Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Obama issues rallying cry for Senate health reform support

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
PRESIDENT Barack Obama said last night it was time for the Senate to take action after the House narrowly passed a far-reaching plan for overhauling the US health care system.
"For years we've been told that this couldn't be done," Mr Obama said in a brief statement from the White House Rose Garden. "But last night the House proved different."

The Democratic-controlled House late on Saturday passed its health care refor
m legislation, 220-215, but the road ahead in the Senate for Mr Obama's top domestic priority promises to be tougher.

The president said the House vote took courage for many lawmakers because of the heated and often misleading rhetoric that accompanied debate over how the legislation would change the system. He made a rare Saturday visit to Capitol Hill hours before the vote to lobby wavering Democrats.

"Now it falls on the United States Senate to take the baton and bring this effort to the finish line on behalf of the American people, and I'm absolutely confident that they will," Mr Obama said.

"I'm equally convinced that on the day that we gather here at the White House and I sign comprehensive health insurance reform legislation into law, they'll be able to join their House colleagues and say this was their finest moment in public service."

Republicans have vowed to do all they can to stop the Democratic plan, which they contend will cost jobs, raise insurance rates and lead to huge tax increases. The Senate has yet to schedule debate on its version of health care reform.

House Republicans were nearly unanimous in opposing the plan that would expand coverage to tens of millions of Americans who lack it and place tough new restrictions on the insurance industry. But in the Senate, more than a simple majority is needed for passage, and several centrist Democrats still have reservations.

"The House bill is dead on arrival in the Senate," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said. "It was a bill written by liberals for liberals."

A Democratic colleague, Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, predicted an overhaul would pass the Senate because "it's essential" to the country's economic success and people's quality of life. "It will take time," he added.

The House bill is projected to expand coverage to 36 million uninsured, or 96 per cent of Americans. The United States is the only developed nation that does not have a comprehensive national health care plan.

A triumphant House Speaker Nancy Pelosi likened the legislation to the passage of the government's Social Security pension program in 1935 and Medicare health insurance for the elderly 30 years later.

Republicans detailed their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, ten-year $1.2 trillion legislation.

"We are going to have a complete government takeover of our health care system faster than you can say, 'this is making me sick,"' said Republican Candice Miller of Michigan.

In the run-up to a final vote, conservatives from the two political parties joined forces to impose tough new restrictions on abortion coverage in insurance policies to be sold to many individuals and small groups.

The legislation would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide federal subsidies to those who otherwise could not afford it. Large companies would have to offer coverage to their employees.

Insurance industry practices such as denying coverage because of medical conditions would be banned.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 November 2009 12:28 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Barack Obama
 
1

Connoisseur,

09/11/2009 00:46:15
Obama is doing a good job especially under the current circumstances. He inherited the biggest disaster in the world compliments of George Bush and works tirelessly for Americans.
2

Davy,

everlasting grooviness 09/11/2009 01:52:24
Obama
Oh and I suppose all the capitalist nations are now at peace?
All the capitalist corporations are not out, to bankrupt the competition
and their nations. We are all getting along in love, peace and
everlasting grooviness. And all is love and ecstasy and sexiness
and there are ten thousand different products to wash your hair
with and there is plenty of business for everyone, but no shelf space.
And the more booze, dope and sex to sell, a great
society you make. So if our daughter or son gets killed
in a wreck by a drunk and stoned prostitute we only have ourselves
to blame. The policy on: booze, broads and bombs. A very sick policy
on a sick planet that doesn't even realize it is sick.
3

Bryan H.,

Cali 09/11/2009 03:04:46
You know, #1, you keep blaming everything in the past, just look forward and get over it, Bush didn't cause all the problems you think he did, the media was just able to blame him for it. It would be the same way now if the media was conservative, they would be playing the blame game with obama. Point number 2, anything this big that is going to affect this many people should be decided by the people and congress should not be allowed to excempt themselves from it, if they are they must not have any confidence in the bill. So ya, obviously they don't care what the people think since they spend so little time in the state that elected them and even less talking with those people and finding out what they think
4

