy. The state government, as such, is bypassed entirely and the executive branch is obliged to enforce it.

29

thatscottishwoman 2,

09/06/2007 20:12:07

#28 Nomad:

My "ideal" would be based on Sherry Arnstien's Ladder of Citizen Participation:

http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citiz...

I have undertaken a little research on the Initiative Process you mentioned. Yes, though not the "ideal" this is a fairly decent attempt to facilitate participation in public policy and practice decision making processes.

30

thatscottishwoman 2,

09/06/2007 20:13:12

Oops! Cross posting:-)

31

wattie>x 1,

09/06/2007 20:35:58

Both professed Christians; the poodle and master are leaving behind them a legacy of infamy and hatred that will live for future generations to come. I sincerely hope they suffer the same grief, pain and trauma the cowards have been diirectly responsible for; for so many perfectly innocent men women and children.
I hope they are tormented for every second they remain breathing, right up until their last gasp of air. Both, I am sure, will be haunted for as long as they breath the air they denied too so many hundreds of thousands of innocent young children.
They will never be allowed to live normal lives, no matter how long they live.

32

Cynictalk,

E Lothian 09/06/2007 22:32:00

35. thatscottishwoman 2

Whore


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.