Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Ban on 'Queen's tartan' sales over breach of copyright law



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 July 2008
THE Queen once showcased it to the world, but a court heard yesterday that the world was being subjected to "cheap and poor-quality" imitations of the Isle of Skye tartan.
Websites and a chain of souvenir shops across Scotland were selling kilts, scarves and other goods using the design on cloth from China, a judge was told.

A raid on a warehouse in Fife had revealed hundreds of metres of the cloth, and it was suspe
cted other evidence had been hurriedly removed during a delay in starting the search.

At the court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday, Lady Dorrian granted an interim interdict to Rosemary Samios, who holds copyright in the Isle of Skye tartan, against Gold Brothers, banning the firm from making, marketing, importing or exporting goods made in the design.

The firm is operated by Surinder, Galab and Dildar Singh, of Edinburgh.

The court heard that Mrs Samios, who has connections with Skye but lives in Australia, acquired rights in the tartan from a weaver, Angus McLeod, in 1992. She had enjoyed "considerable commercial success" granting licences to manufacturers, and the tartan's popularity was boosted when the Queen wore it for the opening of the Scottish Parliament in 1999.

Lawyers for Mrs Samios, who is also claiming £150,000 damages, said she was tipped off that wool scarves in the Isle of Skye design and described as "Skye Isles" tartan were being sold in the Royal Mile, Edinburgh, by Gold Brothers.

The firm, based in Kirkcaldy, Fife, has several shops in Edinburgh, as well as Glasgow, Callander, Pitlochry and St Andrews. It also operates websites, and trades as Heritage of Scotland, John Morrisons, Clans of Scotland and the Scottish Shop.

A licence cost an initial £12,000, with 10 per cent royalties payable.

Inquiries had established that Gold Brothers was also selling "Skye Isles" and "Bright Skye" scarves, rugs, kilts and hats.

It was alleged the firm had imported from China substantial amounts of cloth in the Isle of Tartan design, and Mrs Samios complained of serious damage to the reputation of the genuine tartan by "its application to cheap products of inferior design, quality and materials".

Lady Dorrian was told that a search of the Gold Brothers warehouse in Kirkcaldy had recovered items including four 80m bales of Chinese-made cloth, enough to make around 160 of the "poor-quality" kilts sold by the firm. The bales had been numbered 55, 57, 58 and 59, suggesting the firm had possessed at least another 54 bales, enough to make more than 9,000 kilts.

• Printing any tartan design without a licence is an infringement of copyright law. The register of tartans bill, to be considered by MSPs in September, aims to collate the thousands of registered designs.

Price is right for cut-price gifts, say Gold Brothers

MOST visitors to Edinburgh's Royal Mile are unlikely to miss the "tartan tat" shops scattered along the capital's most famous thoroughfare.

Few will realise they are mainly owned by the one family of Indian businessmen.

To many of the capital's business figures they have ruined the Royal Mile with their cut-price clothes and novelty gifts such as "See You Jimmy" hats and Nessie toys.

Yet they have proudly defended their controversial brand of "kitsch" clothing, insisting that they are merely giving tourists what they want at the right price.

The multi-million pound empire run by brothers Malap, Surinder, Galab and nephew Dildar Singh – who trade under the name Gold Brothers – has humble beginnings.

The brothers' father, Garbuchen, started the business with a single market stall at East Fortune, in East Lothian, in the early 1970s. But the empire now includes at least 20 shops in Edinburgh city centre, as well as three in Fife.

However, they have become the bêtes noires of many other businesses trading on the Royal Mile.

Geoffrey Nicholsby, a kiltmaker who has fitted out the likes of Charlton Heston and Mel Gibson, claimed the shops were guilty of "cultural rape".

Both the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce and the Federation of Small Businesses have urged the city council to intervene over the "tartan tat" shops on the Royal Mile.

The strongest critics include the Scottish Tartan Authority, which claims the Royal Mile looks "like an Eastern bazaar".



