Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Union highlights 'scandal' of rail parking costs at up to £7 an hour

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 May 2009
SCOTTISH passengers are being "ripped off" over the price of parking at stations, facing charges of up to £35 for five hours.
The Transport Salaried Staffs Association said rail users are paying more than £1 billion a year at station car parks, describing it as a "scandal".

A union survey of more than 1,000 station car parks in England and Scotland showed charges includ
ing £35 for five hours at Glasgow Central, while in England, passengers were paying £55 for four hours in Birmingham and Manchester, £135 for eight hours' parking at the same stations, £1,404 for an annual car park ticket at York station and £1,790 for an annual car park ticket in Guildford, Surrey.

More than £1 million a year is being made from the car park at Birmingham International, which is being trebled in size.

The TSSA said Network Rail, which controls the country's 18 largest stations and charges the most, is making more than £15 million a year from passengers.

Releasing the survey at the union's annual conference in Torquay yesterday, general secretary Gerry Doherty said: "This is a real scandal and we are today calling on Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon to do something about it.

"Passengers, like visitors to hospitals, are being ripped off simply because they are a captive audience. They are already paying the most expensive fares in Europe and now we find they are paying the highest car parking charges as well."

The union leader called on the government to curb car parking charges by including them in the fares formula, which prevents rail companies from increasing regulated fares by more than 1 per cent above inflation every year.

Customers at Glasgow Central car park said yesterday that the charges were high but had positive points.

Barry Livingstone, a delivery driver, said: "It is very expensive if you stay here for longer than 20 minutes, but it's perfect for me because it means I can almost always get a parking place in the centre of the town, and make my delivery for minimum cost."

William Wilson agreed: "At £35 upwards you would never spend a whole day here. "

A Network Rail spokesman said: "They are absolutely misrepresenting what we charge for short-stay car parks."

The spokesman added that Network Rail do not have control of the pricing of the vast majority of station car parks.

"The dozen or so we do have responsibility for are at the heart of major cities where public transport alternatives are in abundance.

All that money is invested in the railway and we've got every right to tap into revenue streams. We make no apologies for that."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 May 2009 9:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The railways
 
1

FamilyMan,

Edinburgh 19/05/2009 08:30:20
What's their beef? That use of car is made more expensive relative to train? Or that they like to park their own cars there, but don't want to pay? Surely this is a purely commercial decision and the Union's comments (as reported) shows up their economic illiteracy. Are there no bigger scandals in the rail world? What about the scandalous bias towards car journey pricing which currently fails to cover the total costs of road service provision (delays, safety, pollution)? When was the motorway network last closed down completely in the wake of a serious accident?
2

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 19/05/2009 10:42:13
#1:

You are completely off target there.

The government supposedly wish people to take the train rather than drive their cars. So why the hell are they allowing companies to rip people off for parking at the station then? Parking at the station should be free (or at best a nominal fee---say £1 - £2 per day) for bona fide train passengers. If you are not travelling by train then fair enough, the £7 per hour charge should apply.

How the hell are you supposed to take the train if you cannot park your car at the station without being ripped off? If I had to pay £7 per hour to park my car at the station every weekday, it would amount to nearly £60 per day. Even in my car, that would take me on a round trip of about 260 miles. What would be the point of me taking the train if it was far cheaper to drive instead?

You are misguided if you think that car drivers do not pay enough to cover the costs of roads maintenance. If you try buying and running a car, it will be come immediately apparent that this is not the case at all.
3

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 19/05/2009 10:45:46
"It is very expensive if you stay here for longer than 20 minutes, but it's perfect for me because it means I can almost always get a parking place in the centre of the town, and make my delivery for minimum cost."

Hang on a minute... This is supposed to be a STATION car park, not a loading yard. These people are exactly the kind who should be penalised for abusing the facilities---along with the "just popping into the shops" brigade.
4

FamilyMan,

Edinburgh 19/05/2009 17:06:23
#2 You will find that it is you who is off target and misguided, to wit:

> How the hell are you supposed to take the train if you cannot park your car at the station

You could walk to the the station or use public transport. If you live so far from the station that you need a car to get there and need to commute daily, you probably live in the wrong place or need to find a different kind of work. Nobody is going to build you a bridge to get to work if you fancy living on a remote island, so get real. Of course there is a case for intermodal travel (which would include cars, although low on the priority list), but this is where the commercial decision comes in I alluded to above. You yourself make the point under #3 that it is difficult to police abuse and that high parking charges may be the best way to achieve this.

> You are misguided if you think that car drivers do not pay enough to cover the costs of roads maintenance.

Oh dear. Assuming that you have bought a car and pay for running it, when did you last pay proportionately (or at all) as a car driver for pollution, delays (to others), or road emergency services and their huge infrastructure, let alone the long-term costs of fatal and serious accidents? You haven't?! Like most car drivers, you have - quite rationally - discovered that it is cheaper to share these costs with the general tax payer. If you don't believe me, check out the relevant studies, many of them commissioned by the department of transport and promptly buried.

Happy reading and may you enjoy many intermodal journeys in future.
5

Andrew,

19/05/2009 20:35:07
Parking at ANY major city centre station is just 'not on' as space is at an absolute premium! Moreover, Edinburgh Waverley is especially DANGEROUS due to the coming and going of traffic, particularly taxis (and from time to time HUGE and awkward replacement BUSES which TOTALLY block the concourse outside the main ticket hall) ALL AT PLATFORM LEVEL which further impedes the SAFE flow of passengers who rightly do NOT AND SHOULD NOT expect to meet vehicular traffic in a RAILWAY station. SO, BAN ALL TRAFFIC FROM OUR MAJOR CITY CENTRE STATIONS - almost all of which are otherwise served by frequent local rail, bus or tram services! Do we see vehicular traffic INSIDE air terminals etc? NO! NO! and thrice NO!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.