Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tiger tilts balance in brilliant back nine



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2008
TIGER Woods conjured up a brilliant back-nine performance yesterday to seal his seventh victory in eight outings as Ernie Els let a fourth Dubai Desert Classic title slip from his grasp.
The world No 1 trailed the South African by four shots when he bogeyed the ninth, with Els, a three-time winner in Dubai, four groups behind. But a remarkable turnaround saw Woods card six birdies coming home, which included a crucial 25-foot putt
at the last, as he covered the back nine in just 31 to complete a round of 65 and set the mark at 14 under.

Els was one stroke behind but had three holes in which to find at least one birdie to force a play-off, but his ambition proved to be his downfall as he dumped his approach to the par-5 18th in the water as he attempted to reach the green in two.

That cost him any chance of victory and a bogey six meant he signed for a one-under 71, which dropped him back into a share of third place with compatriot Louis Oosthuizen on 12 under.

Abu Dhabi champion from three weeks ago Martin Kaymer finished runner-up, a shot adrift of Woods after an impressive final-round 66.

After winning the Buick Invitational by eight strokes last week, Woods collected his second victory in Dubai and his 82nd career triumph. At one point during his final round Tiger slipped to 20-1 with one bookmakers to win the tournament, which goes to show you should never write off the American.

"It's an ideal start to the year. To go two for two is a pretty good start," said Woods. "I felt good today with my putting stroke. Yesterday it was a touch off but today I feel like I rolled the ball well and all week I've had good pace.

"When you have good pace you can read the greens and I was reading them pretty good all week."

Woods topped the leaderboard for the first two days but slipped four shots adrift of overnight leader Els after a frustrating third-round 73. He began the final day with three birdies in his first four holes but reached the turn just one under for his round after bogeys at six and nine, three-putting the latter.

But after clawing back a shot at the 10th there followed three successive birdies – sparked by a chip-in at the par-4 12th – to lift the American to 12 under. Woods picked up another stroke at the 17th before that crucial birdie at the last when he sank a tough 25-foot downhill putt – having bogeyed the hole yesterday by hitting his second into the water.

The world No 1 was then forced to watch as Els headed down the last with a birdie required to force a play-off but the South African's 240-yard 3-wood approach caught the wind and came up short in the water.

Woods admitted he had some sympathy for Els after he had a similar – although not as catastrophic – experience the previous day. "People don't realise how much the wind blows on the grandstand over the 18th. If you just up shoot it a touch the wind will just smoke it and that's what happened to me yesterday," Woods added.

"I got off to as good a start as you possibly could, I was three under through four but dropped shots at six and nine and I went from being in the mix to being out of the mix.

"I told my caddie (Steve Williams] if we shoot 30 on the back nine maybe we will be in a play-off. I shot 31 and it happened to be good enough. I like winning by seven or eight, it's less stressful."

Els played a solid front nine and two birdies meant he reached the turn at 13 under for the tournament. However, by then Woods' charge was well under way and missed par putts from inside five feet at 11 and 12 cost the South African dearly. Back-to-back birdies followed to set-up a thrilling climax but Els could not find the one birdie needed over the closing three holes to force a play-off.

"It was a little disappointing. I played really solid on the front nine but it could have been four or five under," said Els, who has now finished inside the top three in each of his last seven visits to Dubai. "Those two putts really cost me the tournament in the end because I played really solid coming in."

(Gbr & Irl unless stated, par 72)

274: T Woods (USA) 65 71 73 65

275: M Kaymer (Ger) 67 73 69 66

276: E Els (Rsa) 68 72 65 71, L Oosthuizen (Rsa) 73 69 69 65

278: G McDowell 67 72 69 70

280: S Hansen (Den) 68 72 70 70, R Gonzalez (Arg) 72 71 72 65, P Hedblom (Swe) 69 70 70 71, H Stenson (Swe) 68 70 68 74

281: R Fisher 69 70 71 71, N Fasth (Swe) 72 71 70 68, L Westwood 69 71 68 73, T Levet (Fra) 67 71 72 71

282: J-B Gonnet (Fra) 72 68 72 70, G Murphy 67 72 71 72, S Hend (Aus) 67 72 72 71, P McGinley 71 72 69 70, B Dredge 73 72 68 69

283: JM Singh (Ind) 67 76 69 71, A Wall 73 72 68 70, R Karlsson (Swe) 70 70 73 70, H Otto (Rsa) 69 70 72 72, S Garcia (Spa) 68 71 70 74, T Jaidee (Tha) 69 73 70 71

Others: 287: I Poulter 70 71 70 76. 288: S Gallacher 70 73 71 74. 292: C Montgomerie 72 72 73 75, A Coltart 69 71 72 80.



The full article contains 986 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 February 2008 9:59 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Tiger Woods
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.