,

09/11/2009 03:56:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Lynne,

09/11/2009 04:21:54
I am hoping that all those that signed on to this bill will be voted OUT of ooffice in the next election.
It is a monstrosity consisting of more lies, fuzzy numbers, and by the time it is conferenced and merged with the Senate bill, it will be unrecognizable. Every poll taken says that we the people DO NOT WANT THIS BILL. We the people are more interested in the economy and JOBS.

The fact that they did not listen to we the people, means that they will pay the price in the end.
6

Lynne,

09/11/2009 06:26:31
Sen. Graham has said this bill is dead on arrival in the Senate. It is a bill written by liberals, for liberals. It will cost over a trillion dollars in new spending, and still has the public option.
It only passed by 2 votes after a day of arm twisting and intense lobbying.

7

JG,

Fife 09/11/2009 09:27:36
#5 Lynne
Depends on who you poll, Lynne. If you're asking rich people if they want the Bill then there's no surprise what the answer will be.
8

Lynne,

09/11/2009 13:04:54
JG, Fife.. It's the middle class, not just the "evil" rich who do not want this bill. It adds taxes, fines, and intrudes on the way of life in America. 1.2 Trillion so far would be added to the debt with this bill, and it's not just the "evil" rich paying for it.
And it willnever be that 1.2 Trillion... it will be much more. It always is.

As far as the polls go... 85% of Americans LIKE what they have, see no need to turn this health care bill into a socialistic program for 15% who do not have healthcare..
They do not like the public option, which is just steps away from a single payor plan.. when there are other things that could be done to fix health care.
9

right of center,

Chicago 09/11/2009 14:37:09
#7

I am far from being rich, I am middle class at best. This terrible healthcare bill being pushed thru by the left wingers will take away military retiree Tri-Care. Hopefully the Senate will listen to the American public.
10

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 15:12:21
Anything that upsets Lynne and the loony right is fine by me.
11

Sandi31,

09/11/2009 15:34:03
The 1.2 trillion, or whatever it ends up being, is spread over 10 years.

While I want to see major changes in the way health care is accessed in the US, I have qualms about this bill, not least because it virtually makes abortion illegal. While I am past the age of having to ever consider abortion myself, it is a legal procedure in this country. By failing fo oppose the Stupak amendment to this bill Obama has shown once again that women and women's rights are of no importance to him at all. He doesn't care what is in this bill so long as he can say he signed a healthcare bill into law.

A majority of Americans want health care change, and a large majority is in favor of the "public option" which is in this bill, but will almost certainly not make it through the Senate.

What we need is a single payer system, but that's not what we're going to get...not even close.
12

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 09/11/2009 17:24:59
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/08-0

Liberal Democrat Dennis Kucinich opposes President Obama's health care bill. because Obama's bill is a defense of the extremely high profits of health care companies. In other leading countries besides the US the costs of health care are dramatically lower no matter how you look at it. The US system is set up so that big companies can take huge amounts of money in the health care system. Other countries have done a much better job. We should copy them. President Obama is a sell-out. The whole debate is a charade.

Ron Paul of the Republicans also opposed this bill. All president Obama is doing is protecting the interests of health care companies. Health care paid for by government should be for the people, not for big companies.

Why does a hip replacement operation in the US cost $125,000 while in New Zealand it costs $25,000? In India $10,000. Across the board American health care costs are similarly out of line. The idiot republicans say this is good because profit makes the system go around and produces quality. But objective standards show that the American health care system does not deliver health care to all of the people as well as in other nations.

