Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Mixed views on £240 rise in residents' parking charges

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 July 2008
A MIXED reception has greeted plans to hike up the costs of parking permits for drivers of the most polluting cars in Edinburgh.
Motoring groups have attacked the city council's proposals to charge some motorists up to £240 a year more to park outside their homes.

However, environmental campaigners and business leaders have welcomed the proposals – revealed in The Scotsman
yesterday – which would see the cost of a city centre permit rise from £160 a year to £320 for the biggest "gas-guzzlers".

The proposals, the first of their kind to be drawn up in Scotland, will result in motorists facing higher charges for permits for second vehicles. But the owners of less- polluting vehicles will see the cost of their parking permit plummet to as low as £30.

Yesterday, however, Jo Abbott, a spokeswoman for the RAC Foundation, said the proposals would do nothing to reduce congestion or pollution rates in the capital.

"It is a tax on ownership and not on use," she said. "Cars with lower emission rates that are used frequently will contribute more to overall pollution rates than larger cars used to drive fewer miles – and if you are using the roads less, you contribute to fewer traffic jams.

"The charges are also unfair because of their retrospective nature. Many families who need larger cars to accommodate young children will have bought them unaware of these new permit rates."

Bruce Young, the Lothian and Borders co-ordinator of the Association of British Drivers, branded the proposals as a "political exercise."

He added: "I think drivers will prefer to have a new council rather than a new car."

Joanna Mowat, the Tory councillor for the city centre, said: "This is another slap in the face for city centre residents, who already face huge difficult trying to park near their homes.

"The council should be looking at a whole range of measures to improve the situation before even looking at this option, which won't actually punish people for how much they drive their car."

The city council insists that about two-thirds of permit holders will benefit from the new system, with just one in five people expected to pay more for their permit.

There are at present about 17,000 residential parking permits in Edinburgh, although 3,500 have been issued to households with more than one car.

The scheme being considered for Edinburgh was drawn up as a result of a local manifesto commitment by the Liberal Democrats in the city, who formed a coalition administration with the SNP last May.

Duncan McLaren, the chief executive of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: "We're supportive of what the council is doing as long as it is part of a comprehensive package to improve public transport.

"It's a perfectly reasonable idea to look at bringing in variable charges for permits," he added.

Graham Bell, a spokesman for Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "We would support any measure that has a positive impact on the environment; however, we would hope that the council also looks at how to improve the parking situation for businesses."

Councillors will meet to discuss the issue on Tuesday.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 01:50:19

NO "Views" Required! Do the right thing!

'Get-Rid' of these, irritating, unneeded, snob value,..
Gas Guzzlers!

Praise to Edinburgh City Council!
2

madrab,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 06:50:03
#1 Couldn't agree more.

Why don't they introduce a £500 charge for every additional vehicle registered at an address?

That would provide the council with substantial funds for catching up with road repairs etc.
3

an interested party,

23/07/2008 07:13:59
or the other view

a money grab
4

SouthernSkye,

23/07/2008 07:16:42
I don't live there so it is not really for me to say but I would think the idea of charging extra for a second car is daft. that will put people off having a "smart car" type thing for doing the local runs and a family car for igh-days, holidays and longer trips. Of couse all of the propositions will only impact those who do not have a house with a driveway and/or a garage I assume? Therefore the very wealthy (or lucky ones) will be able to avoid this charge by having off road parking will they not?
5

SouthernSkye,

23/07/2008 07:17:27
Will Blue-Badge holders be exempt?
6

scottish person,

23/07/2008 08:23:29
Charles Linksaill wrote
NO "Views" Required! Do the right thing!

'Get-Rid' of these, irritating, unneeded, snob value,..
Gas Guzzlers!

Praise to Edinburgh City Council!

I have a so called gas guzzler. I also take seven children to and from school everyday, removing the need for two other cars. I also get 37 MPG, why is my car called a gas guzzler by some pompous cooncil offishal. Ars*****s the lot of them.
7

Grumpy,

23/07/2008 08:56:27
BUt most of the gas guzzlers are owned by people living in the posh areas of The Grange, Cramond, Ravelston etc - areas (so far) outside of the controlled zones. So the penalty is not going to affect them in the slightest.

As for people actually living inside the zone with 4x4s - many are "needed" to circumnavigate all the pot-holes and road works in Edinburgh and to go off road into the supermarket car parks......
8

Goat Boy,

23/07/2008 09:17:18
Ask the Council to justify this decision.

Ask the Council to show the reasoning behind this decision.

Then challenge it.

This is a fund raising exercise, it has nothing to do with the environment.
9

DAVID,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 09:38:21
#7 - why do you think the council is so keen to expand the Controlled Parking Zones?
10

Daff,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 10:34:43
I live in the centre and I dont have a problem with the new charges. Then again I didnt have a problem with the congestion charge either. You cant have it both ways! It was obvious that these kind of actions would be taken after the rejection of the charges.
11

Paddy Power,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 11:20:21
This has nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with raising funds. Personally, all I will do is not renew my permit and park surreptitiously outwith CPZ which will cause more damage to the environment as I drive around and around trying to find a space. What wonderful thinking by our esteemed council numpties
12

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 23/07/2008 12:56:39
11 Paddy Power

It has EVERYTHING to do with the environment.

You have to start somewhere to reduce carbon emissions and this is one way.

Gas-guzzlers are the scourge of modern society and even GM and FORD are cutting back or ceasing production of these monstrosities.
13

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 23/07/2008 14:33:07
#12 - Here was me thinking knife crime and the breakdown of respect for others was the scourge of modern society.....
14

Scottish then British,

Corstorphine 23/07/2008 19:57:50
Why do people have a car and no where to park it but the public road/street.


Of course parking on the pavement could be the answer which is becoming common practise.
Has parts of the "Highway Code" been rewritten and we haven`t been informed or the police are turning a blind eye to this offence as it hinders the cyclist from using the pavement.
15

Feemcgee,

Lytham St Annes 24/07/2008 10:08:30
It's not about raising funds, other articles have stated that the council are actually LOSING £50,000 a year by doing this.
People living in outer zones will still have to pay more if they have a gas guzzler.
Remember that the vast majority of people will pay less or the same as they do now.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.