Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Main line rail chaos will last all year



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 March 2008
THE scale of disruption to rail passengers travelling between Scotland and England is set to reach unprecedented levels, with engineering work now planned on the west coast main line on almost every weekend for the rest of the year, The Scotsman can reveal.

Network Rail wants to shut sections of the line for far longer than previously publicised, as part of a huge project to enable faster and more frequent trains to run from December.

But Virgin Trains, which runs services between Glasgow and London, predicted the misery for passengers would last even longer – until May next year.

Passenger watchdogs said last night they were "concerned" at the extent of the work still to be done, but added that they just wanted the job completed.

Network Rail previously said closures would be required over an extra 13 weekends this year – or one in four. However, it has now admitted this will be in addition to an extensive programme of disruptive work that has not been widely publicised.

The scale of the work means that, for much of the rest of this year, there will be virtually no weekends when passengers using the 400-mile line will not have to change their travel plans.

Network Rail has increased the amount of time it needs to complete the £8.6 billion upgrade, which started nearly a decade ago, following a major work overrun at New Year.

It has redrawn its plans, which are out to consultation, after the Office of Rail Regulation fined it a record £14 million for a four-day work overrun at Rugby, in the Midlands, in January.

So, from May until December, sections of the line will be closed over most weekends. In addition, a stretch near Rugby will be shut every Saturday between May and the August bank holiday, adding up to two hours to journeys.

Network Rail has also asked for a series of "firewall" weekends to be earmarked, in case it needs extra time to do work.

It said these would be cancelled in advance if they were not needed, but admitted that train companies would have to plan on the basis that services would be disrupted on those days.

News of the extra work came as Network Rail reassured passengers that work on the line over the Easter weekend would finish on time. No trains will run on the southern section of the line, between London and Birmingham, until Tuesday.

Virgin has advised its passengers to switch to the east coast main line instead.

Iain Coucher, the chief executive of Network Rail, said: "I can guarantee that we will do absolutely everything that we need to minimise the chance of any kind of overrun.

"We have learnt our lesson. We are very confident that we can do all the work we have to do over these four days."

Robert Samson, the Scotland manager of Passenger Focus, the official watchdog, said: "We are concerned about the amount of work that still has to be carried out, but our main concern is that the new, faster timetable is in place in December.

"Passengers have experienced years of delay on the west coast main line through engineering work, and we look forward to when they can enjoy massively improved services."

Alison McInnes, the Liberal Democrats' Scottish transport spokeswoman, said the disruption would do little to tempt commuters away from the roads.

She said: "It's very difficult to persuade the public to switch from their cars to trains if they cannot be guaranteed reliable and trouble-free journeys. The Scottish Parliament's transport committee needs to call in Network Rail to explain this situation as a matter of urgency."

After the upgrade is completed, Glasgow-London trains will increase to almost hourly in each direction, with journeys for the fastest services cut to four hours ten minutes – one hour faster than five years ago.

Virgin Trains said it remained to be convinced by Network Rail's latest plans for the rest of the year, and that there might be a case for extending the work to May next year.

"What passengers want is some degree of certainty, which we are currently unable to give them," a spokesman said.

"It is possible that extending this year's work into next year may be less painful for passengers, but we have not been given full details of the options.

"The situation in January opened a can of worms. After the New Year fiasco, Network Rail has gone back to the nuts and bolts to look at the work again."

Virgin agreed that once the project was completed future work should be less disruptive to passengers. This was because the upgrading work has included extra tracks, so trains can be switched to them when lines have to be closed again.

Mr Coucher said: "There is a massive prize to be had for passengers and freight users by finishing the £8.6 billion west coast improvements this year. There will be a huge increase in services, some 30 per cent, and Scotland will see significantly faster journey times.

"To deliver these benefits and finish the project, we need to add a further 10 per cent of time to the engineering work we had already planned and agreed. This additional time adds 13 extra weekends of work and extends some existing booked work.

"During this work, passengers will still be able to get to Scotland directly by train – it is completely wrong to suggest there is going to be massive additional disruption."

