Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Historic names escape axe in shake-up of constituencies

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 May 2009
HISTORIC names of Scottish constituencies will not disappear in the latest boundary review after the Boundary Commission bowed to pressure.
The commission has today published its final consultation document on constituency boundaries for Holyrood.

While there will still be major changes to their shapes, many of the traditional names such as Edinburgh Pentlands, Glasgow Pollok and Gla
sgow Cathcart will remain.

Previously, the commission had wanted to replace them with "compass" names such as South Glasgow and East Edinburgh.

In Glasgow, and in many other places, names have been chosen in an attempt to differentiate them from similarly named Westminster constituencies that cover similar areas but with different boundaries.

The review, however, has been met with a mixed political reaction as the boundaries change the Scottish political landscape.

Privately, the Conservatives are believed to be the happiest with boundary changes in the north-east, including a new Angus North and Mearns constituency, and alterations in Ayr and Edinburgh which may help them in terms of winning constituency rather than list seats.

Labour are still strongly contesting the division of Dumfries into two different seats and other changes, including the loss of a seat in Glasgow, could be detrimental to their prospects.

The Liberal Democrats have privately admitted that the new configuration is mixed for them, although it strengthens their hold on constituencies in the north-east and Edinburgh.

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Tavish Scott said: "I'm pleased that the interim report reflects some of the representations made by Liberal Democrats."

The SNP claimed to be happy overall but said there were some areas the party intends to contest.

An SNP spokeswoman added: "In particular we are pleased to see that constituency names have been retained."

Radical changes on what was originally proposed will occur in Aberdeen. The earlier recommendation was for an east-west split but the commission is now proposing an Aberdeen Central and Aberdeen Donside split.

Dundee's two Holyrood seats are to become Dundee City East and Dundee City West, while planned changes in the central belt have also been revised.

The commission had last year proposed a North Renfrewshire and Clydebank constituency, straddling the Clyde between Renfrewshire and Dunbartonshire, but this has been dropped in favour of rejigging other boundaries.

Population shifts were also to have given West Lothian two-and-a-bit constituencies, through the creation of a seat called Lanark, Shotts and Whitburn.

But for the final recommendations there will be just two constituencies, Almond Valley and Linlithgow, even though these will have big electorates – 60,080 and 62,810 respectively.

New maps and overlaps leave many voters confused

THE changes and overlaps between Westminster and Holyrood constituencies have continued to cause confusion among some voters, in terms of realising who represents them.

If you live in the Leith Links area in Edinburgh you would be in the Edinburgh North and Leith Holyrood constituency, but in the Edinburgh East Westminster constituency.

Previously, residents there had been in the Edinburgh North and Leith Westminster constituency as well.

Under the new proposals, their Holyrood constituency is changing its name again to Edinburgh Trinity and Leith.

Meanwhile, residents in Maryhill in Glasgow will also have to get used to some different names. They have been in the Glasgow Baillieston Holyrood seat represented by Margaret Curran, who fought and lost the Glasgow East by-election for Westminster last summer for Labour.

Glasgow East is the Westminster seat for Maryhill.

However, Glasgow is losing a constituency and going down from nine to eight.

This means that Glasgow Baillieston is disappearing and voters will, if these proposals are accepted, end up in a new, larger Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn seat.

In Aberdeen, it is more straightforward. Residents north of the River Don would have once been in Aberdeen North for both Westminster and Holyrood. There was a proposal to put them in new Holyrood seats of Aberdeen East or West, but this has been scrapped for a new Aberdeen Donside seat.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 May 2009 11:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Scottish Parliament
 
1

Don Roberto,

21/05/2009 08:23:28
Pause and think a while of poor Dr Elaine Murray Labour MSP who has lost the strongholds of Lincluden and Lochside to West Dumfries, this really could be her last term, will her hubby Councillor Jeff Leaver survive the cut too?
2

Kenny A,

21/05/2009 13:56:09
What is the purpose in these changes, just confuses people, will the Western Isles remain just that, change back to the Outer Hebridies, mutate into a place south of the Pharos or just land up lumped with Greenland. The lads in the Shetlands will be even more confused, as probably their MSP will live in Bergen and their MP the North pole to claim second Igloo expenses.
3

Canny Mann,

The Kingdom 21/05/2009 18:22:43
Names and boundaries of constituencies are only of interest to an MP.
In an indipendant Scotland, we wouldnt need these boundaries at all.
These names and boundaries were only brought about by the common man being given the right to vote for a UK parliament. It once was only the landed, gentry and aristocracy who had the right to vote.
Scotland doesnt need lots and lots of MPs, she needs good MPs. Morally, ethicaly, honourable and up standing but most of all, answerable to the people. Scots could have the power to oust a sitting MP for ANY wrong doing(a vote of no confidence throwing up a bye election). A government should be frightened of the people, not the people frightened of the government.
In the UK government we currently have approximately 650 MPs and a UK population of 61 millions, giving a ratio of approx. 1 MP per 100,000 of the population.
Using these figures, it easy to recognise that scotland is over populated when it comes to MPs.
Scotland has by government figures a little over 5.1 million people living here.
Running costs could be significantly reduced, should scotland use these figures/ratios in an indipendant Scotland. Even a baby boom and immegration isnt going to require a scottish parliament to need more than 50 to 55 MPs for some years to come.
A Scots Parliament wouldn't need these constituency names in the new and modern scotland of tomorrow.
Independance would give Hollyrood a blank canvas to redraw and rename the constituencies more in keeping with a modern nation.

Vote SNP and give scotland the change it cries out for.

Alba gu brath...




4

Canny Mann,

The Kingdom 21/05/2009 18:26:01
immigration^
5

GOODBYE LONDON LABOUR,

Aberdeen 21/05/2009 21:19:48
Boundary changes or not, there is no hiding place for London Labour. You have betrayed Scotland and you will pay the price. Prepare for wipeout, say goodbye to the seats you have ill-served for years and take your vile unionist ideas back to the wilderness.

VOTE SNP! VOTE FOR INDEPENDENCE!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Is the parliament building at Holyrood still worth all the fuss?
No, people have got used to it now
Yes, it sticks out like a sore thumb in the Old Town
Yes, the £414m cost still hangs over the building


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.