Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Regulator fines Network Rail £14 million following Christmas chaos



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

NETWORK Rail was today fined a record £14 million following serious engineering work overruns over the New Year.
The fine was imposed by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) which had been investigating the overruns, the most serious of which was on the West Coast Main Line.

The ORR decision comes on the day that NR chairman Sir Ian McAllister, who stayed at
home during the overrun crisis saying he would only get in the way if he went into work, is officially knighted at Buckingham Palace.

The ORR said the fine was "to reflect the serious nature of this breach, the impact it had already had on passengers and rail freight users and the need for the company to take urgent action to improve its approach".

The ORR also ordered NR to "remedy systematic weaknesses in its planning and management of engineering projects and in its communication with train operators about progress with such projects".

In addition, ORR also ordered NR to provide a clear plan of how it intends to complete the upgrade of the West Coast Main Line, currently due to be completed by December.

NR has already announced that the West Coast Main Line (WCML) will face further closures over Easter as engineering work continues.

According to the BBC, the line will also have to close at some weekends away from bank holidays during the summer as the work is running late.

The WCML work which overran at the New Year was at Rugby in the West Midlands. The work had to go on for four extra days with thousands of passengers having to take coaches between Northampton and Birmingham as the line was shut.

The other overruns which hit passengers over the festive period were at London's Liverpool Street station and at Shields Junction near Glasgow.

ORR chief executive Bill Emery said: "What happened over the New Year was totally unacceptable for passengers and freight customers, and to train operating companies. The weakness in NR's management of these projects had a serious impact on all of them and on the reputation of the railway.

"It is quite clear from our thorough investigation that NR is failing to manage major engineering work as consistently well as it should. This is due particularly to weaknesses in the company's planning, risk assessment and site management of projects as well as to failures of communication within the company and with train operators. We have published a draft Order directing them to address these failings and thus reduce the risk of similar events in the future."

He went on: "It is right that we should also impose a fine to mark the seriousness of this breach of NR's licence and to send a clear message to the company's board and senior management that it needs to address the weaknesses we have identified as a matter of urgency.

"Given the scale of the investment programme on the rail network, improved project planning and management will bring real benefits to NR's customers in terms of improved capacity, performance and value for money.

"In addition, the company has accepted that it does not currently have a robust plan, agreed with operators, to deliver the upgrade work to the WCML needed for the December 2008 service improvements. We have therefore ordered it to produce quickly a plan on how it will do this."




The full article contains 568 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 February 2008 8:36 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The railways
 
1

Alan B,

28/02/2008 09:35:56
The sooner that transport can be fully devolved the scottish parliament the better. It is a crazy situation where the sp can fund rail projects but cannot control its structure. Madness.
2

sceptic,

28/02/2008 09:45:21
Network Rail, the not for profit quango, took over from the discredited Railtrack only to spend 3 times as much public money and prove to be just as accident prone.
Now we have the ludicrous situation of the public purse paying fines to the public purse. I rarely agree with a union spokesman but he made that point very clearly on this morning's TV news.
3

Upbeat,

28/02/2008 11:45:59
The only way that this fine will have any consequnce is if the budget from which it is drawn is that which might otherwise have been set aside for bonuses for senior executives.

If the money comes from anywhere else, it is a case of one government department raiding the coffers of another. The penalty will only fall on those who depend on Rail for transportation.

What is this about closing the railway every holiday weekend anyway. Don't they want people to travel by public transport ?
4

CRAGman,

Edinburgh 28/02/2008 12:39:33
£14m would be far better used re-opening the Edinburgh South Suburban Railway to local passenger services. In fact, with the £8m raised by E-Rail towards this project, you would more or less have the total sum required. So, I say: don't fine Network Rail - tell them to use the £14m to do some good.

www.reopenthesouthsub.org.uk
5

Caliwag,

york 28/02/2008 21:08:20
What ever happened to the good old days when the engineers ran the show, not the bean counters...on Today programme...blah blah blah robust plan blah blah efficiencies blah blah blah addressing the weaknesses blah blah blah improving the delivery record...jeezo!
pathetic, cancel the bonuses, blah blah

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.