The full article contains 724 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 July 2008 10:01 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Monarchy
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 03/07/2008 00:57:17
It's just another bumbee tartan.
2

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 03/07/2008 01:03:25
All tartans are bumbee but they are nice!
3

Guga II,

Rockall 03/07/2008 02:03:22
You foreigners don't know what you're talking about.

4

bring them on,

03/07/2008 02:57:41
How could anyone claim to have the right to a tartan?

5

Gina Gibson,

Wales 03/07/2008 04:26:26
#4 People have the rights to something they have designed.
If you had read the article fully you would have seen THIS paragraph:-

" Printing any tartan design without a licence is an infringement of copyright law. The register of tartans bill, to be considered by MSPs in September, aims to collate the thousands of registered designs."
6

bring them on,

03/07/2008 05:37:00
#5

Gina

Thanks.

I had read the paragraph, but my point (badly put) was that it seems nonsense (to me) that any tartan should be able to be registered.

How do you determine what is an original registerable tartan, and what is not.

7

Hermitage,

Edinburgh 03/07/2008 06:03:06
All tartan, along with the surrounding mythology of clans and "Every name a tartan" etc, etc, is a load of rubbish which was dreamed up by Walter Scott in 1822 ad perpetuated by Queen Victoria and 'Balmorality'.

The result is the tartan-tat tourist shops as owned by the Gold Bros, together with the squawking bagpipers which infest Edinburgh streets.
8

Jim Ellen,

Edinburgh 03/07/2008 08:06:30
Tartans can be registered just like any other unique and original design. You might as well say how can a company logo be copyright. It would be nice to hear people defending our national interests rather than just spouting a lot of negative knocking as usual.

The Gold Brothers have no business scruples and fill their shops with inferior rubbish copies. Anyone buying from them is a mug.
9

donald,

glasgow 03/07/2008 08:43:25
The same hoary old myth about Scott keeps getting repeated. Scott was angry about this at the time, claiming he did not invent tartans. How can you proscribe something that "never existed".
10

spurtacus,

03/07/2008 08:55:30
8# I agree, we certainly must defend our national interests!

Now what about that woman from Oz holding the rights to a tartan? Surely that can't be right!
11

Anglofile,

03/07/2008 09:35:58
Surinder, Galab and Dildar Singh.........what guid Scottish names.
12

Ribbonman,

03/07/2008 11:47:26
What are we all getting upset for? At this very moment we as a nation are "seriously" ruled from England,and reigned over by the queen of England ,so! whats all this fuss about a piece of cloth?
13

We love fitba,

google! 03/07/2008 12:08:57
No, Scott did not invent tartan. What he did do was kickstart the resurgence of Scottish culture, after the destruction of the Highland Clearances. Helped by Queen Vic, Scottish icons were no longer seen as subversive, but instead became fashionable.

The rest is lost to history, sadly. It is very unlikley that each clan had a specific tartan... this was all invented after the revival of Scottish traditions.
14

Sir Minty Moonbeams, Casino Royale,

03/07/2008 12:18:05
Anyone with a ruler and some coloured pencils and a blind fold could design a new tartan.

The basic design of tartan already exists. They are all just a variation on the same idea. This is taking intellectual property rights to extremes.
15

WKKB,

03/07/2008 12:38:55
i think the more important story here is the tartan tat shops spilling over on the royal mile and surrounding areas.

It is beginning to look like bargain shop row except for the very few reputable shops where you can pick up a Scottish made gift for the folks back home. Whenever I take my foreign guests to the mile I avoide the cheap foreign run shops. When in Scotland... Buy Scottish!

We've all seen the influx of foreign shop owners taking over and the tat that comes from most those shops disgust me but hey.... it's more money for our government to throw away,isn't it.

16

Pazuzu,

03/07/2008 12:46:50
The Queen has no right for her own tartan, as she has no right to Rule Scotland.

Cheap tartan does not help the Scottish Industry either.

GGTTH.
17

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 03/07/2008 13:36:11
16 Pazuzu

Your comment is without merit and verges on the insane.

The "Queen's Tartan" is the royal Stuart tartan and only HM and members of the royal family are legally entitled to wear it.