He said Network Rail wanted passenger feedback before taking a final decision for approval by the rail regulator.


The full article contains 942 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 March 2008 9:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: ScotRail , The railways
 
1

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 22/03/2008 01:01:37
This is news? The fact that Network Rail are trying to bring the railway up to date seems to be surprising a lot of people.
The work that is and has been done at Crew should have been done 40 years ago, just as the work elsewhere on the network, which the incompetent management over the same period could have and should have done.
Look at Waverley, the work being done on the track now is merely rectifying the neglect of the management in running what should have been a successful operation but the lack of fore-site never mind the investment was totally lacking.
The West Coast main line accident should never have happened; the crossing points were facing points and should have been removed before the track was cleared to run at 125 mph.
The accident happened, what was the result? the crossing was removed entirely, it was not required, management collected their bonuses as usual.
2

Navvy,

22/03/2008 02:27:11
We should do what no government has had the b*lls to do namely build a dedicated track high speed railway. Britain's railways are the oldest in the world and it shows. The WCML is fortunate that the companies which built straight up and over Shap and Beattock had faith that more powerful locomotives would come - they did but no 20th or 21st Century government has the bottle that the Victorian's had.

Quintinshill rail crash - 22 May 1915; 227 killed, 246 injured Mostly Royal Scots on their way to the Western Front. The worst in British railway history
3

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 22/03/2008 06:32:11
The railways are the the past and the future of land travel. I look forward to motorways being converted to high speed tracks. We can already get from Edinburgh to our but'n ben in a French village in 18 hours by train. That will be reduced still more when high speed tracks come on line.
4

terry osser,

morden 22/03/2008 07:01:23
can do it in 2 hours by plane and cheaper. the massive cost inflation is due to elf and safety and notworks rail spending other peoples money. have not been on a train for years
5

Slippylizard,

Sunny Rock 22/03/2008 07:45:35
Need to build a high speed link. Straight down to London. We are just about the only country in Europe without this. Why does this not shock me I wonder?
6

Buckfastleigh,

waiting on Newton St Cyres station for the Glasgo 22/03/2008 09:41:53
When aircraft begin to feel like metamorphosed trains inside and the train fare from Exeter to Glasgow is reduced to less than 200 bank of england notes, it will be time for folk to consider the options.

Seven Hours of crowded train hassle or six hours of airport surprises and the associated tedium? Start taking the Diligence or the coastal packet?

I just wonder how long the Rail Industry will take to provide service equivalent to those of France and other more civilized parts of Europe in England?

Well this is not a problem as London is blissfully unaware that other parts of the Realm are so badly served by train.

Out of sight out of mind eh Westminster?
7

Biker,

Ayr 22/03/2008 09:49:18
Its is indeed time for massive investments in rail travel. Along with taking cars off the roads it also has the added benefit off reducing road freight. Perhaps if previous and indeed present governments looked at this aspect we could see the light at the end of the tunnel.(Metaphoricaly speaking)
8

Neil,

Glasgow 22/03/2008 11:11:21
My sister 7 her family came up from London by rail yesterday. The had to stand the whole way. Had the ticket seller said that the train was booked solid they would have come by car which would have lost the train a small amount of money immediaitely but made it likely they get the custom in future.

The argument for subsidy of rail is that it is necessary to keep the track in use when it is quiet & that the running costs are similar even when it is almost empty. However if they cannot work profitable even when so consistently overloaded the system seems beyond help.
9

Gwnefyr,

Kyoto Yet Sakura is Here! 22/03/2008 12:34:08
Slippylizard,
Why? Would you please explain?
Each time I want to travel from Dundee to Wales,it is such a long journey-12 hours!- by railway.Looking at Britain,it confuses me,why is the railway map looks so grifted?
Oh,wOw Japan Railways! They zoom through the stretched country!
It would have been such a dream to come true if motorways were converted to railways and change motors to solar motors! Farewell liferipping armies!
10

Gwnefyr,

Kyoto 22/03/2008 12:36:40
And all the politicians to volunteer for railway convertion projects!Sing and work!
11