As Kucinich has learned his fellow Democrats are not much better. President Obama is grossly irresponsible not to back significant reforms that will bring our costs into line with other countries. We could've done that. we didn't. Obama's mission is to protect the high profits of big companies and to screw the Americans.
13

JG,

Fife 09/11/2009 19:06:17
#8 Lynne
I find this intruiging. Why is it some American posters feel the need to label people so much? I suggest that maybe this bill will help poor people, so right away I'm slagging off the 'evil' rich. Are rich Americans really evil?
Obama presents a policy - whatever it is - and if the viewpoint isn't one step from Atilla, he's a 'Communist'. What's that all about?
If you want to keep paying over-inflated prices for health care (which, I believe, in general terms) is no better than the care offered in other countries, then you carry on.
It may be that this Bill isn't right, but that doesn't mean that changes to your system aren't required.
14

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 09/11/2009 19:27:05
JG in #13:

When you label people like that you can avoid thought and discussion. You can also further a mob-mentality that furthers some people's agendas.

It is interesting that you see this tendency among the Americans. We've been arguing over things for a long time. Our mass media has contributed strongly to this tendency to label people and dismiss them based on the label. Myself and many others contend that the left-right paradigm in our country is promoted as a means to obfuscate and mislead us.

In the 1790's in George Washington's administration there were people who argued incredibly. Washington tried to listen and officiate. Of the 2 factions in his cabinet one faction became the democrat party and another became the whig party before transforming into the republican party. Famously in Washington's 1796 Farewell Address he warned us that the spirit of party facilitated evil. He was referring to the 2 factions in his cabinet that argued so much.

Our mass media frames the debate in a dysfunctional matter that only furthers the agenda of those who rule and incidentally own the mass media. Our people are not up to the task of thinking outside of that box. Our democracy experiment has been a failure.
15

JG,

Fife 09/11/2009 20:15:00
#14 Wally
What a really insightful contribution that was, Wally - honestly!
Yes, I'm often surprised how some of your compatriots are quick to label people so broadly (I take part in discussions on some of the other boards here where the insults are often much more personal!). It's clear from what some of them say that they can't comprehend that someone from 'the other side' might actually have some sound opinions. I was highly amused one day when someone called me 'an anarchist'.
We've been arguing over things even longer than you have, and have several smaller political options. I'm not suggesting that our system is better only that some people have 'thought outside the box' and struck out on their own. A few years ago a journalist was so incensed at the behaviour of a politician he stood against him in his constituency as an Independent and won! OK, it was only one parliamentary seat, but it rattled a few cages.
I think the press on both sides of the Atlantic have a lot to answer for, though I don't think you have the same number of tabloid newspapers we do. For that, you should be grateful!
I'm currently studying American history (though not that particular period) and was interested in what you said about George Washington. He couldn't have known how relevant the content of his farewell address would be over 200 years later!
16

,

09/11/2009 20:22:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Bryan H.,

Cali 10/11/2009 00:55:57
Now see, I have total respect for those last two comments (not 16) because it was handled civily and with mutual respect, why can't politicians do the same thing? I get so tired of them
18

Lynne,

10/11/2009 01:49:23
Sandi.. did you read the bill?.. This has so many hidden agendas in it. The gov't will be able to tell you how to raise your children!!

Most of this is unconstitutional if you listen to Constitution lawyers.

Pelosi has lied her way thru this monstrosity. She now thinks that we the people will find her out... that is why there is no transparency.

Unlike you, I don't favor single payor plans.. that is socialized medicine. I am not happy with the gov't telling me what procedures I can and cannot have.

There is a way of fixing healthcare... this bill is not it!!

Maybe you should read the bill.. and all it's secrets.



19

,

10/11/2009 12:17:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

JG,

Fife 10/11/2009 16:28:19
For some strange reason my comment at No. 19 was removed. It was not offensive, contained no bad language and simply suggested that it was not wise to shout 'liar' at anyone who had the misfortune to disagree with your opinion.
Having the opposing contribution removed is, of course, an alternative way!
Pathetic!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.