Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anti-war protest erupts in violence with 25 arrested during Bush visit



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 June 2008
AN ANTI-WAR demonstration held yesterday to coincide with George Bush's farewell tour of London descended into violent clashes between protesters and police.
What began as a peaceful demonstration in Parliament Square yesterday afternoon flared into scuffles as protesters tried to force their way past blockades on to Whitehall.

The road was sealed off by police as the US president met the Prime Ministe
r, Gordon Brown, at Downing Street last night.

Officers lined up behind a metal barrier, striking demonstrators with batons as they surged forward.

Police last night said 25 people had been arrested.

One protester, Suzanna Wylie, 29, was left bleeding from a head injury after being hit by a baton. She had been linking arms with protesters at the front of the crowd, trying to stop demonstrators surging forward.

She said: "I've been on lots of demonstrations before and every one of the Stop the War demonstrations has been peaceful.

"This time because Bush is here, specifically because Bush is here, because of his own security arrangements, they won't let us demonstrate. If they let us demonstrate, there would have been none of this."

Mounted and riot police were brought in to control the crowd. The mood was tense as officers arrested individual protesters. Some demonstrators could be heard hurling abuse at police, while others were simply caught up in clashes.

One 17-year-old girl was held on suspicion of assaulting a police officer. Her friends said she has her A-level exams next week.

There were around 2,000 to 2,500 demonstrators in Parliament Square at the height of the protest, Scotland Yard said.

The president yesterday defended his decision to go to war with Iraq. "When anybody dies in a war, of course it weighs on my conscience," he said.

"On the other hand… getting rid of Saddam Hussein was the right thing to do, and I'm not going to back off one inch," he said. "The world is better off without him, and I'm sorry that innocent civilians died in Iraq, but I want you to remember, hundreds of thousands died when Saddam Hussein was leading that country.

"War is brutal. I wish we didn't have war, but I believe we're now on the way to peace."

The president did, however, strike a note of contrition, expressing regret about his use of "Wild West language" in relation to Osama bin Laden after the 9/11 attacks.

"I said 'dead or alive' right after September 11 – it's an unfortunate statement I made," he said.

Earlier, he and the First Lady, Laura, took afternoon tea with the Queen at Windsor Castle.

Talks between Mr Bush and Mr Brown today are expected to cover the continuing world economic crisis, rising fuel and food prices and attempts to persuade the oil-producing countries to step up production to ease the oil price.

The US leader will also have a meeting with the former prime minister, Tony Blair, in his role as Middle East representative for the Quartet – the UN, the EU, Russian Federation and the US.

Later today Mr Bush will travel to Stormont in Belfast and join Mr Brown for talks with the Northern Ireland First Minister, Peter Robinson, and his deputy, Martin McGuinness.

Rare royal honour – and tea – for the president

GEORGE Bush is the first US president to be welcomed at the royal residence since Ronald Reagan was pictured riding at Windsor with the Queen in June 1982.

The Royal party were joined for tea yesterday by America's ambassador for Britain, Robert Tuttle, and his wife, Maria.

The group enjoyed traditional English afternoon fare of tea, small sandwiches and cakes, and the Queen, who wore a pink floral print dress, later gave the president and his wife a tour of some of the castle's state apartments.

They viewed a private exhibition of pictures, letters and other items relating to visits presidents have made to the UK and tours by the Queen and her father to the US.

The monarch last met Mr Bush during her state visit to the US in March last year. During the tour Mr Bush winked at her after making one of his most famous gaffes.

While delivering a speech on the White House lawn, he fluffed the date of his country's bicentenary and, as the crowd laughed, he turned to the sovereign and winked and then quipped: "She gave me a look that only a mother could give a child."



The full article contains 754 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 June 2008 12:49 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Monarchy
 
1

Silence of the Yams,

16/06/2008 00:44:11
Usual turnout of rentamob of Islamists and similary unwashed old school leftys.
2

Fifi la Bonbon,

16/06/2008 00:54:43
"One 17-year-old girl was held on suspicion of assaulting a police officer. Her friends said she has her A-level exams next week."


She should have thought of that before putting herself at risk of getting lifted, then, shouldn't she?
3

bring them on,

16/06/2008 03:32:23
It's just such a joke. The thought of Bush sitting down to discuss the economy.

Bet that's a short meeting....
4

W Smith,

Middle East 16/06/2008 08:10:40
Cubans are denied one of the most basic human rights - the right to travel.

They are denied the right even to leave Cuba for a holiday and are not legally entitled, under Cuban law, to hold passports.

