Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The show the critics loved but the crowds shunned

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 January 2007
IT WAS hailed as a long overdue show by the man described as Scotland's most successful modern artist.
But it has emerged that Turner Prize winner Douglas Gordon's first solo show in Scotland in 13 years has failed to attract a large number of visitors, despite receiving positive reviews from the critics.

Barely 10,000 people will have viewed Gord
on's two-month-long "Superhumanatural" exhibition by the time it closes this weekend at the National Galleries of Scotland in Edinburgh.

This compares with more than 100,000 people who turned out last summer to see the giant sculptures by Ron Mueck in the same space.

The former director of Glasgow museums and cultural commentator, Julian Spalding, said yesterday: "You don't expect that number for a major show. It sounds as though the public are voting with their feet.

"Reviews can actually have no impact at all. Word of mouth is what actually matters, and if there are more people going to the exhibition at the end than at the beginning."

As part of Gordon's show, the walls of the Royal Scottish Academy building, on the Mound, were painted black to feature film works, including 24 Hour Psycho, Hitchcock's movie in ultra-slow motion.

Films are projected on wall-sized screens of ponderous elephants or of conductors' hands.

The exhibition also includes a new work in which a dead tree has fallen on a smashed mirror. Other works are showing at the Royal Botanic Garden.

Until 8 January, 8,259 visitors paid to see the exhibition, which opened on November 2. Student trips and lectures will take the final number to 10,000 by the end of the run, the galleries said.

The Ron Mueck show took place over the peak Festival time and was much easier to understand for the general public, a spokeswoman said.

A better comparison was the show of the Renaissance artist Adam Elsheimer, whose small-sized paintings attracted 10,193 visitors.

"This is a show by a cutting-edge artist and it is always difficult to judge how the general public will perceive it," the spokeswoman said.

"It has certainly raised the profile of the NGS's display of contemporary art in Scotland."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 January 2007 9:18 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Turner Prize
 
1

Bill, Dunblane,

13/01/2007 01:02:33

Aye, entertainment for the masses right enough.

Emperors new clothes anyone?

2

Spondoolicks,

13/01/2007 08:54:34

I went

It was SO badly done except for the elephant piece.

This should have been at the Gallery of Modern Art. The RSA is not the place for this kind of work which relies on where it is as much as what it is.

Also - the staff let non-paying punters who'd gone to see the college show downstairs wander into the exhibition. I met a mate who said 'I didn't realise you had to pay!'

Another reason for poor footfall.

I wasn't blown away by the guys work but I was embarrassed for him by the shoddy way the exhibition was mounted.

Completely (a)RSA(d) up!

3

MacCoinnich,

13/01/2007 11:48:29

I would completely disagree with you - I thought it made a great use of the RSA space. The Modern Art Gallery is in a very linear layout, and I think it would have been difficult to replicate the effect there.

While it is important that enough people do go to the big shows, the numbers attending can't be the only way you judge the sucess; if that did happen, we'd only have shows by the impressionists, interspersed by Rolf Harris, Jack Vettriano and Beryl Cook retrospectives

4

Unbending Atheist,

13/01/2007 12:01:53

It's great when the view of the critics is shunned. Who the hell are these self-appointed arbiters of taste and excelence anyway? In the world of classical music there are a couple of jokers who have no right to pontificate on anything in Scotland. Tumelty at the Herald is a laughing stock in the music world, with his inane tabloidesque ranting and raving. Walton on th Scotsman is just tedious and incompetent.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.