Pazuzu, go back to the ignorant cave from which your crawled, you gormless numptie.
18

Humble,

Edinburgh 03/07/2008 15:24:54
Firstly the bagpipe players are banned however the Gold Brothers are aloud to blast out music from their stores?

Secondly has anyone noticed that they are trying to push out an orginal scottish shop on Princes Steet? The tradition shop owns the building by Marks n Sparks however are currently in a temporary shop and the Gold brothers have set up 2 shops either side and every evening blast out terrible music which is the last thing you want to hear after work and makes princes street look horrid.

The Gold Brothers need to go!!!
19

ThistleCEO,

Edinburgh 03/07/2008 15:56:30
Intellectual Property in Scotland (be it whisky, tartan, Fair Isle or Harris Tweed, or tablet) needs to be defended as rigorously as EU countries do with their sparkling wines, cheeses, hams and the world does around computer software, pharmaceuticals, music and video, and athletic gear. This is hard and serious money we're talking about here as well as the decimation of cultural identity and heritage by marketing to the lowest common denominator. I truly believe that if 'tat' were banned then visitors to Scotland would still buy, but better quality and authentically MADE IN SCOTLAND. Individuals and companies spend a great deal of time and money developing products, branding them and subsequently marketing them to the world. The exploitation of Scotland's IP results in not only in a loss of millions of GBPs annually (all monies that every Scotsman or woman is entitled to in order to develop a dynamic and self sustaining economy resulting in independence). So instead of questioning why it's important, rather ask yourselves why 4.5 million who live here aren't being more vocal about getting the Scottish Parliament to protect what is rightly Scotland's and filling yours or your neighbours bank accounts with revenue which belongs to those whose hands still create some of the most extraordinary products in the world - they just can't be found easily amongst the horrible and pervasive which litter our High Streets.

20

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 03/07/2008 16:14:49
All I can say is that I bought a couple things in the Gold Bros. shop at the top of the Royal Mile and am glad that I didn't buy more as the quality was not good. By the end of one season, the scarves, etc. looked like old ratty stuff from my attic. WOuld love to see a shop with better made wares in that spot.
21

Ribbonman,

03/07/2008 16:22:25
#16 Pazuzu. Well said. It is time that we stopped behaving like Scottish peasants and stopped doffing our caps to our English queen.
22

AJ Fife,

03/07/2008 16:27:31
Might have known the Queen was up to her neck in it! Has this woman no shame??
23

Ribbonman,

03/07/2008 16:57:39
#22 AJ. The answer to your question is NO!
24

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 03/07/2008 18:29:59
#3, 5, 8, 19. I'm with you all the way! Most of the rest we can write off as nonsense. The Queen's personal tartan is the Balmoral tartan, designed by Prince Albert in the 19th century and based on a light grey sett. It may not be reproduced or copied.

The notion that tartan is a modern invention is pure havers, and the fact that this legend is still being repeated shows how far the deliberate cultivation of the Scottish cringe has gone. The reality is that the Roman writers more than 2,000 years ago have left us detailed descriptions of the tartan clothing worn by their Celtic adversaries. There are even pictures of tartan garments on ceramics dating from the first century BC, unfortunately not in colour. These written descriptions indicate that certain patterns were indeed worn by families, although district patterns were also the rule up to about 300 years ago, presumably on account of the local availability of certain herbs and other dyestuffs.

Scotland is the only one of the Celtic countries where this tradition has been maintained over thousands of years. It is one of the many national characteristics that establish our national identity in the world, and it is not something that any responsible Scottish government can allow to die or become endangered.

These activities by Messrs Surinder, Galab and Dildar Singh must be firmly slapped down. Since their Scottish roots are presumably very shallow they perhaps do not realise how offensively they are acting in their adopted country. In any event I hope that the Scottish government and parliament will soon have the matter firmly under control.

25

indune1,

Canada 03/07/2008 21:48:15

Research the Sobieski twins who claimed to be the illegitimate sons of Bonnie Charlie.