Many Cubans went to their grave without having the chance to see their sons and daughters who had made a new life for themselves in the USA.

Meanwhile Salmond and Galloway enjoy the freedom of the skies with their British passport in their hands.

The SNP don't have an issue over this as they are too busy demonstrating outside the Amercian Conslutate over the fact that some muslim terrorists are effectively being treated like Cubans.

We can't have that now eh Salmond?

BTW
1) Send the muslim terrorists to the notorious Pelican Bay for a few weeks and they'll be greetin' to get back to Guantanamo Bay.

Pelican Bay prison is in Northern California near the border with Oregon. Its where the latinos and the blacks kick and stab lumps out of each other.

The white american prison governor has to put them in lock down for their own safety.

Some of the most violent disturbances in all of american prisons occur here and some of the footage has been shown of documentaries and eventually youtube.

2) The cost of keeping one muslim terrorist prisoner well fed and comfortable in Guantanamo could feed 50 Cuban families over ten years - EASILY!

The human rights lawyers in the UK don't have a problem with that then, eh?
5

Calum Crubag,

Taigh na Croiche 16/06/2008 08:18:40
Do all unionists support right-wing nutter Bush?

#6 - Smith - you in Saudi Arabia talking about freedoms??!! Ya golddigger. Nae shame man. Now hud yer wheesht.
6

An Beal Bacht,

16/06/2008 08:29:53
I pushed the button and elected him to office and a
He pushed the button and he dropped the bomb
You pushed the button and could watch in on the television
Those motherf**kers didn't last too long

I'm sick of hearing about the have and have not's
Have some personal accountability
The biggest problem with the way that we are doing things is
The more we let you have the less that I'll be keeping for me

Well I use to stand for something
Well I'm on my hands and knees
Turning in my god for this one
and he signs his name with a capital G

Don't give a sh!t about the temperature in Guatemala
Don't really see what all the fuss is about
Ain't gonna worry about no future generations
And I'm sure somebody's gonna figure it out

Don't try to tell me that some power can corrupt a person
You hadn't had enough to know what its like
Your only angry cause you wish you were in my position
Now nod your head cause you know that I'm right..alright!

Well I use to stand for something
But forgot what that could be
Theres a lot of me inside you
Maybe your afraid to see

Well I use to stand for something
Well I'm on my hands and knees
Turning in my god for this one
and he signs his name with a capital G
7

porters at 9,

16/06/2008 08:44:23
hee haw wrong with a bit of war
8

Alan Reid,

NZ 16/06/2008 09:39:56
Bush is a scumbag.
9

brownlie,

16/06/2008 10:51:41
Bush claims "The world is a better place without him".

Actually the world is a much more dangerous place without him.

Britain is in much more danger now than it was from Saddam's weapons of mass destruction which could be unleashed at 45 minutes notice.

Anyone who visted Bagdad before and after the invasion can see that Iraq is a much more dangerous place.

Over 5 million Iraqi refugees know that it is a much more dangerous place.

The families of those killed as a result of the invasion know that it is a much more dangerous place.

On the plus side Halliburton and various other Bush-related companies are better off.

Bush's cronies are better off.

Armament manufacturers are better off.

Tony Blair is better off.
10

bluehead,

edinburgh 16/06/2008 11:02:32
bush is not welcome here,I think the people on this planet have seen enough of him
just to look at bush and blair is enough to make one sick
11

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 16/06/2008 11:40:56
After reading about the usual protest against Bush and his regime it was comforting to see that The Scotsman gave a soothing account of the President and Mrs. Bush having tea at Windsor with The Queen. Nice juxtaposition.

But I still am perplexed by Bush's comment,"...it weighs on my conscience."

The jury is still out on whether he has a "conscience" and his legacy, once he leaves office, will be debated and written about for years by biographers, political "pundits", special-interest parties, et al.

It will make for interesting and alarming reading as the knives have already come out for Bush, his cabinet, the Republicans, his advisors.

Will anybody emerge unscathed from the tempestuous tenure of Bush and his dysfunctional government.
12

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 16/06/2008 11:47:25
This farce is costing the taxpayers £1 million. They could have just wheeled out the Madame Tussauds waxwork of Dubya and saved us all a fortune.
13

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 16/06/2008 12:09:18
"Anti-war protest ends in violence"

Just about says it all doesn't it? The majority of "anti-war" protestors are just teams from "rent-a-hippy" who get off on kicking up a stink about things they don't understand.