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 22/03/2008 12:38:07
#4 Terry Osser

You cannot fly from N. Britain to S. France, door-to-door, in two hours. And is it cheaper? Hassel for hassel?Luggage for luggage? Damage to the environment?
12

Tris,

dundee 22/03/2008 13:07:26
"Main line rail chaos will last all year"


Ha Ha... in the UK, you can bet it will last the rest of our lives.......
13

Paul S.,

Mauricetown, NJ, USA 22/03/2008 13:38:41
At least someone's concerned about maintaining the rails in the UK.

Here in the USA the national rails budget is cut and cut and the national Amtrak passenger trains are forced to ride on tracks leased from freight lines that 1) don't send them through on time, and 2) don't keep the tracks up to passenger speed levels. I can remember well trundling through Iowa at about 45 mph because the freight company who owns the trackage hadn't kept the right of way up to even 80 mph repair. And these trains can go over 100 mph when given good tracks repair.

If only dedicated tracks could be found for Amtrak throughout the nation. In the northeast from Boston down to Washington, D. C., they own the right of way and on-time rates are around 95%. Speeds reach 135 mph and only idiots fly from Boston to New York or New York to Washington (now under three hours by train; drive time over four). There is no reason except the habit of using petroleum fuel that there is not regular high-speed service between New York and Chicago — about 930 mi. — at speeds over 200 mph. One very effecacious right of way still exists, though it is abandoned and used as hiking trails or for freight.

At capacity (and I recently wrote an article for the nespaper for which I write, using this info) Amtrak trains have a fuel effecience of about 400 passenger miles per gallon. Nothing can top that.
14

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 22/03/2008 14:44:38
You can't make an omelette without first cracking a few eggs. Yes the disruption is painful, but the end result will benefit all those who use the route. Things don't just improve by magic and most right minded people can see the bigger picture. Rather than whinging and trying political point scoring we should be thankful.
15

brux,

Saint Paul, MN 22/03/2008 14:46:32
When the train owners own the track, they will maintain it efficiently, because otherwise they make no money. NetworkRail loses little if any money from travelers' inconvenience, as long as the goods trains get through. Paul S.'s description of the U.S. situation is accurate and a cautionary tale of the dangers of splitting up industries in order, supposedly, to maximise profit potential.
16

Buckfastleigh,

waiting for a train somewhere in Cornwall 22/03/2008 15:55:13
The tain operating companies have a franchise from the state to operate across a certain number of routes;

naturally they hire the rolling stock and locos from the Banks for a modest 6% (they do own some ropy rolling stock though which they still charge 6% on but these are exclusively reserved for the yocals of the SW);

the State owns the track and infrastructure which needs updating.

So you have a formula which suits everyone and is guaranteed to provide overcrowded late and expensive trains. Enjoy!
17

High Speed Now!,

22/03/2008 18:02:14
This story just emphasises yet again that we need a completely new high-speed network in the UK. If it can be done in France, Spain or Germany , why not in Britain? If Madrid to Barcelona or Malaga is less than 3 hours then London to Edinburgh/Glasgow should be too. To try and justify chaos with the end result of more than 4 hours just confirms the complete lack of organisation and leadership in the UK transport industry.
18

Buckfastleigh,

platform 2 26/03/2008 07:44:57
Oh; I am pleased to say my train has just arrived...
19

,

28/03/2008 16:49:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

28/03/2008 16:51:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

28/03/2008 16:53:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

,

28/03/2008 16:55:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

,

28/03/2008 16:58:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

,

28/03/2008 17:01:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

28/03/2008 17:01:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

,

28/03/2008 17:02:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

,

28/03/2008 17:05:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

28/03/2008 17:12:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

,

28/03/2008 17:12:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

,

28/03/2008 17:12:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

,

28/03/2008 17:22:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

,

28/03/2008 17:25:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

,

28/03/2008 17:26:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
34

,

28/03/2008 17:26:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

,

28/03/2008 17:30:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.