At a time of latent guilt within Victorian society about the Highland Clearances, these two characters basically invented a number of tartans and then pulished a book which was given support within Royal circles. A number of these tartans still exist.

What mattered more to a Highlander than a tartan was what he wore in his bonnet and the war-cry of his clan.

I am always amused by the phrase "tartan twilight". Given this story and lucrative tartan industry, I would suggest the phrase should be: "tartan glare"!!!tara
26

The Canadian,

03/07/2008 22:03:10
24
How come that this Dr. of Medicine is unable to use the word Gaelic instead of Celtic which is a family of languages and not just one language. It is like calling the English language Ayrian rather than English.

As regards to the Tartan it was worn in many areas of the Highlands long before the 1600's and in Gaelic is called Am Breacan just as the little Kilt is called Am Feile.
So many Scots seem to have little or no deep knowledge of their own language and culture; why is there so much ignorance around?
27

Ribbonman,

03/07/2008 22:36:48
Phoblacht na Alba go brugh. Alba Abu!
28

bring them on,

03/07/2008 22:45:59
Some of the posters to this thread are like little children,

"It's my tartan so you can't make one". Ludicrous.

Tartan belongs to the people, not an individual person or company.

Free the tartan!

29

john z,

edinburgh 03/07/2008 23:56:32
If you are going to get a kilt go to a real kiltmaker. The El cheapo Tartan tat shops do a great harm to Scotland.

I have seen people wearing kilts from these places, and they look dreadful. It is a terrible shame, as they then wear this garbage, and make Kilts (and themselves) look silly.

A lot goes in to the making of a real kilt, a well made one is really quite special - it is not just a tartan skirt, which is what the tartan tat shops sell.

Warning to tourists, choose where you buy a kilt very carefully, otherwise you'll end up looking very, very silly. It is a real craft, and involves a lot of work. If someone is selling 'off the peg' kilts to you really cheaply, then they really are just tartany skirts. There really is a big difference.

As regards copyright, there is nothing stopping someone creating their own tartan, which can then be copyrighted. These guys knew what they were doing and got caught. Give them a slap.
30

john z,

edinburgh 04/07/2008 00:02:49
Number 13, and similar,

You are seriously incorrect on your assertions regarding tartan and Scottish history. What you say betrays a lack of knowledge of Scottish History.

This kind of 'anti- culture' nonsense originated in England, and you do yourself a big dis -service by proudly spouting it, with no knowledg whatsoever. Sadly many younger Scots believe this 'anti - culture' nonsense, due to a failure of our education system to teach the history of Scotland.

The other one you hear often is, Oh, Gaelic, it was only ever a highland language. Piffle. It was spoken all over Scotland, and is not a dead language, rather part of Scottish culture. It is just so sad, that unlike Wales and Ireland, a lot of Scots swallow bile about our own language.
31

donald,

glasgow 04/07/2008 09:34:32
Tartans were woven by district weavers, who used local dyes and setts, which were in effect clan tartans and lost after 30 odd years of Proscription and racist ridicule. Wilson's of Bannockburn merely tried to record some of them, as most were lost in the proscriptions acts.

Wilsons of Bannockburn is now another neglected Scottish building and there is no chance of the anti Scottish National Trust taking it over. Such things would not be neglected by the English National Trust (No, not their colony in Scotland)or Irish tourist board, or academe.
32

MoiraMac,

Royal Mile Street Market 06/07/2008 17:27:45
http://www.richardmurphyarchitects.com/projects/100/

This building won a Saltire Award in 2000 - I think it was for good design. You ought to see it now - it's called 'The Best Fae Scotland'
If you decide to visit please read the following:
Health Warning: beware of kilted mannequins falling from above, runaway postcards and face slapping flags!!!!

33

CurlySue,

12/07/2008 14:48:27
Surely the Gold Brothers kilts whatever tartan they are just 'fancy dress' for Halloween or Fancy Dress Parties. These kilts are not SEXY!!!! Every time I see a man in these taki kilts I think he should be wearing a twinset and pearls.
They always give me a good laugh - thanks for that boys!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.