We've had them before and will continue to have them---Greenham Common, Faslane etc, etc.

For the record, I didn't agree with us getting involved with Iraq and Afghanistan but now that we are involved, I have the common sense to realise that we need to see the job through to the bitter end and that it is not simply a matter of pulling out and leaving the countries concerned to their own devices---which is exactly what the majority of these bampots think we should do.
14

brownlie,

16/06/2008 12:16:36
15 Alt.

On the contrary, perhaps they are kicking up a stink because they do understand.

Strangely enough, "leaving the countries to their own devices" was the outcome envisaged and promised by the USA and the UK before and after the invasion.
15

Neal! Whit? Haud yer Whisht!!,

16/06/2008 12:46:19
I'm willing to bet that the Police were the first to use violence, they usually are . . .
16

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 16/06/2008 13:16:57
If we are serious about terrorism, then let's start by hunting down those responsible for 9/11.

And that's pretty easy as 9/11 was an inside job.
17

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 16/06/2008 14:05:49
"Strangely enough, "leaving the countries to their own devices" was the outcome envisaged and promised by the USA and the UK before and after the invasion."

That was something I saw right through and knew would never happen. However, it fooled most of the British public at the time and was part of the basis for us getting involved.

Ultimately, the aim IS to leave the countries to their own devices, but this has to be done in a controlled manner. You need to firstly gain an acceptance of the invading forces (us), then you need to re-establish local authorities, then you need to increase the popularity and respect for the local authorities, then you need to reduce the popularity of the invading forces.

At the same time as this, you need to neutralise insurgents such as the Taliban or forces sympathetic to Al Qaeda. It is not a simple task and will likely drag out over many years (and maybe decades). This is what the anti-war hippies do not understand. They think we should just pull out. To do that would be disasterous for the countries concerned, and perhaps even the rest of the world. You can't go in to a country, destroy its infrastructure and eradicate its government and then just leave it.

I didn't agree with us getting involved in the first place. I could see straight through all the lies---and I could remember things in the past that it was assumed everyone had forgotten. However, we have done it now. We need to follow our actions up.
18

Arrow,

Scotland 16/06/2008 14:15:18
~6 i am not really sure what the SNp have to do with this particular tirade from you. the cuban are not allowed to leave? that will be news to the son of a friend of mine who married a cuban girl and they both now live in england and have been back to cuba a few times and her parents visit them in England. her father is not a member of the Cuban government or anything like that but is quite a quiet and reserved man.
i note that you appear to be writing from that hot bed of parliamentary freedom and open government - the Middle East. how is the access to booze and worship? no restrictions on your wife driving or having bare arms? no censorship in magazines from abroad? openly practising christianity? unable to visit a city of your choice (Mecca or the other one? thought not.
19

Biker,

Ayr 16/06/2008 19:46:09
Not sure I agree with the comments decrying the protestors. Good for them for attempting to highlight the situation regarding Bush and Blair (and Brown).
Unfortubnately Alternative the best laid plans and all that, as the US particularly do not wish to see a peacefull withdrawal from the region. The fact that Cheyney and Wolfowitz disbanded the Iraqi army soon after the invasion began undemined any thoughts there were about a peacefull withdrawal. Stretch it out as far as they can and Haliburton and co stock continues to rise.
I think it would be fair to say that the US and UK entered Iraq without a full game plan or withdrawal proceedure worked out.
20

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

16/06/2008 21:02:13
#15 Fairly sensible comments - the truth is that there is a significant minority in the anti-war movement who are solely motivated by their own anti-Americanism or see it as another excuse to resort to toytown revolutionary tactics.
21

brian mcc,

the arctic 17/06/2008 01:35:11
Welcome to the real world. A cowboy with a strange mind and a stranger set of advisors did not pollute Scotland as #5 thanked God.

Did he come close enough for you to see his insanity?
22

Hickory,

US 17/06/2008 19:18:58
Excuse me lefties while I puke from your stench! 'ave ye learned Farsi yet? With ye stinkin' attitued ye will 'ave to soon. That is, those of ye that keep ye heads. Aye, ye will be askin' someone else to protect ye. NOT!!!!!
23

Biker,

Ayr 18/06/2008 16:27:23
Hickory. Wow is your neck red pal.
24

celtic4,

USA 03/07/2008 00:15:30
While I must agree that to most, Bush is just a big joke, he is still (until January) our President.
And #17, do you have information that the entire rest of the US do not have? How could you say that 9/11 was an inside job, unless you had something to do with it???? Not!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.