Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 16th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council 'taking health and safety a step too far'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 May 2008
FOR 150 years, amateur and professional artists have flocked to Montrose to paint the famous "Kirkie Steps" – the picturesque sandstone flight of stairs that flank the historic churchyard in the heart of the market town.
But yesterday the local council, which brought in workmen to daub the leading edges of the steps a fluorescent yellow in the name of health and safety, was branded "cultural vandals" by irate residents.

A local heritage society is planning to s
end a letter to Angus Council, demanding that the fluorescent strips be removed to protect what members claim is the town's most valued feature. Sandy Munro, a spokesman for the society, said: "The council have to be jumped on from a great height. I am all for protecting people and health and safety, but what they have done is over the top. It is cultural vandalism."

The steps, known affectionately by locals as the "Kirkie Steps", form part of Churchyard Walk, a path which links the town's historic Old and St Andrew's Church on the High Street with the Mid Links, a series of gardens laid out in the Victorian era.

Mr Munro said he had been left "flabbergasted" when he discovered what workmen had done. He said: "People have been painting those steps or photographing them for years. They essentially symbolise Montrose. The fact they have painted these yellow lines on them is absolutely hideous. If there is a need for something to be done for the sake of health safety, surely it could have been done in a far more sensitive manner?

"I would respectfully suggest that when you have a unique townscape feature the council don't have to apply exactly the same criteria as if it's the steps into a public lavatory. We want these strips removed."

Richard Cook, of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, said: "This is overkill. All too often we're seeing local landmarks being defaced like this in the name of health and safety. An appropriate sign warning people about the steps would probably have been a better idea."

But a spokeswoman for Angus Council said the steps had been painted "as part of health and safety measures designed to assist the visually-impaired". She said: "Angus Council, like other local authorities, is making improvements and adaptations to council buildings to provide equality of access for those with disabilities under disability discrimination legislation."





The full article contains 404 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 May 2008 9:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 10/05/2008 00:52:15
"The council have to be jumped on from a great height."

Great, could we organise a "bash a councilor" day in every city.

I've seen these lines on stone steps outside the shopping centre in the east end of princes street in Edinburgh in other areas too. A waste of resources, totally unnecessary, unsightly and plain stupid.

Sack 90% of council operatives. Introduce fee docking, and sacking due to incompetence.



2

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/05/2008 01:15:26
If these steps are actually used by real people, and they are, the council is right to sort out the risks to the safety of people who use them. We have to work out whether our old towns are choclate box tourist traps, or real places for living and working.

It sounds as if the objectors' only use for these steps is to look at them. But they're for walking on, not just being photographed.

I see the Tory candidate for Eastwood - in the guise of the "Campaign for Political Correctness" - has managed to get his name in the paper. He seems to think that a notice of some sort warning that there are steps will help visually impaired people see the edge of the steps better. Silly boy.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 10/05/2008 01:40:38
Petty bureaucrats and jobsworths that deserve to be strangled with their own red tape.
4

Navvy,

10/05/2008 01:49:28
fifi yeraff yer heid
5

Guga II,

Rockall 10/05/2008 02:58:52
#5. Very apt.
6

Stuart W,

10/05/2008 03:01:31
Can't quite see how the council will ever manage to provide the "equality of access" for the disabled in relation to the likes of these stairs.

BTW, there was a picture of the steps in Friday's Courier:

http://www.thecourier.co.uk/output/2008/05/09/newsstory11334040t0.asp
7

Vincent-W,

10/05/2008 06:12:57
Interesting that neither the article or any of the posters even attempt to consider whether the hazard is real or the risks are significant or if there is a history of accidents or near misses.

That's the right way to make decisions.

8

WKKB,

10/05/2008 09:09:09
#8 I was thinking the same thing? Are there any accounts of accidents that were considered and if so why weren't they disclosed to the public to show the risk factors?
9

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/05/2008 09:11:37
The photo to which #7 links shows steps which are of unconventional length on a broad path which clearly forms a main route in the town. A visually impaired person would clearly benefit from the help offered by the yellow marks.

The local history society describes the steps as the town's most valuable feature. That is very disturbing. Surely the people of the town, and its visitors, are the most valuable feature? In this matter the Angus Council seems to have got its priorities right.
10

Geomac 1,

Kinross 10/05/2008 16:14:03
All cooncillors and cooncils are over the top with health and safety. It's bit like global warming and being used as an excuse to control our lives.
The real problem is that we have too much government - all with huge bureaucracies and a need to be seen doing something - ity's pity that they can't find meaningful and useful things to do!!!
11

Matt there,

somewhere 11/05/2008 00:02:39
Anyone who complains about these yellow lines is a whining idiot!

They clearly have a problem with people with sight problems. Or do not care about them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.